Rense.com



Europeans Vow To Stop US
From Selling Subs To Taiwan
By Anton La Guardia, Diplomatic Editor
and Hannah Cleaver in Berlin
http://www.telegraph.co.uk
4-26-1

America's military package to Taiwan was thrown into doubt yesterday when Germany and Holland said that they would not allow Washington to sell their diesel-powered submarines to Taipei.
 
With the United States no longer making its own diesel-powered vessels, the most likely source for a design and parts would be the two European countries. But both immediately distanced themselves from the arms sale for fear of upsetting Beijing.
 
The sale of the eight submarines is the centrepiece of the arms package to Taiwan. However, having relied on nuclear power for the past four decades, the United States would either have to buy the submarines from a third party or build them for Taiwan under licence.
 
 
Germany was swift to back away from involvement. The Foreign Ministry said; "If an application was made to the German government, it would not be approved." A spokesman said Berlin did not sell weapons to Taiwan "on principle", and did not want to "increase the tensions in the region".
 
Germany has large and growing business interests in mainland China. Locally-made Volkswagens dominate the booming car market and a German-built high-speed "magnetic levitation" train is planned to link the financial capital, Shanghai, with its new airport.
 
In 1993, as premier of the western state of Lower Saxony, Gerhard Schroder lobbied the then Chancellor, Helmut Kohl, to waive national security concerns and allow shipbuilders in his state to build submarines for Taiwan. His plea was rejected.
 
A spokesman for Mr Schroder, explaining the change of heart by the Chancellor, said: "There is a difference, whether one is regional prime minister or president, and feels responsible for jobs, or if one is federal chancellor and has responsibility for the foreign relations direction of an entire country,"
 
Taiwan's only two modern submarines were bought from Holland in the early 1980s. Taiwan tried unsuccessfully to buy several more but the Dutch buckled under huge diplomatic and commercial pressure from Beijing and agreed in 1984 not to sell any more arms to Taiwan.
 
 
A spokesman for the Dutch Foreign Ministry said: "If the US wants to go ahead and sell certain types of submarines to Taiwan they would notify us and they haven't done that. They haven't asked us. The question of whether we would comply with such an order is a hypothetical one. We have an arms export policy which says that we would not agree with this. We don't think that policy will change."
 
 
An American company is about to sign a deal to build two Dutch-designed Moray-class submarines, of the type that Taiwan is seeking, for Egypt. If the deal goes ahead, they would be made by a shipyard in Pascagoula, Mississippi, home town of one of Washington's most powerful Taiwan lobbyists, the Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott.
 
Britain does not make diesel submarines, and the Foreign Office last night said it knew of no British components in the arms to be sold to Taiwan. Britain last year approved scores of licences for the sale of military equipment to Taiwan, including components for tanks, engines and radar.
 
But these are minor compared with arms sales to mainland China, despite European Union sanctions imposed after the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. These sanctions covered engines, radar, military electronics and small satellites. Britain has also signed micro-satellite deals with China and, against Pentagon objections, is selling Rolls Royce engines to power its Xian JH-7 fighter bombers.
 
From: jr@rense.com X-Sender: sightings@mindspring.com Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 08:46:08 -0700 To: jneff@arkansas.net, webmaster@sightings.com, nde@ipa.net, jr@rense.com Subject: comment
 
 
Comment
 
From Rory Dawson
rorydawson2000@yahoo.com
5-1-1
 
Hi Jeff,
 
I'd like to respond to the article "Europeans vow to stop US selling subs to Taiwan" posted on your site.
 
The article fails to mention the Swedish/Australian Collins class (refer www.subcorp.com.au). That is another option which may possibly be open to the Taiwanese, depending upon whether Australia is not so clouded by its own short-sighted appeasement of China to see the merits in having a strongly armed Taiwan.
 
Now that the long-suffering Australian taxpayer has paid to have most of the kinks ironed out of these new subs, the Collins class is a viable alternative. If you replace its current fire-control system with a tried and tested American one these submarines would be quite formidable. If the Bush administration is serious about arming Taiwan in the face of increasing threats by China (I'm not yet convinced that they are) then pressure could be placed on the Australian government to export this class. Given the current crop of socialists posing as conservatives (Howard's Liberal government) and the even more socialist opposition (Beasley's Labor Party) it would probably take US pressure to arrange such a sale.
 
It is simply criminal to leave Taiwan exposed in the face of an increasingly aggressive China. If Australia and the US are as freedom loving as they claim to be they should help a natural ally and put an end to this disgusting policy of appeasing China (and blatant arming of same by certain US sell-outs who seem intent on fanning the flames of war).

 
MainPage
http://www.rense.com
 
 
 
This Site Served by TheHostPros