SIGHTINGS

JFK Meets The Entity
Who Exactly Are "They" To Whom
We Refer When Assigning Blame?
By Gregory Burnham <burnham@jfkresearch.zzn.com>
2-11-2000
 
 
Political assassinations are perpetrated against those who would challenge the agenda of, what I prefer to call: "The Entity"
 
The single greatest threat to this "agenda" -- was first recognized during the 16th century and it has not changed in nearly 500 years. In the distant past that threat has been, and to this day it continues to be: The FEAR generated by the mere possibility of GLOBAL PEACE breaking out. Indeed, even the remotest chance that a world where a "fair and just peace" may become the guiding principle is anathema to "The Entity".
 
Just imagine the utter alarm that "they" must have experienced when JFK, the strongest, youngest, brightest, arguably the best educated and most qualified individual, was not only elected to be the President of The United States, but who then succeeded in EARNING, against ALL ODDS, the most powerful position as THE UNDISPUTED LEADER OF THE ENTIRE FREE WORLD!
 
He now commanded the world's strongest Army. Not only was he Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces, but for the first and only time in history, the President of The United States was also the Commander-in-Chief of all "Americans as a PEOPLE" -- Indeed, truly the most powerful army with which to reckon.
 
Yet, much to the Entity's chagrin, JFK remained cognizant that the ONLY REAL REASON nations can make war is because those who do the actual fighting are convinced that to do otherwise would be disloyal.
 
JFK knew that in the Nuclear Age, the height of the Cold War was nothing more than a fraud; a very dangerous lie was being sold to the tax-payer at the risk of Nuclear Armaggedon.
 
Why?
 
For the express purpose of financing and turning a profit by exporting "manageable" pseudo-wars in the "hot zones" around the globe. In places like Vietnam. There the war generated 550 BILLION DOLLARS; was planned at a cost of 58,000 American lives lost, "young patriot brain-washed soldiers" -- all; and the lives of some 2 MILLION native Vietnamese, whom we were supposedly there to protect from the so called Communists.
 
A look at who this "enemy" actually was reveals a lot about the military/industrial complex's marriage to "The Entity" -- Did you know the Viet Cong was an enemy who couldn't even be identified in the field? Whose pajama-like "uniforms" were not distinguishable from the non-military daily garb of the local natives of the land? An army who could never have killed, with all their weapons combined, a third of the number we killed with just our bombs alone?
 
President John F. Kennedy had been in the military. He had seen combat. He understood the absolute necessity to treat war, not as some board game, but as a confrontation with an enemy who is threatening to take away one's freedom by the use of force. He knew there was no point to fighting a war if there was no real enemy. He believed such a war was immoral. He knew the danger of "behaving as though he were actually the President of The United States" -- But he had sworn to uphold the Constitution and that is exactly what he planned on doing, even if it WAS dangerous. He signed the order to withdraw from Vietnam on October 11, 1963. Three weeks (to the day) later President Diem of South Vietnam was assassinated, November 1, 1963. Three weeks (to the day) later President Kennedy was assassinated, November 22, 1963.
 
Four days later LBJ ordered an escalation of the Vietnam war.
 
A war without a clear objective cannot be won. When the objective of the war has nothing to do with its stated purpose, nothing to do with which side is victorious, but rather the objective is met when "The Entity's" agenda has been reached, it is time to identify the "Entity" and get a copy of its CHARTER. When we have done that we will have identified the true Enemy of All Mankind. Is this a huge and risky challenge? Most definitely. Will it be met with strong resistance? It already has been and continues to be.
 
Will it bring John F. Kennedy back? No.
 
But, it may bring control of our Government back to whom it belongs; back to those to whom JFK was determined to deliver it in his second term; back to those from whom it was usurped:
 
We The People.
 
 
Greg Burnham

 
SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE

This Site Served by TheHostPros