- One of the more disturbing issues surrounding
the TWA Flight 800 crash has been the claims made by some people that on
the night of the crash they saw reports on TV that confirmed a missile
hit, yet the reports apparently disappeared into an Orwellian black hole.
NOW a news cameraman has spilled-the-beans on one of these disappeared
TV reports, indicating that what people have been saying they saw on TV
really was on TV.
-
- People have claimed they saw an interview
right after the crash of an Air National Guard pilot as he stood on a tarmac
in front of an aircraft where the pilot said the jet was hit with a missile
and that Navy-missile exercises were being conducted at the time. Consistent
with such an interview, the Long Island paper Suffolk Life reports [1]:
-
- "Long Island's Channel 55 cameraman
James Hughes, said during an interview that he and another camera crew
from one of the networks were at the airport when the C130 landed. The
crew, he said, stated they saw a missile heading toward FL800 just before
they witnessed the explosion. The C130 crew members were pulled away from
the two camera crews by what Hughes said appeared to be their superiors
and came back claiming they had seen nothing."
-
- This not only confirms TV-witness accounts
of a truth-leaking interview of a pilot at an airport, but it also clearly
indicates that the truth was known that night and, with the immediate censure
of the pilots, it also reveals that a massive cover-up was activated immediately,
which must explain why the media forgot about that explosive interview.
-
- (The C-130 was piloted by Col. William
Stratemeier. Major Frederick Meyer, who said he saw a meteor-like streak,
piloted an HH-60 helicopter. After retiring from the ANG, Meyer said that
the first blast looked like "the detonation of an anti-aircraft shell."[2])
-
- It would seem that if military command
says forget that news, it is forgotten and any who remember it and/or who
believe what those pilots said they saw are smeared by the GovtMedia as
lairs, criminals, or nuts... as one who might have to be locked away. The
evidence suggests military control of society.
-
- Maybe that's why the same week Pierre
Salinger's report came out CNN reported [3]: "The FBI this week launched
a criminal investigation, hoping to stop missile theorists." The government
of a civil nation does not activate "criminal investigations"
to "STOP THEORISTS" (!!), but the U.S. Govt does!
-
-
- MORE CONFIRMATION OF PILOTS INTERVIEW
-
- The sudden change of the pilots story
is consistent with a report from Aviation Week & Space Technology [4]
that the ANG C-130 pilot "said he had seen what appeared to be the
trail of a shoulder-fired SAM ending in a flash on the 747," and then
in the next issue, Aviation Week reports that the pilot had a sudden change
of mind, now saying: "We did not see smoke trails [from a missile],
any ignition source from the tail end of a rocket nor anything..."
[5] And the media filmed the witness intimidation [1]:
-
- "The C130 crew members were pulled
away from the two camera crews by what Hughes said appeared to be their
superiors and came back claiming they had seen nothing."
-
- Anyone capable of rational thought can
see (a) that the military pilots were pressured to say they did NOT see
what they'd ALREADY said they saw, and (b) that this is prima facie evidence
of a cover-up, and (c) specifically, a cover-up of a missile hit.
-
- If X says he saw a missile hit P, and
then X gets a talking-to by superiors, and then X says he did NOT see a
missile hit P, one of his two statements must be false and it stands to
reason that it's the second.
-
- If the media taped those pilots changing
their story under pressure and yet forget that event and portray those
who believe there's a cover-up as nuts & liars, then the media are
choosing to promote the cover-up.
-
-
- THE MAJOR MEDIA: VOICE OF THE MILITARY
STATE
-
- If the media could forget about a widely-televised
interview of military pilots saying FL800 was hit by a missile, pilots
who are then quickly whisked away by superiors only to return saying they
saw nothing, could we trust the major media to report it if someone with
inside information contacted them with a major scoop? If they'd cover-up
the former, they should also cover-up the latter. In fact, when James Sanders
gave CBS a patch of the rocket-fuel-covered seat cushion [6] so that they
too could test it, CBS gave it to the FBI instead and then assisted with
the FBI's efforts to jail Sanders by spreading FBI disinformation about
him.
-
- So when people say there could not be
such a large cover-up since someone would come forward, it stands to reason
that if someone with critical evidence did come forward and in so doing
contacted a major media network to get his/her story out, the network would
contact the FBI and then forget about the incident.
-
-
- STILL MORE DISAPPEARED AND CENSORED NEWS
-
- Speaking of news the media ignores, last
September the agent who headed the FBI's "investigation" said
that the "boats" below FL800 seen on the NTSB radar plot that
the FBI cited the Privacy Act to conceal the identities of, were "Navy
vessels that were on classified maneuvers." An outright admission
by the top FBI agent of a cover-up, and recorded on tape! Would that make
headlines? Not one. 100% black out! (See http://www.erols.com/igoddard/coverup4.htm)
The evidence indicates that the major media operate as a team, advancing
the agenda of the military-state.
-
- Consistent with that hypothesis is the
fact that the day after FBI agent James Kallstrom called Hollywood director
Oliver Stone a "bottom-feeder" for his plan to interview eyewitnesses
of the FL800 crash in an upcoming TV program looking into the missile theory,
ABC canceled the program. Other TV networks chimed in to denounce Stone's
shameful effort to allow eye- witness accounts to evade the military black
out, which the on-the-spot censure of the C-130 pilots proves went into
effect on the night of the crash.
-
- In Closing...
-
- Our military-government may or may not
have good reasons to keep the Navy maneuvers under the TWA 800 crash classified,
but we as citizens do have good reason to hold up the light of free inquiry
to the darkness of military-state secrecy: secret government endangers
truth, freedom, and democracy.
-
-
- [1] SUFFOLK LIFE: "Flight 800: Accident
Or Terrorist
- Attack? - Part 4 Was There A Cover-up?"
By Joey
- Mac Lellan. December 17, 1998.
- http://www.suffolklife.com/Top%20Stories/FL800_3.html
- http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1998/12/17/43518
-
- [2] AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY:
ANG Pilot: Jet Hit
- by Object. By David Fulghum, March
10, 1997.
-
- [3] CNN admits that: "The FBI this
week launched
- a criminal investigation, hoping
to stop missile
- theorists." http://cnn.com/US/9703/13/twa/index.html
-
- [4] AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY:
Terrorist Fears Deepen
- With 747's Destruction. E.Phillips,
P.Mann (7/22/96) p.20.
-
- [5] AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY:
ANG Eyewitnesses Reject
- Missile Theory. By David Fulghum,
July 29, 1996, page 32.
-
- [6] The Facts About the Seat Cushion
J. Sanders Liberated:
- http://www.accessone.com/~rivero/CRASH/TWA/GLUETESTS.html
- FBI's Op: http://magnet.fsu.edu/~stalcup/synopsis3.htm
|
