|
Dear Ms. Oliver: ( Kim.Oliver@gov.scot )
This is in reply to your letter, reference 2018/012901
Getting letters like yours is what we're talking about when it comes to aspartame. Governments reference their agency who say aspartame was proven safe when it wasn't. What do you need as proof? What about scientific peer reviewed research? Almost 100% of independent studies, peer reviewed, shows the horrors of this chemical poison. One of the worst is the Trocho Study which showed the formaldehyde converted from the free methyl alcohol embalms living tissue and damages DNA. Here is that study: HYPERLINK " http://www.mpwhi.com/ aspartame_and_preembalming.htm " http://www.mpwhi.com/ aspartame_and_preembalming.htm Tell me how a study could show such a horror if its safe! According to the medical text, "While Science Sleeps: A Sweetener Kills", HYPERLINK " http://www. whilesciencesleeps.com/ " www.whilesciencesleeps.com the formaldehyde from aspartame turns the tissues to plastic! Now tell me why an aspartame researcher would write such a text, about aspartame being a killing machine, if it was safe. The author Dr. Woodrow Monte took the aspartame issue to the supreme court who wouldn't hear it because of the power of the aspartame industry.
While you're thinking how to answer these questions consider the agency who is stated to approve aspartame did not do so. Aspartame was approved in England through a business deal: HYPERLINK " http://www.wnho.net/how_ aspartame_got_approved_in_ england.htm " http://www.wnho.net/how_ aspartame_got_approved_in_ england.htm You will notice that the famous Guardian article about this deal is added proving how aspartame was marketed in England. Can you argue with the facts? Parliament was outraged that aspartame was marketed without anyone knowing it but didn't rescind the order. Food Standards was set up specifically to keep this agency of the government there free from industry influence so this couldn't happen again. Food Standards instead used industry's propaganda. I tried to get them to get it off their web site for years. No studies were done in England. When I was lecturing there I made this statement. Someone raised their hand and told me there was one 30 day study but all the rats died from the aspartame so the professor said they could cut off the study just before the rats died, it didn't have to be a 30 day study. So since aspartame was not proven safe in the UK tell me of what use is it that you use Food Standards and EFSA for reference?
As to EFSA, they are the worst example of an agency protecting the public. Three Ramazzini Studies by Dr. Morando Soffritti in Italy were done which showed aspartame to be a multipotential carcinogen. Industry was in a frenzy using excuses for EFSA not to accept these prestigious studies, for which an award was given to Dr. Soffritti only given twice in history. Here is a recent article I wrote on aspartame for OPEDNews, regarding seizures. You will notice a picture of me with Dr. Soffritti in New York when he received this distinguished award. HYPERLINK " https://www.opednews.com/ articles/Doctors-Giving- Babies-Aspa-by-Dr-Betty- Martini-Aspartame-Carcinogen_ Aspartame-Causing-Birth- Defects_Aspartame-Class- Action-Suits_Aspartame- Poisoning-180227-513.html " https://www.opednews.com/ articles/Doctors-Giving- Babies-Aspa-by-Dr-Betty- Martini-Aspartame-Carcinogen_ Aspartame-Causing-Birth- Defects_Aspartame-Class- Action-Suits_Aspartame- Poisoning-180227-513.html
Then Harvard said they had the longest and strongest study showing the link to cancer, leukemia, etc. When the Ramazzini Studies were done. Dr. Herman Koeter was head of the committee at EFSA and he resigned saying: "We were pressured by industry to hijack science" and mentioned the Ramazzini studies. What was it the aspartame industry was doing? They told EFSA to not accept the studies because the rats had respiratory problems. Dr. Soffritti told them of course the rats had respiratory problems, this was a lifetime study, and the rats were dying. Respiratory problems is the dying process. Here is the whole rebuttal by Dr. Soffritti: HYPERLINK " https://www.ramazzini.org/ comunicato/erf-stands-behind- aspartame-study-results- announces-ongoing-research-on- artificial-sweeteners- response-to-efsas-afc-panel- decision/ " https://www.ramazzini.org/ comunicato/erf-stands-behind- aspartame-study-results- announces-ongoing-research-on- artificial-sweeteners- response-to-efsas-afc-panel- decision/
The aspartame industry is well known to pressure agencies and researchers. After Harvard announced they had the longest and strongest study showing aspartame's link to cancer industry got to them so quickly that the next day they apologized for publishing the study. In the case of the Trocho Study, the aspartame industry tried to assassinate the charter of the brilliant researcher, Dr. M. Alemany.
Are you aware of why EFSA was set up? The European Commission on Food did a review on aspartame to say it was safe. The only problem was there was no committee who proved safety. OLAF (European Anti-Fraud Office) found out there was only one person, probably a flack. So the European Commission on Food became inactive and EFSA was set up. Just follow the corruption.
Then EFSA did a review and even I alerted OLAF of the conflict of interest. EFSA was even reported because rather then doing an review using independent research which shows how deadly aspartame is, they elected to plagiarize an industry review trying to defend their poison. Here is that information: HYPERLINK " http://www.holisticmed.com/ aspartame/EFSA-Draft- Plagiarism.htm " http://www.holisticmed.com/ aspartame/EFSA-Draft- Plagiarism.htm This is from the Aspartame Toxicity Center, and you can get more information at HYPERLINK " http://www.holisticmed.com/ aspartame " www.holisticmed.com/aspartame . So here is another question, if aspartame was so safe then why would there be an Aspartame Toxicity Center. Also, why would we have Aspartame Detoxification Centers like one in Chicago with Dr. Pauline Harding, one in San Francisco with Dr. Ken Stoller or one in Australia with Dr. Sanddra Cabot? If aspartame was so safe why do victims who use aspartame have to be detoxed?
When I lectured in New Zealand I visited Food Standards there as well. I noted they had misinformation and gave them the correct papers. Then I asked if they did any studies before allowing this poison on the market. I was told they did none and accepted the FDA approval. The FDA never proved aspartame to be safe. On the contrary they tried to have G. D. Searle indicted for fraud for what they did when they couldn't prove safety. Aspartame breaks down to diketopiperazine, a brain tumor agent. So when the rats developed brain tumors G. D. Searle would excise the tumors and then put them back in the study. When they died they resurrected them on paper. They were caught red-handed. Why weren't they indicted? Both U.S. Prosecutors Sam Skinner and William Conlon hired on with the defense team and the statute of limitations expired. That's the power of the aspartame industry. FDA banned it twice, once in 1974 when they told Searle they couldn't market it. They did it anyway because my neighbor built the aspartame factory in Augusta, Georgia and he told me they not only was selling it but gave some to him which made him sick. When I moved into this neighborhood over 20 years ago I gave out flyers so people here would be saved from it. My neighbors first words when I handed him the information was "It's a deadly poison."
The FDA set up a task force which showed the corruption. It was so bad that G. D. Searle went to court to get it removed from the record. Don't worry we have the records. Here are some comments from that report: HYPERLINK " http://www.wnho.net/whopper. htm " http://www.wnho.net/whopper. htm So the FDA set up a Board of Inquiry and revoked the petition for approval, the second time the FDA banned it. Here is a copy of that report: HYPERLINK " http://www.wnho.net/fda_ petition1.doc " http://www.wnho.net/fda_ petition1.doc Notice the petition was revoked based on the fact that aspartame caused brain tumors and couldn't be proven safe.
So your next question would be so how did it get on the market. G. D. Searle sued when aspartame was revoked. Don Rumsfeld was on the transition team of President Reagan and was hired by Searle to get past the FDA and get this poison on the market. The day after Reagan became President a member of the transition team called FDA Commissioner Jeri Goyan and fired him. Knowing it would take 30 days to get a new commissioner who would approve aspartame President Reagan wrote an executive order which forbid the FDA to sign the revoked petition into law. He appointed Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes to do the deadly dead. Do in a nutshell aspartame was marketed through the political chicanery of Donald Rumsfeld and why often aspartame disease is called "Rumsfeld's plague".
When the task force was set up an FDA lead investigator, Philip Brodsky, said in excerpts from the conclusion, "We have uncovered serious deficiencies in Searle's integrity in conducting high quality animal research to accurately determine or characterize the toxic potential of its products." He also said, "We have found instances of irrelevant or unproductive animal research where experiments have been poorly conceived, carelessly executed or inaccurately analyzed of reported." .."The cumulative findings of problems within and across the studies we investigated reveal a pattern of conduct which compromises the scientific integrity of the studies."
You can understand why G. D. Searle filed suit to remove these comments. In l976 in a Senate Subcommittee on Labor and Public Welfare meeting, Senator Edward Kennedy stated that "the extensive nature of almost unbelievable range of abuses discovered by the FDA on several major Searle products is profoundly disturbing. Dr. Samuel Epstein in January 1976, then Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Schmidt testified before Senator Edward Kennedy (D-Mass) that Hazleton Laboratories, under contract to Searle, had been charged with falsifying toxicological data on the sweetener. Samuel S. Epstein, M.D. is Professor emeritus of Environmental & Occupational Medicine at the University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health; Chairman of the Cancer Prevention Coalition; and author of over 200 scientific articles and 15 books on cancer, including the groundbreaking 1979 The Politics of Cancer, and the 2009 Toxic Beauty.. The title of Dr. Epstein's article is " An Overdue Ban On A Dangerous Sweetener" Senator Kennedy is now deceased of a brain tumor.
After aspartame was released to the public there were so many complaints it was reported in Congress the FDA was referring the complaints to the AIDS Hotline., We have the congressional hearings on HYPERLINK " http://www.mpwhi.com/ " www.mpwhi.com Here is the FDA report of 92 symptoms including death: HYPERLINK " http://www.mpwhi.com/92_ aspartame_symptoms.pdf " http://www.mpwhi.com/92_ aspartame_symptoms.pdf Senator Howard Metzenbaum wrote a bill to put a moratorium on aspartame until independent studies could be done on what they were seeing in the population including behavioral problems, especially in children, drug interaction, seizures, what it does to the fetus, etc. It never got out of committee. Senator Orrin Hatch received money from Monsanto who bought the company in 1985, and had delayed hearings, Monsanto could not have studies done, after all the original manufacturer couldn't show safety and they knew independent studies would show what aspartame really triggers and precipitates.
I've tried to get aspartame banned on two occasions and just recently sent the FDA another petition to ban. Here is an article I wrote about it with a great deal of information. HYPERLINK " https://www.opednews.com/ articles/Egregious-Outrage- FDA-Fig-by-Stephen-Fox- Ajinomoto_Aspartame- Carcinogen_Aspartame- Poisoning_Betty-Martini- 170711-977.html " https://www.opednews.com/ articles/Egregious-Outrage- FDA-Fig-by-Stephen-Fox- Ajinomoto_Aspartame- Carcinogen_Aspartame- Poisoning_Betty-Martini- 170711-977.html
If you are interested in the front groups and those operations set up to mislead the public on aspartame here is who we have to deal with: HYPERLINK " http://www.rense.com/ general96/aspartame-what-are- we-up-against.html " http://www.rense.com/ general96/aspartame-what-are- we-up-against.html They are well known to the public so it wouldn't be advisable for anyone to use front groups as references.
What does Scotland need to ban aspartame? How about the confession of the FDA that it is illegally on the market because it violates the Delaney Amendment and causes cancer, and therefore FDA should not have been able to set an allowable daily intake? Dr. Adrian Gross, FDA toxicologist and top scientist who investigated aspartame testified in 1985 to the Senate and ended by saying: "If the FDA violates the law who is left to protect the public?" Here are those statements in this article published by the National Health Federation - "No Safe Dose of Aspartame": HYPERLINK " https://us505.directrouter. com/~isjvubql/images/hfnews/ hfn-pdfs/HFN_2012-2.pdf " https://us505.directrouter. com/~isjvubql/images/hfnews/ hfn-pdfs/HFN_2012-2.pdf You can also read it in the congressional records on my web site, HYPERLINK " http://www.mpwhi.com/ " www.mpwhi.com What about other FDA scientists involved with the original investigation? Dr. Jacqueline Verrett was another FDA toxicologist working on the aspartame case and testified before the Senate in 1987. Here is her entire testimony: HYPERLINK " https://www.nal.usda.gov/ exhibits/speccoll/items/show/ 3899 " https://www.nal.usda.gov/ exhibits/speccoll/items/show/ 3899 She was testifying in 1987 and says aspartame still hasn't been proven safe. According to government records it was approved by Dr. Hayes who over-ruled the Board of Inquiry after it had already revoked the petition for approval in 1981.
HYPERLINK " http://www.rense.com/ general96/the-aspartame- situation-in-scotland- personal-note.html " http://www.rense.com/ general96/the-aspartame- situation-in-scotland- personal-note.html Here is my last correspondence on this matter and you will notice Parliamentarian Roger Williams tried to get it banned in England and admitted it was patented as a biochemical warfare weapon.
Dr. H. J. Roberts saw aspartame victims in the trenches of medical practice for 30 years and wrote the 1000 page medical text, "Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic". Here is another question. Why would a world expert on aspartame write such a medical text if it wasn't an ignored global plague? The largest study ever done on aspartame was done on the public who has become the rats and guinea pigs. No doubt millions have perished from the diseases it triggers or precipitates discussed in this medical text. Commissioner Hayes of FDA approved NutraSweet for soft drinks two months before he left office. Hayes resigned while Dept of Health and Human Services was investigating his acceptance of gratuities including free rides aboard General Foods jet. Anthony Brunetti, the FDA Consumer Product Officer who drafted the notice approving NutraSweet in soft drinks, later accepted a position with the Soft Drink Association as a science advisor.
In 1983 the FDA disregarded Section 170.22 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal regulations (which would have limited the safe daily intake of diet drinks to only 2 cans per day) and they raised the acceptable maximum daily intake of Aspartame to 50mg/kg/day (maximum milligram of a toxic substance per kilogram of body weight per day), which translated to an allowable intake level of 17 cans of diet drink for a 150 pound person.
World renowned neuroscientist who founded the field of neuroscience called excitotoxicity and testified before Congress on aspartame, Dr. John Olney, was told by FDA that even though Rumsfeld got it on the market they would see to it that no child ever got aspartame. Here is his testimony to the Board of Inquiry: HYPERLINK " http://www.wnho.net/dr_ olney1.doc " http://www.wnho.net/dr_olney1. doc He says birth defects are a given., In 1984 aspartame use was approved in children's chewables and multivitamins and then they started adding it to drugs,
Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D. wrote "Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills". l He also goes into the brain tumor issue in this book and has several others going into aspartame.
Here is the last chapter from Dr. Woodrow Monte's medical text, "While Science Sleeps: A Sweetener Kills" on aspartame and autism: HYPERLINK " http://www.rense.com/ general96/asparautism.html " http://www.rense.com/ general96/asparautism.html I can't imagine anyone reading it wanting this poison on the market. He calls aspartame a killing machine and that's exactly what it is. Here is how its made: HYPERLINK " http://www.rense.com/ general96/howaspar.htm " http://www.rense.com/ general96/howaspar.htm
What else could you possibly need to remove aspartame from Scotland? How about the FDA themselves admitting corruption and their fear of speaking out because of reprisals. Here it is: HYPERLINK " http://www.mpwhi.com/fda_ claims_they_are_fundamentally_ broken.htm " http://www.mpwhi.com/fda_ claims_they_are_fundamentally_ broken.htm
Remember also that aspartame is a psycho drug and interacts with all antidepressants according to Dr. H. J. Roberts. In "Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic" there is a chapter on drug interaction. Psychiatrist Dr. Ralph Walton did the research for 60 Minutes on scientific peer reviewed research and funding: HYPERLINK " http://www. lightenyourtoxicload.com/wp- content/uploads/2014/07/Dr- Walton-survey-of-aspartame- studies.pdf " http://www. lightenyourtoxicload.com/wp- content/uploads/2014/07/Dr- Walton-survey-of-aspartame- studies.pdf He also did a study on aspartame and the institution stopped the study after the administrator who took part in the study lost the vision in one eye. Others stated they were being poisoned. Here is an article he wrote on psychiatric problems from aspartame. HYPERLINK " http://www.wnho.net/ aspartame_and_psychiatric_ disorders.htm " http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_ and_psychiatric_disorders.htm
Romania banned aspartame because of the cancer. Scotland should too. If you can't answer the questions in this letter then there are problems in Scotland. Think of the people there. I lectured in Scotland and its a beautiful country and with lovely people. They deserve safety. I can't think of a single reason you would want a poison on the market. There is a safe sweetener, "Just Like Sugar" made from organic food like organic orange peel and chicory and it should be available in Scotland soon. HYPERLINK " http://www.justlikesugarinc, com/ " www.justlikesugarinc,com
Sincerely,
Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder
Mission Possible World Health Intl (warning the world off asparetame)
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097
HYPERLINK " http://www.mpwhi.com/ " www.mpwhi.com , HYPERLINK " http://www.wnho.net/ " www.wnho.net , HYPERLINK " http://www.holisticmed.com/ aspartame " www.holisticmed.com/aspartame ( HYPERLINK " http://www.dorway.com /" www.dorway.com files now on HYPERLINK " http://www.mpwhi.com/ " www.mpwhi.com )
If you are interested in the front groups and those operations set up to mislead the public on aspartame here is who we have to deal with: HYPERLINK " http://www.rense.com/ general96/aspartame-what-are- we-up-against.html " http://www.rense.com/ general96/aspartame-what-are- we-up-against.html They are well known to the public so it wouldn't be advisable for anyone to use front groups as references.
Aspartame - Second Reply From The Scottish Government
Dear Ms. Oliver:
Reference 2018/0013162
Thank you for your reply. Obviously you realized from my last email pure acceptance from agencies who are associated with industry and accept their power must be researched to get accurate information on whether a product is safe. Food Standards uses the aspartame's propaganda on their web site even though they have been sent information from aspartame experts , and scientific peer reviewed research.
Here is information from the UK Food Guide on E951, aspartame: http://www.ukfoodguide.net/ e951.htm Note it says: " Aspartame sugar substitutes cause worrying symptoms from memory loss to brain tumours. But despite US FDA approval as a ‘safe' additive, aspartame is one of the most dangerous substances ever to be foisted upon an unsuspecting public." Remember I gave you information on how aspartame was marketed in the US through the political chicanery of Don Rumsfeld. I even gave you the URL for the documentary so you could actually see and hear some of the world experts on aspartame explain how dangerous it is, "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World".
Also from the UK Food Guide it says: "Despite being widely used 75% of the adverse reactions to food additives that were reported to the US Food and Drugs Administration have been concerning aspartame. These reactions have included: headaches/migraines, dizziness, seizures, nausea, muscle spasm, weight gain, rashes, depression, fatigue, irritability, tachycardia, vision problems, breathing difficulties, anxiety attacks, vertigo, tinitus, memory loss and joint pain.
"It is also believed that certain chronic illnesses can be triggered or worsened by ingesting aspartame. For example brain tumours, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's, birth defects, diabetes and ME."
To bear this out as accurate I gave you the FDA's own record of 92 symptoms including death, and a list of some of the medical texts by the aspartame experts, and recording scientific peer reviewed research.
You say Food Standards funded a double-blind study by the University of Hull. Are you aware this was a single dose of 100 mg of aspartame. In fact 147 individuals self-reporting aspartame sensitivity called and volunteered for the study before one aspartame sensitive individual agreed to participate, which reflects the intensity of the concern individuals feel about 56 consuming aspartame. In addition this potentially reflects a population bias; it could be argued that individuals with SRAS who declined to participate would include those potentially the most sensitive to aspartame and their inclusion could have led to a different result.
Do you know what 100 mg. of aspartame amounts to? About half of what is in a diet soda. Everywhere aspartame victims have to carry epi-pens in case they experience such things as anaphylactic shock because of the chemical hypersensitization of aspartame. I've been taking cases for 28 years and some of them don't make it. Even I was given aspartame unknowingly in prescription drugs. It damages the mitochondria or powerhouse of the cell and interacts with drugs and vaccines. Three times I stopped breathing when other medication was administered. This is the real world of aspartame.
Let me show you how the aspartame industry performs studies done. The Rowan (1995) study administered aspartame for only one day to 18 subjects (16 were taking anti-seizure medication). These 18 subjects were given one capsule of aspartame, and that was the study. They actually managed to get this peer reviewed, and that's power. Read about it: http://www.holisticmed.com/ aspartame/burdock/
The FDA has violated so many laws in the approval of aspartame including the Delaney Amendment because it causes cancer, adulteration laws, and even Interstate Commerce laws because you can't ship an adulterated product for sale. Here in the US you can litigate these federal agencies. There are now precedents for suing federal agencies that license or monitor products. In Berkovitz v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court asserted that the government can be sued for injuries caused by government-regulated products if the regulators negligently violated government policies. By a 9 - 10 decision, it rejected the argument that government is immune from liability for "any and all acts arising out of the regulatory programs of federal agencies." An appellate court may grant summary judgment to a plaintiff suing a regulatory agency of the federal government, and remand the case for a new trial. In Nehmer v. United States Veterans Association (1989), a United States District Court found that the defendants had failed to comply with the Dioxin and Radiation Exposure Compensation Standards Act by erroneously interpreting two provisions of the Act.
I'm sure there are laws there for Food Standards. Here in the US Congress approved a food additive amendment in 1958 intended to protect the public against unsafe food additives to the same degree as unsafe drugs. Its objective was stated in Congressional and Administrative News. Legislative History of Food Additives Amendment of 1958 (p. 5302): "Safety required proof of reasonable certainty that no harm will result from the proposed use of an additive." The "concept of safety" for food additives was amplified.
"The concept of safety used in this legislation involves the question of whether a substance is hazardous to the health of man or animal. Safety requires proof of a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from the proposed use of an additive."
Why is this so important? The FDA is in violation because the manufacturer's own studies proved aspartame triggered seizures, birth defects and even caused cancer, just for starters. This resulted in the FDA's scientist who investigated aspartame, Dr. Adrian Gross, telling the Senate on 8/1/85 that aspartame was on the market illegally because it violated the Delaney Amendment because of the cancer. He said therefore the FDA should not have been able to even set an allowable dose. Other countries simply rubber stamped approval of aspartame. In the agencies I've investigated no studies were done on aspartame in these countries. In England as I told you it was approved through a business deal.
Someone said to me today, "Everyone wants the answers but so many don't want to listen to the facts." This man was telling me about a woman who drinks diet soda with aspartame who has leukemia and only a few days to live. I said, "Aspartame has not only been proven on scientific peer reviewed research to cause leukemia but also so many of the blood disorders, and blood cancers like multiple myeloma and lupus. She is accelerating the disease." The lupus epidemic is just rampant. Lupus is a chronic autoimmune disease in which the body's immune system becomes hyperactive and attacks normal, healthy tissue. This results in symptoms such as inflammation, swelling, and damage to joints, skin, kidneys, blood , the heart, and lungs. Here Dr. James Bowen explains how aspartame precipitates the disease. "The ability of methyl alcohol/formaldehyde to create antigenicity, especially as combined in APM molecules is so great as to cause severe autoimmune reactions to the tissues deformed by formaldehyde polymerization, adduct formation. The immune system turns against the victim's tissues: Lupus." Read his whole article because he explains how aspartame violates the federal genocide law. http://www.rense.com/general/ asp.htm
Dr. James Bowen has Lou Gehrigs from aspartame. When we were trying to get aspartame banned in New Mexico Dr. Bowen wrote Senator Gerald Ortiz y Pino who sponsored the bill to ban. Notice at the bottom of the letter is a copy of his letter to the FDA explaining that aspartame is mass poisoning the people. http://www.wnho.net/letter_to_ senator_goyp_concerning_ aspartame.htm
He says: "There is the issue of the approval of aspartame for market, which has violated every principle of responsible science and responsible government."
When Dr. H. J. Roberts died, world expert on aspartame, who wrote the medical text, he left me his 30 years of research on aspartame. Mission Possible World Health International was set up for one purpose - to alert the world aspartame is a deadly chemical poison. We are the messenger. We've gathered all the records industry has tried to cover-up, scientific peer reviewed studies to government documents and facts from the experts. We provide them free.
It all boils down to does Scotland want the answers and is the government willing to accept the facts instead of propaganda. Even the famous "Ecologist" in England exposed that aspartame was listed with the pentagon in an inventory of prospective biochemical warfare weapons. Here it is: http://www.mpwhi.com/ ecologist_september_2005.pdf
In Barson v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. (1984), the Supreme Court of Utah asserted:
..."the drug manufacturer is held to be an expert in its particular field and is under a "continuous duty ... to keep abreast of scientific developments touching upon the manufacturer's product and to notify the medical profession of any additional side effects discovered from its use." The drug manufacturer is responsible therefore for not only "actual knowledge gained from research and adverse reactions reports," but also for "constructive knowledge as measured by scientific literature and other available means of communication."
The original manufacturer of aspartame never did this but covered up the dangers of aspartame. In fact, in "Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World" you will find out Dr. John Olney got so disgusted with G. D. Searle's attempt to hide the toxicity that he made them do studies in his lab so he could oversee the studies and prevent fraud. He thought aspartame would not then be approved because he saw that it caused brain damage. He did not realize G. D. Searle failed to give the results to the FDA.
Consequently because of the cover-up physicians had no idea that aspartame interacts with their drugs and vaccines. That's how I got poisoned in the hospital, and the physician admitted he had no idea it was in drugs. My point is since the manufacturer of aspartame today continues to cover-up this toxin is a killing machine we are happy to be the means of communication giving you any records you may need to protect the lives of the Scottish people.
Sincerely,
Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder
Mission Possible World Health Intl
9270 Riverclub Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097
770 242-2599
www.mpwhi.com
More aspartame information on www.wnho.net , www.holisticmef.com/aspartame
|
