To
Maintain Their Free Will!
It
was the first day of my marketing class in college. All my classmates
were at their desks waiting for our professor to arrive.
I
knew the professor by his excellent reputation, but had never seen
him. I was anxious to find out just what the learned lecturer looked
like … that is, if he ever showed up.
After
four or five minutes of waiting, some of the students glanced at each
other with questioning looks.
A
frustrated male student stood up, gathered his books, and started for
the exit. Then it happened.
A
bull of a man with a mane of long white hair stormed into the room,
looking fierce. He paid no attention to the student who had paused on
his way to the door.
Instead,
the professor made haste to the straight-back chair standing beside
his desk. He picked up the chair, raised it over his head, and threw
it against the far wall.
Good
heavens … is he crazy?
Murmurs
of awe rippled around the classroom. Was the man dangerous?
“Do
I have your attention?”
yelled the professor. “That’s the first lesson of salesmanship …
Do not start or give any part of your sales pitch … until you have
your prospect’s attention.”
That
eccentric teacher was the most popular professor in the university
because he expressed his free will in beneficial and entertaining
ways,
And
while I can remember little, if any- thing, I learned in college, I
remember those practical (if banal) words of my marketing professor
words I took with me to the sands of Miami Beach the ensuing summer.
Years
ago, during the summer of 1958, learning how to ski was a big deal in
Miami for vacationers lounging on the beaches; and the only
authorized ski school allowed on the beach was Lee’s
Water-Skiing School.
Lee’s
salesmen all wore white shoes and socks, with long white pants and
tee shirts, all topped off with white pith helmets. Across their tee
shirts were emblazoned words in blue type: Lee’s
Water-Ski School.
The
only place I could get a job that summer was as a salesman for the
pirate water-ski school: Scotty’s
Ski School.*
*Scotty,
with long blond hair down to his shoulders, looked like a sunbaked
hippy and acted like an unreformed ex-convict. He had all the
personality of the Grinch.
Scotty’s
girlfriend, Marge, looked like a sunbaked heroin addict and drove a
fifteen-year-old Buick station wagon. It was a beat-up old clunker in
which Marge drove the embarrassed students of water sking from their
hotels to meet Scotty on the Intracoastal Waterway.
My
uniform was a pair of old flip-flops, a swimsuit, and aviator
sunglasses. Such abbreviated beachwear served two vital purposes: I
could usually go undetected as a ski salesman, and I could perhaps
impress some of my female customers.*
*Back
then, I had muscles to spare.
From
the beginning, I had decided to limit my clientele to shapely,
attractive young women. And while I had no problem remembering my
professor’s sage words, I had annoying troubles keeping my
wandering mind off the young ladies and onto my sales pitches.
It
is often said that wisdom
is of little value if it is not put to practical use.
Certainly
that axiom is true if we define practical
as something that not
only benefits ourselves, but others as well.
It
is certainly practical to earn money; but, is it practical for one to
increase their exercise of positive
free will?
I believe it absolutely is, as the exercise of positive free will
benefits others as much as ourselves.
In
other words, we can use our free will to expand our free will
potential (the use it
or lose it principle)
or use negative free will to decrease our free will capacity.*
*Free
will comes to us in two varieties: positive and negative. And the
only way to hold on to one’s free-will potential, with the exercise
of negative free will, is to announce one’s negative intentions
beforehand; otherwise, we would be overriding the free will of
another.
Overriding
the free will of others diminishes our own employment of free will.
Carefully
choose between your positive and negative paths of free will, as your
spiritual future depends on it.
My
marketing professor gave me an obvious sales axiom, with the real
possibility to expand my positive free will on the beaches of Miami.
I could, however, have chosen to merely flirt with girls, stolen
their money, and provided no ski lessons. If I had done that and had
never told them of my negative intentions, I would have lost
free-will potential, because I would have abrogated their free will.
Such an unannounced negative use of my free will would have
overridden their free will, which would have eventually blunted my
use of my free will either negative or positive.
On
the other hand, if I had told them, “Give me money for ski lessons
that do not exist,” and they did … then I would not have lost any
of my own free will potential.
And
that is why the satanic forces are always telling us of their evil
plans either surreptitiously in their fictitious novels,
television, or movies, or most indisputably in their many hundreds of
thousands of pages of governmental legislation, regulations,
statutes, edicts, decrees, rulings, and proclamations.
These
dark forces have to tell us of their negative intentions before they
act on them or they lose their power of free will both negative
and positive. It’s just the way it is in a free-will universe such
as ours.
Still
on an entirely smaller scale, there are those who try to covertly
override our free will. Such transgressions are committed by those
ignorant of what they are doing to themselves and their karma.
The
ruling banking oligarchs of earth, however, are much more clever than
the petty tyrants of our families, circle of friends, or work
associates who try secretly to blunt our free will.
At
any time in the last century, the controlling dark lords could have
had the US government violate every free will of every American,
without ever announcing their intention to do so if it were not
for the supreme universal law that punishes such offenses with a
reduction of their free will potential.
So,
the power structure has always gone to great pains to have the
federal government pass laws, issue orders, directives, regulations,
and decisions “legalizing” their negative agendas. And with
insufficient objections from the people, there is no overriding of
free will, as such tacit agreement is still agreement.
So
if there is not adequate kickback or resistance from the public, then
the people have given their consent to those governmental agencies,
meaning there is no infringement of the public’s free will.
Conversely,
if the collective American consciousness opposed the federal
government’s negative agendas, those evil plans could not be
implemented without the negative forces losing some of their
free-will power. It is our collective ignorance and apathy that is
enslaving us.
You
see, free will cuts fairly both ways: positive and negative.
When
the federal government tells us that its Executive Branch agencies,
like the Post Office, have bought millions of rounds of illegal
hollow-point bullets (banned
by the Hague Convention),
or that its Internal Revenue Service has just bought thousands of
shotguns, they are alerting us to something that is most significant.
They are telling us that those weapons are to be used on us.
If
we do not object to such outrageous practices, then our free will has
not been violated; in fact, such inaction on our part implies our
agreement, even though we are scheduled to be killed.
Much
of our collective torpidity comes from our naive inability to
confront evil, as the turpitude of the dark forces defies our general
understanding of depravity.
Still,
every negative exercise of free will that we acquiesce to, either by
general agreement or ignorance, reduces our ability to implement our
own free will.
Of
course, the satanic Controllers of our world are fully aware of
mankind’s potential for positive free will, and so strive for you
to have as little of those latent abilities as possible.
This
is the reason that government-mandated schools indoctrinate rather
than teach critical thinking.
They
enact hundreds of thousands of pages of mistitled laws in nations all
over the world in order to keep us in ever smaller mental prisons
that leave most people feeling overwhelmed, with little positive
free-will potential.
The
No Child Left Behind
Act should accurately
be labeled the No
Child Left Educated Act. The
new Common Core
“educational”
initiative is
even more insane.
The
Patriot Act should
be called the Imprison
Patriots Act.
The
Safe and Accurate Food
Labeling Act should
be called the No
Labeling of GMO Foods Act.
The
War on Illiteracy is
actually a War on
Literacy.
The
War on Drugs is
actually a war on the American people meant to fill the corporately
owned and managed US and state prisons with slave labor.*
*US
government statistics tell us that 72 percent of African-American
children are born to unmarried mothers. This is primarily due to the
illegal street drugs brought into Black communities by the American
shadow government that leads to the imprisonment of fathers and
husbands for possessing or dealing drugs.
And
with so many media reports of well-meaning citizens running afoul of
governmental overreach, the majority of Americans have withdrawn
their use of free will.
Many
join the vast herds of the living
dead and only go
through the motions of living, trying to avoid stress as best as they
can. But such people are on the run, with misery and suffering
closing in on them. These are the people who go along to get along
and justify media propaganda as fast as they are exposed to it.
Then
there is the smaller but very vocal underbelly of Republican and
Democratic agitators and ignorant dilettantes who campaign for all
negative agendas by supporting the likes of the Bush or Clinton crime
families.
These
are the people who use their free will to support more wars, human
torture, the non-labeling of GMO foods, forced vaccinations, race and
gender friction, a further degraded culture, the Federal Reserve
System, and more tyrannical government. These are the ones who are
actively reducing their capacity for positive free will and are
destroying their souls in the process.
Why
do they do it? They can no longer help themselves. It is the end
result, the end phenomenon of foregoing their use of free will or
using it in too many covert and negative ways.
The
history of the studies on free will are said to be more than 2,000
years old, with today’s neuroscientists and cognitive scientists
largely holding sway with their denial of the existence of man’s
free will.
This
bias may largely be due to the fact that those who control the
corporate mainstream media also control major research and modern
science.
Those
godless oligarchs not only deny that man possesses free will, they
work tirelessly to ensure that man never attains it and for good
reason.
Man’s
free will potential is a moral, ethical, and unpredictable threat to
the psychopathic would-be Controllers of this world. That is a fact
that has long been well known by great writers such as Shakespeare,
Voltaire, Tocqueville, Mark Twain, and Isaac Asimov. The great
American author and professor of biochemistry at Boston University,
Isaac Asimov, is best known for his works of science fiction and for
his popular science books.
Transhumanism
The
Controllers’ latest thrust in their man
has no free
will campaign is what
they call transhumanism.
The
commonly used definition of transhumanism
is the belief or theory that the human race can and probably will
evolve beyond its current physical and mental limitations by means of
science and technology.
Transhumanists
believe the human brain creates mind and consciousness, and that man
has no free will. They also believe that without their tech, it’s
birth to death and nothing more.
Nevertheless,
the likely near-term trajectory of transhumanism is using
nanotechnology to insert mechanisms, chips, and drugs into the human
brain and body that would ensure man is never again able to practice
free will.
Those
unfortunates who are forced into or even volunteer for transhuman
experiments will be implanted for a variety of reasons: behavioral
control, tracking, mind manipulation, thought pattern generation and
alteration, and a reduction of consciousness.
This
assault on humanity has already begun on a wide scale with vaccines,
which, in part, are covert operations to re-engineer the DNA of
humans all of course without man’s informed
consent.
Yes,
we have consented to their vaccines but were never informed of its
dangers. Nevertheless, consent (even ignorant consent) is all that
matters in a free-will universe.
While
concealing the true intention of vaccines but lauding their promised
benefits, the Power Structure lies to us. Lies, however, are allowed
in our free- will universe; it is up to our own free will to believe
and act on lies or not.
There
has been a virtual explosion of scientific knowledge during the last
fifty years, likely greater than in all of man’s history most
of it kept from public awareness. Most of these awe-inspiring
advancements have been in military weapons for control and death.
All
this has come from the synergy and interplay between three recent and
amazing revolutions: biotechnology, quantum theory, and the computer
or so says Professor Michio Kaku.
Smart
phones, smart meters, smart cars, smart roads, smart drugs, smart
vaccines, smart bombs, A.I. (artificial intelligence), ubiquitous
computing, transhumanism, and depopulation are all part of the
dystopia planned for us once we are sufficiently disarmed of our free
will.
Using
robotics and brain implants to merge our minds with machines will
limit, or likely eliminate, our capacity for free will, which is the
goal of the satanic forces, all under the guise of treating various
psychoanalytic or neurological conditions.
Advanced
biogenetic engineering is certainly possible; but whether it will be
used for positive or negative purposes is the important question.
In
today’s world it is guaranteed that advancements in biogenetics
will be used to defeat humanity.
Man’s
free will capacity will lessen to the degree he becomes machine-like,
no matter the physical advances of humans interfacing with bio or
nano- technology.
Abdicating
one’s free will to the crimes of transhumanism could be the most
grievous mistake anyone could ever make.
Free
will is our most valuable asset and weapon against enslavement. We
must not only protect our free will, we must expand its use.
Already,
controlled science claims man is no more than a rather moist robot
that is controlled by the programming of his brain and that no
overriding “ghost” in the machine exists.
This
concept completely overlooks the obvious fact that free will is
necessary for ethical and moral responsibility.
Man,
by the employment of the positive free-will potential that comes from
a higher part of our makeup (our
spiritual selves), can
become far more than the mere programmed robots the banking oligarchs
(wretched brood of
vipers) and their
many transhumanists (soulless
minions)
would like for us to become.
Don
Juan in Carlos
Castaneda’s books talks of the contradiction between the
intelligence of man, the engineer, and the stupidity of his systems
of belief, or the stupidity of his contradictory behavior. This is
easily seen in the men who develop weapons to alter or destroy human
life overtly with war or covertly with vaccines and depleting
uranium.
Determinism
or Free Will?
Determinism
is the doctrine that free will is merely an illusion, and all events,
including human action, are ultimately determined by causes external
to the will. Some philosophers have taken determinism to imply that
individual human beings have no free will and cannot be held
accountable or morally responsible for their actions.
Free
will, on the other
hand, asserts the belief that all non-psychopathic, ensouled human
beings have the ability to act on their own discretion.
We
exercise our free will when we practice to improve our selflessness,
self-discipline, self-control, self-esteem, self-image, and
self-awareness.
Self-awareness
becomes obvious to us whenever we stop and realize that we
are aware of being aware.
And
as self-aware beings we have a great responsibility to ourselves and
others: we must hold criminal leaders accountable for their crimes
for if we do not, more crime around the world is assured.
I
certainly believe our national leaders are responsible for their many
crimes against humanity and should be held accountable. Do you agree?
I’m
pretty sure which viewpoint my wise old marketing professor would
support.
J.
Speer-Williams
Jsw4@mac.com
|