John knew first hand there was no freedom of the press. For well over 100 years the press has been a major enemy, a willing conspirator against the American People. As to the so-called Cold War, that was created by the secret societies and President Kennedy knew it. The bottom line - "wars" are considered money makers for the powers that be. 

To further show the lack of freedom in the press, let's move from April 1961 back to Feb.13, 1917. Congressman Oscar Callaway speaking inside the House, Oscar: "In March 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding and power interest, and their subsidiary organizations got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the police of the daily press. They found it only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the great papers. An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers bought, to be paid by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarisms, financial policies and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers."

Paragraphs from the pratt rat's online history: "IT ALL STARTED as an inquiry, indeed, “The Inquiry.” To the select few who knew, this was the name of a working fellowship of distinguished scholars, tasked to brief Woodrow Wilson about options for the postwar world once the kaiser and imperial Germany fell to defeat. Through the winter of 1917-18, this academic band gathered discreetly in a hideaway at 155th Street and Broadway in New York City, to assemble the data they thought necessary to make the world safe for democracy. (make the world safe for democracy. How many times have we read or heard that drivel before?)

The scholars of the Inquiry helped draw the borders of post World War I central Europe over tea at the Quai d’Orsay, a more congenial venue than the plenary sessions held in Versailles’ Hall of Mirrors, shown above.

In congenial and civilized encounters, they floated ideas in the noncommittal style of an Oxford Common Room; they noted each others’ expertise and forged lifelong friendships without regard to age or nationality. In these unrecorded discussions the frontiers of central Europe were redrawn (subject, of course, to their principals’ sanction), vast territories were assigned to one or another jurisdiction, and economic arrangements were devised on seemingly rational principles. “It seemed to us that the drafting of peace would be a brisk, amicable, and hugely righteous affair,” wrote Harold Nicolson, one of the young Britons in attendance.

This was all too reassuring to let fade once the statesmen had gone home. On May 30, 1919, a little group of diplomats and scholars from Britain and the United States convened at the Hotel Majestic, billet of the British delegation, to discuss how their fellowship could be sustained after the peace. They proposed a permanent Anglo-American Institute of International Affairs, with one branch in London, the other in New York. (Hmm an anglo-american institute with a branch in New York and a branch in London. Now please give some thought to the anglo-american establishment's Bush-Blair memo - America and England attacking Iraq over non existing weapons of mass destruction.) 

But it was a more discreet club of New York financiers and international lawyers organized in June 1918 that most attracted the attention of the Americans from the Peace Conference. Headed by Elihu Root, the secretary of state under Theodore Roosevelt and a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, this select group called itself the Council on Foreign Relations. It began with 108 members, Shepardson recorded, “high-ranking officers of banking, manufacturing, trading and finance companies, together with many lawyers.” Its purpose was to convene dinner meetings, to make contact with distinguished foreign visitors under conditions congenial to future commerce.

The scholars of the Inquiry, returning from Paris, saw an opportunity. The American Institute of International Affairs envisioned at the Hotel Majestic could provide diplomatic experience, expertise, and high-level contacts but no funds. The men of law and banking, by contrast, could tap untold resources of finance but sorely needed an injection of intellectual substance, dynamism, and contacts—whether to promote business expansion, world peace, or, indeed, both. This was the synergy that produced the modern Council and promoted its unique utility for decades to come: academic and government expertise meeting practical business interests, and, in the process, helping conceptual thinkers to test whether they stood on "rock or quicksand".

Not until February 3, 1921, did the diverse interests and egos of the two groups permit a preliminary encounter. Merger negotiations proceeded for five months. The established members of the Council rented New York office space at 25 West 43rd Street, and they agreed to enlarge the businessmen's club “by selecting and inviting to membership,” as Shepardson put it, “a number of carefully chosen individuals.”

A fortuitous transatlantic circumstance solved the problem of naming the surviving organization. The British diplomats returning from Paris had made great headway in founding their Royal Institute of International Affairs. Undeterred by isolationism or the inhibitions of the Americans, they had even acquired an elegant London headquarters, the St. James's mansion once owned by William Pitt, known as Chatham House.

THE NEW COUNCIL was conceived, in the words of its incorporating charter, “to afford a continuous conference on international questions affecting the United States.” By its first annual report, November 1922, it had assurance of financial support for the startup years and close to 300 “carefully chosen” members, including Root from the old Council, but also new and promising figures like Herbert H. Lehman, W. Averell Harriman, and John Foster Dulles.

The Council's founding fathers appreciated that democracy involved the factor of public opinion, but they were uncertain at first about how such opinion was to be formed and expressed. They established a program of “study groups” and “discussion groups” (the Council made a distinction: the former were serious and scholarly, the latter more casual, to appeal to members who wanted to learn as much as to talk), aimed at producing a written analysis with policy conclusions by a single author. The purpose was seldom a public statement by the group, much less by the Council as a whole. Rather, as the method evolved, the designated author would guide discussions, present tentative analyses to be considered and criticized by fellow experts and peers, and polish and assemble them in writing under his sole responsibility. Rarely would the group leaders attempt to negotiate agreement on a consensus that, in most cases, would have had to be compromised into blandness. Lionel Curtis, a leading light in London's Chatham House, had written that “right public opinion was mainly produced by a small number of people in real contact with the facts, who had thought out the issues involved.” The leadership of the New York Council concurred."

If you haven't spent much time on the trail of Elihu Root, he was the bag man between president Wilson, our State Department and the Bolsheviks. The governments of the United States and England financed the Bolshevik revolution. Doubters please read Mr. Sutton's America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones and Mr. Eustace Mullin's Murder by Injection: The Medical Conspiracy Against America. Readers, all relationships whether business or personal are built on Truth and Trust, therefore Folks can take my word for it or read those books for yourselves. And since Obamacare is at best a medical nightmare, Murder By Injection is an eye opener into a host of medical scams.

As to one of the hyena house founders, Lionel Curtis's thoughts: right public opinion was mainly produced by a small number of people in real contact with the facts, who had thought out the issues involved - John Coleman, Edward Bernays is a name all of US should be familiar with. The powers that be have used Bernays' crystallizing public opinion (published in 1923) and propaganda (1928) as the blue prints for controlling the Masses by controlling the flow of information made available to the Public. 

Let's break down according to the pratt house's web site "...promising figures like Herbert H. Lehman, W. Averell Harriman, and John Foster Dulles." Herbert Lehman's kin, Robert pratt rat Lehman was chosen for the crooked 9/11 Commission, enough said. W. Averell skull & bones Harriman was Franklin Roosevelt's evil right hand during the rat and hyena negotiated Moscow Conferences, the results of which the butcher Stalin was handed all of Europe east of Berlin except for Austria, the birthplace of another butcher, Adolf Hitler. Harriman was a pratt rat director for the years 1950-55. One of his fellow directors during those years was Allen Dulles, John Foster Dulles's brother. Pedigrees tend to breed true and it is hard to find two sorrier brothers than the Dulles pratt brothers and the churchill chatham brothers, Winston & Jack. A modern day comparison would be George W. skull & bones, owl Bush and his owl brother Jeb; two members of the alfalfa club. 

Miss Alexandra Robbin's - Secrets of the Tomb: Skull and Bones, the Ivy League, and the Hidden Paths of Power, her title alone sums up the demise of AMERICA. The big four secret societies at ivy league Yale are skull & bones, scroll & key, wolf's head and book & snake. If Folks wondered why the the congressional inquiry into September 11, 2001, was a farce look no further than Porter book & snake, pratt rat Goss. Porter snake Goss wasn't going to turn on George W. skull Bush. In a nutshell its all a game within a game played by packs of wolves masquerading as sheep. When Folks have a few minutes look into the membership of Princeton's ivy club, Cornell's quill & dagger and Harvard's porcellian club. The names involved are more important pieces in the game within a game. A for instance would be the Gramm-Leach-Bliley bankster act of 1999. Both Jim Leach and Phil trilateral Gramm are/were pratt rats and Leach is member of the ivy club. Of course fellow trilateral wolf slick Willy Clinton signed it. 

When Robert wolf's head Fiske was investigating Bill bilderberg, pratt rat, trilateral Clinton, that too was a farce. Likewise, when Kenneth bohemian grove attendee Starr was handed the reins of the White Water investigation/cover-up.

 

<>