.
Blogging
‘Gays’ Urge Murder, Castration of Christians By Matt Barber
|
It happened
Dec. 2, 2013, in Buenos Aires, Argentina. LifeSiteNews.com broke
the story with the headline: “Violent mob of topless pro-abort
feminists attacks praying men defending cathedral.” The
raw
footage is disturbing to the extreme (warning: viewer discretion
advised for nudity, lesbian lewdness and violence. A censored version
is available
here.) Both
the video and the story have since gone viral. WND summarizes the attacks
as follows: “Chanting, ‘Get your rosaries out of our ovaries,’ a mob of
pro-abortion feminists many of whom were topless with Nazi swastikas
on their chests and foreheads attacked and sexually molested a group
of Roman Catholic men who were praying as they stood outside a cathedral
in Argentina to protect it from threats of vandalism.” WND
managing editor David Kupelian called the siege a “display of demonic
fury.” Indeed, it’s hard to watch the footage without discerning the palpably dark spirit that possesses many of the estimated 17,000 lesbian, pro-abortion and feminist assailants (but I repeat myself). Thousands
of painted, topless pagans prancing a ring around the pope burned in effigy
for the chief purpose of celebrating a “right” to sacrifice, alive,
their own children to goddess abortion is eerily redolent of ancient
Baal worshipers dancing about the inferno and live-roasting, in burnt
offering to Moloch, their own children. For
liberals, although the means may change, the ends remain the same. Still,
equally disturbing are a number of comments posted about the incident
on at least one award-winning “gay”-activist blog. Ironically, the site,
“JoeMyGod,” a serial Christian-defaming cyber-rag, won the award
for “Outstanding
Blog” in 2011 at the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation
(GLAAD) Media Awards. While
Joe Jervis the blog’s militant atheist and “gay” sadomasochist founder
refused to denounce the Argentinian “hate crimes” outright, he at least
begrudgingly admitted:
“I really can’t see how this advances the cause of abortion rights.” Ya think? Even so, Jervis, whose blog has a long history of anti-Christian extremism and violence-charged rhetoric, nonetheless permitted several of his regular posters to not only condone the feminist attacks, but to illegally call for a steep escalation in anti-Christian violence in general (up to and including church bombings, and both the castration and even murder of Christians in the U.S.). (Update:
Jervis has now scrubbed his blog of the post. Screenshots have been taken.) Poster
“mike moore” kicked off the bloodlust: “BRAVA! I wish this happened all
the time, particularly here is the U.S. … It’s LONG past time for women
to violently react to [being] … denied birth control and then forced to
carry a never-wanted child to term.” “Jeff
Chang” offered specific suggestions as to what such violence might look
like: “How about destroying the oppresive regims (sic) of the church.
To that end would you support firebombing a church? How about removing
the clergy (sic) from power? Perhaps a ultra radical (sic) hit squad can
use lead pipes and beat the clergy to death. How about just creating FEAR
for all male Catholics? A bomb during there (sic) planning meeting would
work, do you support that?” Chang
then answered his own questions: “As far as I’m concerned, those quasi-religious,
hypocritical bastards should have been castrated on the steps of the cathedral
they so pompously took it upon themselves to ‘protect’ talk about your
bullst grand-stand plays. That’s right. We should get rid of ALL of them
in one fell swoop. I say that we firebomb the next planning meeting.” “Hands off my uteris!!” agreed: “They should have burned their f-ing church to the ground!” So did
“Rolf”: “They were lucky they didn’t start castrating them.” Poster
“Seamus Ruah” justified the violence and sexual assault, comparing it
to the similarly violent Stonewall Riots of 1969. Stonewall is largely
credited for launching today’s increasingly aggressive “gay rights” movement:
“When you push a segment of the population too far,” wrote Ruah, “they
have a tendency to fight back. /Stonewall.” In the
aforementioned WND report, David Kupelian recalled a similar “1989 attack
on New York City’s famed St. Patrick’s Cathedral in which hundreds of
‘gay’ activists stormed the church and terrorized its parishioners during
Mass.” JoeMyGod’s
“BudClark” recalls it too: “I HAD a problem with Act Up’s ‘Die-In’ in
the middle of High Mass at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in NYC, back in the
day,” he wrote. “I DON’T, anymore. The Catholic HIERARCHY deserve (sic)
anything and everything they have coming to them, including JAIL.” Poster
“Vel” had a suggestion for Christians and conservatives: “I hope the right
wingers come here and take note of these comments. … Assaulting and humiliating
people and interfering with their nonviolent expression is OK if done
for the right political cause. So the right wingers should note all of
this. …” Rather
than lamenting the anti-Christian violence itself, poster “zhera” instead
worried: “My only problem with this video is that the Catholics are now
able to use it as proof for how they are victims.” Proof
indeed, zhera. And with the burgeoning success of radical “LGBT” and pro-abortion
legislation worldwide especially in countries like Argentina and the
good ‘ol USA we can expect a rapid increase in similar such “proofs”
of systemic anti-Christian persecution both at home and abroad. In its
story, LifeSite reported that “some of the women chanted a song, with
the lyrics: ‘To the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church, who wants to get
between our sheets, we say that we want to be whores, travesties and lesbians.
Legal abortion in every hospital.’” Nice.
There you have it: The heart of “gay rights” activism, left-wing feminism
and “pro-choice” savagery distilled in one angry rant. “During
the attack some men were visibly weeping,” continued LifeSite. “None of
them retaliated against the abuses heaped on them.” Indeed, to borrow from Madonna, it seems Argentina has much to cry for. And
so does America. But
as for “JoeMyGod,” the question is this: Will GLADD now publicly disavow
Joe Jervis for allowing (and perhaps tacitly condoning) such violent (and
very likely illegal) rhetoric? Will this self-styled “anti-defamation”
group rescind its “Outstanding Blog” award? Don’t
hold your breath. Even
still, a bigger question remains: Will federal authorities investigate
these threats? If it were Christians threatening “gays,” Eric Holder himself
would kick-in the door with MSNBC in tow. Every newspaper in America would
give it above-the-fold coverage. But
it wasn’t Christians threatening “gays.” It was “gays” threatening Christians. And
that just doesn’t fit the false “gay victimhood” narrative. Matt Barber (@jmattbarber on Twitter) is an author, columnist, cultural analyst and an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. Having retired as an undefeated heavyweight professional boxer, Matt has taken his fight from the ring to the culture war. |
Donate to Rense.com Support Free And Honest Journalism At Rense.com | Subscribe To RenseRadio! Enormous Online Archives, MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, Highest Quality Live Programs |