US Zionists using their leverage in the Democratic party especially over Lyndon Johnson, House Minority Leader, to block Eisenhower’s economic sanctions and to support Israel’s invasion.  Eisenhower rejected Zionist pressure and went to the UN Security Council where his armistice and withdrawal proposal was vetoed by France and Britain.   Eisenhower then called a special session of the General Assembly where he triumphed by a 12 to 1 margin.  France, Britain and Israel were defeated and forced to retreat.  No other President before or since Eisenhower ever took a forthright stand against Israeli colonial wars and territorial seizures.

            During the Egyptian invasion, Sharon’s military leadership was severely questioned by his Israeli superiors.  His troops suffered the highest casualties of any unit because of his order to attack heavily fortified Egyptian emplacements when Israeli air power could have done more with less.

            During the so-called Six Day War (June 5 -10, 1967), Israel’s sneak attack on Jordan, Syria and Egypt, resulted in the seizure and occupation of vast areas and the conquest of millions of Palestinians.  Sharon’s military achievements included the wholesale massacre of Egyptian prisoners of war.. President Lyndon Johnson, totally under the thumb of his Zionist fundraisers, not only supported Israel’s war of aggression but acquiesced in Israel’s bombing of the US intelligence ship the Liberty and the killing and maiming of over 200 US sailors.  In the 1973 Yom Kipper War, Sharon and the Israeli high command were on the verge of military defeat by the Egyptian and Syrian armed forced intent on liberating occupied territories, until Kissinger airlifted 22,395 tons of weapons to Israel, including scores of fighter planes, helicopters and transport planes to turn the tide.

            From the Yon Kipper debacle onward, Israel never lacked for US military and political backing and diplomatic protection in its military invasions, colonial settlements and air assaults on Arab countries and inhabitants.

Upward Advance:  Master of Massacres and Mediocrity

            Sharon’s political career was aided by his leading role in massacring Palestinians in Lebanon and in the Occupied Territories.  In Lebanon, Sharon slaughtered  2000 children and women at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camp.  He certainly did not rise to political power for his mediocre performance during the Suez crises and Yon Kippur war.  In fact, when Sharon faced well-trained and well-armed military forces, as was the case during the Hezbollah war in 2006, he was even less than a mediocre commander.  Only against civilians and poorly trained irregulars did he “succeed”.  Only where he could murder and dispossess hundreds of thousands of unarmed civilians and settle Israeli Jews was he glorified as the “King of the Jews” by the Israeli settler population.

            World leaders praise Sharon because of his power and usefulness in smashing nationalist Arab-dissent.  Sharon’s ascent to the Pantheon of world statesman was greased by the western mass media, who to no small extent, sup at the table of his main Zionist benefactors.  Sharon’s “legendary history” is media manufactured to fit the requirements of his western Zionist power brokers.

The Context of Sharon’s and Israeli Ascendancy

            Israel cannot and does not wield power on the bases of its military capability or performance ­ it operates on borrowed power.  When the US was ruled by a President who rejected Zionist influenced Congressional pressure and used available economic and political leverage, Israel retreated, surrendered captured territory and abided by UN sanctions.  In other words, Israel’s war aims and its bellicose behavior, is dependent on the power of the Zionist power configuration in the US to turn Washington in its favor.

            The Israeli leaders and most, especially Sharon, learned the lesson of the Eisenhower experience.  The key to regional power lies in the capacity of American Zionists to control Washington’s decision-makers.  In the blunt language of Sharon, in reply to Shimon Peres on Koi Yisrael radio (October 3, 2001) “Every time we do something, you (Peres) tell me, Americans will do this and that.  I want to tell you something very clear.  Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel.  We the Jewish people control America and the Americans know it”.

            In this, his comment on the relations of power between Israel and the United States, Sharon is also providing an insight into his own importance and influence.  Sharon the “legendary military leader” is a complete artifact of the real power that the Zionists wield in the US on behalf of Israel.

            Sharon is, in a sense, a “cardboard general” who has lost or nearly lost the most important battles in his career ­ beginning with Suez in 1956, Yom Kippur in 1973 and Lebanon in 2006.  Israel has prospered economically and become a major military power largely through over $130 billion dollar transfers from the US Treasury over the past half century; plus tens of billions in favorable trade concessions; plus ‘imports’ of highly trained professionals from the US and Russia (educated by the tax payers of those countries); and more recently billions more in “venture capital” by overseas speculators.  In other words, Israel is an artifact of the ‘power of extraction and transfer’ by its overseas acolytes embedded in the US political and economic power structure.

            Without the influence and material privileges which have accumulated over four decades, Sharon would have ended his mediocre military career as a crabby second rate politician, barking “blood libels” at his adversaries in the Knesset.

            But as circumstances dictated Sharon was not an insignificant figure.  His brutal colonial policies reflected the Israel-Jewish political tradition and shaped what has become a dangerous ethno-supremacist ideology, which unfortunately has traversed across borders and entered into the consciousness of many Zionists.

            It was one thing to joke, as many of us did in our university days, about the ghetto expression “Is it good for Jews?.  It is another for leaders in positions of power to apply this ethnocentric criteria to American foreign policy, personnel recruitment and professional appointments.  That is the real legacy of Ariel Sharon:  the legacy of an Israel -centered world built on ideology of ethno-religious supremacy which displays superiority and disdain for non-Jews.  For the ethnic supremacists like Sharon, most Americans exist to pay tribute and fight wars for Israel and to keep a tight lip about it.

A Final Word on the Sharon Legacy

            Let it be said, here and now, that Sharon’s presumption to speak for “the Jewish people” confused his rabid electoral supporters in Israel and blind adherents among US Zionist leaders, with a growing number of Jews and ex-Jews who detested him and scorn his legacy.  His boast that “Jews control America” has dangerous implications, especially in the context of growing popular malaise in these United States.  Sharon’s claim that Americans knowingly submit to a foreign tyranny, is very provocative especially if and when Americans begin to wake up--- and it will be the majority of Jews, who neither abide by Sharon’s legacy nor share his naked contempt for non-Jews, who will pay a painful price.

            The Sharon legacy lives on, among his epigones at the prestigious universities and with the billionaires who bankroll the Democratic Party.   Sharon’s Israel First legacy lives on with the government officials who betray the trust of the American people and prostrate themselves before his present-day disciples (Klansmen with yarmulkes), the Avigdor Lieberman’s, Naftali Bennett’s and Netanyahu’s who execute the Sharon legacy of dispossession and assassination of unarmed Palestinian people. Ariel Sharon is dead but his crimes will not be buried.  They live on in the policies of the Netanyahu regime but also in the collective memory of humanity in its struggle for freedom and self-determination.