- The Duma elections held no surprises, but the election
turmoil can't obscure the kind of politics that will continue to characterise
Russia over the coming decade thanks to United Russia and its eminence
grise, predicts Eric Walberg
-
- With a 60 per cent turnout, United Russia's solid 49.5
per cent plurality in the 4 December Duma elections, giving it 238 of the
450 seats, is the envy of any Western political party. But it is nonetheless
a disappointment after its 2007 sweep, where it gained over two-thirds
of the seats. Very, very few parties ever approach the magic two-thirds
that lets them ignore the opposition and change the constitution, and Prime
Minister and president-virtually-elect Vladimir Putin even put a positive
spin on the results: "This is an optimal result which reflects the
real situation in the country," Putin, 59, said coolly. "Based
on this result we can guarantee stable development of our country."
(He will be recrowned president in pro forma elections 4 March.)
-
- Post-Soviet Russian politics over the past two decades
has been a rollercoaster. Until the founding of United Russia in 2001,
a short decade ago, the Russian Communist Party was the largest political
force in the country. By uniting the Westernisers and soft nationalists
around his charismatic leadership, Putin was able to push the Communists
aside and capture 1/2 the seats in 2003, UR's debut. Within a few weeks
an additional 78 MPs climbed on the bandwagon, giving UR the magic two-thirds.
With this election, the Communists have now recovered, almost doubling
their vote to 20 per cent, an underestimate of their real support, given
who has the money and who controls media and election procedures. "The
Communists are the only real party out there," admitted one Western
banker in Moscow, and are now attracting even liberals disillusioned with
UR.
-
- In his first two terms as president, Putin transformed
Russia, with UR his political figleaf, restoring state power in the economy,
centralizing political control, guaranteeing a piece of the pie for almost
all, while hiding the many deep social and political problems corruption,
violence, gangs, mafia, drugs, despair, and on and on. Relying on Soviet-era
prestige and Russia's vast material resources, UR has been the vehicle
for creating a crude but powerful national force that keeps chugging alone,
even as the West descends into financial chaos and self-inflicts wounds
in pursuing will-o-the-wisp imperial wars around the world.
-
- Of course, the Duma is not much more than a prestigious
sandbox, an expensive talk shop which can't take any real initiative without
a nod from above. The whole electoral process is heavily in UR's favour,
with a brutal 7 per cent popular vote necessary for initiation into the
club, and persistent rumours that the also-ran Communists, Liberal Democrats
and Fair Russia quietly cut deals to divvy up the seats in less than transparent
proportional elections. UR is able to mobilise the vast administrative
apparatus, the fortunes of oligarchs, the private and public airwaves.
It is for all intents and purposes invincible. The elections, however,
are still an important barometre of public mood, and the almost daily opinion
polls make too blatant vote-rigging a risk, given the Russian elite's proclaimed
insistence that Russia is "democratically" governed.
-
- The general outlines of post-Soviet Russia as shaped
by UR-Putin have now become clear: Russia will not join the West as a subservient
"postmodern state", the neocon version of Kant's world order,
where nations give up their sovereignty to a "higher" organisation
in the interests of world peace. (Kant envisioned a neutral United Nations,
as opposed to the unipolar imperial order established with the collapse
of the Soviet Union.) The early post-Soviet Yelstin crowd seemed willing
to join the US-led imperial order, but there were enough savvy patriots
who were not duped by US professed intentions and who raised the alarm
and put the breaks on this process in time.
-
- It will do whatever is necessary for its security and
national/ federal sovereignty (Chechnya and Georgian wars, missile defence),
and work with others to lessen dependency on the US order (Latin America,
India, China, gas/ oil deals with Europe). To pursue this, it is developing
new international structures especially in Eurasia (SCO, CSTO, the new
regional customs union and proposed Eurasian Economic Community) to counterbalance
US-controlled structures and prepare for the inevitable collapse of US
empire.
-
- But at the same time, the new Russian political-economic
elite is still very much a part of the US-led economic order, based on
the dollar and the Bretton Woods financial institutions, with billions
of dollars stashed abroad, and children attending elite foreign schools
both in Europe and now in the heart of capitalist Russia. But US hopes
to wipe Russia as a major force off the political map were dashed, and
even the most Atlantophile Russians balk at becoming the latest Latvia.
-
- In contrast to old Soviet-era policies, this Russian
strategy is manageable in the face of hostile powers. It accepts the international
framework the US established after WWII and even new additions like the
International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocols which the US rejects,
and thus does not face the anticommunist reaction of Soviet years by Western
liberals and conservatives. It no longer threatens the interests of the
ruling elites of other countries, making Russia an attractive partner for
many countries who seek to remain free from US imperial control. These
polices enjoy a broad consensus inside Russia, ensuring UR-Putin's continued
domination of Russian politics for the time being.
-
- For an objective outside observer, the Russia fashioned
by Putin and UR plays a positive force in world politics and economics,
though it is not above playing its own games; for instance, in Belarus,
possibly in Kyrgyzstan, using its transit route to Afghanistan as a bargaining
chip with the US, regardless of the justness of the NATO occupation of
Afghanistan. It let down longtime ally Gaddafi in Libya, has jilted Iran
on nuclear power and weapons sales in the interests of placating the US,
not done much for the Serbs, especially in Kosovo (yet). If NATO pushes
hard, Russia will back down, unless its direct and vital interests are
threatened. The best Russia can do for countries threatened by US empire
is support their appeals to international law and wield its veto at the
UN Security Council.
-
- It should no longer be "empire vs Communism",
the zero-sum game which the US fashioned in the 20th century to counter
the "Soviet threat", though just what the game adds up to now
is entirely the responsibility of the empire to determine, rather than
the non-empire independents like Russia, all of whom are trying to survive
in the face of pressures to accept a subservient role as "postmodern
states". Russia has forfeited claims to be the gravedigger of capitalism
and by extension imperialism, and just wants a fair shake in a fairer world
order. At the same time, leaders in the Kremlin are under no illusion about
the reality of US empire; that, for all their smiles, its leaders see Russia
(along with China) as the enemy; and that "Western policies always
aim at the eventual dismemberment and demise of Russia," writes vineyardsaker.blogspot.
-
- "They just don't believe that the Soviet way to
oppose the US was the correct one," the Russian-American analyst continues.
Rather than being an active midwife of a new world order opposed to imperialism
(Soviet policy), Russia is playing a waiting game -- the age-old policy
of retreat used against the Mongols, the French and the Nazis. "Americans
play Monopoly, Russians chess," quips Spengler at Asia Times. Afghanistan
looms large as another Vietnam, and the US is busily adding Libya, Syria,
Iran, who-knows-where next to its overfull plate of indigestible goodies.
At times, it is wise to sit back and wait for the straw that breaks the
ogre's (excuse me, camel's) back. A fool's mate comes about when your opponent
is bankrupt, and it certainly looks like this is how the current game is
shaping up.
-
- UR will no doubt continue its slide, and even Putin himself
come 4 March may find himself in a runoff with some dark-horse challenger,
as it is also clear that UR-Putin are unable to face down the corrupt administrative
minions who keep "the party of crooks and thieves" in power.
However, the cautious, patriotic policies of the 2000s as sketched above
have been set for the near future. Perhaps the world financial crisis will
turn Russians back to their tried and at-least-partially true socialist
heritage to make sure the country survives. But its domestic and foreign
policies will not be too much different from the ones UR has put its (rubber)
stamp on, policies which are effectively the work of Putin as Mr UR.
-
- ***
-
- Eric Walberg writes for Al-Ahram Weekly http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/
You can reach him at http://ericwalberg.com/ His Postmodern Imperialism:
Geopolitics and the Great Games is available at http://claritypress.com/Walberg.html
|