In January 2011, National
Geographic published one segment in a series on the world's population
by Robert Kunzig titled: Population
In the text, Kunzig places this:
"Ehrlich’s book, The Population Bomb, made him the most famous of modern
Malthusians. In the 1970s, Ehrlich predicted, "hundreds of millions
of people are going to starve to death," and it was too late to do anything
about it. "The cancer of population growth....must be cut out," Ehrlich
wrote, "by compulsion if voluntary methods fail."
A great deal of the article is focused on world population growth and
reduction efforts, i.e., "The Indian government tried once before to
push vasectomies, in the 1970s, when anxiety about the population bomb
was at its height. Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and her son Sanjay used
state-of-emergency powers to force a dramatic increase in sterilizations.
From 1976 to 1977 the number of operations tripled, to more than eight
million. Over six million of those were vasectomies. Family planning
workers were pressured to meet quotas; in a few states, sterilization
became a condition for receiving new housing or other government benefits.
In some cases the police simply rounded up poor people and hauled them
to sterilization camps."
Worked into the article is the same worn out promotion of global warming.
As one further progresses in reading, you find this:
"The World Bank has predicted that by 2030 more than a billion people
in the developing world will belong to the "global middle class," up
from just 400 million in 2005. That’s a good thing. But it will be a
hard thing for the planet if those people are eating meat and driving
gasoline-powered cars at the same rate as Americans now do. It’s too
late to keep the new middle class of 2030 from being born; it’s not
too late to change how they and the rest of us will produce and consume
food and energy. "Eating less meat seems more reasonable to me than
saying, ‘Have fewer children!’" Le Bras says.
Interesting enough and what I find alarming, is homework now being given
here in Texas where I live, in one school (and possibly others), appears
directly tied to the article cited above. In Katy, Texas, high school
given an assignment.(Click on down load at that link.)
This is no coincidence for those of us who have thoroughly researched
the underbelly of Agenda 21 and it's endless tentacles.
In her book, Environmental Overkill: Whatever Happened to Common
Sense? by the late Dixy Lee Ray, former Governor or Washington
State and former Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, Ray covers
in exhaustive detail the outcome of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio De
Janeiro. On page 77, Ms. Ray gives a shocking report of just how contemptible
those behind forced population reduction are - this particular segment
covers banning DDT:
"For example, in response to a reporter's questions about banning DDT,
Dr. Charles Wurster, who was then chief scientist for the Environmental
Defense Fund, stated that in his opinion there are too many people,
and "this is as good a way to get rid of them as any." Another statement
of Dr. Wurseter's was brought out in congressional testimony before
the House Committee on Agriculture, 92nd Congress, first session, 1971:
"It doesn't really make a lot of difference because the organophosphate
(pesticide) acts locally and only kills farm workers, and most of them
are Mexicans and Negros." There is no record of any media or public
reaction to this shocking statement. 
"Dr. LaMont Cole, a respected environmentalist at Yale University, asserted
that "To feed a starving child is to exacerbate the world overpopulation
problem." And Dr. Van den Bosch of the University of California chided
others about their concern for "all those little brown people in poor
"Malthusian predictions about overpopulation and starvation have been
made since the beginning of the 19th century. America's most ardent
Malthusian is Paul Ehrlich of Stanford University, who, with his wife,
proposes the following program to prevent or ameliorate the population
"1. We must institute the Chinese Communist system of compulsory
abortion and various forms of infanticide so that each couple will only
have one child. We must hope that our government doesn't wait until
it, too, decides that coercive measures can solve America's population
problem...The price of personal freedom in making childbearing decisions
may be the destruction of the world.
"2. As Barry Commoner recommended, we must go back to the spinning
wheel, returning to a beatific state of endless drudge labor, six days
a week, and exhaustion on Sunday. Most of the labor-saving devices and
the appliances of everyday life consume fossil-fuel energy, which, if
course, poisons the environment.
"3. Air travel by businessmen must cease, with the world's executives
linked instead by closed-circuit TV.
"4. All this nonsense of getting into the family car and driving
off on vacation must cease, too."
I am very concerned about America's children being inculcated with the
dangerous philosophy you read above, not just in high schools, but in
lower grades as well. Then, they go on to "institutions of higher learning"
and you see the insidious propaganda being feed to young adults.
How many of our next generation of graduates will have been indoctrinated
into believing they must control the population of this earth?
How much reproductive education is actually priming the next generation
to accept population control by whatever means necessary - including
Bill Gates Talks ‘Vaccines to Reduce Population’
Holdren's guru: Dispose
of 'excess children' like puppies
The Population Control
Agenda by Stanley K. Monteith, M.D.
Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population
Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests."
Thelma Taormina is the founder of We The People Are The 9-12 Association,
Inc., a grassroots organization in Houston, TX. She has been
actively educating herself and others about Agenda 21 and the dangers
it presents to individual freedom. To find out more visit http://912membersusa.com