Few days ago, Zalmay Khalilzad invited some tribal elder in Kabul to
secure their allegiance in the event that he nominates himself as a
candidate in the next Presidential election in 2014. Upon
hearing this news, we were both angry and surprised. We were angry
for Khalilzad’s disregard for the Afghan lives and the role
Khalilzad played in facilitating the conditions wherein they find
themselves. Khalilzad was in part the architect of the current
misery. We were surprised to see how shameless this man has
become and continues to show no remorse to be the point man for
Washington’s global architects of disaster in the region. Hence, we
felt compelled to write this short write-up in order to shed some
light on who he is and what he has done for Afghanistan since his
conduct cease to reflect Afghan dignity or Islamic values.
Khalilzad made a career from advocating wars and destruction in the
region. He has been one of the neoconservatives and a
protégé of Paul Wolfowitz and had studied under Albert
Wohlstetter, philosophical thinker for the neoconservative movement
in the United States. It is through these types of mentorships that
Khalilzad was able to advance to the sphere of influence in the US
foreign policy circles. He earned his PhD from the University of
Chicago in 1979 and served as fellow at the Council on Foreign
Relations and has worked on the Project for the New American
Century, the neoconservative philosophy that molded the post-911
world.
In 1998, he and the other neoconservatives signed a letter to then
President Clinton advocating the removal of Saddam Hussein. The
inspiration for this letter stemmed from the Policy Paper, Clean
Break, which advocated toppling regimes through wars throughout the
Middle East. During the Bush Administration Khalilzad and his
neoconservative associates advocated war in Iraq, a fact well
established by their letter to President Clinton in 1998. In Iraq,
of course, it is no secret that over a million people lost their
lives, millions were maimed and the dignity of its people
compromised and historical artifacts looted.
In short he was the point man for Dick Cheney when George W Bush was
elected President and worked in the National Security Council [NSC]
under Condoleezza Rice. It is there in the NSC, where he has most
likely helped plan the invasion of Afghanistan. It is worth
mentioning that his plans for the invasion of Afghanistan stemmed
from his so-called White Paper he had led to author in 1998. The
White Paper was actually the “Dark Paper” for what was to become of
Afghanistan. His prescription for the cure of war-torn
Afghanistan in reality caused the current sociopolitical epidemic.
Khalilzad’s White Paper invested a lot in the Afghan minorities,
warlord, drug lords, and the future shape of the Afghan government.
As envisaged in his White Paper, Khalilzad had planned for a weak
central government in Afghanistan with the goal to please
Afghanistan’s neighbors. That is why, the development of different
parts of Afghanistan were entrusted to the immediate neighbors of
Afghanistan and India. Similarly, through his suggestions,
individuals with direct links to foreign countries found their way
to the new government in Kabul further creating dependency on the
countries in region.
The rationale for Khalilzad’s approach was that Afghanistan had
created rivalries between neighbors of Afghanistan; hence, something
had to be done to alleviate those rivalries. However, common sense
dictates that any such approach would further foster factions inside
Afghanistan with allegiance to outside powers. Furthermore,
Khalilzad advocated local autonomy in the new system of government.
This set the stage for warlords to seek the system of federalism to
secure their gains and work for the division of Afghanistan. Since
Khalizad facilitated outside influence in Afghanistan, the goal of
the criminal warlords of the Northern Alliance was on track to seek
federalism, a precursor to the division of Afghanistan. This method
of appeasing the warlords could have stemmed from one conceived
goal, corruption. Khalilzad probably aimed to gain influence in
these corrupt circles for corruption purposes; otherwise, why would
any rational person pursue such an approach that would add to the
internal instability of Afghanistan. It is no secret that billions
have vanished in Afghanistan and those billions could not have
disappeared without outside cooperation from officials of the US
government.
To sum up Khalilzad, he was trained for imperial violence and
domination. He has his hand in every US adventure aimed at killing
Muslims in region under the pretext of the war on terror. He
has signed known documents such as the neoconservatives letter to
President Clinton in 1998 advocating the removal of Saddam Hussein,
hence, war in Iraq. Furthermore, he has been the architect of the
disastrous regime of Karzai and his criminal affiliates, the
Northern Alliance Warlords. His political plans certainly qualify as
evil politics; hence, in this mode of politics, it would not be far
fetched to say that he acts like Satan, who “whispers in the hearts
of men.”
On a personal note, Khalizad has two sons, Alexander Benard and
Maximilian Benard. Their names do not appear to have any cultural or
religious links to Afghanistan. Our question is based on
what background or positive contribution in Afghanistan, has he
decided to run for president in 2014?
Dr Mohammed Daud Miraki, MA, MA, PhD
mdmiraki@ameritech.net
Dr Rahmat Rabi Zirakyar, MA, PhD
zirakyar1234@yahoo.com
All Rights Reserved, February 1, 2012 |