"Is there anything more shameful than the
man who lacks the courage to be a coward?" Peter
On April 10, 2012, another Obama/Soetoro
ballot access hearing took place in New Jersey. Objectors were
represented by superior legal counsel, Mario Apuzzo. Barry Soetoro's
attorney' argument can only be described as delusional:
"Obama's attorney made a motion to
dismiss the Objection in its entirety. She argued that it was not
relevant to being placed on the ballot whether Mr. Obama is a
"natural born Citizen," where he was born, and whether he was born
to U.S. citizen parents. She said that no law in New Jersey obligated
him to produce any such evidence in order to get on the primary
What Ms. Hill is saying is that anyone can
be a presidential candidate on their state ballot. Doesn't matter
where the individual was born or whether he was even born to U.S.
citizen parents. The hell with the U.S. Constitution and why the
framers grand fathered in the clause about 'natural born
The implications behind such lunacy, never
mind stomping on the U.S. Constitution, are horrendous. But, of
course, the useful fools who serve their master don't give a damn.
They care only for their paychecks and protecting the empty suit
camped out in our White House.
Mario argued the meat of ballot
qualification regarding candidates for U.S. president:
"We argued that Mr. Obama under the
Constitution has to be a "natural born Citizen." We argued that
under New Jersey law (the state constitution, statutes, and case law),
Mr. Obama must show that he is qualified for the office he wishes to
occupy and that includes showing that he is a "natural born
Citizen," which includes presenting evidence of who he is, where he
was born, and that he was born to two U.S. citizen parents. We argued
that the Secretary of State has a constitutional obligation not to
place any ineligible candidates on the election ballot. Judge Masin
denied Obama's motion to dismiss and the case proceeded to
"After calling to the witness stand Mr.
Moran and Mr. Purpura, who gave testimony as to why they brought the
ballot challenge, and introducing documents showing there is a
question as to Mr. Obama's identity, I called Brian Wilcox to
testify as an internet image expert. Mr. Wilcox was going to testify
on how the Obama April 27, 2011, long-form birth certificate has been
altered and manipulated either by computer software or by a human or
both, producing a forged documents, and that since the image is not
reliable, we need to see the original paper version. Obama's lawyer
objected to my proffered testimony. I then offered that I would not
need to have Mr. Wilcox testify, provided that Obama stipulated that
the internet image of his birth certificate could not be used as
evidence by either Judge Masin or the New Jersey Secretary of States
and that he presented to the court or the Secretary of State no other
evidence of his identity or place of birth.
"Judge Masin also asked Obama's
attorney whether she would so stipulate. She did so stipulate,
agreeing that both the court and the Secretary of State cannot rely on
the internet birth certificate as evidence of Obama's place of birth
and that Obama has produced no other evidence to the court regarding
his place of birth. She also argued that Obama has no legal obligation
to produce any such evidence to get on the primary ballot. Judge Masin
then took the issue under advisement. Having produced absolutely no
evidence of his eligibility for the Office of President, Judge Masin
will decide whether as a matter of law Obama has a legal duty to
produce such evidence before he may be placed on the New Jersey ballot
in light of the pending objection filed against him. If he decides
that he does, then the Objection will be successful. If he decides
that Obama has no such legal obligation, the Objection would fail on
the first issue.
"The second issue that Judge Masin
addressed was whether the definition of an Article II "natural born
Citizen" includes the requirement that the child be born to two U.S.
citizen parents. Judge Masin relied heavily upon the fact that no
court in the nation has yet ruled that Mr. Obama had to have two U.S.
citizen parents at the time of his birth. I explained that most cases
regarding Mr. Obama have been ruled in his favor on procedural grounds
rather than on the merits of the definition of a "natural born
Citizen." He relied heavily upon U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) and its
use of the English common law to define U.S. citizenship. We also
discussed the Indiana Ankeny decision and the Georgia ballot access
cases. I explained how Wong did not hold that Wong was a "natural
born Citizen," but only a "citizen of the United States" under
the Fourteenth Amendment which does not define an Article II
"natural born Citizen." I explained that Wong distinguished between
a "citizen" and a "natural born Citizen," explaining how
Justice Gray used Horace Binney's distinction between both classes
of citizens. I argued that it is error to rely upon Wong as though it
held Wong to be a "natural born Citizen."
Both the judge and Barry's attorney agreed
the Internet birth certificate released by the impostor in the White
House cannot be used as evidence to prove his place of birth. A huge
admission that made absolutely no difference to the gutless coward
wearing a black robe.
Several hours after the fake trial, Deputy
Director and Administrative Law Judge, Jeff S. Masin, emailed Mario to
inform him he believes the malignant narcissist in the White House was
born in Hawaii and is therefore eligible, ignoring completely the
'natural born citizen' requirement.
"Then Masin turned to Hill and asked
"Is it your legal position that the
document on the Internet is irrelevant to this case?
"Hill replied, "Yes." Masin
"And indeed you concede that Mr. Obama
has not produced an alleged birth certificate to the Secretary of
"Hill at first said, "It has been
released nationally," but then admitted that she did not know
personally that Obama had given any such document to the Secretary of
State, nor did she intend giving such a document to the court today.
But she also argued, after Judge Masin asked her repeatedly, that
Obama need not produce any evidence at all.
"Apuzzo told CNAV during a recess in
the hearing that this was the most stunning thing that any lawyer for
Obama had ever admitted, in an Obama eligibility case or in any other
case. When the hearing finally adjourned at 12:30 p.m., Apuzzo was
confident of prevailing on this point.
"He observed that Hill, after objecting
to everything that Apuzzo tried to introduce into evidence, offered no
evidence on her own behalf and even admitted that the infamous PDF
document was legally worthless."
Without a single piece of verifiable
evidence and completely ignoring the U.S. Constitution as to
eligibility requirements for a presidential candidate, Judge Masin
checked his manhood at the door and will forever be a
"It's official: the corruption goes all
the way to the top of the Georgia judicial branch. This week the
Georgia Supreme Court denied our motion for an emergency injunction to
delay the certification of the Georgia Democratic Presidential primary
election results. Yesterday the Georgia Secretary of State certified
Obama as the winner of that election.
"There's an old saying in law:
reasonable minds can differ on almost any argument. Our motion for
injunction was an exception to the rule. No reasonable, unbiased
person would have denied this motion. We were asking for something
that wouldn't have harmed the defendant in any way. Delaying
certification of the primary election results for a few weeks would
not have changed the outcome of the election and would not have cost a
dime. When granting an injunction will harm no one, and denying the
motion will arguably destroy the Constitution, what possible reason
could be given for denying the motion? Apparently the answer for the
Georgia Supreme Court is: None.
"The order denying our
motion was one sentence: "Upon consideration of Applicant's
'Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction,' the motion is hereby
"You can see the order on our web site.
Such one-sentence orders are not unheard of. However, in this case
issuing a one-sentence denial reflects an unbelievable level of
disregard for the importance of this motion. Add to that the fact that
a denial is completely unsupportable considering the relief requested,
and you can see why this ruling is so appalling. Essentially the
Georgia Supreme Court said: We deny your request for relief that would
have harmed no one, and we have so much contempt for your request that
we're not going to bother explaining our shocking ruling.
"The Court also waited to rule until an
appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was impossible. Liberty Legal
Foundation filed our emergency motion seven days before the Georgia
Court ruled. As you can see from our filings on our web site we gave
the Georgia Court all the information it needed, including the lack of
harm that would result from granting our motion. Both LLF and Georgia
Representative Mark Hatfield pointed out to the Court the date on
which the Secretary of State planned to certify the election. Yet the
Court sat on our filings for seven days, then ruled on the day
certification had been planned.
"If we had been given one or two days
we could have filed an emergency motion with the U.S. Supreme Court.
Currently the Justice assigned to review such motions from Georgia is
the most Constitutional originalist, Justice Clarence Thomas. I'm sure
that the Georgia Supreme Court is aware that Justice Thomas would have
been our next step, had we had time to file another motion. The
Georgia Court ensured that such review was not possible by waiting
until the last day to rule before our motion became moot. It is
possible that this timing was nothing more than a busy court not being
able to rule faster, but after what we have seen in Georgia, do you
believe that? Even if that is true, what does it say about this
Court's level of respect for the importance of this case? The Court
didn't even bother to spell our client's name
In my lifetime I have never seen such
cowardice by public servants, elected or appointed, including the
Never. Not in any of the worst political
scandals in my lifetime.
All to protect someone who, through fraud,
lying and cheating, has usurped the highest office in our land. The
actions of Judge Masin, Judge Malihi and the entire Georgia Judiciary
shame all the blood spilled on the battlefield to birth this republic.
If Patrick Henry were alive today, he would spit in their face and
call them out for being the yellow bellied cowards they
We know why. To deny Soetoro a place on any
ballot in the 50 states is an admission he was not eligible in 2008
and he's not eligible in 2012. Such an admission would create a
constitutional crisis never seen before in our land. Every bill the
usurper has signed into "law" is null and void as is every
treaty and action Soetoro has taken masquerading as our legitimate
There are many critical major issues we are
fighting: Agenda 21, Monsanto poisoning us, massive spending an
unpayable debt; an endless list to be sure.
However, when enough people lose faith in
our court system, anarchy is sure to follow.
If judges refuse to uphold laws passed by
their state legislatures, and federal judges continue to ignore the
U.S. Constitution, why should anyone obey any laws?
Judicial cowardice must become a major issue
in this country. Depending on the level of judge, many can be removed
by recall. Removal from the bench varies by state. Usually state
supreme court justices are appointed by governors. In November 2010,
determined citizens in Iowa threw three of their Supreme Court
Justices off the bench for their decision to allow a legal fiction
called 'same sex marriage'. There was a lot of sniveling, but the only
thing that counts is the will of the people and the determined people
in Iowa had their way.
It can happen in every state, it just takes
boots on the ground. In New Jersey, here is the law:
New Jersey Statutes 52:14F-4 -
Administrative law judges; appointment, terms; compensation;
New Jersey Statutes- Title 52- Chapter 14F -
§ 52:14F-4 - Administrative law judges; appointment, terms;
4. Permanent administrative law judges shall
be appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the Senate
to initial terms of one year. During this initial term, each judge
shall be subject to a program of evaluation as delineated in section 5
of P.L.1978, c.67 (C.52:14F-5). First reappointment of a judge after
this initial term shall be by the Governor for a term of four years
and until the appointment and qualification of the judge's
That makes it more difficult, but if large
groups like 9/12 or tea party chapters got together and hounded their
governor to remove Masin, they can succeed. While Gov. Chris Christie
has been made some sort of 'conservative' hero by dullard's like Sean
Hannity, beware of the wolf dressed in sheep's clothing. But, if you
want something bad enough, like the good people in Iowa, you go after
Make Judge Masin a household name for being
a coward by getting on talk radio, writing letters to the editor. Make
that judge (or a judge in your state that needs to be removed from the
bench) such a pariah in the public's eye, they resign. It can be done.
I know it was done in California. Citizens attempted to recall a state
senator. They didn't succeed with signatures, but his reputation was
so justifiably ruined, he never ran for office again.
If I lived in New Jersey I would get my
volunteers together, get my permit and stand outside the building
where Masin hears cases (Office of Administrative Law, 9 Quakerbridge
Plaza, Mercerville, New Jersey 08619) with a huge banner which reads:
'Judge Masin is a coward who does not believe in the law'. Have a one
page flyer to hand out which gives an overview of the trial and
explain his gutless decision. Make your flyer about the law, not
politics: Regardless of your political affiliation, or even if you
have none, no one is above the law, not even Obama/Soetoro. And, stay
with it until you succeed. Hound Masin right out of a job he doesn't
deserve to keep.
My volunteers and I did it for nine months
outside the "Federal" Reserve building in Denver, CO., in
1993. In freezing cold temperatures to blistering sun, holding our
huge banner to abolish the "Fed" - 80 years is enough!
People flocked to us for a copy of my Why A Bankrupt America booklet,
which I gave out for free. Even local police on their horses wanted
know why we were there and took a copy of my booklet. People hopped
off the bus, grabbed my booklet and hopped back on. We educated
thousands. Not ten or twenty people, but thousands.
Every time some judge renders yet another
decision to completely ignore the crimes of Barry Soetoro aka Barack
Hussein Obama, it is another step towards a totalitarian system that
will crush us. We must stop the stench. That will only happen by
unifying and acting no matter the sacrifice.
http://www.devvy.com . You may also sign up for her free email alerts.
Site Served by TheHostPros