Two
States are now deciding how to literally forbid
Everything from having any effect upon the public in two states.
“Free-Market Analysis: These bills are all about the criminalizing of
the Internet. Now that SOPA has been pushed back on the federal front,
the action is turning to the states. The idea, in our view, is to whittle
away at the Internet bit by bit. Create precedent at the state level
and then move in again at the federal level.
The powers-that-be don't like the Internet or what we call the Internet
Reformation that has changed the context of the power debate in the
US and throughout the world.
The Internet has exposed the memes of the elite, the dominant social
themes that are used to promote world government by scaring people into
cooperating with internationalist facilities like the UN.
The powers-that-be are using the same strategies as regards the Internet.
They are trying to convince people that a series of organized electrons
are as a dangerous as a dark alley on a bad side of town. The Internet
needs to be seriously policed and criminalized.” (1)
Similar plans were announced for Arizona where this same plan awaits
that Governor’s signature. (2)
However the real problems which this slipshod, shoot-from-the-hip legislation
will create have yet to be even thought about much less discussed Because
while these “LAWS” envision preventing anything coming from the Internet
to interfere with any of the thoughts of their State’s (about-to-be)
criminally-protected citizens: In reality this will go much, much further.
What about songs or music that falls into the same category? What about
video games, graphic novels, books, movies, or even television? How
will this affect the whole of the wider society, not just the damaged
people that these noble legislators say that they MUST PROTECT? What
about the commerce clause, will companies be charged because whatever
they “sell” might adversely affect some moron living in outbackConnecticut
or the sandstorms of Phoenix?
As someone who has had his work banned by Oklahoma (Black Lizard Books
were BANNED in Oklahoma because I did the covers) I have to wonder
how long will it be before instead of Tail-gate parties and night long
conversations, in coffee shops or bars or just around the backyard Barbque—Amerikans
will be reduced to book burning parties and the wholesale destruction
of all those video-games and other CD’s because they might threaten
the very delicate minds of either themselves or their precious offspring?
In California this week there was a mass killing of students on a Christian
college campus where 7 people died because of a nut job that went berserk.
How would these new bills have prevented that? Should the San Francisco
Chronicle be liable because they ran stories about that shooting on
their front page?
“04-03) 09:30 PDT OAKLAND -- Hours after a gunman killed seven people
at a small Christian college in Oakland, relatives gathered a few miles
away to mourn Katleen Ping, 24, a school employee shot in Monday's mass
murder.
As he watched the Cartoon Network on television, Ping's son, 4-year-old
Kayzzer, didn't understand what had happened. And no one around him
seemed to know what to do about that.
"He doesn't know," said his anguished grandfather, Liberty Ping, as
the little boy ducked behind the couch to hide and then scampered across
the room on all fours. "He keeps asking everyone why they're crying."
In the next room, Katleen's brother, Kaine Ping, wept as he looked at
photos of his sister on a desktop computer.
Before the shooting at Oikos University, he said, his sister had been
the stabilizing force not only for her young son, but for her whole
family, which lives together on a tough block in East Oakland.
"She took care of us," said Kaine Ping, 21.
"It's hard to accept," said Liberty Ping. "I could accept it maybe if
she was (killed while) out driving or walking. But she was in the best
place, the safest place - a school." (3)
Apparently the legislatures in Arizona and Connecticut have not even
bothered to read the First Amendment of the US Constitution - because
everything they want to do with this Bill is in active VIOLATION of
RIGHTS that are PROTECTED BY THE US Constitution. If this is signed
in Arizona or passed in Connecticut then a lot of people around the
world could be charged or possibly arrested—before the legitimacy of
this new piece of The New World Order gets sorted out, by being challenged
in Federal Court.
There is also a question of the time-line, regarding the difference
between when something was written or created and whether or not
that "offending result" can then be used retrospectively to charge people
for articles of commission BEFORE this bill became “Law”?
And of course that is the $64 Trillion dollar question can a state
make laws that trump the US Constitution? Obama has said that he has
“no faith” in the Supreme Court because they are an unelected body:
But Obama has more than faith in the UN which is not an elected body
either—yet Obama has placed the national security of the United States
at the mercy of that unelected body without bothering to consult with
anyone (any elected-someone) about that! So what will government do
now with this OBSENITY that flies in the face of everything this nation
was suppose to stand for before Obama became our new dictator/GOD over
the entire world?
kirwanstudios@sbcglobal.net
1) US Internet Criminalization Now Pursued at State Level Conn
Attacked
http://thedailybell.com/3757/US-Internet-Criminalization-Now-Pursued-at-State-Level-Conn-Attacked
2) The Noose Tightens: Arizona Law criminalizes Internet
http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/the-noose-tightens-arizona-law-criminalizes-internet-speech-that-would-terrify-intimidate-threaten-harass-annoy-or-offend_04032012
3) Shooting’s victims Family struggles to cope
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/04/03/BANL1NTVSF.DTL&tsp=1
BACKGROUND:
Shooting Suspect felt Picked on http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/04/03/BALR1NU3F1.DTL
|