18, 2010, I wrote a column titled, Re-electing
the Band Aid Brigade. The point I was making is the American people
scream and yell about the job the Outlaw Congress is doing, but come election
day they continue to elect the same incumbents over and over and over.
In 2010, a whopping 86% of incumbents in the Outlaw Congress were sent
back to continue destroying this nation. Well, it's not my incumbent at
fault, it's the Democrats! Or the Republicans! They continue to reelect
the very same people who never propose constitutional solutions, only
more Band Aids. Conservatives continue to support the Band Aid pushers
to conserve what?
of millions of voters continue to fall into the same old trap. Let me
quote Kelleigh Nelson, researcher
and writer not afraid to write the truth:
the words of Clinton's mentor, Carroll Quigley, professor of history at
Georgetown University and author of the 1966 book, Tragedy and Hope. "The
argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies,
one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea
acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two
parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can 'throw
the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive
shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four
years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things
but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies."
are conservatives going to figure out how they've been played for suckers?
Party groups have been endorsing candidates to replace the rotten, corrupt
Congress. As I have written many times, I fully support local tea party
and 9/12 groups. I know many of them; they are hard working activists.
Truly wonderful, patriotic Americans who hate what is happening just as
much as you and I do. However, too many simply do not understand how government
systems and programs actually work. In their desperation to get rid of
the maggots infesting the U.S. Congress, sadly, they are endorsing more
of the same. Of course, if you only have one or two hopefuls running against
the incumbent and neither one of them know what they're talking about,
it does make it difficult.
to make it clear that my criticism of the candidates below is nothing
personal. I don't know any of them. I don't doubt their sincerity, but
all I see is more of the same.
start with Terrence (Terry) McGowan, running in the 4th District in New
off the bat I saw Mr. McGowan is pushing something called a "fair"
tax reform. This tells me right away Mr. McGowan may be one of those Americans
who has not thoroughly studied the toxic poison called a "fair"
tax. Hard to say since his web site has nothing posted of any substance.
It does say he's a former Navy Seal taking action, but what action would
that be? Where is his commitment to abolish the unconstitutional "Federal"
Reserve Banking Act of 1913? It is the head of the snake choking this
nation to death. Fair tax reform? Where is anything on Mr. McGowan's knowledge
of the IRC (Infernal Revenue Code)? Will he commit to introducing bills
to abolish the unconstitutional Federal Department of Education, the EPA,
the SBA, stop all foreign aid because no where in Art. 1, Sec. 8 does
it authorize the thieves in Congress to steal the fruits of our labor
to give to any country for any purpose.
sorry, but Mr. McGowan is showing a blank slate on his web site. When
I ran both times for Congress (94 & 96), there weren't web sites back
then to any large degree, but all of my
campaign literature, speeches and the debates made very clear my position
on those and other issues destroying this republic.
is David Larsen, running in the 7th Congressional District in New Jersey.
A moral conservative, but his stand on the issues is the same boiler plate
nothing I have seen for four decades:
SPENDING: David Larsen will end wasteful government spending. He opposes
wasteful spending by both parties and supports a balanced budget.
JOBS: David Larsen will eliminate burdensome regulations that stifle job
growth and work to create incentives for American small business to hire
TAXES: David Larsen will fight for a just and simplified tax system that
does not discourage innovation or encourage the government to gamble with
American's hard-earned money, but a policy that fuels productivity and
fosters American Prosperity for All.
all going to cut wasteful government spending, but they don't. Why? Because
the outlaws in Congress refuse to abolish the unconstitutional cabinets
and agencies gobbling in excess of $1.7 trillion BORROWED dollars a year
and newly elected candidates don't even understand the problem. Electronic
vote fraud makes sure constitutionalists don't get elected to Congress.
Larsen sings the same old rhetoric about reforming the tax system. There
is no need for any "federal" income tax. Where is any commitment
to abolish the unconstitutional central bank which is fed by stealing
the fruits of your labor via the dragoons who work for the IRS? Where
is his commitment to expose
the fraud committed by the IRS against we the people by misapplying
the Income Tax Code?
Larsen also says: "Conservative David Larsen will help Restore The
American Dream and our nation to the greatness those before us worked
so hard to achieve, ensuring that President Reagan’s legacy of liberty
and prosperity will endure for generations to come."
Reagan promised to abolish the Federal Department of Education, Department
of Energy and the SBA. All broken promises the minute he was sworn into
office. I know Ronald Reagan is a big hero of conservatives, but I am
not even though I voted for him twice. You see, back then, I fell for
all his carefully crafted and beautifully delivered lines as if he were
starring in another movie. Dullard's like Sean Hannity pump Reagan as
if he were the second coming. Thankfully, presidents are only allowed
took office in January 1981. By
the end of that year the national debt created by the thieves in the
Outlaw Congress was $1,028,729,000,000; 32.9% of the GDP. By the time
he left office, Reagan has signed into "law" all the unconstitutional
spending sent to him by Congress to the tune of $2,684,392,000,000 or
a whopping 52.6% of GDP. Reagan never once tried to use his influence
to abolish the privately owned "Federal" Reserve banking system.
To do that would have made it impossible to continue the massive spending
while he was in office. Reagan signed a phony immigration reform law in
1986 that literally opened the flood gates for illegal aliens to sneak
in this country and steal jobs that belong to Americans. Thank Ronald
Reagan for the massive invasion by illegals we've seen the past 25 years.
Larsen needs to go back and look at Reagan's real legacy (I lived in California
when he was governor):
in his California governorship he had signed a permissive abortion bill
that has resulted in more than a million abortions. Afterward, he inaccurately
blamed this outcome on doctors, saying that they had deliberately misinterpreted
the law. When Reagan ran for president, he won backing from pro-life forces
by advocating a constitutional amendment that would have prohibited all
abortions except when necessary to save the life of the mother. Reagan’s
stand was partly a product of political calculation, as was his tactic
after he was elected of addressing the annual pro-life rally held in Washington
by telephone so that he would not be seen with the leaders of the movement
on the evening news."
was no friend of the Second Amendment
is NO question in my mind that Reagan and then Secretary of State George
Schultz, knew for a fact that all the passengers on KAL Flight 007 survived
a successful water crash 'landing'. For political reasons, Reagan sacrificed
61 Americans including Congressman Larry McDonald and many children. Yes,
do I know Reagan lied? Because for one thing, the South Korean government
received confirmation directly from the CIA that the plane had landed.
Former U.S. Senator Jesse Helms continued the cover up, but he knew the
memo that was unearthed reads: Sen. Jesse Helms to Boris Yeltsin - Dec.
10, 1991: "The KAL 007 tragedy was one of the most tense incidents
of the entire Cold War ... Please provide a detailed list of the camps
containing live passengers and crew, together with a map showing their
on to Anna Little, running in New Jersey. Tragically, Mrs. Little is pushing
for the toxic "fair" tax. Being an attorney, one would think
Ms. Little would at least do the research to understand why there is nothing
"fair" about the so called "fair" tax:
tax is a trap: Demand NO vote on H.R. 25
is any commitment by Mrs. Little to abolish the head of the beast - the
central bank? Don't any of those candidates understand the disabilities
of our monetary system, it's relation to the "income" tax and
why both must be abolished? If they don't understand those two key issues,
they aren't qualified to serve in the U.S. House. All these candidates
running can talk about "fixing" Washington, DC and "smaller
government" until the cows come home, but it amounts to nothing but
empty words. Her "solution" to education is more boiler plate
"conservative" talk. Doesn't Mrs. Little understand that the
Outlaw Congress never had any constitutional authority to hijack the educational
system in this country? Does she not understand the government's indoctrination
centers are nothing more than incubators churning out dumbed down cattle?
Little has this on her web site: Remember
We Can't Change Washington Without Changing The People We Send There!
That's all well and good and sounds great, but if those you're sending
to Washington, DC., don't understand how the problem got started and don't
have the backbone to stand up against the banking cartel and commit to
actually reducing the size of government by abolishing unconstitutional
agencies and cabinets, how the hell do you expect to "Change Washington!"?
Steelman is illegally running for the U.S. Senate:
States Did Not Ratify 17th Amendment - What Will States Do?
Steelman touts 'Show me solutions' being she's from Missouri. Her solutions:
she calls herself a Reagan Republican which means she chooses to pursue
the same failed path: "That is why Sarah will oppose any and all
efforts to increase taxes and will be a steadfast vote in the US Senate
for a tax code that is simpler, fairer, and flatter." Big red flags.
Mrs. Steelman has a master's degree in economics, yet she says not a single
word about abolishing the unconstitutional "Federal" Reserve.
Nothing about why fiat currency is poison. At the risk of repeating myself:
All the clever word smithing in the world doesn't mean squat if a candidate
doesn't understand what is killing our economy besides the massive, glutinous
spending made possible by the central bank.
solution to education is no solution. Again, she doesn't even mention
that no where in Art. 1, Sec. 8 of the U.S. Constitution does it authorize
the U.S. Congress to legislate education. As for Mrs. Steelman's position
on national security, here is another neo-con who just can't seen to understand
the proper role of our military: "Pursuit of non-military means of
achieving foreign policy objectives (diplomacy, sanctions, and covert
operations) but if those means fail, we deploy overwhelming force for
swift and sure victory."
what would those foreign policy objectives be, Mrs. Steelman? What right
do we have to impose economic sanctions on any country causing massive
hardship and death? Just what country will be next in line for the political
whores in Congress and the next puppet in the White House when they want
someone else's oil or natural resources? I do give her credit for her
stand on no more unconstitutional nation building, but her previous statement
is the camel's nose in the tent. Before long, it becomes nation building.
And, last but not least, on the issue of spending, it's a question and
federal government currently offers incentives and subsidies to businesses,
ranging from the bailout of automobile manufacturers, to subsidies for
ethanol. Our country even sends more than $140 million a year to Brazilian
cotton farmers. Do you think our country should cut or even eliminate
these type of subsidies? Which subsidies should be eliminated and which
subsidies kept? What can we really afford?"
Steelman is obviously an educated woman, but what exactly did she get
educated in when it comes to the founding of this republic and the U.S.
Constitution? Where is a strong statement by her, i.e., "The federal
government currently offers incentives and subsidies to businesses, ranging
from the bailout of automobile manufacturers, to subsidies for ethanol.
All illegal under the U.S. Constitution and any member of Congress who
voted for the bail outs violated their oath of office and the law."
Why doesn't she come out and say the incumbents in the U.S. Congress stole
your hard earned money to illegally send $140 million BORROWED dollars
a year to Barzilian cotton farmers? Instead, it's a wishy-washy question
session on her web site.
is why I have a problem with amateurs. I fully support citizen candidates,
but not when they have no understanding of the founding documents and
the supreme law of the land. Not when they propose more Band Aids which
are not solutions, only more feeding the addiction of spending.
Lingle is illegally running for the U.S. Senate from the State of Hawaii.
She is the former governor who I believe was complicit in covering up
the fraud involving Obama/Soetoro's birth certificate. Lingle is a fierce
supporter of killing unborn babies. Another RINO who wants to make the
unconstitutional EPA a full cabinet. Her solution to jobs and the economy
completely ignores the core evil, the "Fed", and instead provides
nothing but more speech material. Another political animal happy to ignore
the U.S. Constitution.
of them do talk tough about illegal immigration, but you and I know there
has never been any real intention to seal our borders because the end
game is to seamlessly merge Canada, Mexico and the U.S. as one region
of world government. The goal is a 'North American Union'. The solution
to locking down our borders can and should come from the four border states
and their legislatures if done right. Arizona is taking the lead and I
pray they are successful in the near future.
hope that supporters of all candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives
will sit down with their favorite candidate and talk to them about the
cancer called the "Fed" and why it must be abolished. Encourage
each candidate to use their campaign dollars to purchase Dr. Edwin Vieira's
two volume set, Pieces
of Eight: The Monetary Powers and Disabilities of the United States Constitution
and read it. Every word. There is NO other publication like it. If every
candidate for the U.S. House read Edwin's research and scholarly presentation,
we might actually get a few constitutionalists elected to the U.S. House.
Being a "conservative" doesn't mean a candidate is educated
on the issues killing this country.
of Eight should be mandatory reading for all upper level high school students
and every college student in this country. We already have an entire Congress,
with the exception of Ron Paul and maybe one or two others, who have no
clue about the central bank. Even though this testimony is aged, it still
reflects the ignorance of those serving in the Outlaw Congress:
Greider, Author: Secrets of the Temple
House Banking Committee - October 7, 1993
only players who are left out of this conversation are the American people
and, to a large extent their elected representatives. Instead, they are
provided a frustrating stream of evasive euphemisms and opaque jargon
and platitudinous generalities and, sometimes, even downright deception.
As more than one Federal Reserve governor confided to me, it would be
very difficult - perhaps impossible - for the Fed to have an honest discussion
of monetary policy with Congress or the public because the level of ignorance
is so profound...
the Fed does not even have to confront intelligent scrutiny from those
the people have elected to represent them. That is, the Congress. In my
experience, congressional oversight hearings are usually a dispiriting
mixture of posturing and bile and trick questions that the Federal Reserve
governors find quite easy to fend off. It is hard to take most of the
congressional questioning seriously and not surprising that many at the
Federal Reserve do not."
for a commitment from your candidate to read the entire Memorandum
by Tommy Cryer, Attorney at Law. "There is no law making working
Americans liable for the income tax." Tommy Cryer.
is any discussion about federal jurisdiction from candidates and federal
goons running amok terrorizing family farms over things like raw milk?
Cutting government spending for existing unconstitutional cabinets
is no solution. Not to mention the out of control mass murderers
known as the Federal Drug Administration. All I see (and the examples
above are just a few of the dozens I've received) is the same old script
for votes. I have yet to read on any web site for congressional candidates
that I have checked, one word about getting the U.S. out of the communist
UN. Not one word. Not one line committing to stop all unconstitutional
foreign aid, stealing the fruits of your labor to give to other countries.
Too radical? The same thing was said of people like Patrick Henry.
voters don't want to know the truth and how government systems are set
up and why they continue to fail? Not all, but millions do. I learned
and then when I ran for Congress, I spent nearly three years campaigning
and educating during speeches, debates, breakfasts, lunches and dinner
events. People were hungry for the truth.
candidate doesn't understand our monetary system and lacks the courage
to take on the powerful banking families, he/she has unqualified to serve
in the U.S. House of Representatives. The same applies regarding the communist,
heavy progressive "income" tax. If they have no understanding
of Art. 1, Sec. 8 and the intent of those who wrote the U.S. Constitution,
they are not qualified to serve in the House. If the candidate has no
clue about federal jurisdiction (and it's up to the voters to ask questions),
he/she is not qualified to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives.
No candidate for the U.S. Senate has any legal right to run because I
have provided iron clad proof not enough states ratified the Seventeenth
I ask: How do you expect to "change things in Washington" if
you elect candidates who have no real knowledge of the core cancers killing
Liberal Legacy" by Joshua Green
http://www.devvy.com . You may also sign up for her free email alerts.
about the passengers of KAL Flight 007?
3- Will Bush Demand
Putin Release American Hostages?
007 (Sakhalin Incident) - Follow-up
Site Served by TheHostPros