- "Why is it significant that many of Bush's staff
and cabinet appointees are former pharmaceutical company executives as
was GW's father, former President George Bush? These corporations are voraciously
patenting the earth's life forms-its plants, bacteria, viruses, animals
and even human genetic lineages. Reproduction of plants, animals and humans
may eventually be totally controlled by these corporations, genetically-altered,
recombined into chimeric life forms and exploited for profit." Robert
Lederman
-
- GMO-salmon has caused an uproar but GMO-fish, altered
by the biotech industry, are already being sold, marketed as "pets."
-
- There is uproar over GMOs in the food supply but over
GMO vaccines, produced by the biotech/pharmaceutical industry and being
given to millions of children (23 of them, called DNA vaccines), being
marketed for "disease prevention," there is almost total
silence.
-
- Or is there?
-
- The biggest international story surrounding vaccines
today is the Lancet's removal, many years after its acceptance, of an article
by Dr. Andrew Wakefield and others investigating mitochondrial dysfunction
and digestive issues in autistic children.
-
- The allegations against Wakefield have already been proved
untrue and questions as to the connections between the journalist
making the allegations, the owner of the London Times, and the pharmaceutical
industry are coming to light. Wakefield is demanding a retraction
from the BMJ after documents proved his innocence.
-
- The question is what significant thing did Wakefield
touch on which has led to the almost unheard of - the removal many
years after publication of an accepted and peer reviewed article - and
his being drummed out of medicine in the UK?"
-
- The issue swirling around Wakefield was his allegedly
saying that the MMR vaccine causes autism. He did not say that. He and
his co-authors asked for further investigation into the condition of the
children and its possible relation to the MMR vaccine. Wakefield
did not recommend that parents stop giving their children vaccines for
measles, mumps or rubella, only to not take them in combination. (The
UK government immediately removed the single measles vaccine from the market,
voiding a less worrisome choice.)
-
- But is the MMR vaccine distinguishable from the single
vaccines not only in being a combination vaccine, but in another way? Is
it, in fact, a DNA vaccine? Those vaccines have affinity for the
DNA of the person receiving the vaccine, and can potentially affect their
DNA.
-
- It represents a whole new class of vaccines.
-
- Are the problems Wakefield wrote about not just related
to the MMR vaccine or even a DNA MMR vaccine, but endemic to all the DNA
vaccines - the third generation of vaccines? Below is background on these
DNA vaccines.
-
- It should be noted that the article from Wikipedia from
which this material is excerpted may come from the vaccine industry, which
makes admissions of unknowns more significant. The article begins
with: "Vaccines are among the greatest achievements of
modern medicine ..." while erroneously claiming " in
industrial nations, they have eliminated naturally-occurring cases of smallpox,
and nearly eliminated polio ... " when statistics
do not bear that out.
- Emphasis has been added.
- "First generation vaccines are whole-organism
vaccines either live and weakened, or killed forms.[2] Live,
attenuated vaccines, such as smallpox and polio vaccines, are able to induce killer
T-cell (TC or CTL) responses, helper T-cell (TH) responses
and antibody immunity. However, there is a small risk that
attenuated forms of a pathogen can revert to a dangerous form, and may
still be able to cause disease in immunocompromised people (such
as those with AIDS). While killed vaccines do not have this risk,
they cannot generate specific killer T cell responses, and may not work
at all for some diseases.
-
- "In order to minimise these risks, so-called second
generation vaccines were developed. These are subunit vaccines, consisting
of defined protein antigens (such as tetanus or diphtheria toxoid)
or recombinant [genetically engineered] protein components (such
as the hepatitis B surface antigen). These, too, are able to generate TH and
antibody responses, but not killer T cell responses.
-
- "DNA vaccines are third generation vaccines,
and are made up of a small, circular piece of bacterial DNA (called
a plasmid) that has been genetically engineered to produce
one or two specific proteins (antigens) from a pathogen. The vaccine DNA
is injected into the cells of the body, where the "inner machinery"
of the host cells "reads" the DNA and converts it into pathogenic
proteins. Because these proteins are recognised as foreign, when they are
processed by the host cells and displayed on their surface, the immune
system is alerted, which then triggers a range of immune responses.[1][2] These
DNA vaccines developed from "failed" gene therapy experiments.
...
-
- "It is not understood how these different methods
of DNA immunization, or the forms of antigen expressed, raise different
profiles of T-cell help.
-
- "When DNA uptake and subsequent expression was first
demonstrated in vivo in muscle cells,[37] it was
thought that these cells were unique in this ability [uptake of DNA] ... However,
subsequent research revealed that other cells (such as keratinocytes, fibroblasts and epithelial Langerhans
cells) could also internalize DNA.[30][39] This phenomenon has not
been the subject of much research, so the actual mechanism of DNA uptake
is not known.
-
- What does it mean to say cells "internalize DNA"?
Does this mean that the genetically engineered material being injected
into children becomes part of their own DNA? DNA is the very code
of life, and of everyone's existence. Are genetically engineered
DNA vaccines altering children's DNA?
-
- Is it possible that the driving issue behind the vicious
attacks on Wakefield which have so mystified people, is bigger than "autism
and the MMR vaccine"?
-
- Wakefield was broadening of the picture of "autism"
by investigating mitochondrial disfunction in autistic children. Would
he and fellow researchers have questions next about the children's DNA?
Would that bring them closer to issues of genetic engineering. Would
the question arise as to whether these children are so sick because they
have being contaminated at the level of their DNA by GMOs? And not
just any GMOs but ones built from segments of pathogenic viruses and animal
poxes.
-
- Wakefield and others were seeing mitochondrial disfunction.
Once one begins thinking in terms of genetic engineering, it might
be hard not to notice that
- mitochondrial dysfunction is a central problem in cloned
animals and in genetically engineered animals. for those promoting cloned
and GE-animals the dysfunction of mitochondria, the part of the cell that
provides energy for life, is not a small problem. Dysfunction of
mitochondria exposes that altering DNA is not working. "Tampering
with previously perfect DNA" would be more accurate to describe
"altering DNA" and it has thus far resulted in profoundly
defective beings.
-
- Is this not what parents of autistic children are saying
- something suddenly went terribly wrong with their previously perfectly
normal child?
-
- This is not to argue that only GMO-DNA vaccines
can produce damage a child severely. Microbiologist Shiv Chopra says
that vaccines are "cluster bombs" affecting every cell of
the body and violating the basics of biology. Cell microchemist Garth
Nicolson says they all are contaminated with mycoplasm that destroys cell
membranes. And vaccines contain one thing after another known to
harm.
-
- pestivirus
- mycoplasma
- viral fragments
- DNA fragments
- bacterial components
- adjuvants like
- squalene MF59 and ASO3
- thimerosal
- aluminum
- beta-propiolactone
- animal cancer cells
- nucleic-acid fragments
- live organisms
- pathogenic viruses
- simian cytomegalovirus
- ethylene glycol (antifreeze)
- Formaldehyde
- embalming fluids
- phenol (carbolic acid)
- antibiotics like Neomycin and streptomycin
- Pus fromm sores of diseased animals
- Horse Serum
- Calf Serum
- Fecal Matter
- Macerated Cancer Cells
- Sweepings from diseased children
- Lactalbumin hydrolysate Aluminum phospha
- Retro-virus (SV-40) - contaminant virus of some polio
vaccines
- Chick Embryo
- Sodium Phosphate
- Foreign animal tissues containing genetic material (DNA/RNA)
- from growth medium
-
-
- But GMO-DNA vaccines may be going beyond such damage,
to do something new in the history of mankind, something more rudimentary
- scrambling people's DNA code itself, and with pathogenic DNA.
-
- Is this where Wakefield's work may have taken on threatening
significance to those invested in GMOs, especially in GMO- DNA vaccines?
For DNA vaccines are not even mentioned in the vaccine debate though they
are current vaccines now. In investigating mitochondrial failure
in children taking the MMR vaccines, did Wakefield come too perilously
close to looking into whether these children's DNA was normal? And
from there, would it be only a small step to recognizing that their DNA
would have been altered by "DNA" vaccines?
-
- At that point, the association of GMO vaccines with mitochondrial
failures might bring up the mitochondrial dysfunction of cloned animals
and GMO-animals
-
- Things were already adding up.
-
- 1. There is no question now that autistic children
have mitochondrial dysfunction, a problem at the most fundamental
level of physiologic functions - production of energy.
- 2. Robin MacNeil described this as well on his
PBS autism series, which also implicated the MMR vaccine (as well
as the DTaP and HIb vaccines).
- 3. A retired pharmaceutical industry scientist
has done a study now linking autism to the new DNA vaccines.
- 4. Wakefield's work considered autism in relation
to the MMR vaccine, a new vaccine, most likely a DNA vaccine.
-
- Had Wakefield and the other researchers begun looking
at the DNA of the sick children? Is it altered? Did the
MMR - assuming it is a DNA vaccine - introduce foreign DNA into the child
which changed his or her own DNA code for the rest of his existence? Was
the child, in receiving an MMR injection, contaminated by GMOs, and at
the level of his or her DNA? Do the sick children now have pathogenic
material built into their DNA?
-
- If so, could one say accurately that the child has become
a genetically engineered organism?
-
- Wakefield simply wanted further investigation into the
MMR vaccines (never spoken of as a GMO-DNA vaccine) and autism. His
questioning the safety of the MMR led to inexplicably virulent media attacks
against him internationally, to the end of his stellar medical career,
and to his leaving his home country. What was done to him could certainly
be effective as a warning to any doctor or researcher to steer clear of
vaccine research and safety issues. Where did it come from? The
journalist who brought the charges did so under the aegis of the London
Times, owned by James Murdock, son of Rupert Murdock who controls a huge
international media empire. James Murdock joined the board of Glaxo
Smith Kline which manufacturers the MMR vaccine.
-
- In India, a bill proposed by the biotech industry, the
BRAI (Biotech Regulatory Authority of India), would treat those who question
as harshly as Wakefield, if not more so, but is explicit as to what should
be walled off from public questioning - GMOs. BRAI seeks prison for
anyone questioning the safety of GMOs, including in vaccines.
-
- Was Wakefield drummed out of medicine in the UK and is
he now experiencing ceaseless media attacks all the while not
even realizing his investigation of mitochondrial failure in autistic children
may have accidentally been the leading edge of questions into the safety
of a GMO-DNA MMR vaccine? For there is no question there are endlessly
complex problems once anyone begins playing with genes.
-
- Did Wakefield, unawares, come too close to exposing the
biologic failure of the first attempts to genetically modify people? Are
the dysfunctional children - mentally and biologically - the poster children
for GMO contamination of human beings via vaccines? Is the world
not just looking at autism but GMO-DNA experimentation on millions ...
and without informed consent?
-
- This would certainly throw into a cocked hat all mandated
vaccines, especially as most of the new ones are GMO-DNA vaccines. The
slew of legal "alterations" occurring around vaccines increases
safety concerns: the FDA has written a new rule allowing manufacturers
to insert or change any ingredient with the approval of only one person
at the FDA; all liability has been removed by the Supreme Court for the
manufacturers; and the FDA is arguing in court that the public has no fundamental
right to health. Bush, creating false fear around flu pandemics, introduced
state pandemic laws which mandate vaccines based solely on a declared emergency
by a suspect CDC. Logically, forcing vaccines on the entire population
would mean contaminating the DNA of millions of people.
-
- The world is already working to stop a biotech push for
GMOs in seed, fish, trees, in all kinds of food plants, etc. even as information
is flowing in on the dangers and failures, including Monsanto and
regulators having hid data since 1980 on birth defects. But the world,
in watching the push for GMOs - , has not yet realized
that the Gates' push for vaccines is also a push for GMOs.
-
- The concern around the first is of whole scale contamination
of nature. But now, with recognition that the new vaccines are GMO-DNA
vaccines, concern over whole scale contamination of human beings could
follow. Whole scale would be no exaggeration as Bill Gates, heavily
invested in Monsanto's GMOs, is also invested in GMO-DNA vaccines, and
he wants every newborn on earth registered for vaccination.
-
-
- Why have there been attacks on doctors investigating
the cause of severe illness in children and disparagement of parents asking
what happened to their once normal children after vaccines? If mitochondrial
dysfunction is linked to GMO-DNA vaccines and tampering with human DNA, what
is left of the vaccine industry's assertion of themselves as "humanitarians" working
for human health and vaccines as miracles of medicine?
-
- What could possibly be going on with vaccines that would
induce Bill Gates to go on TV to attempt to silence parents by accusing
them of killing children simply for questioning vaccines. What
was so important that international media would fraudulently discredit
Wakefield and his work?
-
- Is the uproar around Wakefield, actually an uproar over
GMOs?
-
- The world has been subjected to the corrupt insertion
of GMOs into food chain and nature. Keeping them unlabeled has trapped
people into a GMO experiment people have little way to avoid.
-
- Is the uproar over Wakefield meant to focus away from
an immense reality - that the vaccines being pushed on the world are also
GMOs, also "unlabeled" - a parallel on the medical side to what
is happening in food, but literally mandated and more dangerous?
-
- Is the Wakefield uproar meant to divert from the new vaccines
that alter DNA with GMOs?
-
- Are these GMA-DNA vaccines part of the largest, most
profound, on-going and forced experiments on human beings ever conducted?
|
