Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

 
rense.com
 

Dr. Andrew Wakefield And GMOs
By Richard Brown
6-22-11
 
"Why is it significant that many of Bush's staff and cabinet appointees are former pharmaceutical company executives as was GW's father, former President George Bush? These corporations are voraciously patenting the earth's life forms-its plants, bacteria, viruses, animals and even human genetic lineages. Reproduction of plants, animals and humans may eventually be totally controlled by these corporations, genetically-altered, recombined into chimeric life forms and exploited for profit."  Robert Lederman
 
GMO-salmon has caused an uproar but GMO-fish, altered by the biotech industry, are already being sold, marketed as "pets."  
 
There is uproar over GMOs in the food supply but over GMO vaccines, produced by the biotech/pharmaceutical industry and being given to millions of children (23 of them, called DNA vaccines), being marketed for "disease prevention," there is almost total silence.
 
Or is there?
 
The biggest international story surrounding vaccines today is the Lancet's removal, many years after its acceptance, of an article by Dr. Andrew Wakefield and others investigating mitochondrial dysfunction and digestive issues in autistic children.
 
The allegations against Wakefield have already been proved untrue and questions as to the connections between the journalist making the allegations, the owner of the London Times, and the pharmaceutical industry are coming to light.  Wakefield is demanding a retraction from the BMJ after documents proved his innocence.
 
The question is what significant thing did Wakefield touch on which has led to the almost unheard of -  the removal many years after publication of an accepted and peer reviewed article - and his being drummed out of medicine in the UK?"
 
The issue swirling around Wakefield was his allegedly saying that the MMR vaccine causes autism.  He did not say that.  He and his co-authors asked for further investigation into the condition of the children and its possible relation to the MMR vaccine.  Wakefield did not recommend that parents stop giving their children vaccines for measles, mumps or rubella, only to not take them in combination.  (The UK government immediately removed the single measles vaccine from the market, voiding a less worrisome choice.)
 
But is the MMR vaccine distinguishable from the single vaccines not only in being a combination vaccine, but in another way?  Is it, in fact, a DNA vaccine?  Those vaccines have affinity for the DNA of the person receiving the vaccine, and can potentially affect their DNA.
 
It represents a whole new class of vaccines.
 
Are the problems Wakefield wrote about not just related to the MMR vaccine or even a DNA MMR vaccine, but endemic to all the DNA vaccines - the third generation of vaccines? Below is background on these DNA vaccines.
 
It should be noted that the article from Wikipedia from which this material is excerpted may come from the vaccine industry, which makes admissions of unknowns more significant.  The article begins with:  "Vaccines are among the greatest achievements of modern medicine ..." while erroneously claiming "­ in industrial nations, they have eliminated naturally-occurring cases of smallpox, and nearly eliminated polio ... " when statistics do not bear that out.
Emphasis has been added.
"First generation vaccines are whole-organism vaccines ­ either live and weakened, or killed forms.[2]  Live, attenuated vaccines, such as smallpox and polio vaccines, are able to induce killer T-cell (TC or CTL) responses, helper T-cell (TH) responses and antibody immunity. However, there is a small risk that attenuated forms of a pathogen can revert to a dangerous form, and may still be able to cause disease in immunocompromised people (such as those with AIDS). While killed vaccines do not have this risk, they cannot generate specific killer T cell responses, and may not work at all for some diseases.
 
"In order to minimise these risks, so-called second generation vaccines were developed. These are subunit vaccines, consisting of defined protein antigens (such as tetanus or diphtheria toxoid) or recombinant [genetically engineered] protein components (such as the hepatitis B surface antigen). These, too, are able to generate TH and antibody responses, but not killer T cell responses.
 
"DNA vaccines are third generation vaccines, and are made up of a small, circular piece of bacterial DNA (called a plasmid) that has been genetically engineered to produce one or two specific proteins (antigens) from a pathogen. The vaccine DNA is injected into the cells of the body, where the "inner machinery" of the host cells "reads" the DNA and converts it into pathogenic proteins. Because these proteins are recognised as foreign, when they are processed by the host cells and displayed on their surface, the immune system is alerted, which then triggers a range of immune responses.[1][2] These DNA vaccines developed from "failed" gene therapy experiments. ...
 
"It is not understood how these different methods of DNA immunization, or the forms of antigen expressed, raise different profiles of T-cell help.
 
"When DNA uptake and subsequent expression was first demonstrated in vivo in muscle cells,[37] it was thought that these cells were unique in this ability [uptake of DNA] ... However, subsequent research revealed that other cells (such as keratinocytes, fibroblasts and epithelial Langerhans cells) could also internalize DNA.[30][39] This phenomenon has not been the subject of much research, so the actual mechanism of DNA uptake is not known.
 
What does it mean to say cells "internalize DNA"?  Does this mean that the genetically engineered material being injected into children becomes part of their own DNA?  DNA is the very code of life, and of everyone's existence.  Are genetically engineered DNA vaccines altering children's DNA?
 
Is it possible that the driving issue behind the vicious attacks on Wakefield which have so mystified people, is bigger than "autism and the MMR vaccine"?
 
Wakefield was broadening of the picture of "autism" by investigating mitochondrial disfunction in autistic children.  Would he and fellow researchers have questions next about the children's DNA?  Would that bring them closer to issues of genetic engineering.  Would the question arise as to whether these children are so sick because they have being contaminated at the level of their DNA by GMOs?  And not just any GMOs but ones built from segments of pathogenic viruses and animal poxes.
 
Wakefield and others were seeing mitochondrial disfunction.  Once one begins thinking in terms of genetic engineering, it might be hard not to notice that
mitochondrial dysfunction is a central problem in cloned animals and in genetically engineered animals.  for those promoting cloned and GE-animals the dysfunction of mitochondria, the part of the cell that provides energy for life, is not a small problem.  Dysfunction of mitochondria exposes that altering DNA is not working.  "Tampering with previously perfect DNA" would be more accurate to describe "altering DNA" and it has thus far resulted in profoundly defective beings.
 
Is this not what parents of autistic children are saying - something suddenly went terribly wrong with their previously perfectly normal child?
 
This is not to argue that only GMO-DNA vaccines can produce damage a child severely.  Microbiologist Shiv Chopra says that vaccines are "cluster bombs" affecting every cell of the body and violating the basics of biology.  Cell microchemist Garth Nicolson says they all are contaminated with mycoplasm that destroys cell membranes.  And vaccines contain one thing after another known to harm.
 
pestivirus
mycoplasma
viral fragments
DNA fragments
bacterial components
adjuvants like
squalene MF59 and ASO3
thimerosal
aluminum
beta-propiolactone
animal cancer cells
nucleic-acid fragments
live organisms
pathogenic viruses
simian cytomegalovirus
ethylene glycol (antifreeze)
Formaldehyde
embalming fluids
phenol (carbolic acid)
antibiotics like Neomycin and streptomycin
Pus fromm sores of diseased animals
Horse Serum
Calf Serum
Fecal Matter
Macerated Cancer Cells
Sweepings from diseased children
Lactalbumin hydrolysate Aluminum phospha
Retro-virus (SV-40) - contaminant virus of some polio vaccines
Chick Embryo
Sodium Phosphate
Foreign animal tissues containing genetic material (DNA/RNA) - from growth medium
 
 
But GMO-DNA vaccines may be going beyond such damage, to do something new in the history of mankind, something more rudimentary - scrambling people's DNA code itself, and with pathogenic DNA.
 
Is this where Wakefield's work may have taken on threatening significance to those invested in GMOs, especially in GMO- DNA vaccines? For DNA vaccines are not even mentioned in the vaccine debate though they are current vaccines now.  In investigating mitochondrial failure in children taking the MMR vaccines, did Wakefield come too perilously close to looking into whether these children's DNA was normal?  And from there, would it be only a small step to recognizing that their DNA would have been altered by "DNA" vaccines?
 
At that point, the association of GMO vaccines with mitochondrial failures might bring up the mitochondrial dysfunction of cloned animals and GMO-animals
 
Things were already adding up.
 
1.  There is no question now that autistic children have mitochondrial dysfunction, a problem at the most fundamental level of physiologic functions - production of energy.
2.  Robin MacNeil described this as well on his PBS autism series, which also implicated the MMR vaccine (as well as the DTaP and HIb vaccines).
3.  A retired pharmaceutical industry scientist has done a study now linking autism to the new DNA vaccines.
4.  Wakefield's work considered autism in relation to the MMR vaccine, a new vaccine, most likely a DNA vaccine.
 
Had Wakefield and the other researchers begun looking at the DNA of the sick children?  Is it altered?  Did the MMR - assuming it is a DNA vaccine - introduce foreign DNA into the child which changed his or her own DNA code for the rest of his existence?  Was the child, in receiving an MMR injection, contaminated by GMOs, and at the level of his or her DNA?  Do the sick children now have pathogenic material built into their DNA?
 
If so, could one say accurately that the child has become a genetically engineered organism?
 
Wakefield simply wanted further investigation into the MMR vaccines (never spoken of as a GMO-DNA vaccine) and autism.  His questioning the safety of the MMR led to inexplicably virulent media attacks against him internationally, to the end of his stellar medical career, and to his leaving his home country.  What was done to him could certainly be effective as a warning to any doctor or researcher to steer clear of vaccine research and safety issues.  Where did it come from?  The journalist who brought the charges did so under the aegis of the London Times, owned by James Murdock, son of Rupert Murdock who controls a huge international media empire.  James Murdock joined the board of Glaxo Smith Kline which manufacturers the MMR vaccine.
 
In India, a bill proposed by the biotech industry, the BRAI (Biotech Regulatory Authority of India), would treat those who question as harshly as Wakefield, if not more so, but is explicit as to what should be walled off from public questioning - GMOs.  BRAI seeks prison for anyone questioning the safety of GMOs, including in vaccines.
 
Was Wakefield drummed out of medicine in the UK and is he now experiencing ceaseless media attacks  all the while not even realizing his investigation of mitochondrial failure in autistic children may have accidentally been the leading edge of questions into the safety of a GMO-DNA MMR vaccine?  For there is no question there are endlessly complex problems once anyone begins playing with genes.
 
Did Wakefield, unawares, come too close to exposing the biologic failure of the first attempts to genetically modify people?  Are the dysfunctional children - mentally and biologically - the poster children for GMO contamination of human beings via vaccines?  Is the world not just looking at autism but GMO-DNA experimentation on millions ... and without informed consent?
 
This would certainly throw into a cocked hat all mandated vaccines, especially as most of the new ones are GMO-DNA vaccines.  The slew of legal "alterations" occurring around vaccines increases safety concerns:  the FDA has written a new rule allowing manufacturers to insert or change any ingredient with the approval of only one person at the FDA; all liability has been removed by the Supreme Court for the manufacturers; and the FDA is arguing in court that the public has no fundamental right to health. Bush, creating false fear around flu pandemics, introduced state pandemic laws which mandate vaccines based solely on a declared emergency by a suspect CDC.  Logically, forcing vaccines on the entire population would mean contaminating the DNA of millions of people.
 
The world is already working to stop a biotech push for GMOs in seed, fish, trees, in all kinds of food plants, etc. even as information is flowing in on the dangers and failures, including Monsanto and regulators having hid data since 1980 on birth defects.  But the world, in watching the push for GMOs -  , has not yet realized that the Gates' push for vaccines is also a push for GMOs.
 
The concern around the first is of whole scale contamination of nature.  But now, with recognition that the new vaccines are GMO-DNA vaccines, concern over whole scale contamination of human beings could follow.  Whole scale would be no exaggeration as Bill Gates, heavily invested in Monsanto's GMOs, is also invested in GMO-DNA vaccines, and he wants every newborn on earth registered for vaccination.
 
 
Why have there been attacks on doctors investigating the cause of severe illness in children and disparagement of parents asking what happened to their once normal children after vaccines?  If mitochondrial dysfunction is linked to GMO-DNA vaccines and tampering with human DNA, what is left of the vaccine industry's assertion of themselves as "humanitarians" working for human health and vaccines as miracles of medicine?
 
What could possibly be going on with vaccines that would induce Bill Gates to go on TV to attempt to silence parents by accusing them of killing children simply for questioning vaccines.  What was so important that international media would fraudulently discredit Wakefield and his work?
 
Is the uproar around Wakefield, actually an uproar over GMOs?
 
The world has been subjected to the corrupt insertion of GMOs into food chain and nature.  Keeping them unlabeled has trapped people into a GMO experiment people have little way to avoid.
 
Is the uproar over Wakefield meant to focus away from an immense reality - that the vaccines being pushed on the world are also GMOs, also "unlabeled" - a parallel on the medical side to what is happening in food, but literally mandated and more dangerous?
 
Is the Wakefield uproar meant to divert from the new vaccines that alter DNA with GMOs?
 
Are these GMA-DNA vaccines part of the largest, most profound, on-going and forced experiments on human beings ever conducted?
 
 
 
Disclaimer
 
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros