- The new (GMO-DNA) vaccines contain SV40.
-
- Wikipedia, in an article on DNA vaccination includes
this reference to SV40:
-
- "The SV40 promoter was conventionally
used until research showed that vectors driven by the Rous Sarcoma
Virus (RSV) promoter had much higher expression rates.[2] ... An
example of DNA vaccine plasmid is pVAC, it uses SV40 promoter.
-
-
- The SV40 Cancer Foundation, however, goes into more detail.
-
- "SV40 was the 40th virus found in rhesus monkey
kidney cells when these cells were used to make the polio vaccine. This
virus contaminated both the Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) created by
Dr. Jonas Salk and the Oral or "Live" Polio Vaccine (OPV) created
by Dr. Albert Sabin.
-
- "In 1961, SV40 was discovered by Dr. Bernice Eddy
of the National Institute of Health, Division of Biologics when she took
the material used to grow polio vaccines and injected it into hamsters.
Tumors grew in the hamsters. Her discovery was subsequently validated by
Drs. Maurice Hilliman and Benjamin Sweet of Merck.
-
-
- Children being fed sugar cubes with the oral polio vaccine. Circa
1961.
-
- "Upon the discovery that SV40 was an animal carcinogen
that had found its way into the polio vaccines, a new federal law was passed
in 1961 that required that no vaccines contain this virus. However,
this law did not require that SV40 contaminated vaccines be thrown away
or that the contaminated seed material (used to make all polio vaccines
for the next four decades) be discarded. As a result, known SV40 contaminated
vaccines were injected into children up until 1963. In addition, it has
been alleged that there have been SV40-contaminated batches of oral polio
vaccine administered to some children until the end of the 1990's.
-
- Dr. Robert Bell, once Vice President International Society
for Cancer Research at the British Cancer Hospital said:
-
- "The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous
increase in cancer has been vaccination."
-
- Hillerman, chief of vaccines at Merck not only validated
Bernice Eddy's discovery but he admitted that all Merck's vaccines contain
cancer viruses and other viruses and that their Hepatitis vaccine
caused the AIDS epidemic in the US.
-
- Dr. Larry Palevsky, a NY board certified pediatrician,
agrees as well that vaccines contain viruses and says that most of the
viruses in vaccines can not be removed.
-
- The new vaccines are GMO-DNA vaccines. The material
that they wish to inject has been genetically engineered (thus GMO) using
parts of viruses, cancers, animal poxes, and combined, and are then shot
or inhaled or injected into the body, to be "taken up by the DNA"
(thus DNA) . This material is meant to affect the body in the most fundamental
way possible, by affecting the very coding of the body (the DNA) which
controls functions for the existence of the person.
-
- And doesn't SV40's potential uptake by the child or adult's
DNA present a much graver danger than previously? Could this cancer
virus now become part of the body's coding itself?
-
- SV40 was removed by federal law. So, is against
federal law to introduce it into vaccines again? And is it not
an extreme threat to anyone taking the new vaccines, to have it taken up
by their DNA?
-
- Bill Gates wants every newborn on earth registered for
vaccination, with cell phones to alert parents as well as locate people.
-
- The Redmond, Wash.-based company's cofounder and chairman
envisioned collecting biometric information on babies via handsets and
transmitting the data to a central health registry, which could be used
to remind parents about vaccinations. GPS data from the phone could also
help guide medical personnel to remote locations to administer vaccines.
-
- Gates imagined trialing the program in areas with low
vaccination rates like Nigeria or northern India.
-
- "If you could register every birth on a cell phone-get
fingerprints, get a location-then you could systems to make sure the
immunizations happen," said Gates. ....
-
- Gate's plan didn't address the privacy implications of
a birth database, which could be more or less substantial depending on
how the information was structured.
-
- Bill Gates is heavily invested in the new vaccines, that
is the GMO-DNA vaccines. His plan would establish a global tracking
system of everyone on earth which includes biometric identity information.
While it clearly violates fundamental privacy rights as a prelude
to violating human rights (i.e. giving governments power to inject things
into anyone on earth in the name of "health"), Mr. Gates has
come up with a unique marketing device for his own products. His
plan arranges to track people down wherever they may be and force his products
on them via government agencies.
-
- One sees the downside in terms of health rather quickly.
Wouldn't every newborn, via the new vaccines, be injected with this
known cancer virus at birth (or with Rous Sarcoma Virus RSV-
another cancer virus) and then be injected with it or other viruses
many, many, many, many, many times more over the course of infancy, childhood,
adolescence and adulthood?
-
- Assuming that almost all parents want to protect their
children from cancer, wouldn't Mr. Gates' seeking to vaccinate every newborn
on the planet with his GMO-DNA vaccines with SV40, be reason for even more
parents and grandparents to reject vaccines. They are are already
doing so, not just because of the studied connection between vaccines and autism,
bowel disease, and mitochondrial dysfunction but because of personal
experience through knowing personally what has been happening to children
of friends, relatives and co-workers after vaccination.
-
- The article quoted above about Gates says "Unfortunately,
phones can't fight the ignorance that leads some Americans to leave their
children unvaccinated." Is the writer referring to Robin MacNeil's
daughter who said in her father's PBS series on autism that it
was after the MMR, DTap and Hib vaccines that her son became autistic?
One would assume she might be leaving her children unvaccinated after
that, not out of ignorance but out of direct, unmediated by media, information
of what happened after vaccination.
-
- The article concludes with these words: "The
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has given billions of dollars to charitable
causes, making the couple the most generous philanthropists in America."
Philanthropy is defined as the desire to promote the welfare of others,
expressed by the generous donation of money to good causes. But Mr.
Gates is doing quite the reverse. He would be using his money
to ensure that viruses proven to cause cancer would be injected into every
possible child on the planet and has devised a plan to try to make sure
none can escape. Mr. Gates would be hurting millions, perhaps billions,
helping international health agencies funded in fact by himself, to seize
their rights to control their own bodies and that of their children, while
guaranteeing himself profits with no end in sight. Were people to
become ill, he would make more money from selling yet more vaccines.
|
