- While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone
Orwellian redefinition.
-
- A "conspiracy theory" no longer means an event
explained by a conspiracy. Instead, it now means any explanation, or even
a fact, that is out of step with the government's explanation and that
of its media pimps.
-
- For example, online news broadcasts of RT have been equated
with conspiracy theories by the New York Times simply because RT reports
news and opinions that the New York Times does not report and the US government
does not endorse.
-
- In other words, as truth becomes uncomfortable for government
and its Ministry of Propaganda, truth is redefined as conspiracy theory,
by which is meant an absurd and laughable explanation that we should ignore.
-
- When piles of carefully researched books, released government
documents, and testimony of eye witnesses made it clear that Oswald was
not President John F. Kennedy's assassin, the voluminous research, government
documents, and verified testimony was dismissed as "conspiracy theory."
-
- In other words, the truth of the event was unacceptable
to the authorities and to the Ministry of Propaganda that represents the
interests of authorities.
-
- The purest example of how Americans are shielded from
truth is the media's (including many Internet sites') response to the large
number of professionals who find the official explanation of September
11, 2001, inconsistent with everything they, as experts, know about physics,
chemistry, structural engineering, architecture, fires, structural damage,
the piloting of airplanes, the security procedures of the United States,
NORAD's capabilities, air traffic control, airport security, and other
matters. These experts, numbering in the thousands, have been shouted
down by know-nothings in the media who brand the experts as "conspiracy
theorists."
-
- This despite the fact that the official explanation endorsed
by the official media is the most extravagant conspiracy theory in human
history.
-
- Let's take a minute to re-acquaint ourselves with the
official explanation, which is not regarded as a conspiracy theory despite
the fact that it comprises an amazing conspiracy. The official truth is
that a handful of young Muslim Arabs who could not fly airplanes, mainly
Saudi Arabians who came neither from Iraq nor from Afghanistan, outwitted
not only the CIA and the FBI, but also all 16 US intelligence agencies
and all intelligence agencies of US allies including Israel's Mossad, which
is believed to have penetrated every terrorist organization and which carries
out assassinations of those whom Mossad marks as terrorists.
-
- In addition to outwitting every intelligence agency of
the United States and its allies, the handful of young Saudi Arabians outwitted
the National Security Council, the State Department, NORAD, airport security
four times in the same hour on the same morning, air traffic control,
caused the US Air Force to be unable to launch interceptor aircraft, and
caused three well-built steel-structured buildings, including one not hit
by an airplane, to fail suddenly in a few seconds as a result of limited
structural damage and small, short-lived, low-temperature fires that burned
on a few floors.
-
- The Saudi terrorists were even able to confound the laws
of physics and cause WTC building seven to collapse at free fall speed
for several seconds, a physical impossibility in the absence of explosives
used in controlled demolition.
-
- The story that the government and the media have told
us amounts to a gigantic conspiracy, really a script for a James Bond film.
Yet, anyone who doubts this improbable conspiracy theory is defined into
irrelevance by the obedient media.
-
- Anyone who believes an architect, structural engineer,
or demolition expert who says that the videos show that the buildings are
blowing up, not falling down, anyone who believes a Ph.D. physicist who
says that the official explanation is inconsistent with known laws of physics,
anyone who believes expert pilots who testify that non-pilots or poorly-qualified
pilots cannot fly airplanes in such maneuvers, anyone who believes the
100 or more first responders who testify that they not only heard explosions
in the towers but personally experienced explosions, anyone who believes
University of Copenhagen nano-chemist Niels Harrit who reports finding
unreacted nano-thermite in dust samples from the WTC towers, anyone who
is convinced by experts instead of by propaganda is dismissed as a kook.
-
- In America today, and increasingly throughout the Western
world, actual facts and true explanations have been relegated to the realm
of kookiness. Only people who believe lies are socially approved and accepted
as patriotic citizens.
-
- Indeed, a writer or newscaster is not even permitted
to report the findings of 9/11 skeptics. In other words, simply to report
Professor Harrit's findings now means that you endorse them or agree with
them. Everyone in the US print and TV media knows that he/she will be
instantly fired if they report Harrit's findings, even with a laugh. Thus,
although Harrit has reported his findings on European television and has
lectured widely on his findings in Canadian universities, the fact that
he and the international scientific research team that he led found unreacted
nano-thermite in the WTC dust and have offered samples to other scientists
to examine has to my knowledge never been reported in the American media.
-
- Even Internet sites on which I am among the readers'
favorites will not allow me to report on Harrit's findings.
-
- As I reported earlier, I myself had experience with a
Huffington Post reporter who was keen to interview a Reagan presidential
appointee who was in disagreement with the Republican wars in the
Middle East. After he published the interview that I provided at his request,
he was terrified to learn that I had reported findings of 9/11 investigators.
To protect his career, he quickly inserted on the online interview
that my views on the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions could be dismissed
as I had reported unacceptable findings about 9/11.
-
- The unwillingness or inability to entertain any view
of 9/11 different from the official view dooms to impotence many Internet
sites that are opposed to the wars and to the rise of the domestic US police
state. These sites, for whatever the reasons, accept the government's
explanation of 9/11; yet, they try to oppose the "war on terror"
and the police state which are the consequences of accepting the government's
explanation. Trying to oppose the consequences of an event whose explanation
you accept is an impossible task.
-
- If you believe that America was attacked by Muslim terrorists
and is susceptible to future attacks, then a "war on terror"
and a domestic police state to root out terrorists become necessary to
make Americans safe. The idea that a domestic police state and open-ended
war might be more dangerous threats to Americans than terrorists is an
impermissible thought.
-
- A country whose population has been trained to accept
the government's word and to shun those who question it is a country without
liberty in its future.
|
