Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

 
rense.com
 

Some Of The Best Of Charlie Reese
4-28-11
 
On Gun Control 
 
Gun-control laws are an effort by elitists to control the people, whom they naturally fear.
 
This is borne out not only by the history of gun-control laws but by current practices. Efforts to ban the Saturday Night Specials are directed at poor people who cannot afford expensive guns. The claim that they are most often used in crime is a cover-up.
 
"Under the Gun: Weapons, Crime and Violence in America," one of the most extensive federally funded studies of the subject in recent years, found no conclusive evidence at all that criminals are any more prone to use cheap guns than expensive guns.
 
Modern gun-control laws cropped up in the post-Civil War South where the sale of cheap guns was prohibited -- obviously to keep them out of the hands of poor blacks and whites.
 
Laws that require permits to carry or to own can be used for elitist purposes. A study in New York City found that most gun permits are issued to the rich elite, such as the publisher of The New York Times, whose paper crusades for even more gun-control laws, and the husband of pop psychologist Dr. Joyce Brothers, who ridicules gun owners as people with feelings of sexual inadequacy. Of course, the common people who are the prey of criminals can't get them.
 
It was a great and significant thing when the framers of the Bill of Rights included the Second Amendment to guarantee that private American citizens could own and bear arms. Modern elitists who don't exactly have a great reputation for intellectual or moral honesty claim the founders only meant a National Guard. Of course, at the time there was no National Guard, only militias of which every able-bodied man was automatically a member. . . .
 
We have no rights that cannot be enforced. With one shot, the killer takes away your right to life; in one act, the burglar or robber takes away your right to property; and in one move, the rapist takes away the right to privacy in the most profound sense.
 
The Constitution intended that every American have rights and the arms to protect those rights. Elitists apparently believe that the Constitution is a means-tested document intended only for the affluent.
 
_______________
 
 
 
On Morality 
 
Years ago I had a conversation with a brilliant man who once had headed the Strategic Air Command (those are the folks who actually would fight a nuclear war).
 
I asked him what he thought about the future of the country, and the general said bluntly, "I wouldn't give you two cents for it."
 
He was prophetic. I wouldn't give you two cents for the future of any country that has turned morality upside down so that legitimate businesses now feel called upon to punish the Boy Scouts for the Scouts' high moral standards. I'm sorry to say that my own newspaper is among them.
 
The problem with adopting the position, which states that the only sin is disagreeing with the proposition that there is no sin, is that it leaches into every aspect of a nation's existence.
 
Everything people do or don't do, say or don't say, is a result of their moral code. Whether a worker is conscientious or sloppy is a moral decision on the part of the worker. Whether a soldier obeys his oath is a moral decision. Whether people take care of their families or abuse them is a moral decision.
 
In America's flight from morality, people have turned to a self-appointed secular priesthood of social workers, psychologists and propagandists for special-interest groups to tell them what is right or wrong. The common theme of the secular priesthood is that individuals aren't responsible for their actions.
 
 
 
Disclaimer
 
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros