- Because the videos show that an JSTAR E-10 MC2A was the
supposed Super-Powered 'Commercial Airliner'.
-
- Even if true, unlike Proven Mini Nukes, It means nothing
in the big picture of how it was actually done or actual evidence of anything
other than the fact the videos are fake. Doesn't mean anything as to whether
or not planes were actually used.
-
- Of course, for this premise of 'fake' video proving anything,
one must also believe that during planning...someone says, since the plan
is to use hijacked airliners, "Hey, let's not use real planes. Let's
truck the plane parts in, crews to lay them out, people to say they saw
planes, etc, et al, and just make some fake videos of planes going into
the towers. Now, when we make these fake videos, instead of photoshopping
in a commercial airliner with windows, we'll photoshop in the plane needed
to actually do it." Everybody high fives and says 'yeah, it's just
our lives on the line for treason.'
-
- Next day, the moron is no longer a threat... most likely
scenario, taken out by their own family out of fear they'd all be taken
out. It's ludicrous on multiple levels.. Not just one.
-
- It's only important if one NEEDS to disprove that something
other than a SUPER POWERED IRREGULAR SHAPED COMMERCIAL AIRLINER FLEW INTO
THE WTCS - INDIRECTLY.
-
- JSTAR E-10 MC2A
-
- http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&q=JSTAR%20E%2010%20MC2A&
um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&biw=1353&bih=830
-
- Evaluation of Video Footage - for wtc comparisons...
http://911review.org/Wiki/Wtc2PlanePod.shtml
-
- Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvment http://www.rense.com/general92/pr911.htm
- has link for Ivy Flats Video
|
