- The Recent Micro Nukes (WMD) in the WTC Bogus Science
-
- Two recent articles regarding the above are examined
very briefly.
-
- http://www.henrymakow.com/beware_bogus_9-11_truth_theori.html
-
- http://www.henrymakow.com/was_the_wtc_demolished_by_mini.html
-
- Interesting how what has been described by Bill Deagle
MD and Jeff Rense as the best presentation/comprehension of information
on the WTC on the web is NEVER ADDRESSED. Nope, seems they only want to
deal with 'others' articles, all of which somehow seem to have easily seen,
ludicrous, easily disproven Bogus Science - a ready made poison pill to
discredit micro nukes.
-
- Virtually all of the WTC residue has been accounted for
in my articles and it is classic, textbook, nuclear reaction residue. In
over 2 years, only one reference has been scientifically refuted - Thermite
and that was by me.
-
-
- The US Government's Usage of Atomic Bombs - Domestic
- WTC
-
- http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/09/25/ward.htm
-
-
-
- Update: The US Government's Usage of Atomic Bombs - Domestic
- WTC
-
- http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/03/05/ward.htm
-
-
-
- The 'Traces Of Tritium' WTC 9-11 Lie Is Obstruction Of
Justice By Accessories To Murder
-
- http://www.rense.com/general85/911.htm
-
- Recently Declassified Video of Testing of the First Micro
Nuke - The Davey Crockett - 0.018 kiloton
-
- YouTube- Declassified U.S. Nuclear Test Film #32
-
-
- This .018 kiloton micro nuke video shows that a .018
kiloton micro nuke could easily have been basically contained with the
WTCs.
-
- The data presented is an above ground detonation. Its
crude design would have been unfocused and would have been no where near
as clean as a 3rd (neutron) or fourth generation nuke. Based on this referenced
proven data, the size of an underground, focused, Minimum Residual Radiation
- http://www.thepriceo.../09/25/ward.htm - micro nuke explosion
could have been 2 or 3 times as powerful and still been basically contained
by the WTC buildings, possibly as large a 1 kiloton, but believe that would
be about the maximum that could be used and still be effectively hidden.
-
- Ed Ward, MD
-
-
- http://www.rense.com...ral87/micro.htm
-
- Recently Declassified Video of Testing of the First Micro
Nuke - The Davey Crockett - 0.018 kiloton
-
- YouTube- Declassified U.S. Nuclear Test Film #32
-
-
- This .018 kiloton micro nuke video shows that a .018
kiloton micro nuke could easily have been basically contained with the
WTCs.
-
- The data presented is an above ground detonation. Its
crude design would have been unfocused and would have been no where
near as clean as a 3rd (neutron) or fourth generation nuke. Based on this
referenced proven data, the size of an underground, focused, Minimum Residual
Radiation - http://www.thepriceo.../09/25/ward.htm - micro nuke
explosion could have been 2 or 3 times as powerful and still been basically
contained by the WTC buildings, possibly as large a 1 kiloton, but believe
that would be about the maximum that could be used and still be effectively
hidden.
-
-
- Ed Ward, MD
-
-
- http://www.rense.com...ral87/micro.htm
-
-
- The Bogus Science (BS)
- Of 'Explosive SuperThermite' Versus The Facts Of A 'Deflagration
Compound'
-
- http://www.rense.com/general77/geddno.htm
-
-
- Recently Declassified Video of Testing of the First Micro
Nuke - The Davey Crockett - 0.018 kiloton
-
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nv_q8q6Z9_I
-
- Thermite?
-
- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/484
-
-
- 'Understanding The Scam of Thermite on 911' by 'Dick'
Eastman/'Dr.' Jones
- A simple rebuttal to the lunacy of http://www.rense.com/general86/therm.htm
-
- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/481
|
