Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!


The Incredible Jewish 'Holocaust'
Facts And Opinions Raise Serious Issues

From Jason Collett
It's Now Official - There Is No Actual Shortage  
'The Israeli Prime Minister's office recently put the number of "living Holocaust survivors" at nearly a million' (extract from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York, published by Verso, London and New York, 2000, p.83). [Google 'Holocaust survivor']
Elie Wiesel vs Encyclopaedia Britannica
Wiesel has been one of the most prominent spokesman for the very sizeable group of people known as Holocaust survivors. Wiesel has chaired the US Holocaust Memorial Council and has been the recipient of a Congressional Gold Medal and Nobel Peace Prize.. 
Time Magazine, March 18 1985:
'How had he survived two of the most notorious killing fields [Auschwitz and Buchenwald] of the century? "I will never know" Wiesel says. "I was always weak. I never ate. The slightest wind would turn me over. In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 to their deaths every day. I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?"
Compare this with Encyclopaedia Britannica (1993), under 'Buchenwald':
"In World War II it held about 20,000 prisoners.. Although there were no gas chambers, hundreds perished monthly through disease, malnutrition, exhaustion, beatings and executions."
"A Terrible Fraud" - Wiesel Ignores Palestinians
Churchill And Eisenhower Reported NOTHING About A 'Holocaust'
"I've checked out the six volumes of Churchill's Second World War and - not a single mention of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war.
Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; Churchill's Second World War totals 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle's three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. 
In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war."
Interesting Arithmetic - The Incredible Numbers
Have a look at a typical account by one of the seemingly endless number of survivors: Olga Lengyel's Five Chimneys: a woman survivor's true story of Auschwitz(Granada/ Ziff-Davis, 1947, 1972).
According to Lengyel, 'After June, 1943, the gas chamber was reserved exclusively for Jews and Gypsies.. Three hundred and sixty corpses every half-hour, which was all the time it took to reduce human flesh to ashes, made 720 per hour, or 17,280 corpses per twenty-four hour shift. And the ovens, with murderous efficiency, functioned day and night. However, one must also reckon the death pits, which could destroy another 8,000 cadavers a day. In round numbers, about 24,000 corpses were handled each day. An admirable production record, one that speaks well for German industry.' (Paperback edition, pp80-81). [No trace of any remains of or in 'death pits' has been found.]
This implies almost 100,000 corpses per four working days, or a million in 40 days, or six million in 240 days (eight months). Notice the bald precision of the figures without any explanation, the utter confidence in the reader's credulity.
The blurb on the cover of the book quotes the New York Herald-Tribune: "Passionate, tormenting". Albert Einstein, the promoter of the US construction of the bombs used at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is quoted as offering "You have done a real service by letting the ones who are now silent and most forgotten speak."
Could this claim be a misprint?
Kitty Hart, in spite of her name a Jewish survivor born in Poland, fully confirms these figures:
'Working around the clock, the four units together could dispose of about 18,000 bodies every twenty-four hours, while the open pits coped with a further 8,000 in the same period.' (p 118; Return to Auschwitz - paperback edition by Granada (1981, 1983).
According to the cover blurb, 'The subject of the award-winning Yorkshire television documentary of the same name.' 'Both engaging and harrowingan important addition to the growing holocaust literature, very little of which conveys so courageously both the daily torment and the will to survive' ­ Martin Gilbert, The Times.
'Sir' Martin Gilbert, indefatigable Jewish campaigner on behalf of the 'Holocaust' and biographer of Winston Churchill, adds to the rich flavour and makes his own numerical claims, certainly not without chutzpah:
In his book Auschwitz and the Allies (1981) he states
'The deliberate attempt to destroy systematically all of Europe's Jews was unsuspected in the spring and early summer of 1942: the very period during which it was at its most intense, and during which hundreds of thousands of Jews were being gassed every day at Belzec, Chelmo, Sobibor and Treblinka.' (p.26). [This statement, first noticed by Professor Robert Faurisson, was then deleted (not corrected) from the next edition - no simple typo, no simple error with omission or spelling or grammar, just a case of being caught red-handed in blatant chutzpah deluxe.]
If we assume a minimum figure of 200,000 per day, this amounts to say a million a five-day working week, or 6 million in six weeks, and this does not include the amazing claims for Auschwitz put forward by Hart and Lengyel with Gilbert's blessing.
I sent the above note about the lies of Elie Wiesel to an anti-zionist contact in New York,
and this is the reply I received:
ha ha ha ! 
Well, here it is - 
"Genetically" speaking I am what is commonly called a "Jew". 
My last name is "_____", which was pronounced as "_____" over in the territory onced called "Austro-Hungaria". 
On my mother's side of the of my family I am genetically tied to the "_____" bloodline, which is "Jewish" and has been here in America-Land, i.e. NY, i.e. "Manhattan", which initially was the Dutch Colony called "New Amsterdam". In point of fact they WERE "money changers", ha ha ha ! 
Back when "Haarlem" (which is Dutch for "Lovely Meadows") was pasture farmland. 
So what does all this stuff have to do with the price of potatoes? 
Ha Ha Ha! So glad you asked! 
Throughout my life, I was inculcated with "Jewish Tradition". My upbringing was notably Christian, but many Bat Mitzvahs, etc, also comprised my life too. During the easter season, having a Passover Dinner with all the rituals was law. 
Whether family members are Orthodox, moderate, or Conservative, or even Rabbis!.. NONE of them spoke of "Death Camps"...."People being thrown alive into Ovens (the so-called Holocaust or "Shoah"), and other utter nonsense. As for Gas Chambers, initially, people laughed at that nonsense. 
In the early 1970's, there was a "Nazi Parade" in Illinois, where the "New Official Holocaust" pronouncements were made. I clearly remember the consternation within my family that these remarks caused. I had many relatives who SURVIVED the Nazi work camps, which was what they were called before this event. 
You have to know that the Orthodox Jew members of my family don't think that the state of "Israel" should even exist! They await for an Act of God to precipitate the return of the Jews to " Israel". 
When they heard of this "new history" about a "Holocaust" they simply went bonkers. 
Many arguments happened and many family ties were broken over this revisionist history. 
Now it is decades later and the divide within my famliy is total and permanent. 
The "new History" is now the "Official History" and we are all worse off because of this fact. 
Soon an "Anti-Hate Law" will be in effect. 
That means that I, a "Genetic jew", who was raised a Lutheran, will PERHAPS be able to express my thoughts, but WILL be labelled a "Self-Hating Jew", and probably in need of psych-meds. 
That is the long and the short of it. 
I am Christian, by the way, and believe that Christ came FOR the jews.....as well as all the rest of the peoples on Planet Earth. 
But don't tell any Jew that..!! 
You will then be an "Anti-Semite"...whatever. 
It is all a crock of shit, and will serve no good purpose, this "revamping" of actual history. 
As for the Irgun and other Jewish Terrorist groups during the "founding of Israel", older relatives told me of their shock and disgust, when word came out about their activities. 
Once again, whatever. 
Simply puty, we are ALL rapidly "Going to Hell in a Hand-Basket", much to my dismay. And there seems to be no one that can do anything about that sad fact at all. 
I'd post a video about my thoughts concerning this but I fear the usual indirect and direct physical terror tactics from the ADL, the JDL and other extremist domestic Zionist terror groups. 
Godless Zionists do NOT care about "religious Jews" at all. As for "Genetic jews" like myself, they care even less. 
You have to recall that Zionists brushed off massive deaths of non-Zionist Jews during WWII. 
They were glad these deaths happened because they provided an impetus for Jewish migration into Palestine. 
And there are too many records of their thoughts on this matter to dismiss out of hand. 
that's it ! 
Back to work.
Followup to this received from Professor David O'Connell at Georgia State University:
Hi Jason,
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. This man is telling it like it is. When I was a kid growing up in Brooklyn in the late 1940's and 1950s, many of the local, small businesses were owned by Jews who had come out of the camps. Candy store, dry cleaners, soda fountain, kosher butcher, podiatrist, oculist. I played with their kids. NEVER, ever, was there any talk of this Holocaust stuff. In fact, my parents, relatives and the people on my block thought the Nuremberg show trial was just that: a show that was used to justify the crimes we had inflicted on the Germans. I remember going to the movies every Sat as a kid and seeing in the newsreels what we had done to these poor people in the name of "civilization." I asked my parents where the people who had lived in these burned, flattened cities had gone, and they set about educating me at a very tender age. 
Nuremberg was a state propaganda effort to brainwash us into believing that the Germans deserved what they got. But the only folks who actually believe all that nonsense are the social elites beholden to the tribe.
Regards -
Problems at Treblinka
A detailed forensic examination of the site of the wartime Treblinka camp, using sophisticated electronic ground radar, has found no evidence of mass graves there.
For six days in October 1999, an Australian team headed by Richard Krege, a qualified electronics engineer, carried out an examination of the soil at the site of the former Treblinka II camp in Poland, where, Holocaust historians say, more than half a million Jews were put to death in gas chambers and then buried in mass graves.
According to the Encyclopedia of the Holocaust (1997), for example, "a total of 870,000 people" were killed and buried at Treblinka between July 1942 and April 1943. Then, between April and July 1943, the hundreds of thousands of corpses were allegedly dug up and burned in batches of 2,000 or 2,500 on large grids made of railway ties.
Krege's team used an $80,000 Ground Penetration Radar (GPR) device, which sends out vertical radar signals that are visible on a computer monitor. GPR detects any large-scale disturbances in the soil structure to a normal effective depth of four or five meters, and sometimes up to ten meters. (GPR devices are routinely used around the world by geologists, archeologists, and police.) In its Treblinka investigation, Krege's team also carried out visual soil inspections, and used an auger to take numerous soil core samples.
The team carefully examined the entire Treblinka II site, especially the alleged "mass graves" portion, and carried out control examinations of the surrounding area. They found no soil disturbance consistent with the burial of hundreds of thousands of bodies, or even evidence that the ground had ever been disturbed. In addition, Krege and his team found no evidence of individual graves, bone remains, human ashes, or wood ashes.
"From these scans we could clearly identify the largely undisturbed horizontal stratigraphic layering, better known as horizons, of the soil under the camp site," says the 30-year old Krege, who lives in Canberra. "We know from scans of grave sites, and other sites with known soil disturbances, such as quarries, when this natural layering is massively disrupted or missing altogether." Because normal geological processes are very slow acting, disruption of the soil structure would have been detectable even after 60 years, Krege noted.
While his initial investigation suggests that there were never any mass graves at the Treblinka camp site, Krege believes that further work is still called for.
"Historians say that the bodies were exhumed and cremated toward the end of the Treblinka camp's use in 1943, but we found no indication that any mass graves ever existed," he says. "Personally, I don't think there was a mass extermination camp there at all."
Krege prepared a detailed report on his Treblinka investigation. He says that he would welcome the formation, possibly under United Nations auspices, of an international team of neutral, qualified specialists, to carry out similar investigations at the sites of all the wartime German camps.
My Favorite Elie Wiesel Stories
.. She explained that she had taken classes in Holocaust studies at Harvard and felt she had a good background on the subject. I wasn't talking to someone who was in the dark about what the Holocaust had been. I wanted to know what texts were followed in her classes but somehow she was unable to name them. She did recall the name of Raul Hilberg, and I was able to give her the title of his book, The Destruction of the European Jews.
"But the writer who influenced me most is Elie Wiesel."
"Is that right?" I said. "We have something in common then. I don't know who has influenced me more in the way I regard Holocaust literature than Elie Wiesel."
"Is that right?" she said enthusiastically, turning in her seat toward me.
"He's not a historian though, is he?"
She considered the question thoughtfully, "Not in a strict sense."
I told her some of my favourite Elie Wiesel stories. I started with the one where he writes that there is evidence that when some Russians were executed at Babi Yar in Ukraine that the cadavers of those who were Jews, in a unique protest against their ill treatment, spurted geysers of blood from their graves for months after they were buried.
"He wrote that in Jews of Silence," I said, "In a straight book of journalism about Soviet Jews and the refusal of the State to allow them to emigrate. Its not a book of poetry, straight journalism. What do you think about a man who would repeat such a claim? Wiesel writes in long hand in French. His wife translates his stuff into English. Presumably Wiesel goes over the translation. The translation is typeset and presumably Wiesel goes over the galleys. When he claims that the Jewish cadavers spurt geysers of blood from their graves for months after they were buried it isn't a slip of the pen. Wiesel believes that it's a credible story. He wants you and me to believe it's credible. He wants the kids he teaches at Boston University to believe it's credible. It isn't only that Wiesel is not a historian. There may be other things as well that he is not. He may not be wrapped too tight, for example."
The girl didn't say anything.
I told her some more of Elie Wiesel stories. I took them largely from his recommended reading list of survivor eyewitness testimonies. I told them as amusingly as I could, and as gently as I could. As I went along I introduced a few observations about the gas chamber stories from a Revisionist perspective. Occasionally she would smile or ask a question, but as I talked on she grew increasingly silent. After three or four hundred miles I had the feeling I had said enough, but I couldn't stop myself. The longer I talked the more investment I had in wanting her to see what good sense I was making.
I told her about how Wiesel especially recommends the eyewitness testimony of Yankiel Wiernik as evidence for the gas chambers at Treblinka and the extermination there of about a million Jews. I told her how Wiernik claims that he saw with his own eyes how the cadavers of pregnant Jewish women that had been exterminated would burst open while they were being crematedtheir bellies would burst openand that inside their wombs you could see their fetuses burning like torches.
I said, "Here is the question I think Elie Wiesel's students should pose to him: As the Americans and the British each specialized in burning alive German and Japanese women by the ten thousands in mass terror bombings, and as there are no reports that pregnant German or Japanese women were able to mount such displays with their own wombs and fetuses while their own bodies were in flames, as Yankiel Wiernik ­ is Elie Wiesel ­ suggesting that only Jewish ladies have the talent for it? What is it that Wiesel is attempting to suggest when he recommends Wiernik's eyewitness testimony to his students at Boston University? What does he reveal about his standards for historical objectivity? What does he reveal about his inner life?"
At that moment the girl took her head in both hands, put her face on her knees and moaned: "I just feel like I'm being proselytized," she said. She shook her head slowly from side to side, still holding it in both hands, doubled over in her seat.
Extract from Confessions of a Holocaust Revisionist
By Bradley R. Smith
Another wonderfully far-fetched tale of the 'Holocaust'...
Why One Auschwitz Survivor Avoided Doctors for 65 Years
By Christoph Schult
Sixty-five years ago, infamous Auschwitz doctor Josef Mengele removed Yitzhak Ganon's kidney without anesthesia. The Greek-born Jew swore never to see a doctor again -- until a heart attack last month brought his horrific tale into the open.
To: letters@nytimes.com
Sent: Sun, Dec 13, 2009 9:16 am
Subject: '' Yitzhak Ganon ''
To The Editor:
Let me see if I understand the article that appeared in today's Times about Holocaust survivor Yitzhak Ganon's aversion to doctors. ( ''Heart Treated, Old Wound Opened'' :  NY Times , Dec. 13, 2009 ). According to the article Yitzhak was so traumatized by having his kidney removed by the infamous Dr. Mengele without anesthesia some 65 years ago while an inmate at Auschwitz that he refused to ever visit a doctor again. ''Mr. Ganon was tied down on a table, and without anesthesia was cut open by Dr. Mengele, who then removed a kidney. ''I saw the kidney pulsating in his hand and cried like a crazy man '' Mr. Ganon said.
Although expected when dealing with claims of Holocaust survivors, it is still astonishing that, that the America's so-called ''newspaper of record''  would set aside accepted practices and procedures of journalism and not challenge such an outrageous assertion. For one thing , a ''removed kidney would not pulsate'', but more importantly a kidney removal without anesthesia would have most certainly killed him. To its credit the Times story omitted another claim reported by some of the wire service versions of the story that he was sent back to work within days of the operation. Neither did the Times include the claim that the reason he survived was  that he was # 201 on the line for the gas chamber whose capacity was 200. (Shouldn't he then have been the first to go with the next batch of 200? )   -- giuseppe furioso
Fake Holocaust Memoir Competition
To be sure, false Holocaust memoirs are hardly a recent phenomenon (Next time, Art Spiegelman, do a little research-there was no concentration camp called "Mauschwitz."). But in recent years, they seem to have become both more common and more crappy. It's no longer enough to simply say you were in a concentration camp, like Fauxlocaust survivor Benjamin Wilkomirski. No, now you need to have been led across Europe by wolves, or have a chance encounter years later that results in your marriage to the hidden Jewish girl who saved you. Bad enough that these assorted frauds and lunatics should spew this nonsense, but do they have to do such a bad job of it? Have they no shame?
The answer, of course, is that they don't. And so while the rest of the world may turn away or offer the occasional book deal, we cannot remain silent (much less offer a book deal). What we can-no, must-do, is confront this dangerous trend the only way we know how-with a self-aggrandizing and somewhat offensive publicity stunt.
And thus, we unveil the Heeb Magazine Fake Holocaust Memoir Competition. Simply write a fake Holocaust Memoir recounting your tale of Holocaust survival, get it to us by April 1, and let us do the rest, which, in this case, involves reading your submissions choosing a winner, announcing the winner on Yom Hashoah (April 21) and publishing the winning entry in the subsequent issue of Heeb. You're reading that correctly. You could be published in Heeb Magazine, and who knows-maybe you could be on Oprah, too?
Contest Rules
1. All entries must be received by April 1, 2009.
2. Entries should be emailed to info@heebmagazine.com with the subject line "Heeb Fake Holocaust Memoir Competition" or sent to: Heeb Fake Holocaust Memoir Competition, P.O. Box 687, New York, New York, 10012.
3. Entries may be of any length, but we should tell you that our years of watching TV have really shot our attention span all to hell.
4. Although real Holocaust survivors may enter, the memoirs themselves must be fake.
5. No erotic fan fiction
6. No close friends or relatives of Alex Trebek
7. We reserve the right to mock any and all entries.
8. We reserve the right to publish and mock the winning entry.
9. "Memoirs" shall be defined as a form of writing, not a collage, short film or interpretive dance piece.
10. Jewdar will be the sole arbitrator of entries, and will decide the winner. Don't be too shocked if it's Jewdar's.
11. No parking baby. No parking on the dance floor.
12. No use of the words "tumescent," "engorged" or "moist," unless they are referring to cake
13. No previously published fake Holocaust memoirs
14. All entries must be the original creations of the entrant.
15. We are not liable for anything, anytime, anywhere, no givesies backsies, infinity.
jewdar | Posted on February 09, 2009
Bradley R. Smith - CODOH
Website of Holocaust revisionist Bradley R. Smith and the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH). CODOH encourages a free and open debate on the  holocaust.
"Revisionism means nothing more or less than the effort to correct the historical record."
...Harry Elmer Barnes
America's most successful revisionist activist, Bradley Smith, writes simply but strongly on how the Holocaust taboo blinds professors, journalists, politicians, and the human rights community to their responsibilities to encourage a free flow of ideas. In this Blog Smith reveals himself in the light of day in a way that his most vociferous critics would not dream of attempting. They have their reasons.
The Holocaust Controversy - A Case for open Debate
Is asking questions a crime? If you develop doubts about the Holocaust, isn't the only way to get rid of these doubts by asking questions? A lot of individuals and groups are enraged by those who ask critical questions about the Holocaust. These doubters, who call themselves Revisionists, are often defamed as "Holocaust deniers."
Every other historical issue is debated as a matter of course, but influential pressure groups have made the Holocaust story an exception. Anyone should be encouraged to investigate critically the Holocaust story in the same way they are encouraged to investigate every other historical event. This is not a radical point of view. The culture of critique was developed millennia ago by Greek philosophers like Socrates, and was renewed centuries ago during the Enlightenment.
Revisionists agree with establishment historians that the German National Socialist State singled out the Jewish people for special and cruel treatment. In addition to viewing Jews in the framework of traditional anti-Semitism, the National Socialists also saw them as being an influential force behind international communism and behind the so-called international "finance capital," which they held responsible for the worldwide economic crisis and for the impoverishment of German workers. During World War II, Jews were considered to be enemies of the German State and a potential danger to its war efforts, much like the Germans, Italians, and Japanese were viewed in the U.S. Consequently, Jews were stripped of their rights, forced to live in ghettos, conscripted for labor, deprived of their property, deported, and otherwise mistreated. Many tragically perished.
In contrast to establishment historians, Revisionists claim that the German State had NO policy to exterminate the Jewish people (or anyone else) in homicidal gas chambers or by killing them through abuse or neglect. Revisionists also maintain that the figure of six million Jewish deaths is an irresponsible exaggeration, and that no execution gas chambers existed in any camp in Europe which was under German control. Fumigation gas chambers, both stationary and mobile, did exist to delouse clothing and equipment to prevent disease at POW, labor, and concentration camps and at the fighting front. It is highly likely that it was from this lifesaving procedure that the myth of extermination gas chambers emerged.
We've all seen "The Photographs." Endlessly. Newsreel photos taken by U.S. and British photographers at the liberation of the German camps, and especially the awful scenes at Dachau, Buchenwald, and Bergen-Belsen. For instance, look at the one at the top of this leaflet. These photos and films are usually presented in a way in which it is either stated or implied that the scenes resulted from deliberate German policies. The photographs are real, but their interpretation is false.
Even mainstream historians admit that there was no German policy at any of those camps to kill the internees. In the last months of the war, while Soviet armies were invading Germany from the east, British and U.S. bombers were destroying every major city in Germany with saturation bombing. Transportation, the food distribution system, medical, and sanitation services all broke down. That was the purpose of these air raids, which was the most barbaric form of warfare in Europe since the Mongol invasion.
Millions of refugees fleeing the Soviet armies were pouring into central and western Germany. As a result of the ongoing war, of starvation, and epidemics, millions of civilians were dying all over Germany. The camps were not exempted from this tragedy. Camps that were still under German control were overcrowded with internees evacuated from the east. By early 1945, these inmates suffered from malnutrition and epidemics like typhus and cholera, to which many succumbed. When the press entered the camps with British and U.S. soldiers, they found the results of that. They took "The Photographs."

Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


This Site Served by TheHostPros