- Regarding the queens speech to the United Nations, we
were told by the British Mission to the United Nations that the queen "Will
be taking a global perspective. She will touch on progress made since she
was last here and challenges that remain."
-
- For a woman who says she is not head of any country-only
titular head of state of 16 countries including Australia, Canada and New
Zealand and the nominal representative of 54 governments in the British
Commonwealth, who is fooling who? Why should be the people of the world
listen to a little old lady from Britain? The answer is because her hereditary
demands it.
-
- The visit by the queen, which was billed as low key-a
five hour visit-was designed to get the global agenda of sustainable development
and climate control back on track and to make a statement. Nothing the
queen does is low key as every visit, and every word has a meaning and
a goal for total control.
-
- First let's take a look at the queen herself. According
to Who Owns the World by Kevin Cahill, the queen is the legal owner of
6,600 million acres of land that equals one sixth of the earth's non-ocean
surface. She is the only person on earth who owns whole countries and who
owns countries that re not her own domestic territory. This land ownership
is separate from her role as head of state and is different from other
monarchies-like Norway, Belgium, and Denmark, where no such claim is made.
The value of her holdings is approximately $33T, more than the estimated
value of all of the earth's natural resources which is estimated to be
$25T.
-
- Secondly, the physical structure of the United Nations
and its agenda represents the completion of the dream and aspirations of
British aristocrat Cecil Rhodes to return the United States and the rest
of the world back under British rule. He felt that "too little of
the globe was British territoryand if we had retained Americathere would
be millions more of English living."
-
- In Rhode's 1877 will, it says
-
- "the ultimate recovery of the United States of America
as an integral part of the British Empire, the consolidation of the whole
Empire, the inauguration of a system of colonial Representation in the
Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed Members
of the Empire," which may well ultimately be achieved, by the Roundtable
which "publicized the idea of and the name `British Commonwealth of
Nations.'"
-
- The executors of Rhodes' six wills had concerns and fears
about what kind of structure all of this should take. According to Dr.
Carroll Quigley in his The Anglo-American Establishment published in 1981,
they concluded that they would have to transform the British Empire into
"a Commonwealth of Nations and then place that system within a League
of Nations." The United Nations is the successor to the League of
Nations and the Commonwealth is inside the U.N. In other words, we are
there. The representatives to the UN should have greeted her, "Hail
Caesar"!
-
- It should be noted that from 1946-1989 the British Empire
gave "independence" to many of their former colonies. How they
did this was to allow them to have their own parliament with representative
government and their own prime minister. Lest you think they can do as
they please, the queen has her own appointed representative called the
Director-General that reports to her everything going on in the country
and who reads her instructions after the prime minister provides his report
at the opening of their parliament.
-
- As each country obtained independence, they also got
a vote at the United Nations. Today the Commonwealth has the potential
of 54 votes to America's one vote. You will find if you look at the number
of Commonwealth countries that are members of the other UN agencies like
the IMF, World Bank, World Health Organization, World Trade Organization,
etc., the U.S. is outvoted.
-
- In three separate interviews with representatives from
three Commonwealth nations in 2002, I was told by each of them who looked
at me with fear and terror when I challenged them to leave the Commonwealth
that they could not. In fact the queen made reference to the Commonwealth,
-
- Since I addressed you last, the Commonwealth, too, has
grown vigorously To become a group of nations representing nearly two billion
people. Last November, when I opened the Commonwealth Heads of Government
Meeting in Trinidad and Tobago, I told the delegates that the Commonwealth
had the opportunity to lead. Today I offer you the same message.
-
- Do you now see the meaning of the words and how she used
words? The queen also made mention to the Millennium Development Goals.
The bottom line, these wonderful socialistic humanitarian goals where the
rich countries of the world will give a primary education to every child
in the world, reduce poverty and starvation, HIV/Aids, and give $50 to
every slum dweller to improve their lives will cost rich between $40-$60B
a year according to the United Nations. This money is to come from an assessment
on every country's Gross Domestic Product called "ODA" to the
tune of .07%. In fact, you could call it a global tax. For as long as I
have been covering global meetings, this has been a request by the United
Nations, wow it is a request by the queen. Does anyone know who will get
these monies? No. However, it just so happens that the following ten countries
which are "Highly Indebted Poor Countries" are members of the
Commonwealth: Cameroon, Gambia, Ghana, Guyana, Malawi, Mozambique, Somalia,
Sierra Leone, Uganda and Zambia. Do you see what I see? The civilized word
is "transfer of wealth."
-
- That brings us to the environment, Agenda 21, sustainable
development, and climate change. While the first pre-United Nations Conference
on population was held in 1927 with the assistance of the League of Nations,
it was not until 1972 that the United Nations held its own environmental
conference in Stockholm. Eleven years before in 1961, Prince Philip the
queen's husband and Prince Bernard of the Netherlands started the World
Wildlife Fund, considered one of the oldest and largest environmental groups
in the world. World Wildlife Fund is responsible for the publication of
many studies and reports on how to save the environment. These documents
have been used to support and implement Agenda 21.
-
- In 1972 the Club of Rome published Limits to Growth which
said the world could not sustain the population and that something would
have to be done. Since the dictates of Agenda 21 are based on Limits to
Growth assumptions, in a 2006 interview with Maurice Strong who chaired
the 1972 and 1992 earth summits, I asked him if in looking back the assumptions
and computer models that were used for that report were wrong, given today's
data, and he admitted that they should be revised. The bottom line is that
most of the environmentalism and ideas for environmentalism are being birthed
in England.
-
- It was a British scientist, James Lovelock, who formulated
the "Gaia Hypothesis" that the earth is a living organism and
that it must be protected from you and me. Prince Charles has been involved
in environmentalism since 1970 and is responsible for helping to get Agenda
21 to be approved by 25,000 conference participants and delegates at the
1992 UNCED conference through his Prince of Wales International Business
Leaders Forum. When you study Agenda 21, it basically is a return of the
earth to feudalism. The idea being that you and I cannot protect the earth's
resources so the United Nation's has to do it moves the $25T value of earth's
natural resources into the balance sheets of the QUEEN. The cost to implement
climate change is estimated to be between $80-$100B a year. British Petroleum
which is largely owned by the queen could make up their current oil spill
expenses very quickly if the U.S. government is stupid enough to pass "cap
and trade."
-
- Lastly, several years ago I raised the question, "Does
the Queen of Canada" become the "Queen of America" through
the North American Free Trade Agreement? It appears to be so according
to my research. Although Cecil Rhodes talked about "world peace",
I believe what the queen is talking about is the WHOLE PIECE.
-
- The operation we are discussing here has been 133 years
in operation with many actors contributing to its establishment. They include
many British and American industrialists and bankers such as the Rockefeller's,
Vanderbilt's, the Whitney's, the Morgan's and Schiff's. It includes those
that are members of the Royal Institute for International Affairs and America's
counterpart: the Council on Foreign Relations, it includes the International
Chamber of Commerce, the World Economic Forum, and many other global organizations
and NGO's.
-
- For those who still don't understand what happened at
the United Nations on July 6, 2010 is that the conquering ruler of the
world came and delivered a sharp admonition to the representatives that
it is time to act. She ended her speech with,
-
- In my lifetime, the United Nations has moved from being
a high-minded aspiration to being a real force the common good. In tomorrow's
world, we must all work together as hard as ever if we are truly to be
United Nations.
-
- Do you want to be the United Nations or do you want to
be the United States of America?
|