Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

 
rense.com
 

The Greatest Game - US And China Seek
Influence In Burma And The Koreas

By Anthony C. LoBaido
© 2010
7-15-10
 
Editor's Note -  Journalist Anthony C. LoBaido has spent the past two and one half years traveling between South Korea, Burma, Laos, Thailand, Malaysia, Cambodia, Taiwan and Sri Lanka and in a quest to understand the emerging dynamism of Asia. LoBaido has also spent the last several years teaching 25 courses involving topics such as Advanced Global Journalism, Advanced Globalization Studies, Strategic and Crisis Communication as well as Psychology of Communications.
 
He also worked as a radio reporter for e-FM in Seoul while broadcasting reports from Thailand and Cambodia, trained high-level South Korean Army officers up to the rank of General, appeared in the definitive Korean documentary on U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki Moon, took his students to Thailand to work with abused and injured elephants and was also profiled in a full-page article in the Korea Herald.  - ed
 
 
SEOUL, South Korea ­ During the 19th Century various European powers squared off for influence in Central Asia for control of people, territory and natural resources. This was known as "The Great Game." Just as that long-ago quest continues today over opium, rare Earth metals like lithium, oil, natural gas and pipelines -- as contested in Afghanistan between the U.S./CFR/CENTCOM/NATO vs. Russia, China and Iran, as well as various non-state (Taliban) and supranational actors (Big Business, UN, IMF, World Bank) in and around Central Asia -- another battle, perhaps equally as vital, continues to emerge among the Kings of the East.
 
Students of postmodern history might call it "The Greatest Game."
 
The main players in The Greatest Game are Mainland China and the United States. The prizes they covet are influencing the future direction of Burma/Myanmar and North and South Korea.
 
As a journalist, I often say the purest journalism is akin to a multi-level, multidimensional jigsaw puzzle with multiple realities all simultaneously co-existing. All of the pieces of the puzzle must be considered both individually and as a part of the greater whole until the ultimate picture emerges.
 
In the case of Burma and the Koreas, the puzzle pieces seem almost limitless and the overall picture remains elusive at best. The mirage of archetype Oriental order, tradition, custom, language and respect finds itself overwhelmed by a mad cocktail of regional factionalism, fascism, communism, racism, greed, female gendercide, drugs raging from crystal meth to heroin, jade, timber, the smuggling of exotic animal parts, elephant smuggling, trade (both legal and illegal), migrant workers, rice, oil, natural gas, jade, high technology, the war on monks seeking democracy, control of the Internet, tourist dollars, nuclear weapons, counterfeiting, arms dealing and human trafficking.
 
Behind them all lay the terrestrial gods of money, control and power. It's really just that simple. (James 4:4)
 
To understand how The Greatest Game is being played out, on various levels one must consider North Korea's love triangle relationship with Burma and China. Then there is China's one-on-one relationship with both Burma and North Korea ­ and inclusive of that is the issue of cross-border trade between those nations. Add to that China's contentious relationship with the U.S., as well as the often rocky U.S. relationship with an increasingly uppity South Korea, which is watching America's rapid decline with fear, loathing and sadness.
 
As a player in the Greatest Game, you'll need cut right to the chase and ask the most vital of questions. For example, will Burma, like North Korea, shock the world by acquiring or building an atomic bomb?
 
Will China continue to see the Burmese junta as a reliable partner or will they also shock the world by turning to Nobel Prize Winner Aung San Suu Kyi as a more stable, long-term and internationally correct economic partner?
 
For their part, the Burmese junta see Suu Kyi as far too Westernized and outspoken for the typical behavior expected of a Burmese woman. Her words are viewed by Burma's Generals as not being "proper." Yet proper is a word invented by men who would seek to enslave women who don't live up to their very own definition of the term.
 
Suu Kyi, now a senior citizen, is also viewed by Burma's elite as a female (and equally well-meaning) Nelson Mandela; a person the West can use as a rallying point to overthrow an entire nation's leadership. But the Burmese junta is not F.W. De Klerk, and they will seek a far better deal, and far larger slice of the pie than the once-humble-turned-greedy Afrikaners received at the end of their ruling dispensation in 1994.
 
The questions continue; what will happen if and when Kim Jong-il's son Kim Jong Un
(seemingly more normal, Swiss educated and less prone to cognac and Swedish prostitutes than his fighter pilot-trained father) takes power in the Hermit Kingdom?
 
What about South Korean culture, whose traditional values are under assault from seedy U.S./UK MTV values?
How would South Korea react to a merger with North Korea? What would happen to the balance of power in East Asia, and in fact all of Asia, if such a merger were to take place? How is this future merger viewed by both China and U.S.?
 
North Korea is a mutual headache for China, South Korea and the U.S. Of course the U.S. worries more about China's increasing influence in Africa, Central and South America, her astounding economic growth, alleged currency manipulation, thirst for oil and various raw minerals, de facto control of the Panama Canal through a Hong Kong-based-PLA-front company, attempts to send AK 47s to California street gangs, forced abortions, gendercide vs. females, cyber attacks, espionage, purchasing political influence in the Clinton White House and intellectual pirating of U.S. entertainment products.
 
Yet nevertheless, North Korea remains high on the list of U.S. worries in Asia. China, North Korea and Russia understand America is their enemy. Sadly, far too many of the American Mandarins in control of Washington, D.C. aren't listening to that siren's song.
 
North Korea is used as a pit bull by China to tie up vital U.S. forces in South Korea and on Okinawa. That usefulness is not likely to soon change. The true and ugly face of the Chinese Politburo is revealed by The Greatest Game, for they see North Korea as an ally.
 
Of course no nation has permanent friends and permanent enemies ­ only permanent interests. That's part of what makes The Greatest Game so fascinating to play.
 
Burma's Many Ethnic Faces
 
Still yet, more esoteric questions linger; will the Burmese junta turn the armed militias in Burma's distant, restive border reaches into a latent "border guard force" or will China turn them into a more potent revolutionary army that can tie up the junta?
 
In August of 2009, Burma's hardened army sent almost 40,000 refugees scurrying across its border into China when it overran an ethnic rebel army known as the Kokang. This event did not please Beijing for several reasons. First, it was viewed as an attempt by the Burmese junta to show Washington, D.C.'s political and defense establishment that Burma's army could be used as an active military force to harass China.
 
Just after the Kokang operation, the U.S. turned a blind eye to its visa restrictions in regard to top Myanmar leaders and let Thein Sein, Burma's Prime Minister, come to New York to give a special talk at the United Nations. Was this a quid-pro-quo maneuver?
 
Second, this seemingly minor sideshow in the greater Myanmar theater showed the Chinese they can no longer assume the junta will go along with anything and everything Beijing wants. Burma's army is hungry, cheeky and unafraid of combat. They can be mean-spirited and have shown no compunction about engaging in ethnic and religious cleansing. An activist I interviewed in a Thai-Burma border town working with Magicians Without Borders said the persecution of Burmese-Christian ethnic groups like the Karen, "Is more cultural than anything else." It's not as if the Burmese Army has studied the Gospel of Luke and decided to wipe out those who follow its precepts.
In the end, the relationship between China and Burma is merely a convenient marriage. China is Communist while Burma is fascist. (It should be noted Burma's Socialist and Communist governments did not stand the test of time after independence from the British Empire in 1947.) China is atheistic while Burma is both terribly superstitious and Buddhist. There are some fundamental differences between the two nations.
 
Regardless, the Kokang ethnic clash forced the PLA and the Politburo to reevaluate Burma's border issue in respect to her restive ethnic groups. These groups form an alphabet soup ranging from the NDAA, KIA, UWSA (the United Wa State Army whom the U.S. has publicly classified as a drug cartel) to the MNDAA among others.
 
It should be noted that the Kokang were trained by Mao in the 1960's as part of the Communist front group fighting against Burma's then-ruling socialists. In past decades, Chinese regular army soldiers actually dressed up in Burmese military uniforms and fought against Burmese infantrymen. In the 1950's and 1960's, Burma's leaders were anti-Beijing. Those in power these days in Burma won't forget the mindset they grew up with. They're fully aware Mao murdered over 50 million of his own countrymen through his misnamed and bloody "Great Leap Forward" and "Cultural Revolution."
 
That said, since China has established a semi-autonomous region in Hong Kong, some of Burma's ethnic groups have turned to Beijing in a quest to pressure the Burmese junta to consider a similar grouping, special status, confederation and/or autonomy for Burma's multicultural conundrum. This is where The Greatest Game becomes very tricky, for there are many players with conflicting agendas acting in ways one would never expect.
 
One thing is certain ­ the money changers want this China-Burma marriage to last.
 
The Yunnan border crossing is the key to keeping peaceful, lucrative trade relations going between China and Burma. The peoples on both sides of the border have forged sexual/blood and financial ties. Peace on the border means lots of money to traders of all stripes. HIV/Aids, mostly from shared Aids needles and prostitution, form the darker side of life in this area. The US$ 2.5 billion plus in annual trade between China and Burma (up 25 percent or more since 2008) trumps all when considering the other options ­ war, counter-insurgency and ethnic cleansing. Capitalism needs consumers.
 
If you're wondering about ASEAN's position on dealing with Burma the issue, don't hold your breath. For its part, ASEAN has seen Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Brunei, along with Burma, all reject the idea of issuing a formal statement declaring the Burmese junta should free Suu Kyi. (Recall that ASEAN was originally formed in 1967 as an anti-communist alliance, but has now assumed a less artificial role as a regional building block for the emerging world government and world state.)
 
China for its part does not need to fear nor heed the dictates of ASEAN. Burma gives China a representative of sorts in ASEAN. And more than a few of ASEAN's members are still nominally Communist, Maoist, Marxist and Stalinist-orientated. As China is an atheistic, fascist, one party dictatorship, it has no problem in principle with the Burmese junta's way of ruling that nation. Burma joined ASEAN in 1997 even though both the EU and the U.S. lobbied very strongly to prevent that from happening. The remnant of the Vietcong, Pathet Lao, Khmer Rouge and others saw no problem with expanding their circle to include Burma. In the end, there is little if any regional pressure on Burma to effectively deal with her ethnics or release Suu Kyi from house arrest. That's the reality.
 
Crazy-Beautiful: Understanding the Korean Mind
 
The Korean component of The Greatest Game requires understanding that South Koreans don't hate North Korea. Most Koreans hail from a handful of dynasties and thus share last names like Lee, Shin, Kim, Lim and several others. They call one another (even total strangers) "Ajoshi" or "Uncle" or "Ajuma" meaning "Aunt." Truth be known, North and South Koreans hate Japan due to Japan's brutal colonization of Korea, various environmental crimes and turning some of the most attractive Korean females into "comfort women." This hatred is still white hot in South Korea and might be even worse in the North.
 
Yet this is where the puzzle that forms Korean norms, mores and social values becomes complicated almost beyond imagination. For what the Japanese did to Korea, South Koreans continue on some level to do to themselves. Korean self-hatred is complex.
 
It must be noted that prostitution is rampant in South Korea and is almost semi-openly marketed in certain areas. Additionally, Korean men are well known for their cheating/running around/affairs, alcohol abuse as well as for being terribly controlling and breaking the spirit of their own women ­ both Korean and foreigners alike.
 
For example, a thin, drop dead gorgeous foreign woman married to a Korean man might find herself hearing she's fat and has an ugly face. She won't be allowed to go to church alone if he is a non-believer. A divorced Korean woman is considered a "dead leaf" and will find her social status and work options curtailed. Divorce is frowned upon because South Koreans correctly understand its devastating effects on the stability on children, teens, families and the nation as a whole.
 
Traditionally speaking, women must carry the burden of holding bad marriages together. But Koreans have "jung" or a tight bond of holistic and generic love. The women in South Korea remain strong and work to make society as wholesome as possible in the face of the discrimination they face. (Of course there are good marriages anchored by excellent Korean men, fathers and husbands who adore their wives and children.)
 
More important to understanding the Korean mind is the fact that Koreans value their racial purity and distain the idea of obese, gluttonous and unattractive white men polluting their gene pool. Rare is the Korean daughter who can introduce her foreign boyfriend to her parents. When a white man marries a Korean woman and her parents pass away, it is not uncommon to hear the words "We got lucky." This kind of racism is also a part of The Greatest Game in Asia.
 
Of course South Korean academics and business leaders have no problem with using and misleading whites and other foreigners who are seen as lackeys for enabling their own fraudulent agenda. These sellouts and non-talented individuals trapped in failed careers are legion in South Korea.
 
Some are seen as having no honor and even suicide cannot offer them redemption in the truest Asian sense. These are kind of foreigners who help South Korean elites lie to students, steal their parents hard earned money, offer substandard and almost worthless degrees while playing the role of the "Great Man" to a Korean public ignorant of the truth. Yet some foreigners stay on in South Korea out of true love for the Korean people
-- acting as cultural change agents and trying to teach South Koreans about normal, Christian and decent behavior. Such foreigners are zealous missionaries in Korea today.
 
That said, there are many foreigners available for exploitation. The sad truth is that South Koreans are adept a profiting off of the desperation of foreigners. Like the Afrikaners under Apartheid and to some extent the Israelis, South Koreans are quickly forgetting what it was like when others had them by the throat. Word continues to spread about how foreigners are treated in South Korea. This is a much-needed revelation.
 
South Koreans prefer to operate in smoked filled rooms, making decisions like American robber barons at the turn of the 20th Century. It is that modus operandi; "like fighting a wool sweater," and that very same racism which helps keep South Korea strong today.
 
Many South Koreans lament that Russia, China, and Japan have all in their own way kept the two Koreans apart. Yet it is the United States, via the betrayal of President Theodore Roosevelt, who gave away Korea to Japan for annexation at his summer White House on Oyster Bay, Long Island at the end of the Russo-Japanese War, which remains the Big Brother that's no longer needed or wanted in some quarters. It could be fairly said that South Korea has outgrown America. Like a teenager ready to go away to college, South Korea is ready to stand on her own two feet.
 
One might as just why? For one thing, Koreans are smart, featuring the world's highest average IQ at 107. According to the CIA World Fact Book, only 7 out of 100,000 South Koreans take illegal drugs. South Koreans admire the historical ideals of America but can see the handwriting on the wall concerning America's decline -- with China acting as America's bank, open borders, 20 million illegal immigrants, the reduced value of citizenship, insane and delusional leaders, lost wars, divorce, gangs, Aids, broken schools, weakened families, teen rebellion and the decline of spiritual values.
 
Many South Koreans now fear a similar decline is already gripping their society. Yet of the 20 largest Christian congregations in the world, ten of them are in Seoul. (Seo means "capital" and ul means "place.") There is still hope for South Korea ­ make no mistake.
 
Furthermore, America's economic model has been discredited. South Korea wisely refused to buy Lehman Brothers during the most recent subprime financial Armageddon scenario, when duplicitous and greedy American bankers tried to pawn off that rotting institution to the more than astute South Koreans -- who themselves have perfected lying to an art form and thus know a giant lie when they see one.
 
The aforementioned MTV values, the decline of American culture, tattooed and pierced kids and Big Pharma-tranquilized American youth combine to scare older, normal South Koreans. They don't want their daughters whored out to American gang culture, music and clothing. They still have their pride. They understand the concept of crawling into the sewer, having battled cultural colonization over the centuries from various invaders.
 
So when Koreans offer you the lamentation "It's not Korea anymore" they're talking about things like the new wave of teen sex, teen suicide, famous actresses killing themselves like hotcakes after being forced to have sex with the wealthy Korean businessmen who sponsored their careers, children now being given courses on how to identify strangers and foreigners who might hurt them, pornography, a "sexed up culture" and the dilution of their traditional norms and mores through the mad dash for "segewah" or globalization, proliferation of the Internet and of course, learning English.
 
Sometimes it seems as if the entire nation has gone mad all at once ­ like a Titanic Tsunami of filth has washed over this 5,000 year old civilization. The Korea you saw on M*A*S*H does not exist anymore, if it ever did. (Still there are many great Koreans, so one must try not to be overwhelmed by the current moral direction of South Korea.)
 
By first understanding South Korea, readers can finally begin to understand Wizard of Oz behind the curtain in North Korea and become more astute players in The Greatest Game.
 
It's not the North in North Korea that matters ­ it's the Korea
 
In terms of cognition dissonance, Koreans (North and South) are well known for their manipulation of events in order to create a stir that brings their private agenda to the forefront. They are also well known as frauds in the business world, for (as noted) misleading foreigners, secretive behavior, stubbornness, continually evaluating their personal position of age and status in comparison to others, putting up a false front, preying upon the weakness of others, propaganda and bravado aimed at internal consumption, bad tempers, over-working to the point of a tremendous loss of productivity as well as an over-reliance and trust in large numbers. (Student groups, economic output).
 
Just as South Koreans are adept at using Christianity as a pseudo-pious means to expand business and social influence, so to has Christianity in North Korea been perverted by "juche" or "self reliance" in which the Holy Trinity is comprised of the "father" and "son" from the ruling Kim family while the "Holy Spirit" is juche itself.
 
As such, it is vital to remember that when Kim Jong-il is "acting out" in terms of threats to "turn Seoul into a lake of fire," or actually his launching missiles, exporting weapons and tunnel digging expertise to the Burmese junta, or showing off his budding nuclear arsenal, he is merely acting on a level consistent with the basest elements of the total Korean cognitive profile. He is saying in effect "Look at me! Pay attention to me!"
And treachery is not just a North Korean virtue. Recall that while South Africa and Rhodesian pilots fought and died in the Korean War, South Korea still betrayed those countries at the United Nations through "pro" votes on sanctions. This even while North Korean mercenaries trained the 5th Brigade in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe to kill more than 20,000 ­ 30,000 Matabele tribesmen who opposed the wicked rule of Robert Mugabe.
 
While South Korea has battled North Korean terrorism (the recent Choenan naval attack, the downing of the Korean Airliner and a bombing at the South Korean embassy in Burma), South Korea had no problem throwing Rhodesia and South Africa's anti-communist governments over to the terrorism and Marxism of the ANC and South African Communist Party. (Mugabe's ZANU-PF is more Maoist than Marxist.)
 
More sobering is the fact that South Korea had no trouble torturing and murdering her own citizens as recently as 1980 during the infamous Kwangju Massacre. (By the way, South Korea, once ruled by autocratic Generals, has no problem doing business with the Burmese junta. South Korean men relate well to patriarchal societies.)
 
Again, it's not the "North" in "North Korea" that's the problem. It's the "Korea(n)."
 
Alternative Futures
 
In light of this, one must ask what the future will bring to the Korean Peninsula ­ war or peaceful economic integration? One possible alternate future for the entire region would involve peace hinging upon a "soft landing" for North Korea, reunification with South Korea and a high speed rail (KTX) that would ostensibly run from Pusan to Seoul to Pyongyang to Vladivostok/Siberia, Beijing and Ulan Bator. That is the best possible of all fantasy worlds.
 
What will happen if and when North and South Korea undergo reunification? China would then be witness to a unified, highly patriotic, nominally Christian, capitalist society right at its doorstep. A reunified Korea would boast a well-trained, two million man army complete with almost a quarter million Special Forces (North Korea also trains Burma's Special Forces as attested to an agreement signed by North Korean General Kim Kyok-sik on November 27, 2008), as well as nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.
 
While China and North Korea are both communistic, have spilled blood together, live in varying kinds of police states, use slave labor and see America and Japan as enemies ­ there are limits to their relationship. It is doubtful that China wants to single-handedly be responsible for fixing an imploded North Korea. China could welcome South Korea into her fold as a partner in rebuilding the North. South Korean "chaebols" or mega-corporations would be able to expand and grow in the North. There's money to be made.
 
China doesn't want the North Korean regime to totally collapse and thus hand over a plethora of problems for the PLA and Politburo to fix. Especially after China's successful hosting of the Olympic Games, the achievements of her maverick space program and other 21st Century advances. Mishandling North Korea could be a black eye for China.
 
Keep in mind that this "New Super Korea" would be racially homogeneous and perhaps highly motivated to gain revenge against ancient and recent conquerors of the Korean Peninsula such as a Mongols (who brought the popular "soju" alcohol to Korea from Persia, where the Mongols first encountered what was originally known as "Arak-ju") and the Japanese. The weakness and needless dissolution of human identity through multiculturalism and political correctness would not be a factor in this New Super Korea.
 
These facts have not, are not, and will not be lost on the rulers in Beijing.
 
Reunification would also fix South Korea's abortion issue, with females mostly being the victims, hospitals charging higher fees for abortion according to how far along in the pregnancy a woman is, and abortion having been in the past encouraged ­ while illegal ­ by the government in effort to raise the GDP. Reunification would allow South Korean boys to marry North Korean girls and strengthen the Korean race.
 
Korean men want sons to carry on their family name. The fact that sons are given favored has transformed South Korea's (and China's) social fabric. Many South Korean boys are unable to take criticism, are effeminate, metrosexual in manner and dress, crave attention, are spoiled and prone to emotional outbursts like punching walls and so forth. Luckily for South Korea, the Army is the great leveler of manhood, as all able bodied males must serve in the Armed Forces.
 
South Koreans can export racy, popular K-pop, they can develop, change, mutate and reinvent themselves 100 times over, but they cannot undo certain aspects of their culture ­ thus abortion remains a vital battleground for the soul of Seoul. Along with Guatemala, South Korea is one of the leading providers of adopted children on Earth. Abortion will remain a key issue in Korean society for the foreseeable future. If China is seen by the Western transnational elite as the perfect autocratic model of the emerging world super state, then South Korea's abortion craze is seen as a "positive" to the sick minds lording over the West's, and the worlds, population reduction nihilists.
 
Would China allow really allow North and South Korea to reunite, perhaps if the U.S. were to relinquish protected status over Taiwan? Perhaps as an olive branch, on the 60th anniversary of the Korean War, China has officially rewritten the history of that conflict, no longer calling it an American war of imperialism but actually blaming North Korea.
 
Finally, no player in The Greatest Game would fail to consider the fact that South Korea has invested billions of dollars in China. A reunited Korea would mean Seoul, like Germany, would have to recalculate its foreign investments to rebuild the house of its immediate neighbor.
 
Beyond that, China is already heavily invested in the most lucrative North Korean mining operations and would hesitate to lose those investments. Any reunification of the Koreas would probably have to continue to allow China to profit from those mining ventures.
 
Again in the end, the Almighty Dollar and Almighty Won will take their rightful place.
 
Plan 5029: Securing WMD's if North Korea Implodes
 
Perhaps the most vital question in The Greatest Game is what is going to happen if North Korea implodes before a peaceful reunification can take place? Issues such as famine, starvation, crime and refugees would spill onto China's borders. North Korea is also well known to be the finest counterfeiter of U.S. currency and as a drug trafficker in league with arms and drug merchants based in Burma. Thus a total collapse of North Korea would unleash those smart, well-trained, well-funded and unscrupulous elements to run wild on China's eastern border. Yet the WMD's are paramount to all concerned.
 
Towards that end, Gen. Walter Sharp, commander of U.S. forces in South Korea, has organized drills for a joint Republic of South Korea and U.S. team (believed to be the 20th Support Command and known under its working name "Plan 5029") to train for removing North Korea's weapons of mass destruction in the event that nation completely falls apart. Plan 5029 seeks to address issues such as civil war in Korea, a North Korean coup, a revolt by the North Korean army and untold refugees fleeing North Korea into South Korea and perhaps China. (North Korean defectors living in South Korea are not exactly welcomed with open arms. They struggle to fit in and are viewed as outsiders.)
 
Of course one must remember North Koreans are the world's best tunnel diggers and that their WMD's are heavily guarded by elite troops. It should be noted that one North Korean Special Forces soldier stranded in South Korea during a failed black op killed more than a handful of South Korean troops attempting to capture him. He made it back across the border into North Korea with the relative ease of a Korean Rambo or 007.
 
Securing North Korea's WMD's might be easier said than done. Korean soldiers are known to be tough and excellent fighters. (Ask any American who served in Vietnam). Would those guarding the WMD's in North Korea simply give them up? Would they be tempted to sell them to various Central Asian, Middle Eastern or North African state and non-state actors? Would they smuggle at least some of them to Iran, Syria, Burma or Zimbabwe? Would they give them to the KGB/FSB, PLA, CIA or even to Jason Bourne?
 
The training to remove North Korea's WMD's was held last spring during Operation Key Resolve. If and when the U.S. turns over operational wartime control to South Korea's Armed Forces (OPCON, which is slated for April 17, 2012) it has been agreed that U.S. troops would still spearhead "WMD removal operations elimination and site exploitation" according to the March 12, 2010 edition of the Korea Herald.
 
(Keep in mind this whole scenario comes from the same American establishment that gave you Katrina, BP, 9/11, Af-Pak, the "cakewalk" of Iraq, fun times at Abu Ghraib, the Wall Street meltdown, epic and un-payable debt, errant predator drone strikes and open borders. Can America's politically correct, feminized and sexually-experimental military even begin to take on highly patriotic, hardened North Koreans guarding their WMDs?)
 
The previous regime in South Korean, under President Roh Moo-hyun, had wanted South Korea to lead such operations. It opposed the development of a contingency plan on North Korea, arguing it "could infringe on the country's sovereignty and cause a full-scale war on the Korean Peninsula should the U.S. military take unilateral action against North Korea."
 
Perhaps most interesting is the fact that the U.S. has approached Mainland China about working together to secure North Korea's WMD's in the event that North Korea implodes. This was done by U.S. Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg during a visit to China. That notion has been flatly rejected by Beijing as "estate planning for grandpa while he's still living." The U.S. has also asked China about setting up rules of engagement (ROE's) and other various ground rules to prevent the PLA and U.S. forces from shooting at one another as they did during the Korean War.
 
(Again, can America, which had to pay off half-baked militias in Iraq not to fight, and can't seem to defeat the Taliban in ten years of conflict, take on the PLA and/or North Korean Army on North Korean soil?)
 
According to the AP in an article by Charles Hutzler published on August 4, 2009, "PLA researchers told a group of US Scholars in 2007 that contingency plants were in place for the Chinese military to handle North Korean refugees and even go in to secure nuclear weapons and clean up nuclear contamination." China has its own version of Plan 5029 but won't share it with U.S. military or diplomatic officials. So much for "The Big Two," America and China's allegedly blooming friendship and co-ruling of the el mundo.
 
The amount of troops the U.S. has in Iraq and Afghanistan, in addition to forces already in South Korea (about 28,000) and Okinawa would probably been needed to at least attempt to subdue, conquer, clear and hold the land area of North Korea. Even then nothing is certain. North Korea for all intents and purposes is still caught in the war-like scenario which gripped Korea during the Japanese colonization and Korean War. It can be fairly said that Brazilian kids play soccer, Dominican kids love baseball, Afghan children learn to fight wars and North Korean children are bred to live without bread.
 
On the Border between North Korea and China
For now, North Korea teeters along like Frankenstein; strong yet fragile, a product of the mad doctors who engineered a Stalinist, hereditary cult. North Korea is propped up by trade with China. Without help from China, North Korea would probably collapse in short order. North Korea gets almost all of its petroleum from China (US$ 300 million per year) and much of its food stuffs (Around US$ 150 million).
 
About 250,000 North Koreans continue move back and forth across the border between China and North Korea. Cross border trade along the 1,400 kilometer/840 mile (a kilometer is .6 of a mile) border between the two states was about US$ 1.6 billion according to rough estimates.
 
The route between Dandong ­ the cornerstone of the Great Wall's Eastern Flank -- in China and Sinuiju in North Korea across the Yalu River (where General MacArthur had wanted to place nuclear waste in an effort to stop Chinese troops from reinforcing North Korean forces during the Korean War) being the most heavily trafficked path.
 
China has its own issues to contend with, including keeping the ruling Communist Party together, elites vs. populists and the urban vs. rural dwellers conundrum. As previously noted, North Korea remains just another headache China would rather minimize.
 
Perhaps the saddest facet of The Greatest Game is the fact that Koreans are considered some of the finest gardeners and agriculturalists on planet Earth. As such, given a fair chance, North Korea's agricultural sector would bloom as it does in the South and famine would become a dirty six letter word. Such is the plight of the human condition in Korea.
 
Beyond Rangoon: The Wooing of the Burmese Junta
Players in The Greatest Game will consider the visit of U.S. Senator James Webb to Burma as a small gesture of rapproachment with the Burmese junta ­ which is adept at playing off the West vs. her Big Brother in Beijing. Webb's visit allows us to entertain the notion of what will happen if Burma tilts back towards her historical allies in the West? Recall if you will the brave Karen fighters who helped the Allies during their darkest hours of World War II against the Japanese.
 
But will China let Burma slip out of its orbit that easily?
 
China covets Burma's Indian Ocean coastline as a part of her "String of Pearls" outpost strategy to expand her naval, intelligence gathering and economic power. That string now stretches all the way to the once-troubled island paradise of Sri Lanka ­ where Biblical kings of old are rumored to have found ivory and precious gems and stones. China has made inroads with the Sri Lanka government to forge maritime logistical ties.
 
The ability for China's budding navy to carve out ports of call, military and intelligence bases along Burma's long coast (and thus counter American power on Diego Garcia, as well as to project power to counter India or assist Pakistan) reminds researchers of the famous Chinese Admiral Zeng He, who centuries ago commanded an armada that made Columbus and Magellan look like amateurs.
 
While China has the upper hand right now in regard to influencing Burma, the junta itself still sits in the fabled catbird seat ­ in firm control and sitting on a mountain of natural resources and associated cash.
 
In the 1990's, the U.N. offered the Burmese junta a cool U.S. $ 1 billion to hand over control of the country to would-be native democratic forces. They were given a flat out "No." Why? The Burmese junta is making a fortune from oil, natural gas, uranium mining, rice, jade, teak wood, opium and gems.
 
The junta has promised to hold elections this year (however fraudulent) and to stamp out the opium trade by 2015. The junta won't just sit idly by and see the future totally dictated to it by any foreign power ­ be it China or the West. There's simply too much money involved. Drugs rest at the tip of the spear as they have for centuries in terms of enriching those who control the cultivation and exportation.
 
The opium trade in Burma is largely controlled by various ethnic armies and groups on the hitherto border regions. One of the major players has been the Wa State Army, which is one of the largest private armies in the entire world. The January 27, 2010 edition of the Bangkok Post reported that Burma's opium production is actually on the rise and that the Burmese Army extorts money from poppy growers. In fact, in the Shan State alone, between 2006 and 2009, the amount of land used to cultivate poppies increased five times over. The Shan State provides 95 percent of Burma's opium. Burma is the world's second largest producer of the raw element of the drug. Afghanistan remains the opium Mother Ship.
 
One of the dirty little secrets of The Greatest Game is that more opium in Burma means more drug addicts and more HIV problems for Mainland China. And under pressure from China, the Burmese junta has at times engaged in drug eradication programs.
 
(This is akin to the CIA and DEA fighting against the "unsanctioned" drug networks not controlled by the West's transnational elite in various hotspots around the world ranging from Lebanon to Syria to Colombia and points beyond. It's all just one big money game.)
 
Regardless, it could be fairly said that a Second Opium War, much more limited in scope, exists in certain parts of China. In fact, it has gotten so bad that Beijing has gone so far as to offer financial and technical assistance to farmers in Thailand, Burma and Laos in an effort to get them to grow crops other than opium.
 
Will Burma continue to seek cover from China against the West in regard to resolutions that would otherwise be passed by the U.N. Security Council? Regardless, Burma is "in play" and there is no telling how this story will ultimately play out.
 
The key player for now remains strongman Than Shwe. He's the "Grandfather" called "Aba Gyi" who could buy Ross Perot several times over just from the proceeds the junta earns from the Yadana Natural Gas Project. He has ruled Burma with an iron fist since 1992. Not many Americans or Westerners know that Than Shwe is a high school drop out, former postal clerk and an expert in psychological operations. He's also a financial entrepreneur busy these days building a brand new capital city ­ Naypyidaw -- and an airport that will accommodate 10 million visitors annually.
 
He even changed the name of his country from Burma (a perversion of "Bama" which means one of Burma's tribes) to Myanmar, which is inclusive of all of Burma's tribes.
 
(From ''Pusan'' to ''Busan'' and ''Peking'' to ''Beijing,'' and from "Bombay" to "Mumbai," changing the names of cities remains an annoying Asian proclivity. Can you just wake up one day and change the name of "Miami" to let's say, "Salami?")
 
Than Shwe has entered into agreements with Thailand (via PTTEP), India (through ONGC and GAIL) as well as corporations like Daewoo in South Korea to develop its off shore natural gas resources.
 
(In one of journalism's all-time great ironic moments, the well respected Irrawady Magazine, the Bible of Burma watchers around the world, on Page Six of the July, 2009 edition, featured a picture of Kim Dae-jung, the former South Korean President, and his quote, "Aung San Suu Kyi's continued detention shames Asia." The same page also featured a sidebar reading, "US$ 10 Billion is the expected profit for South Korean industrial giant Daewoo from its investment in Burma's offshore gas field over the next 25 years." 
 
Other investors who have thrown in their lot with the Burmese junta in a quest for oil or natural gas or both are as diverse as Australia, France, Russia and even the British Virgin Islands. Burma and China are working on a gas pipeline that would stretch almost from St. Louis to Philadelphia, ranging from the Bay of Bengal into southwest China in a quest to help quench China's growing thirst for energy to feed her industrial and high tech machine.
 
Chevron and Total (France's national oil company) are major players in Burma's energy sector. One prominent NGO recently stated that the junta's profits from business with Chevron and Total will enable it to proceed with trying to procure or build and atomic bomb. Chevron, Total and other major energy giants traditionally ignore calls to boycott Burma as they might have agreed to do in the Sudan or South Africa under Apartheid. As for the singling out of Chevron and Total, foreign investment in Burma was almost US$ 1 billion in 2009 and almost 90 percent of that number comes from Beijing's rulers.
 
Despite how Than Shwe is portrayed in the Western media, players of The Greatest Game should remember Burma is more than just a typical ''outpost of tyranny'' as former Secretary of State Condi Rice referred to that nation. Burma boasts everything from its own professional soccer league to punk rock. Punk Bands such as Outsider typically produce cleverly concealed lyrics in songs like "I Want to Kill You" that allow a small measure of freedom of speech. However, lyrics that demean Buddhism, promote smoking or alcohol abuse are banned -- as Than Shwe realizes the danger they present to the health of the nation. MTV values are not welcomed in Burma for some odd reason.
 
Also dangerous to the health of the nation is the way Than Shwe has allegedly gone on killing sprees against the ethnic Christian Karen tribe and Suu Kyi's supporters. Worst of all, according to Time Magazine's October 19, 2009 edition, defector Aung Lynn Htut, a former Army Major who defected to America in 2005, claims that Than Shwe ordered the summary execution of 81 Burmese men, women and children on a remote island off of Burma back in 1998. It's not just his postal pony of old that Than Shwe wants to terrorize ­ it is entire villages.
 
These days, as noted, some claim Than Shwe is trying to get a hold of an atomic bomb. Burma has long had interest in atomic energy, dating back to the 1950's. Today several Russian firms are actively digging for uranium in extreme Northern Burma, adding to the worries about Burma's future nuclear ambitions. The junta has confirmed no less than five uranium deposits. Russia, which is busy revamping its own nuclear weapons and delivery systems, obviously has her own reasons for digging for Burmese uranium.
 
Players of The Greatest Game must remember that Russia and China can destroy the United States of America in a nuclear war. The leaders of Russia and China are actively and openly practicing for such a war. (Witness the shrewd Comrade Putin boarding a Russian sub not long ago to take charge of an all-out nuclear attack scenario. As such, Burma's uranium is a strategic plus in the Russian column.)
 
When criticized for his response to Cyclone Nargis, (by not accepting foreign aid and intervention) Than Shwe pointed back a finger at George Bush Jr. and Hurricane Katrina, where New Orleans' political-levy disaster (Mayor Nagin) and the horrific devastation of Mississippi (which took the full brunt of the storm) showed the relative decline of American pride and power to the world at large. Than Shwe was quick to pick up on that theme and use it to the junta's advantage. Who could argue with him -- then or now?
 
Burma has many friends in the arms trafficking business beyond North Korea. To be certain, North Korea's anti-tank, laser-guided munitions, Scuds, nuclear technology, tunnels to hide aircraft and ships, and the aforementioned special forces training being high on the junta's shopping list. These "friends" range from India (Burma wants to use India as a counterweight to its reliance on China) to Russia (which sold Burma a state-of-the-art anti-aircraft defense system) to Pakistan to several former Warsaw Pact countries.
 
Since China is building a new crude oil port in Burma as a part of a vital pipeline to reduce China's reliance upon safe passage of oil through the Malacca Strait, relations between the two nations will probably continue to progress in a positive direction, despite the bumps in the road the mutually encounter along the way.
 
As for South Korea -- that country has the lowest birthrate in the industrialized world. This has do to their aforementioned abortion Holocaust, the high cost of living and other social factors.
 
South Korea recently deployed robot soldiers along the DMZ (as reported in the UK media). Because of the falling birthrate in South Korea, robots and other forms of automation will probably be on the rise in the future. Reunification with North Korea might be the key to securing the future of the Korean race. This fact cannot be denied.
 
In the final analysis of The Greatest Game, bringing Burma and a reunited Korea into the orbit of the U.S. seems to be a vitally important geopolitical endgame. For along with her increasingly good relations with Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Burma (with troops and nuclear missiles in "occupied" Tibet), China is encircling India, expanding her "String of Pearls" and cementing her status as the leader of the Kings of the East. China aims to win The Greatest Game. Can America stop her? South Koreans, North Koreans and the Burmese will shape the outcome. The future awaits, unknown to all except God.
Related LoBaido Articles:
 
Harry Wu talks about China
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43789
North Korea Made Easy
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50972
Korea Rising
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=85786
Desperately Seeking Indiana Jones
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=120538 
Soldiers Who Care: Aki Ra land mine story in Cambodia
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=105331
 
 
lobaidoresponses@hotmail.com Anthony C. LoBaido is a professor, journalist, writer and photographer specializing in globalization issues, Southern Africa, the Koreas and Southeast Asia. 

 
Disclaimer
 
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros