- In the light of this:
-
- Iraq War Vet: "We Were Told to Just Shoot People,
and the Officers Would Take Care of Us" (Dahr Jamail, Truthout.org)
-
- and this:
-
- Support the Troops? (John Caruso, A Tiny Revolution)
-
- and this:
-
- Tears of Rage, Tears of Grief: Mass Death Returns to
Ishaqi (Empire Burlesque)
-
- and this:
-
- Dead Souls: The Pentagon Plan to Create Remorseless Warfighters (Empire
Burlesque)
-
- is there anything really suprising about this? (From
Monday's New York Times):
-
- U.S. Troops Fire on Afghan Bus, Killing at Least 5 Civilians
-
- American troops raked a large passenger bus with gunfire
near the southern city of Kandahar on Monday morning, killing as many as
five civilians and wounding 18, Afghan authorities and survivors said....
-
- One of the bus passengers and a man who identified himself
as the driver said that an American convoy about 70 yards ahead of the
bus opened fire as the bus began to pull to the side of the road to allow
another military convoy traveling behind to pass. The two convoys and the
bus were on the main highway in Sanzari, about 15 miles west of Kandahar
city. All of the windows on one side of the bus were shot out ...
-
- If the Afghan government's casualty toll is correct,
it would suggest that troops fired scores or even hundreds of rounds. It
was not clear why such a large fusillade would have been directed at a
passenger bus....
-
-
- Actually, it is very clear why these troops
would have decided to "light up" a bus crammed with civilians
that was pulling subserviently off the road to let even more of the occupier's
military muscle barrel through their invaded homeland. It's because for
generations, the Pentagon has been employing every mind-bending technique
it can find to turn human beings into killing machines.
-
- And oddly enough, the impetus for this massive, long-term
"engineering of human souls" was ... the greatest feat of arms
in American history: victory in World War II. As I noted in the Moscow
Times, way back in 2004:
-
- America calls its soldiers who fought in World War II
"the greatest generation." They are hymned by Hollywood, celebrated
by publishers and politicians, hailed at every turn....Yet despite the
vast tonnage of celluloid and printer's ink devoted to their praise, what
is perhaps the truest, highest measure of their worth has been almost universally
neglected. And what is this hidden glory, which does more honor to the
people of the United States than every single military action ordered by
their corruption-riddled leaders during the past fifty years? It's the
fact that in the midst of history's most vicious, all-devouring, inhuman
war, only about 15 percent of American soldiers on the battlefield actually
tried to kill anyone.
-
- In-depth studies by the U.S. Army after WWII showed that
between 80 to 85 percent of the greatest generation never fired their weapons
at an exposed enemy in combat, as military psychologist Lt. Colonel Dave
Grossman reports. Many times they had the chance, but could not bring themselves
to do it. They either withheld their fire altogether or else shot into
the air, to the side, anywhere but at the fellow human beings their
blood kin in biology, mind and mortality facing them across the line.
This reticence is even more remarkable given the incessant demonization
of the enemy by the top brass, especially in the Pacific, where the Japanese
soldiers and civilians were routinely portrayed by military
propaganda as simian, sub-human creatures fit only for extermination.
-
- Yet even with official license given to the most virulent
prejudice .. even with all the moral chaos endemic to warfare, American
soldiers, as a whole, killed only with the greatest reluctance, in the
direst extremity. These were not "warriors," bloodthirsty automatons
with stripped-down brains and cauterized souls, slavering in Pavlovian
fury at the bell-clap of command. No, they were real men, willing, as Grossman
notes, to stand up for a cause, even die for it, but not willing, in the
end, to transgress the natural law (implanted by God or evolution, take
your pick) that says: Do not kill your own kind and every person
of every race and nation is your own kind ...
-
- But far from celebrating this example of genuine glory,
the military brass were horrified at the low "firing rates" and
anemic "kill ratios" of American soldiery. They immediately set
about trying to break the next generation of recruits of their natural
resistance to slaughtering their own kind. Incorporating the latest techniques
for psychological manipulation, new training programs were designed to
brutalize the mind and habituate soldiers to the idea of killing automatically,
by reflex, "at the bell-clap of command," without the intervention
of any of those inefficient scruples displayed by their illustrious predecessors.
-
- And it worked. The dehumanization process led to a steady
rise in firing rates for U.S. soldiers during subsequent conflicts. In
the Korean War, 55 percent were ready to pump hot lead into enemy flesh.
And by the time the greatest generation's own children took the field,
in Vietnam, the willingness to slaughter was almost total: 95 percent of
combat troops there fired with the intent to kill.
-
- And today in occupied Iraq, the brutalizing beat goes
on. "Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill, it's like it pounds in my brain,"
a U.S. soldier told the Los Angeles Times last week. Another shrugged at
the sight of freshly slaughtered bodies. "It doesn't bother me at
all," he said. "I'm a warrior. My soldiers, they are all warriors.
They have no problems. There's no place in this Army for men who aren't
warriors." Said a third: "We talk about killing all the time.
I never used to be this waybut it's like I can't stop. I'm worried what
I'll be like when I get home."
-
- Yet strangely enough, this new model army, imbued with
eager "warrior spirit," has not produced the kind of lasting
victories won by the reluctant fifteen-percenters of yore. It was stalemated
in Korea, defeated in Vietnam, chased out of Lebanon and Somalia, balked
in Afghanistan (where 40,000 Taliban troops slipped away to fight again
and drug-dealing warlords rule the countryside), while its two excursions
into Iraq have ended first in irresolution (with "worse-than-Hitler"
Saddam still on his throne) and now in bloody quagmire.
-
- Could it be that the systematic degradation of natural
morality and common human feeling especially in the service of dubious
ends is not actually the best way to achieve national greatness?
|