- How could so many witnesses see a missile intercept Flight
800 and yet the only evidence found suggests that an electrical surge,
not a missile, ignited the center fuel tank? Could there be a war- head
designed to destroy aircraft with a powerful electromagnetic pulse (EMP)
that would only leave evidence of an electrical surge? Looking for the
answer at the Library of Congress I found it
-
- The US Navy began developing a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD)
warhead for antiaircraft missiles ten years ago and was test Þring
them two years before the Flight 800 crash. An MHD warhead kills an aircraft
by burning out its circuits with a powerful electrical surge induced by
a electromagnetic pulse (EMP) from the warhead detonating near the aircraft.
The systems from Flight 800 were riddled with evidence of a powerful electronic
surge. In fact, the ofÞcial cause was declared to be an inexplicable
surge strong enough to put a spark into the center fuel tank.
-
- Goddard,s Journal introduces and explores the theory
that Flight 800 was downed by a missile equipped with an EMP warhead, offering
an explanation for both eyewitness testimony and physical evidence. The
report is replete with photographic evidence and an animation:
-
- EMP-warhead theory: http://users.erols.com/igoddard/twa-emp.htm
-
|
