- On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attack would mean for US-Israeli
relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good.Well, it's not good,
but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)."
-
- Intelligence wars rely on mathematical models to anticipate
the response of "the mark" to staged provocations. Reactions
thereby become foreseeable-within an acceptable range of probabilities.
When Israeli mathematician Robert J. Aumann received the 2005 Nobel Prize
in economic science, he conceded that "the entire school of thought
that we have developed here in Israel" has turned "Israel into
the leading authority in this field."
-
- With a well-planned provocation, the anticipated response
can even become a weapon in the arsenal of the agent provocateur. In response
to 9-11, how difficult would it be to foresee that the U.S. would deploy
its military to avenge that attack? With fixed intelligence, how difficult
would it be to redirect that response to wage a long-planned war in Iraq
-- not for U.S. interests but to advance the agenda for Greater Israel?
-
- Review balance of commentary at What Role Did the U.S.-Israeli
Relationship Play in 9-11?
- http://criminalstate.com/2009/09/what-role-did-the-u-s-israeli-relationship-play-in-9-11/
-
-
- Guilt by Association, the first release in the Criminal
State series can be ordered at Guilt By Association
- http://criminalstate.com/guilt-by-association/
|
