- Starting this year, Americans will have to get government
approval to travel by air. As Privacy Journal revealed last fall, henceforth
"Permission Now Needed to Travel Within U.S." Getting a reservation
and checking-in for air travel will soon require Transportation Security
Administration authorization. That permission is by no means assured: For
example, if your name matches a "no-fly" list, even mistakenly,
you can be denied the right to a reserve a seat on a flight. If your name
is on a "selectee" list, you and your possessions will be searched
more thoroughly before you can board. What is going on here?
-
- All travelers will need government OK in order to board
a flight, or take a cruise. What the government can allow one day, it can
forbid the next.
-
- Protecting air safety is essential, but professional
screening at airports already provides for it. Giving the TSA as an official
agency the additional authority to decide who gets to go where reaches
beyond safety into overextended governmental power. This newly minted "Secure
Flight" rule fundamentally imbalances long-standing citizens' rights
both to travel and to be left alone. If your name appears among hundreds
of thousands on "watchlists," you assert that the government
should not require ID to fly, you don't want to reveal your date of birth
for concern about identity theft, or you don't choose to declare your gender,
you can stay home.
-
- By combining the requirement for government photo IDs
in order to fly with checking government watchlists including potentially
every passenger, "Secure Flight" puts the federal government
into the business of licensing travel. All travelers will need government
OK in order to board a flight, or take a cruise. What the government can
allow one day, it can forbid the next. All things considered, isn't this
a higher-tech and later-day version of South African domestic passports
or eastern European checkpoints? In fact, because of the high technological
capacity of the U.S. version, aren't its implications for travel control
of plane, train, bus and subway travel much more far reaching? It's incredible
that something like this is happening relatively unrecognized in America.
-
- While some people consider the requirement to show ID
or reveal a birth date a small trade-off for security, what is at stake
here is the right to travel. That fundamental freedom of movement appears
in the Articles of Confederation in the right to freely enter and leave
all the states of the then small union. It was so fundamentally a part
of American citizenship that the privileges and immunities clauses of the
Constitution included it without explicitly mentioning it again for the
more perfect union. With a large and expansive nation now ranging from
Hawaii and Alaska to Washington DC, that right to travel nationally, and
petition the distant government, is even more fundamental. Yet some courts
maintain that if you can walk, you don't need the right to fly. People
have the right to walk around freely without carrying a national ID; why
do they have to show one to travel? The Supreme Court has yet to rule on
the scope of the right to travel but lower courts have tended to restrict
it more narrowly than the Founding Fathers would approve.
-
-
- Clearly, the air ID and "Secure Flight" rules
mean you cannot travel any distance reachable only by air without official
permission. Moreover, the system can easily be extended to Amtrak as a
government railroad, which already requires government ID in order to purchase
a ticket. It can further be extended to urban rapid-transit networks tied
to travel cards, and private inter-city buses requiring IDs to buy tickets
or board coaches. These are the bases for an internal passport system in
the U.S.
-
- There are a lot of practical issues here too. The assumption
that any "no-fly" list includes all potential wrong doers is
implausible, and first time criminals would by definition not appear until
it's too late. Many people on these lists are there because their names
are similar to those who are suspect for other reasons. There are perhaps
a few hundred people whose past activities merit keeping them off the streets,
let alone flights; the small group is better caught through search warrants
and good police work before they come to the airport. To demand that 750
million annual passengers have to get government permissions to fly creates
a needle in-a-haystack approach to locating a few potential wrongdoers
(none so far have been caught by the matching). "Secure Flight"
is simply an ineffective use of scarce resources that sweeps much too broadly
over people's most basic rights to travel and be let alone.
-
- What can you do? Like other regulations quickly promulgated
at the end of an outgoing administration, these rules need to be delayed
and reconstituted. Contact your Senators, Representatives and the White
House to suspend such ill-considered regulations now. Insist that the government
create a system that makes flying safe without granting federal officials
the final say over permission for citizens to travel. Otherwise, the traveling
public may be detoured onto a perilous downhill road to being permanently
grounded.
|
