- Introduction.
-
-
- Throughout the Western World, the Christian foundations
of decency, morality, restraint, and integrity; the very moral anchor which
held our civilisation together for centuries, has come under a concerted
and simultaneous multi-theatre attack, which in it's ferocity and intensity
can only be described as diabolical. Here in Northern Europe, with some
rare exceptions, the last bastion of what is true, virtuous and righteous,
is to be found paradoxically, only amongst the followers of Islam, and
make no mistake about it, even that community of faithful believers, is
coming under pernicious attack by the agents of change, in the form of
the welfare state; dabbling in the affairs of Muslim families, the education
system, gradually breaking down the moral and belief systems of the young,
and of course, the sick and twisted `entertainment industry` along with
the mass media in general.
-
- In my recent article, `Who Rules The World,`[1] I hypothesised
that the very source of those afflictions, which have and continue to debase
and de-construct our way of life, eroding ever more, all that was once
marvellous and righteous, in lands which once formed what was known as
`Christendom,` is literally the work of Satan/Lucifer, who with a little
help from his legions of `Fallen Angels,` Demon helpers, and his bloodline
[3]descendants known as the Illuminati, is establishing his dominion here
on earth, just as he set out to do at the very beginning of time.
-
- Having outlined in detail in that three part series the
basis for my hypothesis, there is no need to elaborate further here. It
is sufficient to direct the reader to that article so that he/she may judge
for his/herself whether there is any credibility in my assertion.
-
- Those elements of social and moral decay that we are
witnessing today; the increasingly pornographic culture, high divorce rates;
growing numbers of unwed single mothers; the hordes of illegitimate children;
homosexuality and lesbianism, sexual perversion and the alarmingly high
number of abortions, is not some new phenomenon. It is an ingenious and
fiendish plot that has been around for many Millennia (see Sodom and Gomorrah
and the cruel and debased cultures prevalent throughout the land of Canaan
and further afield during Old Testament times) designed to annihilate what
is, the very heart and foundation of all good and decent society; namely,
the family!
-
- You are about to read written proof of this clandestine
conspiracy. You will learn about who and what is behind it, and their fierce
unwavering mission to degrade and eradicate the family, separate man from
his mate, pervert and `filthify` our God given human spirit, and drag what's
left of humanity after their multi faceted depopulation agenda has been
taken to it's illogical conclusion, into a Luciferian nightmare, whereby
a relatively small and immensely wealthy and powerful `bloodline` elite,
hold sway as the `proxy` lords of this planet, for their master, Lucifer.
-
- Destroy The Family.
-
- In 1956, J. Edgar Hoover, [5] the then Director of the
FBI, himself a 33rd Degree Freemason and therefore no stranger to Luciferian
machinations and other deviant behaviour, somewhat paradoxically wrote:
-
- "The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face
with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American
mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced
into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could
espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and
decent." The Elks Magazine (August 1956)
-
- Mr. Hoover knew what he was talking about, and it is
probably even truer today to comment that few people understand, or even
consider the malicious forces now arrayed against the family, the institution
of marriage and the very nature of our being. They simply cannot comprehend
how hell-bent the forces of evil are on destroying the family. Read into
the chilling words of Communist demagogue, Lenin: "Destroy the family
and you destroy society," [1]and then get an idea of the dire and
perilous nature of the situation.
-
- Lenin had a devious plan to carry out his sinister plot
and he wasn't alone! We will deal with this in a moment. But firstly, it
is necessary to recognise the direct parallels of our current state of
affairs to the original Marxist Communist plot to eradicate the family,
as was noted in the 1926 July issue of the Atlantic Monthly:
-
- When the Bolsheviki came into power in 1917 they regarded
the family, like every other "bourgeois" institution, with fierce
hatred, and set out with a will to destroy it. "To clear the family
out of the accumulated dust of the ages we had to give it a good shake-up,
and we did," declared Madame Smidovich, a leading Communist and active
participant in the recent discussion. So one of the first decrees of the
Soviet Government abolished the term "illegitimate children."
This was done simply by equalizing the legal status of all children, whether
born in wedlock or out of it, and now the Soviet Government boasts that
Russia is the only country where there are no illegitimate children. The
father of a child is forced to contribute to its support, usually paying
the mother a third of his salary...
-
- At the same time, a law was passed which made divorce
a matter of a few minutes, to be obtained at the request of either partner
in a marriage. Chaos was the result. Men took to changing wives with the
same zest which they displayed in the consumption of the recently restored
forty-per-cent vodka.
-
- "Some men have twenty wives, living a week with
one, a month with another," asserted an indignant woman delegate during
the sessions of the Tzik. "They have children with all of them, and
these children are thrown on the street for lack of support!"
-
- (There are three hundred thousand shelter-less children
in Russia to-day, who are literally turned out on the streets. They are
one of the greatest social dangers of the present time, because they are
developing into professional criminals. More than half of them are drug
addicts and sex perverts. It is claimed by many Communists that the break-up
of the family is responsible for a large percentage of these children.)
-
- The peasant villages have perhaps suffered most from
this revolution in sex relations. An epidemic of marriages and divorces
broke out in the country districts. [Marriage became a game where it] was
not unusual for a boy of twenty to have had three or four wives, or for
a girl of the same age to have had three or four abortions. The peasants
bitterly complained: "Abortions cover our villages with shame. Formerly
we did not even hear of them." Many women found marriage and childbearing
a profitable occupation. They formed connections ( sexual) with the sons
of well-to-do peasants and then blackmailed the father for the support
of the children. In some cases peasants have been obliged to sell [everything]
in order to settle such claims. The law has created still more confusion
because women can claim support for children born many years ago.
-
- During the winter of 1924-1925 some of the older Communists
accused the younger generation of indulging in loose connections; they
blame the girl students for practising frequent abortions Russian women
students [noted] that love was almost the only cheap amusement left to
them and demanded that they be given free abortions that factory women
enjoy Both in the villages and in the cities, the problem of the unmarried
mother has become very acute and provides a severe and annoying test of
Communist theories.
-
- Another new point was that wife and husband would have
an equal right to claim support from the other The woman would have the
right to demand support for her child even if she lived with several men
during the period of conception; but, in contrast to previous practice,
she or the court would choose one man who would be held responsible for
the support. Commissar Kursky seemed especially proud of this point because
it differed so much from the 'bourgeois customs' of Europe and America.
-
- Another speaker objected to the proposed law on the ground
that some women would take advantage of its liberal provisions to form
connections with wealthy men and then blackmail them for alimony.[2]
-
- [1] Lenin merely repeated what Socrates had said and
what Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx put into words. Lenin set out to do
just that, hoping that a new society -- with the State as the ultimate
father -- could be constructed. With the collapse of the Soviet Union,
we have seen the consequences of the experiment.
-
- [2] The Atlantic Monthly; July 1926; The Russian Effort
to Abolish Marriage; Volume 138, No. 1; page 108-114. You can read the
document in its entirety by <http://www.ejfi.org/Civilization/Civilization-4.htm>clicking
here.
-
- Here's how the scheme to destroy the family is mapped
out:
-
- Eliminate the sacredness of the marriage covenant from
the minds of the masses. Make them believe marriage is outdated and blasé
-
- Inspire hatred against the family unit, manhood and fatherhood
-
- Institute no-fault divorce and encourage serial divorces
-
- Incite rampant promiscuity, fornication and adultery
-
- Make having illegitimate children become a common practice
-
- Convince society that a child in the womb is not a human
being
-
- Provoke women to have abortions without regard to God
or their consciences
-
- Make true love seem like cheap amusement
-
- Stimulate the people to confuse sex with love
-
- Create an environment that encourages unwed single motherhood
-
- Inspire men to disrespect, dishonour and abuse women
-
- Design laws that motivate women to commit paternity fraud
-
- Incite homosexuality, lesbianism, sexual immorality and
perversion
-
- Influence men to effortlessly abandon children they sire
-
- Most importantly, provoke a fierce relentless gender
war
-
- Is there anybody reading this who can't draw parallels
with their own society?
-
- As you have read above, what happened in the Soviet Union
in 1926 was no accident, and it is important to appreciate and easy to
see, that the social and moral carnage now occurring throughout the West;
the high divorce rate, the huge numbers of unwed mothers, the rage against
fatherhood, the gender wars, the overt battle being waged against marriage
and the family, and the highly detailed attacks on the bedrock of our civilisation,
are equally as well planned, orchestrated and micromanaged by the same
evil force which established and funded that rotten regime.
-
- We will now witness how certain Americans, like their
Communist Russian counterparts, have also been and still are, determined
to de-construct, dismantle and exterminate the family.
-
- The Conspirators.
-
- "The nuclear family must be destroyed , and people
must find better ways of living together. ... Whatever it's ultimate meaning,
the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process. ...
"Families have supported oppression by separating people into small,
isolated units, unable to join together to fight for common interests.
..." - Functions of the Family, Linda Gordon, WOMEN: A Journal of
Liberation, Fall, 1969.
-
- "By the year 2000 we will, I hope, raise our children
to believe in human potential, not God" - Gloria Steinem, editor of
'MS' magazine.
-
- "We can't destroy the inequities between men and
women until we destroy marriage. " -- [Robin Morgan, "Sisterhood
Is Powerful," (ed), 1970, p. 537]
-
- "The most merciful thing a large family can do to
one of its infant members is to kill it" - Margaret Sanger, founder
of Planned Parenthood, in Women and the New Rage, p.67
-
- "Marriage has existed for the benefit of men; and
has been a legally sanctioned method of control over women... We must work
to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition
for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage
women to leave their husbands and not to live individually with men."
- The Declaration of Feminism , November 1971
-
- "Only when manhood is dead - and it will perish
when ravaged femininity no longer sustains it - only then will we know
what it is to be free." -- [Andrea Dworkin. "The Root Cause,"
speech, 26 Sept. 1975, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
(published in Our Blood, ch. 9, 1976).]
-
- "The care of children ...is infinitely better left
to the best trained practitioners of both sexes who have chosen it as a
vocation...[This] would further undermine family structure while contributing
to the freedom of women." - Kate Millet, Sexual Politics 178-179
-
- "In order to raise children with equality, we must
take them away from families and communally raise them." -- Dr. Mary
Jo Bane, feminist and assistant professor of education at Wellesley College
and associate director of the school's Centre for Research on Woman
-
- "Who cares how men feel or what they do or whether
they suffer? They have had over 2000 years to dominate and made a complete
hash of it. Now it is our turn. My only comment to men is, if you don't
like it, bad luck - and if you get in my way I'll run you down." -
Letter to the Editor: Women's Turn to Dominate, Signed: Liberated Women,
Boronia; Herald-Sun, Melbourne, Australia, February 9, 1996
-
- "Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore
and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains
to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow
the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation,
and destroy the male sex." - Valerie Solana, SCUM Manifesto (Society
for Cutting Up Men.)
-
- "How will the family unit be destroyed? ... the
demand alone will throw the whole ideology of the family into question,
so that women can begin establishing a community of work with each other
and we can fight collectively. Women will feel freer to leave their husbands
and become economically independent, either through a job or welfare."-
Female Liberation , by Roxanne Dunbar.
-
- "I feel that 'man-hating' is an honourable and viable
political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against
the class that is oppressing them." - Robin Morgan, (editor of MS
magazine)
-
- "It is important for us to encourage women to leave
their husbands and not to live individually with men... All of history
must be re-written in terms of oppression of women. We must go back to
ancient female religions like witchcraft" - The Declaration of Feminism
, November 1971.
-
- "God is going to change. We women... will change
the world so much that He won't fit any-more." - Naomi Goldenberg,
Changing of the Gods: Feminism and the End of Traditional Religions (Quoted
at beginning of From Father God to Mother Earth)
-
- I hope that the reader now understands by the sheer malevolence
of the above statements, that the Communist `front group` known as the
feminist movement, has nothing whatsoever to do with `women's rights,`
and everything to do with the complete and total emasculation of the human
male, the enforced collapse of patriarchy and the breakdown of the family,
thereby facilitating the depopulation agenda[2] and aiding the implementation
of the Satanic New World Order. This attack against the family, against
the institution of marriage and against God and country is not a game!
-
- These people are serious about abolishing the family
unit, and the American nation, along with all other nation states in fact.
They are relentless and will stop at nothing to eradicate God, morals,
marriage, manhood, womanhood, fatherhood, motherhood, husband-hood and
love of nation from our hearts and minds. Their mission is to persuade
the masses to engage in a cloaked form of Satan Worship, disguised among
other things as humanistic atheism, pantheism, `earth` worship, along with
accompanying social aberrations such as misogyny, domestic violence, child
abandonment, child support schemes and traps, paternity fraud, serial divorces,
serial abortions, pornography, sexual perversion, homosexuality and lesbianism.
-
- Pornography : Debasing Human Nature.
-
- It cannot be argued that one of the most insidious weapons
being used in this war against God's most honoured institution, is Pornography,
and it is this aspect of the vengeful battle being directed against the
hearts, souls and consciences of men and women, not only here in the west,
but increasingly due to internet access, on a global scale, which I will
now deal with in some detail.
-
- Sexual material of all kinds is now all too easily accessible
through television, movies, music videos, and particularly the Internet.
Many will have us believe that this relentless intrusion of pornographic,
sexualised imagery is harmless, but it is anything but. It is a debased
aberrant form of human sexuality, encouraged by the agents of those doing
the work of Lucifer, which is highly addictive, destructive, demoralising,
corrupting and eventually fatal to any chance of a moral and decent way
of life. Despite what its apologists and defenders say, pornography has
a profoundly negative effect on how people view sex and sexual behaviour.
Researchers at the National Foundation for Family Research and Education
concluded not surprisingly that "exposure to pornography puts viewers
at increased risk for developing sexually deviant tendencies." According
to the report, "the rape myth (belief that women cause and enjoy rape,
and that rapists are normal) is very widespread in habitual male users
of pornography."
-
- There is also evidence that the repeated use of pornography
can interfere with the ability to enjoy and participate in normal marital
intimacy. Dr.Victor Cline, a specialist in treating sex addiction, has
documented a recurring progression in the use of pornography. If left unchecked,
what starts as casual viewing of pornography can eventually lead to an
escalation to more hard-core, aberrant material. This, he claims, can lead
to deviant sexual acts. Behavioural scientists agree. Dr. Cline reports
that "any type of sexual deviation can be acquired in this way, and
that it cannot be eliminated even by massive feelings of guilt." Eventually,
the viewer may try to act out the pornography-based, immoral fantasies,
often with devastating results.
-
- The course of this problem may be gradual and undetected,
concluded Cline. He states: "Like a cancer, it keeps growing and spreading.
It rarely ever reverses itself, and it is also very difficult to treat
and heal. Denial on the part of the male addict and refusal to confront
the problem are typical and predictable, and this almost always leads to
marital or couple disharmony, sometimes divorce, and sometimes the breaking
up of other intimate relationships."
-
- The Damage To Young People.
-
- Some researchers say that exposure to pornography can
affect the natural development of a child's brain. Of course it can! Statistics
show that the primary consumers of pornography are boys between the ages
of 12 and 17 years. In fact, for many, pornography is their primary source
of sexual education. This has very disturbing ramifications. "Teen
pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases," notes one report, "are
completely non-existent in porn, giving a false belief that there are no
adverse consequences to behaviours depicted in pornography." Young
males are being targeted by this industry of filth for a very definite
reason: to warp and pervert their ability to interact normally with girls,
by portraying the human female as little more than a collection of body
orifices to be filled.
-
- Dr.Judith Reisman, [6] president of the Institute for
Media Education, and one of the most exceptional human beings currently
inhabiting this planet, concludes: "Health-based neurological observations
about the instinctual brain-imprinted response to pornographic sights and
sounds indicates that viewing pornography is a biologically significant
event that overrides informed consent-and that is harmful to children's
[moldable] 'plastic' brains because it compromises their grasp of reality
and thus their mental and physical health, their well-being and their pursuit
of happiness."
-
- Pornography shapes attitudes and influences behaviour.
Its messages are enticing primarily because they are fantasy and thus presented
as more exciting than the real thing. "Individuals using pornography
set themselves up for unrealistic expectations leading to damaged relationships,"
notes one report. Pornography not only can, but is of course intended,
to destroy trust and openness, two highly essential qualities in a marriage.
Because it is primarily viewed in secret, pornography use often leads to
deception and lying. Mates feel betrayed. They do not understand why their
marriage partner no longer finds them desirable, and what's more nor does
he..
-
- Remember, as we have discussed above, the object of the
exercise is the destruction of the family. How many marriage breakups and
broken homes can be blamed on pornographic addiction?
-
- At a 2003 meeting of the American Academy of Matrimonial
Lawyers, two thirds of the 350 divorce lawyers who attended, said the Internet
played a significant role in the divorces in the past year, with excessive
interest in on-line porn contributing to more than half such cases. Pornography
had an almost non-existent role in divorce just seven or eight years ago[7]
-
- The insistence on selfish instant gratification at all
costs is inbuilt and inherent in pornography use. Hence, viewing pornography
is unloving. It undercuts a true believer's fight to maintain chastity
and a clean moral standing before God. Pornography exploits men, women
and children. It demeans them and robs them of their dignity and rights.
-
- The Main-Streaming Of Perversion.
-
- Many people today are ambivalent toward pornography,
because like all those other vices now prevalent in the West, it has entered
the mainstream and become to a large degree, accepted practice. Modern
attitudes toward pornography may be reflected by the 'prostitute-chic'
fashions many celebrities sport, the music videos that increasingly flaunt
sexual imagery, and the advertising media's adoption of a "porno aesthetic."
-
- Doctors now claim that pornography can spark an addiction
that is far more difficult to overcome than drug addiction. Treatment for
drug addicts usually starts with detoxification to remove the substance
from the body. But addiction to pornography, explains Dr. Mary Anne Layden
of the University of Pennsylvania, "produces mental imagery which
is permanently implanted in the mind of the user and is scaled in by brain
chemistry." That is why individuals can vividly recall pornographic
images from years past. She concludes: "This is the first addictive
substance for which there is no hope for detoxification." But does
that mean it is impossible to break free from pornography's influence?
And what specific harm does pornography cause?
-
- Internet Pornography Facts:
-
- About 75 percent of Internet pornography originates in
the United States. Close to 15 percent originates in Europe.
-
- It is estimated that some 70 million people a week visit
pornographic Web sites. About 20 million of these users are in Canada and
the United States.
-
- A study revealed that during a recent one-month period,
Germany had the largest audience for on-line pornography in Europe, followed
by Great Britain, France, Italy, and Spain.
-
- In Germany, Internet pornography users spend an average
of 70 minutes each month viewing pornographic sites.
-
- Among European viewers of Internet pornography, those
above 50 years of age spend the most time connected to adult Web sites.
-
- According to one source, 70 percent of Internet pornography
traffic occurs during the day.
-
- It is estimated by some that 100,000 Internet sites include
material on child pornography.
-
- About 80 percent of the Internet's commercial child pornography
originates in Japan.
-
- There is a proven connection between pornography and
rape, as well as other forms of violence against women and children. Infamous
serial killer Ted Bundy admits that he had a "strong appetite for
violent pornography." He says: "This condition is not immediately
seen by the individual or identified as a serious problem. But this interest
becomes geared towards matters of a sexual nature that involve violence.
I cannot emphasize enough the gradual development of this. It is not short-term."
-
- Rather than portraying sexual relations as a beautiful
and intimate expression of love between a man and a woman in honourable
marriage, pornography demeans and distorts the sexual act. Casual and perverted
sex is portrayed as being exciting and desirable. Personal gratification
with little or no regard for the other person is highlighted. Women, men,
and children are portrayed as objects that exist only for sexual gratification.
"Beauty is measured by proportion of body parts, shaping unrealistic
expectations," says one report. "Depicting women as anonymous,
ever-wanting/waiting, empty sex toys for men, stripping and exposing their
bodies for monetary gain and entertainment cannot possibly translate into
a message that can exist in harmony with equality, dignity and humanity,"
concludes another report.
-
- Soon, like any other improper stimulation, what initially
arouses becomes mundane and routine. "Over time," says one writer,
"[the users of pornography] require more explicit and deviant material.
They may push their partners into increasingly bizarre sexual activities,
diminishing their [own] capacity to express real affection." Does
that sound like a harmless diversion?
-
- Instead of love, pornography cultivates self-centred,
selfish desire, and fractures and stains every person it contaminates.
It destroys all decency and is a major threat to our traditional way of
life, and particularly, marriage and family.
-
- Pornography - A Vicious Assault On The Family.
-
- It is a sad reality that many Internet porn viewers are
children. Youngsters who though prohibited by law from purchasing pornographic
literature or from renting pornographic videos, can gain access to these
in their own home with a few clicks of the mouse. The choices are endless.
Many children regularly visit Internet sites without their parents' knowledge.
In fact, The Detroit News states that "more than two in five children
have subscribed to a web site or other service online even though nearly
85 percent of parents have rules against them doing so."
-
- Many think that a casual brush with pornography is harmless.
However, the facts show otherwise. Consider the case of a couple who seemed
to have an ideal marriage. They were financially secure, and they loved
to travel. Their friends thought of them as close, affectionate, and devoted,
and in many ways they were. However, problems arose when the husband started
looking at pornography. Writing to a popular advice columnist, his anxious
wife described her concerns: "When [my husband] first started to spend
a lot of time on the computer in the middle of the night and early morning,
he told me it was 'research.' I walked in on him one morning and caught
him looking at [pornography]. He said it was only a matter of curiosity.
When I took a closer look at what he was watching, it made me sick. He
was embarrassed and promised to stop, and I believed he meant it. He has
always been honourable-a man of his word."
-
- This man's perverse habit has cost him his self respect,
his honour, his integrity, and the respect and admiration of his wife.
It has destroyed something intrinsic and wholesome within him. He has become
weakened and his resolve degraded. Many men are now being lured into a
similar trap; anxious to avoid discovery, they log on late at night or
early in the morning. If they are caught, they often try to cover up what
they are doing by lying, as this man did. Can anyone reasonably claim that
a "hobby" that causes "a man of his word" to sneak
around in the middle of the night and to lie to loved ones is harmless?
-
- Pornography makes a profit out of the suffering of others,
and is designed in the main to degrade and subvert the innate goodness
in people, causing serious personal and family problems, to isolate, corrupt
and demoralise. Many people caught up in this evil `racket,` have admitted
that watching pornography has prevented them from developing close relationships
with others. They don't want people around while they indulge their passion
for pornography. People tend to fantasize when they watch pornography,
and fantasy does not equip a person to cultivate strong relationships or
to deal with life in the real world. Increasingly, we are hearing of cases
where people who look at or read pornographic material even have trouble
enjoying normal sexual relations with their mate. Is that conducive to
good family relations? Of course not. Nor is it intended to be. Can a pastime
that alienates people from those who care the most about them be truly
innocuous?
-
- We must consider God's original purpose for married people.
He lovingly endowed husbands and wives with the ability to give joyous
expression of their love for each other, through honourable sexual relations.
Proverbs 5:18, 19 shows that these were meant to be pleasurable: "Rejoice
with the wife of your youth. Let her own breasts intoxicate you at all
times. With her love may you be in ecstasy constantly."
-
- Note that love, not depraved animal like lust, was to
be the basis for sexual relations. The person who looks at pornography
is gratifying his own sexual desires-and alone, in most cases. A married
man who looks at pornography may begin to view his mate as a mere object-someone
who exists solely for his pleasure, or conversely, he simply loses interest
in her altogether. This is far from the dignity and honour that the Creator
intended men to accord women. (see 1 Peter 3:7) Such a practice that interferes
with the most intimate aspects of marriage can never be viewed as desirable?
Moreover, the pornographic industry, owned and controlled as it is by the
Illuminati, understands only too well that what begins as a casual indulgence
inevitably leads to a damaging long-term addiction. One writer observed:
"Just as drug addicts require more potent drugs to receive a 'high,'
consumers of pornography must have a more intense experience to achieve
the same euphoric feelings as before."
-
- That is apparently what happened to the husband mentioned
earlier in this article. One evening several months after he promised to
stop watching pornography, his wife returned home and found him at the
computer. From his demeanour she could see that something was wrong. "[He]
appeared quite nervous and upset," she wrote; "I looked at the
computer, and sure enough, he had been looking at some unbelievably raunchy
stuff. He said he was sincere when he promised to give it up, but he just
couldn't stay away from it."
-
- Just like narcotics, gambling, alcohol and the plethora
of other vices tearing down the Christian moral fabric of our societies,
pornography has been created and designed to create an immoral dependency,
which destroys not only the trust and respect of loved ones, but a person's
self respect and trust in himself. It is a tool of those who will dethrone
all righteousness and goodness and replace it with the purest of evil.
-
- Lucifer's Indulgence: Humankind's Scourge.
-
- Sarah Evelyn Isobel Payne [4]was murdered by Roy William
Whiting in July 2000. The subsequent investigation became a high profile
murder case in the United Kingdom. Following his conviction, Whiting was
imprisoned for life and is currently being held in the maximum security
Wakefield prison, in West Yorkshire.
-
- There is one fact in the disturbing history of Roy Whiting,
convicted of the murder of eight year-old Sarah Payne, which has not received
much attention. He had kept large quantities of pornography in his garage
workshop. Indeed, there is scarcely a sex offender who has not had an acute
pornography habit. In America, the FBI has reported that 81 percent of
sex killers have said their biggest sexual interest lay in viewing pornography,
and in compulsive masturbation. Now, no-one would suggest that pornography
alone causes such men to go and commit these terrible offences; and many
men who use porn lead otherwise blameless lives.
-
- But equally, as the British sex crimes expert, Ray Wyre
has observed, pornography creates a climate of thought and belief which
influences attitudes towards women and children. What's more, Wyre says,
the more men masturbate to pornographic fantasies, the more likely they
are to put those fantasies into practice. In other words, porn has an effect
on the behaviour of those who use it. Yet many think instead it acts as
a safety valve. Unlike fantasies involving violence, sexual pornography
is widely thought to be harmless. More than that, `Tatler` magazine now
reports that porno-chic is the new fashion statement. After all, our society
now runs on sex like a car runs on petrol. TV, films, ads for everything
from perfume to ice cream, are all sold on more and more explicit sex.
So since sex is no longer taboo, isn't it ridiculous to behave like Mrs
Grundy over pornography?
-
- After all, the argument goes, English culture has always
been bawdy and debauched. Just think of Chaucer's Miller's Tale; or Shakespeare's
prostitute Doll Tearsheet; or, indeed, the pornography produced by the
Victorians. Who now would ban the works of DH Lawrence, Radclyffe Hall,
James Joyce or Henry Miller, all of whom were once considered obscene?
Tastes change all the time, along with standards of acceptability. Pornography
is a legitimate form of expression which may even do some good, say it's
apologists .
-
- Such an ostensibly sophisticated view is surely naive
and self-deluding. It was fashionable in the sixties and seventies to believe
that if people were freed from rules and constraints, they could be trusted
to place limits on their own behaviour. But as the feminist Germaine Greer
has observed, porn is nothing to do with freedom of expression. It is a
ruthless industry which abuses not only those who furnish its imagery but
also the men who pay for its product.
-
- The Graphic Detail.
-
- Today's pornography is no longer a bit of full-frontal
nudity and some explicit bumping and grinding. What was illegal merely
eighteen months ago - and could only be obtained by means of a package
slipped out from the back of some tacky premises - is now legally on open
display in licensed sex shops and available through the internet. The spread
of computers has hugely increased the availability of pornography, which
can be downloaded so easily from the web. What was considered illegal material,
amounted to cruelty, degradation and humiliation of women through close-ups
of penetration, ejaculation and masturbation. Now such images are all legal.
-
- The details are sordid, and will shock many. But it is
surely essential that people are aware of what is being tolerated in the
name of freedom of expression and of personal choice. For these legal videos
do not merely show loveless, sad encounters. They dehumanise sex altogether.
There is very little view of faces or indeed any part of the anatomy apart
from the genital region. Women and men are reduced to pieces of hydraulic
machinery. The action consists mainly of close-ups of anal and vaginal
penetration, sometimes simultaneous. Sometimes the girl undergoes double
penetration while practising oral sex on a third man, or with more than
one man at the same time. The female genital region is always shaved to
produce a disturbing simulation of a child; worse still, it is often pulled
back so the camera peers right inside it. The impression that fills the
screen is of a carcass being rammed in every orifice.
-
- What's even more revolting is that in many of these videos
the men ejaculate over the girl's face. In one, as the eight or so men
she is servicing do this to her, the girl's expression is fixed in a ghastly
simulation of pleasure - but for one brief moment when she thinks the camera
isn't looking, the mask slips and you see her utter disgust and despair
before she resumes her pose. We are told that such girls are consenting
adults. But so what? Has our society really arrived at such a pass that
if a girl is so damaged that she allows herself to be treated worse than
any animal - in effect, as a thing - this is considered acceptable because
she is not doing it at knife-point?
-
- Do we not care about the terrible degradation not only
of the girl, but of the men buying this material, and of our whole society?
Are we all now so de-sensitised that we have somehow persuaded ourselves
that tolerating such monstrousness is in our interests?
-
- The answer is despairingly `YES.` Our societies, hearts
and minds are truly in the grip of the `Wicked One.`
-
- An Expanding Industry.
-
- Thanks to the internet, the sheer volume of pornography
has exploded. Tapping in the word 'porn' to one server alone brings up
24,522 sites. These legal websites feature a huge amount of anal sex. This
is all about pain and contempt. 'Watch young teens bite their lips as they
get it in the ass for the first time!' invites one site. 'Amazing anal
- the world's nastiest site', boasts another. Yet another promises: 'It's
hurting time: home to extreme pain hardcore'. This displays hot wax poured
onto and even pins stuck through women's genitals, and asserts: 'These
wenches do it because they love it', fuelling the murderous fantasy that
women want to be hurt.
-
- There's also heavy emphasis on 'teen sluts'. These are
almost certainly older girls pretending to be children, but even so this
shades into paedophilia since the pitch is the stomach-heaving fantasy
that these are children who will be 'split' open. And all this is legal.
You look at these vile images and you wonder what kind of a man could possibly
find pleasure or release in them. For it's no longer just the denizens
of sleazy Soho who are consumers of hard-core. It's the banker or the teacher
or the advertising executive sitting in front of his computer in his neat
suburban house or up-market apartment, downloading this viciousness from
the web and then going out for a nice meal with his wife or girlfriend.
-
- These websites, however, are immensely repetitive and
tedious. They invite a credit card subscription on the promise of more
extreme material, but then deny access to it unless yet more money is paid.
In this way they lead the man on in the hope of finding the ultimate forbidden
thrill. So when this doesn't materialise, what could be more inevitable
or easy for him than to get into an internet 'chat room' and download illegal
paedophile pictures of penetration or oral sex with a child?
-
- The illegal stuff on video and on the web is now confined
to things like paedophilia, bestiality, torture or coprophilia, which involves
bodily waste products. Yet such is the slide in norms of behaviour, the
police expect that in due course these taboos too will disappear. So how
is all this being allowed to happen? In the UK, the law controlling pornography
is the 1959 Obscene Publications Act, which outlaws any material likely
to deprave or corrupt. The first problem is the subjective nature of this
definition and the absence of any firm evidence of the harm such images
can do.
-
- Legal Aid.
-
- In May 2000, a decision by the UK courts dramatically
undermined the restraint the law did offer. Mr Justice Hooper turned down
a legal challenge by the British Board of Film Classification, to a decision
by its own appeal panel that the Board had been wrong to insist on cuts
of explicit sequences before it would license a group of porn videos. As
result, the BBFC had to rewrite its own guidelines, which until then had
outlawed explicit penetration or ejaculation from the videos it licensed.
When board members asked the public for their views, they were told - to
their horror - that the public wanted to make their own decision whether
or not to view such material.
-
- The outcome was that the Board had no option but to issue
revised guidelines which they feared would open the floodgates. Just as
they predicted, they found themselves licensing the kind of highly disturbing
pornography that had previously been illegal. Moreover, these new guidelines
rapidly became a benchmark for everyone else. So porn sites on the web
started to circulate equally explicit material; top shelf magazines stocked
by corner newsagents, started to include equivalent pictures; and TV stations
such as Channel Four and Five are now also pushing to take advantage of
this shift in practice.
-
- A Harmless Diversion?
-
- The argument is that pornographic images don't harm anyone
as they are merely fantasies. But fantasies of what? Of hurting women?
Of humiliating them? Of treating them as dehumanised objects?As the philosopher
Roger Scruton argues in his book `Sexual Desire,` fantasy has a tendency
to remake the world in its own image. So the 'harmless' porn voyeur can
turn into a rapist with a gun. For his fantasy is governed by monstrous
myths and illusions - that women wish to be raped, that children are waiting
to be awakened to sexual pleasure, or that violence is a natural right.
-
- Pornography objectifies women and reduces them to a commodity.
Such dehumanisation affects the man's behaviour, ranging from withdrawal
of intimacy through to harsh treatment of women, to outright abuse. Dr
Trevor Stammers, a GP who has often written about sexual problems, says
most women he counsels whose husbands are into porn claim this has destroyed
their marriages. The husband prefers to find sexual release from a computer
because this doesn't require any personal engagement by him. So he chooses
physical sensation without love. 'There is no doubt', says Dr Stammers,
'that as a result of using pornography such men become far more callous
towards women. What they are seeking from porn is the illusion of power
and control over them'.
-
- Research studies back up the suggestion that using pornography
badly affects behaviour and relationships. American academics Dolf Zillmann
and Jennings Bryant have shown that pornography can diminish a person's
sexual happiness, that it damages beliefs about sexuality and attitudes
towards women, and that it desensitises people to rape as a criminal offence.
An American survey last year showed that more than 200,000 people were
effectively addicted to porn through websites and associated chat-rooms.
Victor Cline of the University of Utah has documented how men who become
addicted to pornography, begin to want more explicit or deviant material,
and end up acting out what they have seen.
-
- Isn't that to 'deprave and corrupt' by any reasonable
understanding of those terms? Yet far from being outlawed, porn is becoming
mainstream behaviour. Sado-masochism has its own fashionable clubs. In
Britain, Sodomy was made legal for women when the age of homosexual consent
was reduced to 16yrs; what was once considered an intolerable assault on
women, from which the law should protect them, has now become their 'right.'
And urination during sex - the 'golden shower' is even discussed enthusiastically
in teen magazines.
|
