- Don Fredrick wrote:
-
- I have tried to keep an open mind on this subject, and
have read quite a few things sent to me by 9/11 skeptics. I do not underestimate
the depths of evil or abuse to which a government - any government,
Republican or Democrat - will go. I imagine that pretty much anything is
possible. (I am skeptical, however, when they tell me they "see
something" in a blurryPentagon photograph that, to me, simply
looks like a blurry photograph.
-
-
- Dick Eastman reply:
-
- The Highest Treason Substantiated -- conclusions
drawn from the evidence in the September 11, 2001 killings at
the Pentagon
-
- I examined the statements of all of the people who claim
to be witnesses of the Pentagon crash. Enough unrelated people -- although
some were suspiciously related as people working for USAToday and or witnesses
like Lincoln Leibner who "saw the Boeing crash", who allegedly
first told Rumsfeld it was a Boeing crash,and who alone
was allowed to enter and bring out (selected) surivivors to the rescuers
who were kept for some reason from themselves proceeding into
the building,and Leibner who hid his face from photographers
and would not give his name when asked for it -- Leibner the captain
who just happened to park far from the entrance for someone who showed
up at the Pentagon at an unassigned time to see if he "could help
out" .
-
- So let's look at the crime scene and the evidence.
-
-
-
- The jetliner by many accounts came "directly over
the Naval Annex." (see witness statements below)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- We are looking east at the west wall of the Pentagon.
North is to our left. The "taxi" lamppost stood
- to the right (south). Yet witnesses at the gas station
at the time, Sgt. Lagasse for one, maintain in
- multiple interviews and correspondence that the plane
passed north of him. Thus it was impossible
- for the Boeing to have been the killer object that brought
down the lamppost.
- Let me show you how that conclusion was reached.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- My conclusion that the Boeing flew over the Pentagon
more from the west as the killer jet (or missile) came from the southwest
is the explanation that best reconciles the witness accounts and the physical
evidence. To many witnesses saw the jetliner come from over the Hotel,
"directly over" Naval Annex and North of the gas station, or
fly straight in to ignore. Yet the line from the southwest most lamppost
that was knocked down to the impact point at column 14 -- the only place
with a hole big enough to accomodate the width of a large plane (although
photos show damage elsewhere on the wall indicating entry by a second object
(air-to-ground missile) too far south to have been caused even by the tip
of the starboard wing of a 757. I have thus presented the data-derived,
data-controlled, explanation that reconciles the facts with the witness
accounts -- unlike the no-plane-hit-the-WTC disinfo-dialectics cover-up
team who fly in the face of 47 video recordings, of witness accounts
of targeted people who were inside the building, of 14 firemen who
colleagues were killed, who deny the importance of airplane shaped
holes with the beams around the edge of the holes pushed in by the plane,
by the absense of even one video what shows the south side of the South
Tower exploding without first a plane hitting (when all of New York and
across the Hudson had been photographing WTC complex that had sustained
an airplane hit fifiteen minutes before -- so that there would be no way
for a "no-plane-at-the-WTC black op to control for all of the cameras
that would or could be aimed at the giant skyline dominating skyscraper at
that moment, which reasonalby would be a great many.
-
-
-
-
- The Army's own newspaper, the Stars and Stripes of
September 12, 2001, presents this map diagram showing where
the jetliner came from and the almost perpendicular angle at which it hit:
-
-
-
- Witness Steve Riskus who was north of the crash headed
south, saw the plane pass just 100 feet in front of him. He wrote that
the plane appeared to him to have gone straight in, although he was not
willing to argue with anyone about it. Only as after he returned to his
car with his famous pictures and was driving further south did he see the
downed lamppost.
- Here is the witness-based illustration that appeared
in the Times on September 12:
-
-
-
- But look at this:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Kelly Knowles from an Arlington apartment two miles away
saw two planes moving toward the Pentagon, one veering away as the other
crashed.
-
- Tom Seibert, in the Pentagon, listened to "what
sounded like a missile" followed by a "loud boom."
-
- Lon Rains Editor, Space News, was driving up Interstate
395 from Springfield to downtown Washington. "I heard a very loud,
quick whooshing sound that began behind me and stopped suddenly in front
of me and to my left. In fractions of a second I heard the impact and an
explosion. The next thing I saw was the fireball. I was convinced it was
a missile. It came in so fast it sounded nothing like an airplane."
-
- Keith Wheelhouse and his sister, Pam Young were preparing
to leave a funeral at Arlington National Cemetery when they watched "the
jet" approach and hit the Pentagon. Both saw another plane flying
near the jet that crashed. When asked if the other plane could have been
an airliner performing a normal landing at Reagan National Airport, Wheelhouse
stated that he was not confused by normal airport traffic.
- More of my old discussion of witness statements here:
-
- http://www.bedoper.com/eastman/witnesses/index.html
-
- Several employees of USA today were out driving in front
of the Pentagon that day and say they saw the jetliner crash. On of them
was Joel Sucherman, who was in his convertible with the top down, doubtless
so he could better listen to the news about the two planes hitting the
World Trade Center in New York. At any rate he became a prime witness,
among several loudmouths who shouted ridicule at other witnesses who spoke
of seeing two planes. (There is at least one on-the-scene newscast
where witnesses are overheard reminding the newscaster that some people
saw two planes. (If you can't find it on youtube let me know and I will
see if I can locate a URL.) At any rate, I took a careful look at Sucherman's
story.
-
- Joel Sucherman's witness story, if his estimates of distances
are at all correct, actually confirms the Boeing passing everywhere
north of where the lamppost was stuck.
-
- Evidence 1.A "Sucherman cross ahead of him while
northbound on Route 27 but the jet or missile that hit the wall crossed
behind him.
-
- Joel Sucherman locates himself on Washington Blvd. 100
yds from the Pentagon headed north. He sees the American Airlines jetliner
cross Washington Blvd. (flying west to east) 50 to 75 feet in front of
him. But the lamppost on Washington Blvd. that hit the taxi stood 322 yds
southwest the crash on Washington Blvd -- behind Sucherman. If the killer
object knocked down the lamppost and hit the Pentagon at a 50 to 55 -degree
angle as the engineers insist -- then the jetliner Sucherman saw pass in
front of him could not have been the plane.
-
- The jetliner that witnesses saw came directly over the
Naval Annex and pass north of the Citgo gas station just before crossing
Washington Blvd proceeded straight on to the Pentagon. But a course directly
to the crash point from north of the gas station crosses Washington Blvd.
(route 27) too far north for that plane to have hit the lamppost on the
southwest corner of the Washington Blvd. stone bridge at the center of
the cloverleaf interchange.
-
- Witness Joel Sucherman confirms this fact when he says
he was 100 yards from the crash location and that the plane crossed Washington
Blvd. in front of his northbound car a mere 50 to 75 yards from his windshield.
Thus the plane passed north of his northbound car. But the first lamppost
that was downed stood on Washington Blvd. on the other side of the highway
322 yards away from the crash -- Sucherman had already passed it in the
slow commuter traffic, it was well south of him, that is behind him, when
he saw through his windshield the plane cross his path ahead of him. The
the same plane could not have crossed Washington Blvd both behind and 50
yards in front of Sucherman. Sucherman had his back to the real killer
plane (or missile) as it knocked down the lamppost and headed for column
14 of the west wall of the Pentagon.
-
- -------------
-
- Concept diagram: Joel Sucherman -- to the extent that
his account is accurate -- proves that the jetliner he saw cross Washington
Blvd 50 to 75 feet ahead of him when he was 100 feet from the crash point,
could not have been the plane that knocked down the pole on Washington
Blvd that was already well behind him and over 300 yards from the crash.
-
-
-
-
- Distance of Sucherman from crash: 100 yards
-
- Distance of Sucherman from the airliner than crossed
Wash Blvd in front of (north of) his northbound car: 50 to 75 yards
-
- Distance of the lamppost southwest from the impact point
on same highway (from pillar #14): 322 yds.
-
- Distance Sucherman in the northbound lane would have
been from the crash if he was even with the lamppost 306 yds.
-
-
- "USAToday.com Editor Joel Sucherman saw it all:
an American Airlines jetliner fly left to right across his field of vision
as he commuted to work Tuesday morning. It was highly unusual. The large
plane was 20 feet off the ground and a mere 50 to 75 yards from his windshield.
Two seconds later and before he could see if the landing gear was down
or any of the horror-struck faces inside, the plane slammed into the west
wall of the Pentagon 100 yards away. 'My first thought was he's not going
to make it across the river to [Reagan] National Airport. But whoever was
flying the plane made no attempt to change direction,' Sucherman said.
'It was coming in at a high rate of speed, but not at a steep angle"almost
like a heat-seeking missile was locked onto its target and staying dead
on course.'"
-
- - "Journalist Witnesses Pentagon Crash." eWeek.com,
13 Sep 2001
- www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,9306,00.asp
-
- What does it mean for the plane to have passed 50 to
75 feet ahead of Sucherman's car and that the crash occured 100 yards away
from Sucherman? And what does it mean that Sucherman saw the plane cross
in front of him from left to right? It can mean only one thing -- that
Sucherman was headed north, that he had already passed the famous lamppost
on the overpass at the heart of the cloverleaf (that pole is over 300 yards
southeast of the where the killer jet crashed -- the pole on Wash. Blvd.
that was knocked down by the killer jet and hit the southbound taxi) and
yet, having past this pole, Sucherman saw the jetliner cross in front of
him (as his car faced north) going from left (west) to right (east). This
means that the plane that Sucherman saw could not have been the plane that
downed the pole that Sucherman had left behind him. The plane Sucherman
saw was the jetliner that come over the Naval Annex and flew from west
to east north of the gas station and well north of that pole. Sucherman
may have made an honest mistake when he interpreted the jetliner he saw
as making the explosion that was caused by the plane that knocked down
that pole and passed behind Sucherman's car and into the wall 100 yards
from Sucherman. Sucherman -- an "unfriendly witness" -- backs
up the already well-established conclusion that the jetliner was not the
plane that hit the pole and that crashed into the west wall at a 50-degree
angle coming from the southwest.
-
- Evidence:
-
- Some of these photos have a Boeing drawn in on the path
taken by the killer object that passed behind Sucherman's car. Remember,
the plane that Sucherman saw came from north of the gas station and therefore
had to cross Washington Blvd. further north than where the lamppost was
struck. In the photo taken from the gas station you can see the stone bridge
where the lamppost stood on the southwest corner (right side). You can
also see that if the Boeing flew to the Pentagon crash point passing north
of the gas station (left in the east-facing picture) that it would have
to have crossed Washington Blvd. north of Sucherman who had already passed
the lamppost on his left as he headed north.
-
- There were other witnesses who said they saw the Boeing
crash -- the most interesting of which is Lincoln Liebner. He is the man
who allegedly told Sec. of Defense Donald Rumsfeld that a plane had been
what did the damage. Liebner was also the man who went in and brought victims
out to Rescuers becasue rescuers were not allowed inside the building.
-
- Next I will send you regarding the security camera
videos. After that I will send photos of the wall before they brought
it down to cover the imprints of the killer object and a second
missile -- but definitely NOT of a Boeing 757. We have only
scratched the surface.
-
- And all the world who have been watching Fox and other
mainstream media is thinking that Fetzer's "no-planes-hit-the-WTC"
is all there is to "9-11 conspiracy theories" -- how successful
the perpetrators have been in keeping the public from the people who have
collected the REAL evidence of the false-flag mass-murder frameup.
-
- Dick Eastman
- Yakima, Washington
- Every man is responsible to every other man.
-
-
-
- Ed Ward, MD Responds To 'Highest Treason'
- 'Accessories After the Fact'
- By Dr. Ed Ward MD
- 9-23-10
-
-
- Highest Treason is located here: http://www.rense.com/general86/hight1.htm
-
- 'Understanding The Scam of Thermite on 911' by 'Dick'
Eastman
-
- A simple rebuttal to the lunacy of http://www.rense.com/general86/therm.htm
-
- The Bogus Science of 'thermite' was exposed long ago,
so Dr. Stephen Jones and Dick Eastman have moved on to the Pentagon.
-
- I'm not putting more efforts into the denial of nukes
or the promotion of COMPLETE BS 'Super-Duper' Thermite - especially when
the truth is already out there. To try to ignore it has become beyond
absurd. The Pentagram information is from 'Spook Central' - and nothing
leaves there unless it is Pentagram-approved. The Pentagon info is not
needed...in light of the already proven Treason by this government and
the ALREADY PROVEN TREASON WITH NUKES. Unfortunately, these authors
continue to obfuscate and misdirect the public.
-
- Here is a key related story:
-
- Mini Nukes Were Used On 9-11 http://www.henrymakow.com/mini-nukes_were_used_on_9-11.html
-
- --Dr. Ed Ward, MD
-
- Ed Ward MD's Weblog of Tyranny http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/
-
- http://www.facebook.com/EdWardMD3
- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/
-
- Concise Briefing: Past/Present Global Tyranny - Basic
Proof, ID, and Remedy = Proven 9-11 Nukes + Included Links are HERE:
-
- Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement
- http://www.rense.com/general92/pr911.htm
|