- The ultimate Israeli objective in Southern Palestine
is to create a neutralized "Gazan" regime that is geographically
and politically separate from the regime in the West Bank. It has always
been part of Israel's strategy to split the Palestinian people into West
Bankers and Gazans. Since the starting of the First Intifada in 1987 Israel
looked for ways to split the cohesiveness of the Palestinian people. I
doubt if at that time their intention was to create two geographically
and politically separate groups of Palestinians, but it looks like Israel
is about to harvest the fruits of many years of planting and replanting.
-
- It was ironic that Israel and the United States would
force the Palestinians with an ultimatum to hold elections at a time when
the Palestinians did not even have a State, but yet ignored all the Arab
States' state of democracy. The election I am talking about is the one
giving Hamas a majority of seats in the Palestinian Legislative Council,
a product of the Oslo Agreement that Hamas opposed and yet to recognize.
The United States and Israel ignored this fact at the time--why? Why didn't
they ask Hamas to sign the Oslo Agreement if it wants to enter the election
which was based on the Oslo Agreement?
-
- Incidentally, I remember Western Media as well as Arab
Media talking about the two million dollars that the US was sending FATAH,
the party of Mahmuod Abbas to use for campaigning at the same time that
Hamas was getting millions of dollars from states that were friendly with
Israel and others which were not, such as Iran. This fact was ignored by
the media. On the contrary even Western Media was talking about the positive
aspects of Hamas social programs, meaning schools and hospitals while at
the same time "exposing" the "corruption" of FATAH
" fat cats". Why?
-
- America and Israel were aware of Hamas' challenge to
FATAH and did nothing to stop it. The Palestinians did not need to have
an election at that time. If Israel and the US were so concerned about
the Palestinian people they would have worked for the establishment of
a Palestinian State and made sure that a friendly regime was in place.
The ironic thing that the U.S. and Israel did was to "help" Hamas
get into a power position and immediately they opposed it. They opposed
a situation that they helped create. Why?
-
- Hamas won the election on January 25, 2006, but in 2005
an Israeli General who warned that Hamas was arming the public to overthrow
Fatah was reprimanded. Why would Hamas be allowed to arm itself and enter
an election? Why?
-
- On June 14 Hamas took over the control of Gaza after
overthrowing Fatah leadership and security apparatus as Israel stood on
the side line and watched as one of its main objectives was finally coming
into reality, two separate Palestinian entities opposed to each other creating
two regimes to mirror the two spectrums of the Arab regimes in the area.
Israel could have stopped Hamas take over with one F-16 sortie or even
an Apache, but chose not to. Why? With Hamas take over the Palestinians
finally came around to exactly where Israel wanted them to be. Geographically,
politically, socially, and otherwise different from their brethren in to
the north.
-
-
- Today, we see Western Media, Arab Media, Palestinian
Media, World governments and their people including Arab Governments and
their people calling it nothing but "Gaza" and the Palestinians
there as "Gazans". "FREE GAZA" we now say, not "free
Palestine". That is exactly what Israel wants, for the world to start
calling that Palestinian territory, Gaza. Palestine is in Ramallah, Gaza
is in Gaza. There are Palestinians, and there are Gazans, just like there
are Iraqis and Kuwaitis, Syrians and Lebanese, Egyptians and Sudanese,
etc etc... It looks like <http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/articles/article0005345.html>Strategy
For Israel In the Nineteen Eighties also known as <http://www.geocities.com/alabasters_archive/zionist_plan.html>The
Zionist Plan for The Middle East is finally reaching the Palestinians
after visiting Iraq and Sudan.
-
-
- Israel did not "get" Hamas all the way here
to destroy it, no, but it wants to disarm it. just as the U.S did with
Saddam and his scuds, Israel want all Hamas heavy guns destroyed for now,
until the time comes when Hamas is no longer needed just like Saddam. In
my opinion it is not in Israel's favor to eliminate Hamas at this
time, on the contrary, it is in its favor to allow Hamas to become
a stronger political organization equally accepted in the Arab
world as well as in the World just as another regime in the
Middle East, like the Hashemites in Jordan, Ba'ath in Syria, Fatah in
Ramallah. Its not Hamas rockets that Israel is after, but rather the wholesale
liquidation of the Palestinian problem.
-
- Does it have to happen like that? Of course not but it
seems that all parties involved ,with no exceptions, find themselves
in a position without any other alternatives but to continue
with this separation. The ball is in the people's court now. Maybe
that is why Israel is targeting the people.
-
-
-
|