- Some remote viewers are quick to claim, "There is
no time." Or they flippantly say, "Time is just an illusion."
-
- Such statements are easy to make, difficult to explain,
and tricky to prove with remote viewing data. Many say, "Remote viewing
is outside of time and space." I think it would be more accurate to
state a remote viewer's consciousness can move through time and space.
-
- Ask most people, "What is time?" and see if
they can speak intelligently for more than 30 seconds. I'm not claiming
I can, but I want to make the point that we humans don't really understand
time, and it is absurd for any of us to make declarative statements about
it. Having admonished myself I will continue. Science tells us that time
is the 4th dimension. At The Hawaii Remote Viewers' Guild we have theorized
that consciousness is also a dimension. Time is linked to consciousness,
because time cannot exist without the observation of consciousness.
-
- Think about that for a moment. Time is consciousness
observing. Space is a dimension. Consciousness is a dimension, and time
exists when consciousness observes.
-
- Please take another moment to wrap your mind around that.
Space is a dimension. When consciousness observes in space, then the dimension
of time must be present.
-
- Now, as remote viewers hopefully we have all proved (at
least to ourselves) that consciousness can traverse space and time. It
doesn't mean space and time do not exist for remote viewers; it means our
consciousness can traverse these dimensions. If space is a dimension, and
time is a dimension, you have to move through them, displacing part your
consciousness, to bring back target data. Every remote viewer who has sat
down with a pen and paper and a target ID knows it is not easy. We all
work hard to produce valid remote viewing sessions.
-
- What is the present? What is the past? What is the future?
The present, or the "now" is a slippery concept. Our human awareness
exists in the very near past. It requires a split second for my spoken
word- sound waves- to travel to your eardrum, for the signal to be processed
by your cerebral cognizance, for you to understand what I said. By the
time your mind gets a grip on it, it is already in the past. Try as hard
as you might, you're not in the present.
-
- So the human awareness adheres itself to the very near
past, the illusion of the perception of what we call that we call the "now"
or the "present."
-
- About the past. Events leave an imprint, and with training
it is possible for a portion of a remote viewer's awareness to overlay
that imprint. If we remote view the events that occurred at The Alamo on
March 6th, 1836 we displace our consciousness to a time and a space where
the events of the Alamo were happening in the now. The event at the Alamo
created a footprint that resonates still in its own time and space. To
remote view that event we displace a portion our consciousness to that
time and space. Our awareness experiences a duplicity of two time lines;
where within our mind we not only process information from the past, we
also process from our present state. And with something of an "overmind"
we sort between the two data streams to recover the information from the
past. So we can replay the events of the past.
-
- As human beings our consciousness adheres to the now
(actually the very near past) more easily than it can be postured or positioned
to the future. The past is a footprint of culminated variables fixed in
their time. The future is a forming wave that transpires as a result of
all the constantly coalescing and changing variables.
-
- So for a remote viewer working a future target is in
fact more complex that perceiving the past. The best example of a remote
viewing prediction of the future was the notarized and published session
when former US Army Special Forces remote viewer and HRVG President Glenn
Wheaton described a Russian satellite streaking into earth's atmosphere
off the coast of leeward Oahu (March 1998) several weeks before it happened.
When Glenn remote viewed that future event it was bound to happen. The
satellite had an orbit and trajectory, and gravity rules. At the time he
remote viewed the target, the variables were lining up and coalescing into
the wave that became the future event and were not likely to change. When
he gathered data describing the satellite burning through the atmosphere,
and when he portrayed the shocked air cargo pilot who witnessed it, the
satellite was already beginning to slow down, earth was pulling it, the
thin upper atmosphere was already affecting it. All of this was going to
culminate in the future. Nothing was going to stop that satellite from
creating the imprint that Glenn remote viewed before it happened. The air
cargo flights were already scheduled. That pilot was in the rotation and
scheduled to fly that future night.
-
- Working a future target is not always that easy. When
you try to work a remote viewing target located in the future, often there
are many variables and anomalies that come into play and affect the future
outcome. Something unexpected might likely occur. The variables are compounded
when you introduce multiple targets in a pool. And when your target within
a pool has not been selected yet, the variables increase again exponentially.
Something unexpected might happen, and something else might get your attention.
Remote viewing is far more complex than we comprehend.
-
- Here's my point. Our own research and evidence at HRVG
shows that working future targets is not as easy as working past or "present
time" (actually very near past) targets. And our experience also indicates
that lumping targets into a pool increases the likelihood that a viewer
will either morph targets or view a target in the pool different from the
one eventually selected. It will be interesting to see if Courtney Brown's
recent Climate Project will ultimately support or refute this.
|
