- In the art of surveillance, there is a cunning ploy,
familiar to the readers of Le Carre: the target is followed by a clumsy
gumshoe; he discovers he is being tailed, easily shakes the tail off and
goes on, feeling secure and unobserved. Unbeknownst to him, there are other
detectives who stick to him like glue and follow him to his perdition.
Professionally it is called a "double tail".
-
- Apparently, some of us were duped by such a ruse in the
peculiar affair of a Zionist plot to infiltrate Wikipedia. This powerful
online encyclopaedia is ostensibly free and open: everyone can be an editor,
add or edit any entry. Editors remain anonymous; their true identity is
hidden behind a nickname. This rule has a serious drawback: using this
anonymity, a dedicated group may infiltrate the system by stealth, distort
reality and create a false picture of the world in the eyes of billions.
Apparently this script has been recently enacted.
-
- Conspiracy? Yes. Jewish conspiracy? You bet! The damning
email exchange was intercepted and published,
revealing a radical Zionist plot to bend "Wiki." A moderate leftist
(some would call it 'tame') US-based pro-Palestinian site EI revealed
that the radical-extremist Zionist organisation CAMERA called for "volunteers
who can work as 'editors' to ensure" that Israel-related articles
on Wikipedia agree with their right-wing-Zionist agenda. This effort was
to be kept secret from the media and the public. Stealth and misrepresentation
were presented as the keys to success. A CAMERA official advised the volunteers
to sign up as editors for Wikipedia and afterwards to avoid editing Israel-related
material for a while, in order to "avoid the appearance of being one-topic
editors". The orchestrated effort was to appear as if it were the
work of unaffiliated individuals, and for this reason the editors were
to avoid picking a user name that marked them as pro-Israel, or that let
people know their real name. The emails taught Zionist apprentices how
to act in the interests of Israel while using neutral language. The emphasis
was on the long run side of the operation: "This is a marathon not
a sprint", a Zionist instructor nicknamed 'Zeq' taught his apprentices
in the email exchange.
-
- The EI article about this revelation was quite sycophantic
towards Wikipedia. It presented Wiki as an objective source at loggerheads
with Zionist infiltrators, and even bordered on advertising: "Openness
and good faith are among Wikipedia's core principles. Any person in the
world can write or edit articles, but Wikipedia has strict guidelines and
procedures for accountability intended to ensure quality control and prevent
vandalism, plagiarism or distortion. It is because of these safeguards
that articles on key elements of the Palestine-Israel conflict have generally
remained well-referenced, useful and objective."
-
- Still, it was not enough, and on the next day, 22 April
2008, EI updated this article with a triumphal and calming statement: "a
plan by the pro-Israel pressure group CAMERA to skew Wikipedia in a pro-Israel
direction appears to have collapsed after it was exposed by EI". Zeq
was dismissed, and anyway, fewer than a dozen of Camera moles were active
at the time EI exposed the scheme. In short: everything is fine, Wiki is
functioning well, and the Zionist scare is gone, thanks to fearless EI.
And anyway, it was only a small operation by the enemies of freedom, and
it is over.
-
- Excuse me, is this an article, or a paid advertisement
for Wikipedia? Did EI receive on evening April 21st an offer they could
not refuse from the owner of Wiki? Only a Zionist can think that Wiki "articles
on key elements of the Palestine-Israel conflict have generally remained
well-referenced, useful and objective." On the contrary, they are
biased in the extreme; just read, for instance, an exceedingly hostile
entry on Hamas, including its Talk, i.e. discussions of editors, deletions
and corrections. It defines Hamas as " best known for multiple suicide
bombings and other attacks directed against civilians [known to whom? To
me it is best known as the ruling party of Palestine, and secondly, as
grassroots mutual assistance movement ISH] Hamas' charter calls for
the destruction of the State of Israel [while all prominent Israeli parties
joined in destruction of Palestine ISH] the organization is described
by many as antisemitic." Is that objective? Further the entry says,
inter alia: Hamas is considered by the US a terrorist organisation. This
is true, but not the whole truth. I personally added: However, Russia refused
to consider Hamas a terrorist organisation. My addition was immediately
removed by ever-watchful Zionist case-officer. Hamas is terrorist, full
stop.
-
- Only a dishonest fool, or a man who never used Wikipedia,
may think that plan of the Lobby "to skew Wikipedia in a pro-Israel
direction appears to have collapsed". The clumsy gumshoe was shaken
off, for Camera is but a bunch of amateurs, extreme Jewish nationalists
with some nuisance value. They do not represent the Jewish mainstream;
but they do play a useful part: they make the mainstream appear moderate.
Being hassled by Camera is like being hassled by the Klan it proves
nothing. They hassle everybody, even moderate Zionists and other fellow-philosemites
whom Camera fanatics consider insufficiently zealous, such as Johann
Hari, an English professional philosemite who recently boasted:
"I have worked undercover at both the Finsbury Park mosque and among
neo-Nazi Holocaust deniers to expose the Jew-hatred there; I went on the
Islam Channel to challenge the anti-Semitism of Islamists, I received a
rash of death threats calling me 'a Jew-lover''. Later he strayed farther
afield and wrote about Israeli sewage pouring all over Gaza. Afterwards,
he complained, "Camera said I am an anti-Jewish bigot akin to Joseph
Goebbels."
-
- Now, when the amateurs are disgraced and gone, the professionals
remain. Wiki is as partial to Jews as the Jewish Chronicle. The picture
of the world it offers is being edited and shaped in full accordance with
general Jewish world view thanks to a group of permanent and devoted editors
and arbiters.
-
- Freedom to add and edit is just a bait attracting millions
unpaid contributors. If Wiki were truly free, provided that "ordinary
people' are in vast majority, we could expect to find a democratic world
view, not one not perverted by a biased minority, but the real Wikipedia
does not work that way. The apparent chaos of Wiki is strictly controlled
by a hierarchy of Agents Smith, who secure the Wiki matrix. They delete
references to Jewish misdeeds, but emphasize every good deed by a Jew.
Israel/Palestine is just one area in what is truly universal agenda. For
instance, they block and remove attempts to mention the Jewish origin of
the founder of Satanist movement, one La Vey (originally Levy), though
this explains his hatred towards Christianity. They insist on inferiority
of Poincare versus Einstein, of Jung versus Freud or Proudhon versus Marx.
Every act against Jews is recorded; every act of Jews against goyim is
blotted out from this organised memory of our generation. These editors
can manage just fine, thank you, without amateur infiltrators.
-
- Zeq has been banned for his indiscretions, but the man
he wrote of so admiringly, whom he described as their role model to his
apprentices ("work with him and learn from him"), an ideal,.
effective Zionist Wikipedia editor called Jayjg, is still there. Jayjg
is not just an editor; he is an arbiter, what passes for a judge on the
Wikipedia. He was appointed to that position by the site owner himself.
He is an Agent Smith of the Wiki matrix. One may see his work in many,
many entries: clever and unscrupulous, he is a master of the subterfuge
and deceit.
-
- Another, superior Agent Smith is Cberlet or John Foster
(Chip) Berlet, the scourge of the web. He is acting under many names. He
is a collaborator with the ADL, the Jewish thought police. Though he previously
denied having any relationship to ADL, he admitted to Israeli Foreign Affairs
that he "had had quite a cordial professional relationship with the
ADL" and "had been doing research in cooperation with ADL".
The New York City Jewish newspaper "Forward" reported that Berlet
transferred information from FBI anti-Communist informer directly to ADL.
Ace Hayes
wrote: "John Foster "Chip" Berlet has been involved, over
the past half decade, in attacking virtually every independent critic of
the Imperial State that the reader can name." His operation is financed
by Ford Foundation. Michael Collins Piper in his monumental book
on the Kennedy assassination, Final Judgment, asserts that Chip Berlet
is a CIA agent. Naturally, his own entry in Wiki is protected from editing.
The Arbitration committee (those who hold the reigns of power on the Wiki)
"admit to hero-worship of Cberlet', as I was informed by a prominent
insider.
-
- These men are discreet, they won't babble about their
devotion to the Jewish cause; they hide it under the veil of bureaucratic
expressions and abbreviations. Their supporting cast includes some Jewish
"antizionists" like RolandR. This is actually a British Trotskyite
trade union apparatchik Roland Rance, who does not mind to cooperate with
convinced anti-Communist, CIA and ADL agent Berlet and with zealous Zionist
Jayjg. So much for his antizionism and his socialism! He, and thousands
of smaller wanna-be Agents Smith did not need the starry-eyed arch-Zionists
of CAMERA, they are already in.
-
- The "revelation" of EI is nothing but a subterfuge,
a "double tail" executed to increase our trust in Wiki. A similar
"double tail" operation was performed last year, when Wiki
"announced it had found CIA-made edits on a few pages. Careful reading
of that "revelation" was even more disappointing than that of
EI. The worst discovered CIA edit of President Ahmadinejad entry was 'added
exclamation "Wahhhhhh!", while "other changes that have
been made are more innocuous, and include tweaks to the profile of former
CIA chief Porter Goss and celebrities such as Oprah Winfrey." This
is ridiculous: the US secret services spend many billions per annum in
their drive for domination of the Web. A recent report speaks of $30 billion
allocated by the Pentagon for an "electronic Manhattan Project"
in order to fight the Web. And they want us to believe that all these billions
produced an exclamation "Wahhhhhh!"? Alas, it is just another
"double tail" sting by the usual suspects.
-
- 2
-
- The Wiki entries on Palestine/Israel are far from "well-referenced,
useful and objective" as the dupes of EI claim. On the second thought,
are they dupes, or willing collaborators? The top man in EI is Electronic
Ali, as Ali Abunima is nicknamed, the man who began the witch hunt against
"Shamir the antisemite". He is the Arab front for various exclusively
Jewish organisations for Palestine, who rather promote the Jewish cause
and fight antisemitism. Such Jewish bodies like to have a compliant shabbesgoy
(as Rosa Luxemburg called these guys) for a front, and Ali fits the bill
perfectly. Even this article on Wiki has some reference to 'evil antisemites'.
-
- In his attack on me, Electronic Ali acted together with
the execrable Hussein Ibish, but since then, the thieves have fallen apart.
Another prominent EI person is, or was, Nigel Parry, a British antisemitism-fighter,
their webmaster and probably also their case officer. Nigel Perry is an
enforcer of Political Correctness and is Gatekeeper General of the permitted
discourse on Palestine, keeping it between hard Likud and the soft Peace
Now. He proudly mentions many years of involvement with the Palestinian
cause. Well, such guys are a reason why the Palestinian cause looks the
way it does.
-
- Why, we could have One State, a single unified state
in Israel/Palestine by now, but for these guys. Looking back, it was a
possible development in 2001, sometime before 9/11, when my call for One
State was heeded by many Israelis and Americans, and supported by major
American newspapers. Then these men began their campaign to denigrate me
and scared the supporters away. "Shamir is discredited and marginalised",
they wrote with satisfaction. For them, it did not matter that together
with me, they discredited and marginalised the idea of One State -- the
only possible peaceful solution to our conflict.
-
- The final battle was fought on the Wikipedia site, where
Ali-Ibish-Parry provided ammunition to Zionist Agent Smith Jayjg and ADL's
own Barlet, with the ADL-sponsored block of "antifascist" e-zines:
British Searchlight, Norwegian Monitor, Swedish Expo, American Trotskyite
Socialist Viewpoint et al. These formidable forces were counteracted by
our wonderful friend Joh Domingo, a South African fighter against apartheid,
and our French friend Omnivore. You can read the protocols of the battle
Here
"They decided to make me a Swedish neonazi impostor, instead of the
Israeli writer I am.
-
- All the time this battle was going on, I lived in my
Jaffa house, receiving endless visitors, giving numerous interviews, going
to work, seeing people but I might as well have been dead. I felt
like Doc Daneeka, a character in Joseph Heller's witty Catch-22, who was
declared dead as the plane he was supposed to fly was downed. "I am
alive!" he shouted. "Here we have a paper saying you are dead",
they replied. His wife "inherited" his property, he was stricken
from the lists, they stopped serving him food, and even his friends and
comrades looked askance when he appeared. This is the power of an official-looking
document or a webpage blue with hyperlinks. Thus I have learned the
dreadful power of an encyclopaedia: it does not reflect the world, but
rather creates the world. Wiki is linked to thousands of sites; whether
you look at answers.com or at an Arab English-language site, you'll be
led to Wiki with its lies.
-
- If an encyclopaedia said I am a Swedish neonazi antisemite,
nothing could change it. I could scream all day long: "Look, here
I am, in Jaffa" but they would reply: "Here we have an official
paper saying that you are not". I am very grateful to Joh Domingo
for his superhuman efforts, but he could not overcome the Agents Smith.
Neither could I. If tomorrow they decide to make you a little green man
from Mars, they will succeed, too. And then, even your friends will look
behind you for your flying saucer.
-
- A few days ago, I spoke to a group of Indian intellectuals
in Delhi, and afterwards I received this touching letter from Come Carpentier,
a French expat writer living in the Indian capital. He wrote: "I meant
to thank you for these enlightening, balanced and always objective yet
passionate words you spoke that evening...Listening to them dispels even
better than reading you the reputation that you have been given by you-know-who
as a firebrand defamer of Israel, holocaust denier, Nazi apologist and
so on and so forth... Not to mention the rumours about your being a clandestine
Swedish Far Right-winger infiltrated in the Holy Land by the international
Islamo-Fascist Cabal!"
-
- III
-
- In a way, pro-Jewish bias of Wiki is unavoidable bearing
in mind Jewish positions in Western discourse, media and universities.
Jews even people of Jewish origin are likely to correct discourse
in a flattering for them way. They did it hundred years ago, and five hundred
years ago. Provided they do it in one direction, they constitute the only
entity (besides the undermined Church and its Orders) capable of a marathon
(in words of Zeq) - of sustaining a long-run operation.
- A hundred years ago, a New York lawyer Samuel Untermeyer
financed the first Scofield Reference Bible; since then, the Scofield Bibles
are being republished in newer even more pro-Jewish editions and they bring
in millions of Christian Zionists.
-
- Joachim Martillo writes in his Judonia:
"Jewish efforts benefit from organizational memory that does not exist
in other lobbying situations. The longevity of Jewish Federation organizations
can give Israel Lobbying efforts a generational aspect not seen elsewhere.
For example, Israel Advocacy organizations worked for fifty years to delegitimize
Arabists in the Foreign Service and State Department, and replace them
with Israel-sympathetic personnel".
-
- Martllo erroneously connects this result with some specific
pro-Israel organisation. Success of Zionism (and incidentally its crimes)
is just the strawberry on top of the Jewish success cake. The Jews are
engaged in advocacy of Jews, and consequently they delegitimize Arabists,
or priests, or independent historians who do not subscribe to the notion
that Jews are special in consistently beneficial way. Zionism is a result
of Jewish pruning of history, and this pruned history is what we were taught.
-
- There are no Arab sheiks or Russian oligarchs or American
oilmen ready to finance anything long term of no immediate relevancy. They
do not understand that practically every entry of encyclopaedia, every
textbook influence future generations. A correct entry on, say, Poincare
or monotheism or Persian invasion could save potential Zionists from their
delusions of grandeur.
-
- Wikipedia is a great idea for Jews: people of all nations
from all over the world contribute of their knowledge, and then this Summa
is pruned in the way acceptable to the pro-Jewish gardeners. Despite its
"free" image, Wikipedia is part and parcel of the immense Judaised
media holding, and thus is as biased as any other publication of the group
from the New York Times (owned by Sulzberger) to Liberation (owned by Rothschild)
to hundreds of Murdock papers.
-
- Conclusion
-
- Wikipedia is an important asset, like the New York Times,
but both are in the hands of enemies of freedom. Sometimes good and truthful
articles or entries are to be found in both, but these are specks of gold
dust placed there to salt the dud mine. We certainly want to democratise
both; to make both really democratic and accessible. Until this is done,
we should explain that both are tools of mind control not to be trusted
or taken at face value. If Wiki wants to preserve some of its reliability,
it must get rid of its Zionist enforcers. Not only of the CAMERA bumpkins,
but of the hard men in black suits, the Agents Smith.
-
-
- In an article
by Osamah Khalil of Berkeley EI deservedly took Ibish to task for his "defense
of Abbas' strategy of deference and obsequiousness to the US and Israel.
According to Ibish's issue paper, Abbas' problem is not that he is a failed,
corrupt and ineffectual leader who appears to Palestinians as an eager
American tool, but that he is "uninspiring" and "lacks the
charisma that many politicians rely upon, and is not an emotive speaker."
Ibish's screed, continues EI, "deliberately ignores a thugocracy in
Palestinian politics as embodied by Mohammad Dahlan, Jibril Rajoub and
their ilk." His idea of an independent secular Palestinian state is
a US-backed government of thieves and their enforcers Ibish derides reconciliation
between Fatah and Hamas as "utopian", as for him there is no
alternative to Abbas' rule, American hyperpower, and Israel's military
and economic dominance in the Middle East."
-
-
- For your viewing pleasure...
-
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbbWaUa3oKU
-
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iefnjc2uhk8
-
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iefnjc2uhk8
-
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYIAeGa3oVM
|