- Recently the esteemed Paul Craig Roberts penned a rather
atrocious display of political illiteracy and impotence when he came out
supporting the candidacy of Barack Obama for President. After devoting
half of the article to a decent analysis of Obama's obscene genuflections
to the Israel and AIPAC, Roberts reverses his critique in midstream to
devote the rest of the article to the promotion of Obama, who he feels
represents an antidote to the Bush years and the Republicans. What is this
all about?
-
- The are a number of fallacies inherent in Robert's capitulation
which reflect his lack of understanding of the true nature of the danger
that we face as regards the Obama campaign and who is behind it. That Mr.
Roberts joins what is a rather mutinous rabble is perhaps not surprising
when one considers his resume as a well seated economist with numerous
think tanks over the years including the Hoover Institute and other repositories
of right wing, anti-American uber-capitalists such as the libertine Cato
Institute. The most notable indication of Robert's pedigree is his roots
with the Mont Pelerin Society. It is the Mont Pelerin Society, which is
the headquarters of the Austrian School of Economics, repositories devoted
to promoting the work of von Hayek and von Mises as post World War II apologist
for the austerity policies of fascism. From the spawn of the Austrian school
arouse the libertarian kook Milton Friedman and the Chicago School of Economics.
The Chicago School is in essence a Rockefeller operation which provides
intellectual cover for Wall Street's looting practices sanctioned by a
programmatic destruction of government as political policy.
-
- It is Barak Obama who is now the anointed political representative
of the Rockefeller/ Trilateralists and the whole Chicago School . This
is most directly displayed through his political advisor Professor Austin
Goolsbee, a member of Skull and Bones which figuratively characterizes
the fruits of such policies which advocates free trade as the cover for
anti-national piracy operations on the high seas of international finance.
Along with Goolsbee who represents a modification of the radical 'free
market' blather of the Chicago School through the adaptation of various
new trends that treat people as animals, to be 'noodged' in a certain
direction through the application of behaviorist principle applied to macro
economics. This is now called "Noodgenomics". Of course we have
to mention the sick George Soros as the hit man pouring millions into the
Obama campaign. Soros the speculator and looter, it should be noted sold
out other Jews with his father during World War II for the Nazis in a time
that he considers the greatest years of his life. This resembles his heavy
investment portfolio in Halliburton as he funded the 'moveon.org' Bush
protection outfit for the subversion of Democratic Party opposition. Of
course neither Repbulicans nor Democrats as a whole excoriate the despicable
leach Soros for being the speculative pirate that he is. Rather he is sadly
revered and allowed to wreck havoc on the world now through Obama.
-
- As one who has done a commendable and exemplary job in
critiquing the Bush Administration's imperialism as a former Reagan Administration
official, Roberts sudden endorsement of Obama represents a profound strategic
misunderstanding. This misunderstanding, which is endemic on the left and
right, is a blindness to the fact that Obama represents the new face of
imperialism of a strain for more dangerous than the overt neocons. The
geopolitical matrix with which Obama resides and is the bait with which
to envelope the world is that of his mentor and advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski.
The world according to Brzezinski, which matches that of his Rockefeller
sponsors, is one that is not complete until the potentiality for powerful
nation states, such as Russian and China are completely emasculated. This
follows precisely script written by British geopolitics and the playing
of the "Great Game' for colonialist exploitation of capital both human
and mineral..
-
- The destruction of national sovereignty including that
of a strong United States has been the mission of the 'Free Traders"
whose tradition is that of British imperialism, intellectually promulgated
by such outlets as the Mount Pelerin Society and the Cato Institute for
the advancement of feudalism. While Roberts and the left excoriate Bush,
one must realize that the foreign policy of the lame duck Bush Administration
has been taken over by the "Principals Committee" and is engaging
in Brzezinski/Obama bombing campaigns against Pakistan. Thus we are seeing
'Obama-ism' in action already!
-
- It was Obama in July of 2007 that called for the unilateral
U.S. bombing of Pakistan , at a time when Bush, Hillary Clinton and McCain
were against such insanity. Now the U.S. is bombing Pakistan . This
is pure Zbigniew Brzezinski, Obama's mentor and godfather advisor. Brzezinski
is perfectly mad with millions of dead bodies on his resume. The true implications
of this geopolitical 'grand chessboard' are betrayed by his track record
and alliances with evil, ranging from the creation of Al Qaeda to deference
to Pol Pot. Brzezinski is a master at burying his plans in his masterfully
deceptive books which are accepted as benign by the left and anti-imperilists
like Roberts. Brzezinski's deceptions though do not get past leaders like
Vladimir Putin who see through the charade, as it was Putin who said he
will resist all plans like those that come from the like of Brzezinski
that would carve Russia into four different nations. The destruction of
Russia is what has always been the aim of this Polish aristocrat, the rest
of the world be damned.
-
- This fits in with Brzezinski's motivation for bombing
Pakistan as called for by Barack and now being carried out under the cover
of the Bush Administration. Pakistan of course is a country larger than
Iran and who has already has thermonuclear weapons. This is part of a general
strategy of destabilization against allies of China which Pakistan is.
Destabilization of Russia and China is required by the Wall Street and
London because such nations represent the capability of a revival of the
world wide economic system against the bankrupt hegemony of bankrupt speculative
paper that is the fueling the hyperinflation of food and oil. Under Obama,
talks with Iran can only mean a strategy of appeasement to thus employ
Iran against Russia by exploiting old ethnic based grievances. Brzezinski's
methods are those of inciting the conditions for irregular warfare to so
breed endless strive.
-
- Under Obama the new face of imperialism will engage in
provocations that could well see the sending of U.S and coalition troops
to Africa and elsewhere under the cover of humanitarianism and human rights.
The prospect of Obama duly bringing the troops back from Iraq is highly
dubious. Where has Obama's opposition to Bush been? He votes for the war's
funding, calls for further adventurism and accepts the whole blowback thesis
of left as regards 9/11 which fuels the continuation of this phony war
on terror. Thankfully Paul Craig Roberts does not accept the whole blowback
copout of the Bush protecting left.
-
- What we might well see with Obama is the reinstitution
of the draft to make up for his call for more troops. In reality he will
not have to because his disastrous economic policies will continue to make
the military the last social safety net for many lower class Americans.
With Obama he will need more troops to promote imperialism, under the
guise of humanitarianism. Look for American troops to go to Africa . This
will be part of the drive for war against China , attack the Sudan and
kick the Chinese out and replace them with American colonialists. It is
Obama, of African decent, who becomes the perfect foil for the west to
further loot Africa for the needs of 'primitive accumulation' for the capitalist
sector, rather than economic development and progress.
-
- Development and progress is what is needed to deal with
the world wide economic collapse. Dirigist measures which create the environment
for true economic investment in the physical economy based on the development
and creativity of labor, as opposed to the present system that is a parasitic
and has created the present speculative nightmare, is needed at this time,
in concert with other nations devoted to promoting the general welfare
of their populations. This is the American System of Economics based on
the precepts of the Constitution Curiously enough John McCain's call
for the building of 45 nuclear power plants in the Untied States thus for
represents exactly the type of commitment towards investment in the future
and the general welfare that is required to counter the economic collapse
through such positive investment. That sets the real debate right there.
-
- What Roberts has done, with his begrudging endorsement
of Obama, is to fall prey to the strategy of the Obama campaign to use
Bush as the target with which to mobilize the masses that are indeed hungry
for change. The sadness inherent in Roberts's mistake is that it is precisely
Obama and the Democrats who have been Bush's greatest allies, funding the
war and opposing impeachment for political purposes, rather than acting
from a position of principle and duty against the very tyranny against
our Constitution. The Democrats are just as guilty and Mr. Roberts know
it. Rather than fall into such a trap, Roberts should first recognize that
Obama is not the presumptive nominee. It is not until August at the convention
and the roll call vote if it is allowed that the nominee is officially
chosen.
-
- We must all know that in essence Obama can not win a
general election without the help of scandal. Rest assured the Republican
527s are already fueled up with an arsenal of Obama scandals, which are
breaking out already with the possibility of convincing the people of the
Democratic Party to fight against this post modern coup being funded by
Soros and maneuvered by Dean and Brazille in the Democratic Party and in
the left faction of the mainstream media. While Obama's will lose a general
election, the Democrats will gain in Congress and as such would be able
to override McCain in a number of areas. I do not endorses McCain, but
rather the emergence of true debate and leadership that is needed to deal
with the world wide financial meltdown crisis of which the imperialism
that Roberts has opposed under Bush is the in fact that very outcome of
'free market' oligarchic capitalism that groups like the Mont Pelerin Society
promote.
-
- Hopefully Mr. Roberts might recognize his folly and reevaluate
the danger inherent in an Obama nomination. Lest reader's think that I
am an advocate of McCain, realize that such a reaction is precisely the
reaction mode that reflects the manipulated debate that cripples our nation
at this time of crisis. Do not be fooled for Obama is the face of post
modern fascism; Obama has a popular movement based on emotionalism that
Bush never had. All Bush had was fear, fear and intimidation to put in
place all the machinations of a police state. Do we want an Obama Presidency
with all the powers of the Unitary Executive, etc. to thus have complete
power with his own party in the majority in Congress? This would be very
dangerous. Remember Hitler and Mussolini started out on the left
and were financed into prominence by international banking interests as
is Obama today.
-
- The danger with Mr. Roberts' pronouncement is that many
will swallow it whole, especially those on the left who have clutched onto
Roberts criticism of the Bush because of the paucity of true opposition
coming from the left. This sad reality is indicative of the left's
obsession with an attack on Iran . The fact of the matter is that an attack
on Iran is mainly a rhetorical show of bravado by the deposed neocons.
Bush and the neocons are lame ducks, if an attack on Iran was to have happened
it would have happened last September but was averted potentially by the
Kennebunkport Warning and the subsequent prevention of the hijacking of
the nuclear weapons laden "Rogue B-52". Sure Israel may try some
sort of attack over the next coming weeks and I do not underestimate the
crazyness of the neocons, but by all indications the Principals Committee
which is cleaning ship in the military is in control, not Bush. The danger
again is the hoopla of an attack on Iran by Bush helps the Obama campaign
in its saying that McCain is the same as Bush. This of course is not true,
but McCain who would face a Democratic majority in Congress is a lame duck
President from day one.
-
- The issue now is to wake people up to the fact that we
need a convention not a coronation in the once Democratic Party and a real
debate on the issues of which the scandals around Obama, from murder and
corruption to drug use, and militant racism as promulgated by his foundation
funded partners such as the Ford Foundation funded Weather Underground
terrorists and such dubious figures as Farrakhan, all must be examined
in full as regards anyone who could have their finger on the thermonuclear
trigger.
-
-
|
