- TIME JUMP EVENT 1
-
- I received the following email from a lady named Linda
who lives in Rochester, Minnesota. In a telephone interview with her on
Feb. 29, 2008 a number of interesting facts came to light. During the telephone
interview Linda came across as a highly intelligent, mature and rational
individual who has at least one adult child which she spoke about. Linda
has given me permission to relate two time jump events in this report.
Her email message to me is shown below exactly as I received it (minus
her personal information):
-
- ****
-
- Ted,
-
- Feb. 29th, 2008 at 11:00:10 am CST I experienced a strange
thing. I got in a car accident. It was so weird because it was like a jump
in time and space I was not at intersection and then suddenly in
the middle of the intersection colliding with another vehicle. I can't
explain it but it was so weird that I went online and found your
website. My question is was there anything that happened on 2-29-2008 at
11:00:10 am CST? The officer at the accident said that there were several
accidents all that happened at the same time and she thought it was weird.
-
- Linda
-
- ****
-
- Linda provided me her telephone number and I called her
to obtain more information. (Note - I do not normally telephone readers.)
In the telephone interview with Linda, several new facts were revealed
about her experiences on Feb. 29, 2008 which I'll summarize below:
-
- * Her husband is a software engineer with a Fortune 1000
computer company. A computer he was working on was unplugged from the wall
at the time of her accident and was also disassembled.
-
- * Late in the afternoon, her husband plugged in the computer
he had rebuilt and turned it on. The clock on the screen had the correct
time before it was disassembled, which it should now be showing on the
screen. Computer motherboards continue to keep time for many years by using
a small lithium battery mounted on the motherboard. However, when the computer
was turned on again the screen clock displayed exactly 11:00AM. This was
the WRONG time it was SLOW by about 5 HOURS.
-
- --- The computer's clock was displaying the EXACT time
of the accident 11:00AM. ---
-
- If the computer's clock chip had stopped functioning,
wasn't properly initialized, was reset because of a dead battery, then
it would have probably displayed 12:00AM. Technically, the chances that
the clock would show 11:00AM are no less than 1 out of 1,440.
-
- * At the time of the accident Linda called 911 on her
cell phone. An officer who responded to the accident scene stated that
they had a number of car accidents like this around the city that day,
all occurring at about the same time. This same officer told also told
Linda that it was very strange this was happening.
-
- * Linda also experienced some other after-effects of
her apparent time jump. This is a common problem experienced by many involved
in time jump events.
-
- A BRIEF SUMMARY
-
- Both Linda's strange accident and her husband's experience
on the same day appear to further support for an actual time jump. One
might dismiss her accident as the result of being preoccupied and not paying
attention to driving. However, I find this is unlikely for two important
reasons:
-
- Linda has owned her new car for just 5 days. Adults are
particularly careful when driving their new vehicle for many months to
come.
-
- Events of her husband's experience with the computer's
clock appear to connect with Linda's experience at the same date and time
of the vehicle accident she had for reasons that remain unexplained.
-
- A number of days prior to the vehicle accident, men from
Homeland Security had paid Linda's husband a visit. They used a story about
checking out their former neighbor, but then these same men also spent
some time looking in and around her husband's vehicle. They did not talk
to any of the other neighbors but simply left. The question arises
were these men actually from Homeland Security, or from a covert government
agency sizing them up for a time experiment or a test of a new weapon?
There is a known history for more than fifty years of the government selecting
people at random for "experiments."
-
- Prior to Feb. 29th, one of Linda's car keys came up missing.
Her purse was stolen from her LOCKED vehicle, then according to police,
"it was found in a snow-bank." Yet no valuables were stolen from
the purse. A missing vehicle key was later found placed on top of the dashboard.
-
- WAS LINDA AND HER HUSBAND TEST SUBJECTS FOR A NEW WEAPON?
-
- Facts about this event may be evidence that a new powerful
weapon has been developed to alter space-time in a confined area. It may
be that Linda and her husband were among those chosen pseudo- randomly
to be unwilling participants in a field test. It may be a new quantum weapon.
Some of the other drivers around the city who had accidents on Feb. 29th,
2008 may have been part of an experimental test as well, and this may have
been the actual cause of many other vehicle accidents. The rare appearance
by agents of Homeland Security adds additional credence to this possibility.
Is it possible everything in Linda's time jump story is mere coincidence?
After listening to consistent, intelligent and complete answers while interviewing
Linda I feel she is a credible witness. She did not hesitate to answer
any of my questions with rational, complete answers. It also appears that
the incident her husband experienced was also real.
-
- TIME JUMP EVENT 2
-
- A few years ago, Linda was in a ramp garage and they
were looking for a parking space. After driving up a couple levels in the
garage they came upon a truck with a number of bumper stickers which they
were trying to read. At the corner of one turn there was a nice blue sports
car which was backed into a parking spot. Linda stated that the license
plate was an easy one for her to remember. I will use the generic name
"Jones" here to protect the vehicle owner's identity, although
the actual name was that of a celestial body in our solar system.
-
- Linda stated, "I remembered this sports car and
its license plate because I thought my husband would look good driving
it."
-
- They continued driving upward to another level looking
for a parking spot. There on the next level in exactly the same parking
spot, was the same blue sports car again with the same license plate. Astounded
at seeing this again, they quickly went back down one level to look for
the car. The car wasn't there, and neither was the truck with the stickers.
-
- What happened? Did they make a wrong turn, or see a glimpse
into the future of a car parked up on the next level above?
-
- ALTERED PHOTO TIME JUMP EVENT 3
-
- Kevin Smith is a highly trained reliable witness, former
police officer and radio show host. He was sent around the world to train
and set up police departments. This part of the report is given with Kevin's
permission. He too, is a fellow explorer into the unknown depths of the
universe.
-
- On March 1st 2008 I spoke to Kevin off-air about a moon
photo. Recently, NASA had obtained new images of the Moon's South Pole
using a new radar technique by using NASA's Goldstone radio- telescope
array configured as a high resolution radar system:
-
-
-
-
- Radar image from NASA's website at original size downloaded
on March 2nd 2008. NASA's image name is "New radar imagery of the
lunar south pole" [3]
-
- The photo below shows a close-up of a "+" shaped
structure in the center of a large crater (red arrow) which appears to
be of artificial construction:
-
-
-
-
-
- Above photo shows a structure in a crater at the South
Pole of the Moon. I have added the red and blue arrows to Kevin's original
photo shown here. [1]
-
- There are visible in the above image a number of objects,
some of which are semi-circular in shape. Some of these objects can be
seen just to the left of the "+" structure near the center of
the crater. Even more remarkable is that literally overnight, an almost
perfect blackened square of pixels appeared (see red arrow) that was NOT
present when Kevin first obtained the image from NASA on the afternoon
of March 1st 2008, the black square was not present. There are also artifacts
visible in this image that may be the result of JPEG image compression.
These are indicated by blue arrows and are not the result of image editing.
However, these video artifacts are not the issue here.
-
- Just a few hours later on the evening of March 1st 2008,
Kevin noticed that the black square had appeared at the base of the "+"
object. When I asked Kevin if he had looked at other image files to confirm
these also had changed, he stated that these images had also changed as
well. Kevin noted that this event reminded him of what I observed with
the Spirit and Opportunity rover sundials, which I wrote about on rense.com
a short time ago and discussed on Kevin's radio show. This incident with
the rovers was also another "past changed event" when the sundial
on each rover suddenly displayed a gear-like structure around the base
of each sundial post that was NOT present in original images.
-
- Sundial images from Mars and Earth originally did not
show the gear- like object.
-
- These images were obtained in 2005 from both NASA and
University of Cornell file servers. In that case of time alteration, all
digital copies of my book with images of the sundial, as well as printed
copies of the book were all changed too. Three other witnesses familiar
with the sundial's design also testified to me that the sundial did not
originally have this gear-like structure.
-
- It appears that someone traveled back in time and altered
reality. In the case of the crater on the Moon, perhaps either the original
image was altered by NASA to hide something after Kevin brought it to public
attention - or something else was changed backward in time at the structure
on the Moon. This alteration would need to take place before the radar
image was taken in the first place, hence the alteration which suddenly
appeared in the radar image.
-
- OTHER SUPPORTING DATA EXISTS
-
- Some time ago, a part of my research included examining
images from an imaging satellite named Clementine. Some of the images the
satellite captured were of the South Pole on the Moon. Clementine was sent
to the moon in the mid-1990s to image and map the entire surface. From
my data archives I have extracted an image from a much larger NASA Clementine
image which shows the same crater as that in Kevin's recent radar image.
-
- Note - the NASA website "www.starbase.jpl.nasa.gov"
no longer exists from which the Clementine photo was downloaded. This is
an interesting website URL to say the least.
-
- Below is a side by side comparison I have made of Kevin's
radar image with another image from the Clementine survey satellite. Keep
in mind that the radar image (below, left) is claimed by NASA to have a
resolution of 20 meters/pixel, while the Clementine image on the right
has a resolution of 200 meters/pixel. Therefore there will be differences
in the level of detail we see in each image:
-
-
-
- RECENT NASA RADAR IMAGE [1] CLEMENTINE SATELLITE IMAGE
[2]
-
- Explanation of added graphics
-
- * Orange circled areas show two reference points
to be sure this is the correct crater in the Clementine image:
- 1. In the lower left corner, we see that there is smaller
crater's rim which touches the larger crater. The straight-sided geometry
along part of the top edge of the smaller crater (orange circle, lower
left corner) matches in both images.
- 2. The top of both images (orange circle near center-top)
have what appears to be a feature similar like a valley or road. There
is little doubt that both of these images are of the same crater.
-
- * Yellow boxed area in the higher resolution radar
map on the left, we see what appears to be a chain of small objects. This
isn't likely to be a resolution issue with the radar image like a form
of pixilation taking place, because of the high 20 meters/ pixel resolution.
In the Clementine photo these separate objects appear as one darkened line.
-
- * White arrow points to what appears to be a defect
in the digital Clementine image. This is similar to a defect in a photographic
print, such as the result of a damaged photographic negative. However,
this image was supposedly obtained only in digital form.
-
- With all of this established, we can now focus on the
"+" structure in the center of the crater. BOTH images have the
same orientation Lunar North and South. I did not rotate either image.
The radar image appears slightly stretched vertically. However, the structure
in the center of the crater is not angularly oriented the same in both
images. How the angular placement of the '+" object could change is
unknown. That is, unless it isn't a building but instead it's a movable
object.
-
- KEVIN'S PHOTO DEFECT THAT APPEARED OVERNIGHT
-
- If we enlarge both images equally by 150%, the blackened
area appears to be more than large enough to be within the resolution of
the Clementine image. And yet we do NOT see this same black area on the
older Clementine image:
-
-
-
-
-
- SUMMARY
-
- To be able to find actual photographic evidence like
this showing an alteration in time is a first that I know of for an object
like this. The difference in angular orientation of this structure in the
bottom of the crater between the two images remains unexplained. However,
the blackened area pointed to by the red arrow indicates what changed overnight.
-
- In the case of the auto accident described earlier, we
know that this also happened. The computer's motherboard clock was apparently
somehow frozen at the same time of the accident, as indicated by the time
displayed when the machine was turned on again some hours later.
-
- WHY WE CAN SEE THINGS CHANGE IN TIME
-
- Our human minds exist OUTSIDE of space-time because they
are non- physical. Because of this, we know what the actual past history
of anything familiar to us is supposed to be. Everything including images
in computers and everything else which is physical all around us will be
instantly altered, if someone returns to the past and changes an object.
These examples in this report and other examples, have given us an important
breakthrough in physics. Time travel is also a scary technology, because
tinkering with time can have, and will have, completely unexpected consequences.
If computer modeling is being trusted to predict every known possibility,
it will be found to be imperfect. In the end it will ultimately be disastrous.
-
- Contemporary physics theory states that changing the
past does not change the future, but will only create a new timeline. Examples
presented in this report prove this theory is certainly not true. We have
already seen that a change in the past instantly changes our present. Time
changes will subsequently change the future as well in ways which are impossible
to predict or model in any computer.
-
- The mere fact that I've connected these and other time
events together will create unforeseen changes, hopefully for the better.
We must not doubt ourselves or anything we see change in the reality which
is all around us. Just because we cannot explain something changed in the
present certainly does not mean that it cannot happen. Incidents in this
report and other on-going examples not covered here show us that reality
may not really be what it appears to be.
-
- There are additional observations on time changes and
jumps from other witnesses. When Data4Science.net website completes the
addition of a special section on time jumps and time shifts, these and
other events will also be revealed.
-
- Ted Twietmeyer
- tedtw@frontiernet.net
- www.data4science.net
-
- Image sources:
-
- [1] www.kevinsmithshow.com
- [2] NASA file server now offline - http://starbase.jpl.nasa.gov/
clem1-l-u-5-dim-basemap-v1.0/cl_3004/browse/large/
- [3] http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/29feb_radarmoon.htm?
list1013174%20
|
