- Adolf Hitler has always been hated by the western media.
Joseph Stalin, however, was once their favorite. Only in recent decades
has he acquired some of the opprobrium once reserved for Adolf Hitler -
and only half-heartedly. What is the explanation?
- Essentially, Stalin was the front man for the Jews -
while Adolf Hitler was the enemy of the Jews. "Uncle Joe" Stalin
was whitewashed for the same reason Stalin was condemned. Stalin's crimes
were committed on behalf of the Jews; Hitler's crimes were committed against
the Jews. When Hitler marched into Czechoslovakia and Poland, the west
erupted in rage. When Stalin marched into Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania
and Poland, the west looked the other way. It was the same after the war
when Stalin took over Eastern Europe. Before the war, the same western
media which screamed over Kristallnacht, viewed Stalin's purge trials as
a legitimate response to an internal threat.
- The western media shrugged with indifference toward seven
to ten million dead in the Ukrainian man-made 'famine', while giving a
public platform to every Jew wailing over his father imprisoned in Dachau.
Stalin's gulags contained millions of victims in the 1930's; Hitler's camp
system pre-war did not contain more than 20-30,000 total inmates - and,
of that number, only 10%-15% were Jews. The remainder were political opponents
of Hitler, such as members of the Catholic Center Party or the Social Democrats.
Hitler was generally improving working conditions in Germany.; Stalin was
sending Russia back to the stone age. Yet Hitler was the Devil of the western
media; Stalin was their angel.
- Why did Hitler get crucified while Stalin got the bouquet
of red roses? The answer is that Stalin killed on behalf of the Jews; Hitler
killed while fighting against the Jews. Stalin was the Czar of Red Russia
- but his commissars were two-thirds Jewish. Stalin got the free pass for
his crimes the same way that the state of Israel gets the free pass for
its crimes. If an Arab suicide bomber kills a dozen Jews, the media wail
for weeks. If the Israeli's bulldoze families to death in the rubble of
their homes, that is not newsworthy. Stalin enjoyed a sainted reputation
until he turned against the Jews in the final years of his life. So long
as he was appointing one Jew after another to high Soviet positions and
blinking at the crimes, he was applauded. Stalin is now more useful as
a whipping boy than as the favorite of the media he once was. He can
take the blame for the crimes of the Jewish commissars who have disappeared
down the memory hole of history. He can even be used to paint the Jews
as victims of communism, rather than the originators of communism,
because he liquidated a few of them late in life.
- Joseph Stalin now enjoys a bad reputation. But he is
never as bad as Adolf Hitler and 'The Holocaust'. Thirty million dead Russians
cannot compare with a mythical 'six million' dead Jews. Stalin was a much
greater mass murderer than Adolf Hitler - but Hitler (supposedly) murdered
the people who really count. And that is why we have one standard for the
man who stood up to the Jews - and a different standard for the man who
killed for the Jews so successfully for so many decades.
- WINSTON CHURCHILL in July 1940
- "When I look around to see how we can win the war
I see that there is only one sure path. We have no Continental army which
can defeat the German military power.. Should [Hitler].. not try invasion
[of Britain].. there is one thing that will bring him back and bring him
down, and that is an absolutely devastating, exterminating attack by
very heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi homeland. We must be
able to overwhelm them by this means, without which I do not see a way
through. We cannot accept any aim lower than air mastery. When can it be
obtained?" [Extract from Winston S Churchill The Second World
War (Volume 2 Their Finest Hour Appendix A), Memo from Prime
Minister to Minister of Aircraft Production, 8.July 1940].
- ADOLF HITLER in May 1940
- Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other
way around. Hitler actually wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals
admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948,
Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order of 24 May 1940
at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British
Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain's most respected military
historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this
- "He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with
admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and
of the civilization that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked,
with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been
achieved by means that were often harsh, but 'where there is planing, there
are shavings flying'. He compared the British Empire with the Catholic
Church saying they were both essential elements of stability in the
world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge
Germany's position on the Continent. The return of Germany's colonies would
be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain
with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere.."
- According to Liddell Hart, "At the time we believed
that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the 'Battle over Britain' had saved
her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original
cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer
England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for
weeks did nothing to spur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade,
he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing,
instead, to invade Russia" (p140).