Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

 
rense.com

CNN Lying On Air That Admin
Would Be 'Slowed' In Case Of
Terror After FISA Expires At
Midnight. Meanwhile, Bush
Leaves The Country

By Barbara S Honegger
barhonegger@aol.com
2-16-8
 
CNN's Wolf Blitzer Report just (shortly before 2 p.m. Calif. time) fear-mongered and lied on air in a segment by Kelli Arena  on the expiration of the Protect America Act (the FISA revision   railroaded through Congress) tonight at midnight, in which  she said in a question clearly set up by Blitzer to elicit the  response, that if something were to come down -- a reference  to terrorism or a terrorist threat -- after the Act expires at midnight  tonight, that it would take longer to respond 'because the Admin.  would have to go to the Courts.' 
 
THIS IS A LIE.  
 
The SAME procedures are required before  and after midnight, with the SOLE exception being if the Admin.  receives information re a 'NEW' terrorist group after the law expires,  but even then, the Attorney General can issue emergency authorization  to proceed under the FISA Act, to which the law reverts at midnight,  WITHOUT first going to the Court (see below press release from  Speaker Pelosi's office).  Also, it was built in to the Protect America  Act that the provisions of the old law continue for a year after expiration. 
 
CNN IS FRONTING FOR THE BUSH ADMIN'S LIE TO TRY TO LEAD  VIEWERS TO 1) EXPECT A NEW ATTACK AFTER THE LAW EXPIRES;  AND 2) BLAME THE DEMOCRATS FOR THE AFTERMATH BECAUSE  THEY LET THE LAW EXPIRE. 
 
PRESIDENT BUSH HAS JUST LEFT FOR AFRICA -- PARALLELING  HIS BEING IN OUT OF WASHINGTON ON 9/11 -- PROBABLY LEAVING  CHENEY IN CHARGE, LIKE ON 9/11.  
 
CALL AND E-MAIL CNN HQ AND THE WOLF BLITZER REPORT  TO DENOUNCE THIS RECKLESS LIE AND DEMAND THEY PUT OUT,  AND REPEAT, THAT THERE WOULD BE NO DELAY IN ADMIN. RESPONSE  DUE TO REVERTING BACK TO THE ORIGINAL FISA ACT.  
 
 
 
Press Release 
Office of the Speaker of the House
Contact: 
Brendan Daly/Nadeam Elshami
202-226-7616
For Immediate Release 
02/15/2008
 
Pelosi: 'The President is Misrepresenting the Facts on Our Nation's Electronic Surveillance Capabilities'
 
WASHINGTON, DC ­- Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued the following statement today after President Bush spoke at the White House this morning on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act:
"The President is misrepresenting the facts on our nation's electronic surveillance capabilities. Last August, he insisted that Congress pass the Protect America Act; but this week, he refused to support an extension, which can only mean he knows our intelligence agencies will be able to do all the wiretapping they need to do to protect the nation. That surveillance can be undertaken under broad orders authorized under the PAA or under orders that can be obtained through the FISA court.
 
"The President knows the facts; if he did not want the PAA to expire this weekend, he should have supported an extension of it, as the overwhelming majority of House Democrats did on Wednesday. Having guaranteed the lapse of the August law, the President should now work in a cooperative way with Congress to pass a strong FISA modernization bill that protects our nation's security and the Constitution."
 
* * *
The Facts
 
1. In the remote chance that a previously unknown terrorist group must be surveilled (now that the Protect America Act has expired and we're back to being under the original FISA Act) we can use FISA. Under FISA, the Attorney General can approve surveillance in minutes. Surveillance can begin immediately and approval of the FISA Court can be obtained within three days: 
 
"It can happen extremely quickly. We have done it in a very short time, minutes sometimes."
- James Baker, former Counsel to the Justice Department's Office of Intelligence Policy and Review under President George W. Bush, 9/18/07, referring to how fast DOJ can approve  an emergency FISA application
 
2. Unlike last summer, there is no backlog of cases to slow down getting surveillance approvals from the FISA Court:  
 
"We're caught up to all of it now."
- Mike McConnell, Director of National Intelligence, 2/7/08 
 
---------- 
 
 
House Leaves Surveillance Law To Expire
By Carl Hulse
The New York Times
Friday 15 February 2008
 
WASHINGTON -- The House broke for a week's recess Thursday without renewing terrorist surveillance authority demanded by President Bush, leading him to warn of risky intelligence gaps while Democrats accused him of reckless fear mongering.
The refusal of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of California, to schedule a vote on a surveillance measure approved Tuesday by the Senate touched off an intense partisan conflict over the national security questions that have colored federal elections since 2002 and are likely to play a significant role again in November.
 
Trying to put pressure on Democrats, Mr. Bush offered to delay a trip to Africa to resolve the dispute and warned that failure to extend the expanded power under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which expires Saturday, could hamper efforts to track terrorists.
 
"Our intelligence professionals are working day and night to keep us safe," Mr. Bush said, "and they're waiting to see whether Congress will give them the tools they need to succeed or tie their hands by failing to act."
 
But Ms. Pelosi and other House Democrats said Mr. Bush and Congressional Republicans were at fault because they had resisted temporarily extending the bill to allow disagreements to be worked out. Democrats would not be bullied into approving a measure they considered flawed, she said.
 
"The president knows full well that he has all the authority he needs to protect the American people," said Ms. Pelosi, who then referred to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's admonition about fearing only fear itself. "President Bush tells the American people that he has nothing to offer but fear, and I'm afraid that his fear-mongering of this bill is not constructive."
 
The decision by the House Democratic leadership to let the law lapse is the greatest challenge to Mr. Bush on a major national security issue since the Democrats took control of Congress last year.
 
Last summer, Democrats allowed the surveillance law to be put in place for six months although many of them opposed it. They have also relented in fights over spending on the Iraq war under White House pressure. But with Mr. Bush rated low in public opinion polls as he enters the last months of his presidency, Democrats are showing more willingness to challenge him.
Republicans say House Democrats are taking a risk, especially in light of the strong bipartisan Senate vote for the bill.
"They can't pass a Mother's Day resolution and got 68 votes for this bill," said Representative Adam H. Putnam of Florida, chairman of the House Republican Conference.
 
The battle over the surveillance bill was also tangled up in the rancor over a House vote to hold in contempt Joshua B. Bolten, the White House chief of staff, and Harriet E. Miers, the former White House counsel, for refusing to testify about the firing of United States attorneys. Republicans said the House was devoting time to that issue when it could be considering the surveillance program, and they staged a walkout in protest.
 
The main sticking point is a provision in the Senate bill that provides legal immunity for telecommunications companies that, at the Bush administration's request, cooperated in providing private data after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Many House Democrats oppose that immunity.
 
Surveillance efforts will not cease when the law lapses. Administration intelligence officials said agencies would be able to continue eavesdropping on targets that have already been approved for a year after the initial authorization. But they said any new targets would have to go through the more burdensome standards in place before last August, which would require that they establish probable cause that an international target is connected to a terrorist group.
 
Intelligence officials also told reporters Thursday that they were worried that telecommunications companies would be less willing to cooperate in future wiretapping unless they were given immunity.
 
Ben Powell, general counsel for the director of national intelligence's office, said some carriers had already asked whether they could be compelled to cooperate even without legal protection, although he indicated that none had actually threatened to halt operations.
 
Ms. Pelosi said that she believed that the differences could be resolved within three weeks and that she had told the chairmen of the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees to work with their counterparts in the Senate to seek a compromise.
Congressional Republicans sharply criticized Democrats for not moving on the final measure.
 
"I think there is probably joy throughout the terrorist cells throughout the world that the United States Congress did not do its duty today," said Representative Ted Poe, Republican of Texas.
 
Democrats said Republicans, struggling politically, were trying to create an air of crisis.
 
"This is a manufactured political crisis," said Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat. "They want something to put in front of the American people to take their minds off the state of the economy." 
 
Disclaimer
 
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros