- Hello all ...
-
- I said many years ago that there would come a time when
the conspiracy would break the surface where all but the most blinkered
and blind would see the obvious.
-
- That had to happen because we are living at a time when
the hidden manipulation wants to morph into daily reality with a global
political, economic and military dictatorship. We are now seeing this with
the onslaught of surveillance and control that invades every area of our
lives and the constant centralisation of power across the world.
-
- And over the last two weeks in the United States another
major expression of the conspiracy has been exposed for those with eyes
to see - the utter irrelevance of 'democratic' elections. It is one more
prime example of the hidden now becoming manifest ... manifestly obvious.
-
- What a 'choice' Americans face in 'choosing' (if only)
their president. In terms of those with a chance of winning in November
there is no choice, except between masks on the same face.
-
-
-
- Democrat or Republican? Clinton or Obama?
-
- We have the same mantra at every 'election' about the
'old' politics and the need to break the grip on America of the 'Washington
establishment'. We need 'outsiders' not absorbed into the Washington web
of lobbyists and 'special interests', the [fairy] story goes.
-
- This is vital to manipulating the people into believing
they still have a choice between different policies and philosophies and
thus they are still 'free'. The key word with regard to this is 'change'
- 'We need change'; 'this country wants change'; 'I stand for change'.
'Hope' is another connected theme thrown in for good measure.
-
- In 1992, a guy called Bill Clinton, an establishment
place-man and crooked to his fingertips, swept to office by talking about
'change', 'change', change'. One of his catchphrases 16 years ago was 'courage
to change' and he also stood for 'hope'.
-
- This can be a potent weapon in twisting the minds of
the populous because most people are not happy with their lives or the
state of their country and so 'change' can seem a very good idea. 'Yeah,
that's right, we need change'.
-
- But the 'change' always turns out to be very loose indeed.
Bill 'Change' Clinton was a close associate of the very father George Bush
that he was seeking to replace in the White House. They had been running
drugs together for years through the Mena Airstrip in Arkansas where Clinton
was governor and his wife was a corrupt lawyer at the Rose Law Firm which
financially and legally stitched up the State.
-
- Sure, Bill stood for change alright - changing the personnel
at the White House by bussing in the Arkansas establishment to relocate
their criminal activities to Pennsylvania Avenue. Nothing changed, except
the names of the people who ensured business-as-usual.
-
-
-
-
- So it was with heavy heart and shaking head that I have
watched the vacuous stage show of 'rock star' Barack Obama. What does
he stand for, he tells us with every breath? 'Change'. He is even quoting
the Cocaine Kid from 1992 with his 'courage to change'.
-
- Strategically placed behind him at almost every rally
are the moronic rent-a-crowds waving their banners emblazoned with two
words 'Obama - Change'. The entire strategy is based on that one thought
with 'nice guy' and 'straight guy' thrown in here and there.
-
- That's it. No substance, no depth, just repeated single
words. Political 'debate' in 2008 has plumbed still new depths.
-
- When I first came across Barack Obama I knew nothing
about him, but when I saw his eyes and his body language and heard his
empty rhetoric and carefully-practiced delivery it was clear to me that
we were dealing with yet another member of the Actors Union. Another Tony
Blair, another Bill Clinton. Obama is not a man I would trust to tell me
anything without checking.
-
- As a professional spinner might say: 'He doesn't have
to believe it, he just has to sell it'.
-
- He claims to be the son of a goat herder in Kenya and
we're now told that 'an African goat herder's son could be the President
of the United States'. But the truth is rather different according to American
columnist Andy Martin, who says the claim is a lie.
-
- Obama's grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama, was a prominent
and wealthy farmer. His son, Obama's father, was a child of privilege,
not privation, Martin writes. He was an outstanding student, not a herdsman.
Martin also reveals that many other statements Barack Obama has made about
his father and the family background in Africa are false and paint a picture
that simply isn't true. As Martin said:
-
- 'I feel sad having to expose Barack Obama, but the man
is a complete fraud. The truth is going to surprise, and disappoint, and
outrage many people who were drawn to him. He has lied to the American
people, and he has sought to misrepresent his own heritage.
-
- 'Obama's life story is vastly different from the one
he portrays. My point: if he will lie about his mother and father, what
else is he lying about? Can we expect "bimbo eruptions"?'
-
- The first term Senator for Illinois is playing the 'outsider',
the fresh face and fresh mind, who is not connected either to the political
past or the lobbyist mafia that controls much of the legislation agreed,
or squashed, on Capitol Hill.
-
- That's what he says he stands for, but it's not what
it looks like.
-
- His foreign policy advisor and vocal supporter is Zbigniew Brzezinski,
Jimmy Carter's national security advisor, who says that Obama offers 'a
new definition of America's role in the world'.
-
-
-
-
- This is the same Brzezinski who created the Illuminati's
Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller in 1973. The Trilateral Commission
is dedicated to a world government dictatorship and closely connects with
other strands in the web like the Council on Foreign Relations (member:
Barack Obama) and the Bilderberg Group.
-
- Brzezinski's foreign 'policy' during the Carter administration,
as he has since admitted without regret, was to entice the Soviet Union
to invade Afghanistan in December, 1979. The idea, he said, was to weaken
their rival superpower and the result was a ten-year occupation that cost
the lives of an estimated 1.3 million Afghans and spawned the Mujahedin,
Taliban and Osama bin Laden.
-
- Deep breath: he's now advising Barack Obama on foreign
policy
-
- The Polish-born Brzezinski's books and public statements
have confirmed his belief in the Trilateral Commission's commitment to
a world dictatorship. In his book, Between Two Ages: America's Role
In The Technetronic Era, he described a new society '... that is shaped
culturally, psychologically, socially, and economically by the impact of
technology and electronics - particularly in the area of computers and
communication'.
-
- He said that 'national sovereignty is no longer a viable
concept' and suggested the movement, in stages, 'toward a larger community
of the developed nations [world government] ... through a variety of indirect
ties and already developing limitations on national sovereignty'.
-
- His son, Mark Brzezinski, an 'international lawyer' in
Washington, is also an Obama advisor and commends the would-be president's
'global approach' ... ('global approach', 'global security', 'world community'
and so on is all Illuminati Newspeak for the centralisation of
global power.)
-
- Obama's advisor on the Middle East is Dennis B. Ross,
who was director for policy planning in the State Department under President
father Bush and special Middle East coordinator to President Bill Clinton.
So much for Obama's 'change' with the past and 'breaking the grip' of the
Washington establishment.
-
-
-
-
- Ross was born to a Jewish mother which hardly makes him
the ideal person to talk independently, and therefore credibly, about how
to end the Israel-Palestine conflict and he became the first chairman of
the Jerusalem-based 'think tank', the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute,
which is funded and founded by the Jewish Agency.
-
- In fact, the Canadian Jewish News and other
Jewish publications have pointed out that Obama 'has made Jewish leaders
an early stop at every stage in his political career'. The first foreign
policy speech of his candidacy was delivered to the notorious lobby group,
the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which is 100% dedicated to
securing US policy that suits the interests of Israel.
-
- Obama says 'bring the troops home' and 'diplomacy, not
war'. All good stuff and it is a compelling message, if it were genuine.
But around him are those, like Zbigniew Brzezinski, who see war and
aggression as a means of global expansion and colonisation. Obama himself
said he would have no problem bombing Pakistan if it suited American interests:
-
- 'If we have actionable intelligence about high-value
terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will'.
-
- That's what Bush said, and did, when he made the 'actionable
intelligence' fit the agenda for invading Afghanistan and Iraq. The fact
is that Obama is not againstwar; he is against the invasion of Iraq.
-
- He advocates deploying troops in Iraq to Pakistan and
Afghanistan to fight 'terrorists' and he says of Iran: 'We should take
no option, including military action, off the table'. So he is not against
war, which appears to be his image for many, he is against one war.
-
-
-
- Moses Mercado
-
- Another Obama claim is that his administration would
not be influenced by lobbyists for the corporate cartels and yet he has
precisely these people among his campaign advisory team, including Moses
Mercado, who has lobbied Congress and the Bush administration on behalf
of two Illuminati private-equity firms, the Blackstone Group and the Carlyle
Group.
-
- The Carlyle Group, which is closely connected to father
George Bush and has had the Bin Laden family among its clients, paid Mercado
$260,000 while the Blackstone Group rewarded his work with $3.7 million.
-
- Among other professional lobbyists (manipulators of policy)
on the Obama team is Daniel Shapiro, a foreign policy advisor on the Middle
East, who has some of America's biggest corporate names on her client list.
These include Anheuser-Busch, Daimler Chrysler, the American Petroleum
Institute and Freddie Mac. Shapiro also served on Bill Clinton's National
Security Council.
-
- In short, Barack Obama is just another fraud and fake
selling a lie - a front man for the same people who have controlled American
politics for decades. He doesn't stand for change, nor hope, but for more
of the same, sugar-coated as 'the new JFK'.
-
-
-
-
- Whether America votes for Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton
the outcome will be the same because they won't dictate policy - the Shadow
People will. Obama says he stands for 'change' and Clinton responds by
saying she also stands for 'change', but she has the experience to make
the 'change' happen.
-
- In truth, they stand for the status quo because that's
the position of those who control them. All the rest is fakery.
-
- This nonsense about a 'Kenyan goat-herders son' becoming
the most powerful man in the world or Clinton's 'strike for women' is just
for effect. They are two come-and-go people, the latest in their line going
back centuries, who have only the appearance of power, not the reality
of it. Clinton is far, far higher in the hidden hierarchy, however, and
she is probably the one they want, although she is a hard sell and others
are ready to play the game should she not make it.
-
-
-
-
- What a shower America is being offered in this election
year. On both 'sides' they line up their crooks, liars, manipulators and
airheads and say 'choose your president'. Never has the 'choice' been so
blatantly irrelevant.
-
- With, that is, one exception.
-
- What a joy it has been to see Republican rebel Ron Paul
take on the establishment repeaters with such incisive intelligence and
common sense. To see this 72-year-old demolish his yes-men rivals with
the sheer logic and grasp of his case has been some real 'change' and he
has exposed both their staggering ignorance and their disinterest in anything,
but their own desire for status and power.
-
-
-
-
- He has brilliantly taken his media opportunities to demolish
the 'money' scam, the invasion and continued occupation of Iraq, and the
way the system is designed to steal the peoples' income through criminal
levels of taxation.
-
- Paul doesn't seem to have the big picture and this week
he distanced himself from those who say that 9/11 was an inside job, which
was disappointing. It was, I would suggest, a major mistake.
-
- But compared with the rest, thank goodness for Ron Paul
amid the political pantomime unfolding on the TV news. I work on the basis
of 'don't vote because it only encourages them', but if I were American
I would make an exception for Ron Paul this time around if only to increase
his public platform.
-
- He can't win because he's not an insider, but he is alerting
many people to the nature of America and at least some of the forces that
control it. This makes Ron Paul a true advocate of 'change' while Barack
Obama is just another fake, another 'rock star', who joined the club.
|
