- With Wall Street capital disappearing as fast as foreclosures
are climbing, one foreign head of state had an epiphany. French President
Nicholas Sarkozy advanced the idea recently that the global financial system
is "out of its mind."
-
- To develop this theory further, I've reconstructed below
some of the mileposts on our journey to this financial loony bin.
-
- Exhibit One: Commit-a-Felony-Get-a-Bonus Contract
-
- Back in 2002, Mark Belnick, who had previously been one
of the legal go-to guys for Wall Street as a rising star at corporate law
firm Paul,Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, found himself transplanted
as General Counsel at fraud-infested Tyco International. Mr. Belnick inked
a retention agreement for himself and it was duly filed without fanfare
at the top corporate cop's web site, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). The agreement guaranteed Mr. Belnick a payment of at least $10.6
million should he commit a felony and be fired before October 2003.
-
- Very prescient fellow, Mr. Belnick was indeed charged
with a few felonies like grand larceny and securities fraud by the Manhattan
District Attorney's office. Mr. Belnick was acquitted of those charges
and the SEC let him off the hook for aiding and abetting federal violations
of securities laws with a $100,000 penalty payment and a prohibition against
serving as an officer or director of a public company for five years. Mr.
Belnick agreed to the SEC settlement without admitting or denying the charges.
Mr. Belnick did not lose his law license and continues to practice law.
-
- While Mr. Belnick was drafting his "felony bonus"
agreement with Tyco, he was also teaching a law course at Cornell on ethics.
Today, his agreement is available at the FindLaw.com web site as a "sample
business contract," raising the suspicion that we as a society have
become desensitized to financial insanity.
-
- Exhibit Two: Supreme Insanity
-
- On December 7, 2006, Wall Street was elated to learn
that the U.S. Supreme Court had agreed to hear its case requesting that
a no-law zone be drawn around its financial borders for acts of collusion
and commercial bribery, such as those so well documented in the issuance
of new stock offerings during the tech/dotcom bubble. Calling the matter
an alleged "epic Wall Street conspiracy," the U.S Federal Court
of Appeals for the Second Circuit had earlier turned down Wall Street for
its requested grant of immunity.
-
- The Wall Street firms and their legions of lawyers appealed
to the Supreme Court, arguing that the SEC (which, by the way, has no criminal
powers) should have sole authority to regulate it and, therefore, it should
be immune from other U.S. laws governing collusion and commercial bribery.
(Credit Suisse First Boston Ltd. v. Billings.)
-
- On June 18, 2007, the Supreme Court issued its opinion
giving Wall Street everything it wanted, concluding that the SEC was doing
a good job. The Court wrote: "...there is here no question of the
existence of appropriate regulatory authority, nor is there doubt as to
whether the regulators have exercised that authority."
-
- The sweeping ignorance of that statement is breathtaking.
Whether it was Wall Street firms price fixing on NASDAQ for decades or
the orchestrated rigging of the market for new stock issues in the late
90s or the current institutionalized system of credit fraud, the SEC always
has its lens fogged until some college professors or investigative reporters
publish a step by step playbook, disseminate it widely, and force the SEC
to take action to save face.
-
- Worse yet, when the SEC finally does take action, it
imposes fines of millions for stealing billions, making crime one of the
most productive profit centers on Wall Street.
- This 2007 decision from the Supreme Court comes exactly
20 years and 10 days after the 1987 Supreme Court decision in Shearson/American
Express Inc. v. McMahon. Under this ruling, Wall Street has been able to
run a private justice system called mandatory arbitration to hear the cases
of the investors or employees it defrauds (with the exception of class
actions). The instruction manual for this private justice system explains
that adherence to the law is not required; arbitration panel members, many
on Wall Street's payroll, can just go with their gut.
-
- In other words, the highest court in our land is telling
Americans that the reward for serial lawlessness is immunity from the law.
-
- Exhibit Three: Banks' Secret Profit Center: Your Death
-
- Few Americans are aware that for at least 16 years big
business and banks have been secretly taking out millions of life insurance
policies on their rank and file workers and naming the corporation the
beneficiary of the death benefit without the knowledge of the worker. The
individual policies are frequently in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
If the employee leaves the company, no problem; big business is still allowed
to collect the death benefit and they track the employee through the Social
Security Administration to keep tabs on when they die. These policies are
commonly known as "dead peasant" or "janitor" policies
because they insure low-wage earners including janitors. Some of the largest
corporations in America have been boosting their income statements by including
cash buildup in the policies as well as receiving the death benefit tax
free.
-
- In 2003, the General Accountability Office (GAO) released
a study with the startling findings that companies were taking out multiple
policies on the same individual and that 3,209 banks and thrifts had current
cash values in these policies totaling $56.3 Billion.
-
- But instead of a congressional revolt against this revolting
practice, it remained in place for at least 16 years after Congress first
learned about it.
-
- Then along comes the worker-friendly sounding Pension
Protection Act of 2006 submitted by our Congress and signed by the President.
Buried deep within this massive document was the grandfathering of the
millions of previously issued policies with a little tinkering at the edges
of tax and reporting issues on newly issued policies.
-
- Exhibit Four: They Keep the Money; You Get the Slogan
-
- Around the time the stock market was in the process of
losing $7 trillion of investor wealth in ill-conceived techs, dotcoms and
telecoms, aided and abetted by Citigroup and its Wall Street cronies, I
was driving on Charles Lindbergh Blvd. in Uniondale, Long Island when a
bizarre billboard caught my eye. The giant billboard read:
-
- He who dies with the most toys is still dead.
- Live Richly.
- (Citigroup logo: "Citi" and angelic red halo.)
-
- I had never worked on Madison Avenue but I knew a lot
of ad folks and I was pretty sure advertisements typically involved children,
pets or other warm and fuzzy things. Citigroup telling me to ponder my
own death seemed, well, "out of its mind."
-
- I knew there had to be more behind this campaign. According
to Citigroup's web site, the "Live Richly" campaign was meant
to communicate "that Citi is an advocate for a healthy approach to
money. Citi is an active partner in achieving perspective, balance, and
peace of mind in finances and in life for its customers."
-
- The ad agency was Fallon Worldwide and it clearly had
Citigroup confused with a social responsibility fund, not the firm that
named its trades after its real motives like the "Dr. Evil" trade
that disrupted the European bond markets or the "Black Hole"
mechanism associated with the bankrupting of Italian dairy giant, Parmalat.
-
- Here's a sampling of the insanity taking place inside
Citigroup as they spent millions extolling the public to evolve as better
human beings and, more subtly, pay no mind to the $7 trillion of investor
wealth that's evaporating behind our curtain of kindness.
-
- Citigroup slogan: People with fat wallets are not
necessarily more jolly.
-
- Citigroup reality: Sandy Weill, Citigroup's CEO, earned
"$785 million in total compensation over five years: more than any
chief executive in America, and by a wide margin." Dan Ackman, Forbes,
April 26, 2001.
-
- Citigroup slogan: Holding shares shouldn't be your
only form of affection.
-
- Citigroup reality: "A recently unearthed 'highly
confidential' Citigroup memo openly discussed the 'pressures' keeping research
analysts from providing investors with honest research. In the 2002
memo, John Hoffman, then global research chief for Citi's Salomon Smith
Barney division, advised Salomon Smith Barney CEO Michael Carpenter of
the internal view that 'implementation and enforcement of clearer and more
accurate ratings is in conflict with certain paramount goals of our firm'-namely,
maximizing underwriting fees." Peter Elkind, Fortune, November 23,
2005
- The memo was obtained as a Florida law firm attempted
to get restitution for what Salomon Smith Barney clients were increasingly
holding: worthless shares.
-
- Cumulatively, all of these examples suggest that a strong
argument could be made that unfettered greed finds its ultimate expression
in systemic corruption which is frequently indistinguishable from insanity.
-
- Please note just how much of this insanity can be placed
at the doorstep of self-regulation.
-
- Pam Martens worked on Wall Street for 21 years;
she has no securities position, long or short, in any company mentioned
in this article. She writes on public interest issues from New Hampshire.
She can be reached at <mailto:pamk741@aol.com>pamk741@aol.com
-
-
|