- It is rare that government documents openly reveal problems
with vaccines. But such a document has just been released by the the US
General Accounting Office (GAO) and the US State Department.
-
- ADD: It is "GAO document 01-21 State Department."
I have obtained a copy of it. It concerns a small pilot project in which
anthrax vaccine was given to State Dept. employees...and, without official
high-level sanction, to military personnel.
-
- ADD: Problem number one--When the State Dept. tried to
redistribute some of its vaccine to the US Dept. of Defense (DOD) for use
on soldiers, the DOD refused to take the batch "when State could not
provide assurances of the vaccine's 'cold chain of custody'--that is, whether
it was properly refrigerated at required temperatures..."
-
- ADD: "None of the US [State Dept.] missions where
the anthrax vaccine was prepositioned had refrigeration units with automatic
temperature monitoring alarms that could ensure the cold chain of custody
for the anthrax vaccine was maintained."
-
- ADD: "Despite DOD's refusal to accept the vaccine
because of the lack of assurances that it met the cold chain of custody,
State Department medical personnel at the US mission where the pilot program
was conducted made a series of anthrax vaccine exchanges with a nearby
US military installation...it is possible the vaccine rotated may have
been substandard."
-
- ADD: "...The Head Nurse at the [State Dept.] pilot
site's medical unit said that these vials [which had been stored without
proper precautions] were used to immunize US military service members at
the [military ] installation."
-
- ADD: Apparently the State Dept. denies that any of its
exchanged or unexchanged batches of anthrax vaccine were kept in a substandard
way. But these batches obviously WERE kept in a substandard way.
-
- ADD: Who knows what the effects of the vaccine were on
the soldiers who received it?
-
- ADD: The State Department did give anthrax vaccine to
53 volunteers among its own personnel. Which batch was that? The State
Dept. seems to claim it was a good and safe batch.
-
- ADD: There were 9 reported adverse reactions. That's
a very high stat.
-
- ADD: 8 of the adverse reactions were among females.
-
- ADD: What were the reactions reported? "...symptoms
such as 'hard nodules,' 'lumps,' or 'knots' on the site of injection, prolonged
soreness of the arm, and for three recipients, the knot or nodule was described
as lasting 4 to 6 weeks. State [Department] records also show that three
additional female recipients also had reactions, but chose not to report
them..."
-
- ADD: First of all, 4 to 6 weeks is a very long reaction.
Second, who knows how many reactions actually went unreported? We so far
know about 12 reactions out of 53 people. That is very, very high.
-
- ADD: The report clearly suggests that most of the reactions
were of the same general type: lumps at the site of injection. But then,
later in the report, here comes a shocking statement. A contradiction.
-
- ADD: "The nurse at the [State Dept.] pilot mission's
medical clinic said that there have been a wide range of reactions to the
vaccine among the participants, but only adverse reactions known to be
associated with the anthrax vaccine, as indicated in FDA instructions accompanying
the vaccine, were documented."
-
- ADD: This is typical FDA lunacy. The FDA is notorious
for arbitrarily limiting what can be called a vaccine reaction and what
can't be. And the FDA is famous for defining a reaction to a vaccine so
that delayed reactions are never attributed to the vaccine.
-
- ADD: Therefore, for example, a baby who develops neurological
damage from the Hepatitis B vaccine is claimed to have a disease by another
name. Doctors on the case blame the mother for "excessive breastfeeding"
or some such. Don't think I'm exaggerating.
-
- ADD: Sure enough, in this GAO/State Dept. document, we
come to this piece: "[The nurse on duty at the State Dept.'s anthrax
pilot program] said that because the burden is on the [vaccine] recipients
to report adverse reactions in a passive reporting system, she did not
encounter any unusually delayed reactions, but believed she could have
obtained more information on reactions using procedures to actively monitor
recipients." To track them over a period of time, in other words.
-
- ADD: Yeah.
-
- ADD: For the US government to admit as much as squeezes
out in this report suggests that a lot more went on here that wasn't found
out, that was swept under the carpet.
-
- ADD: The anthrax vaccine itself, in pristine and perfect
refrigerated form, is shunned by many for good reason. It is a toxic piece
of Russian roulette. But traded back and forth, quite possibly unrefrigerated
and spoiled?
-
- ADD: No major media outlet has as yet reported this story.
-
- ADD: As I keep saying, the war is against the people.
All the people. It is a bio/chem war, globally.
-
-
- MainPage
http://www.rense.com
-
-
-
- This
Site Served by TheHostPros
|