- YouTube
- Local TV News Confirms We Are Being Poisoned (click)
-
-
- If a mass of barium is vaporized in space, within seconds
much of the barium becomes ionized by the suns rays, producing a highly
reflective ionic cloud which deflects newly arriving solar
energy back into space, thereby preventing the ground from warming
to the temperature it otherwise would have attained.
-
- Cooler-than-otherwise surface temperature means the air
immediately above the ground will not heat as much as it would have, not expand
and rise (evacuate upwards) as it would have, and not create the lower air
pressure (relative vacuum) in that location that would have obtained otherwise.
In short, laying cloud causes air pressure to be higher in regions where
the sun has been prevented from reaching the ground. Oversimplifying
somewhat, it means that there will be less "pull" and more "push"
affecting movement of air in neighboring regions of near-surface air than
otherwise; and that, of course, means control of the weather.
-
- By using this push-pull ("high-pressure-block/low-pressure-suck") technique, the
movement of neighboring parcels of air -- the parcels may be wet,
dry, hot or cold, or rotating (cyclonic) -- can be redirected from the
course that a super-high-speed computer pre-determined they would have
taken to new courses calculated during the process. The
calculations take into account (plug into the set of simultaneous equations
that comprise the model) all of the variables (interacting factors) fed
in real time from sensors collecting data from thousands of points in
land, sea air and space. The planes laying reflective cloud change their
course seveal times in the middle of a run as new computations dictate the
latest requirements in the weather intervention to effect the
desired result.
-
- It is impossible to predict weather more than two
or so weeks in advance, because of the errors that creep in each time
you multiply a number shortened in the decimal places (man is
limited in his data measurements to only so many decimal places and
each time different measures are multiplied accuracy is lost, the
prediction becomes accurate to fewer and fewer "significant figures." But
the fact that no one computation can predict weather too
far ahead ( because of the just-mentioned rounding of data numbers
that takes place both in the initial gathering data and in subsequent multiplication
of these numbers in "running the model") does
not rule out effective weather modification, as mathematician John von
Neumann pointed out. The problem of prediction is solved by continuous
computing and building the desired weather effect through successive short-run
approximations.
-
- Clandestine weather modification is done by continuous
high-speed computing generating tolerably accurate short range-predictions
of ,1) what will happen without intervention and 2) what will happen towards the
desired event given a "fitted" a trial intervention. When
an intervention is found that moves the weather system closer to producing
the desired effect, the CWM planes are instructed to execute that
intervention. And even as the planes are heading to their assigned
targets a new intervention is being computed for achieving the next approximation
to what is needed to get what is wanted. In this way short-range
interventions following one after another so that the final goal --
a drought in one place, a flood in another, a hurricane landing on
a particular point on a coast -- is attained. This is clandestine
weather modification -- also called weaponized weather modification --
or perhaps more dramatically but no less accurately, playing God with peoples
lives.
-
-
- The new weather modification leglislation passed by Congress has
been crafted to conceal, not to regulate this activity. The legislation
does not recognize the technology and so these interventions are exempted.
(It's like a company continuing to sell a cancer-causing product
simply because the Food and Drug Administration has not officially recognized
this effect.)
-
- Also, there are those who argue that the laying of ionized
cloud is part of a benevolent plan to save the earth from global warming
due to greenhouse-effect-producing gases in the atmosphere. While
it is true that physicist Edward Teller did make such a proposal, the last
thing you should think is that weaponized weather modification has anything
to do with the government secretly saving us from global warming. Global
warming a deception, the result of selecting the research, suppressing
research, and differentially rewarding researchers for the conclusions
they reach. Global warming is a cover for the use of weather technology
by the most powerful people in the world for their own economic and
geopolitical benefit. Global warming is more real than
space aliens at Roswell or ray guns bringing down the twin towers of the
WTC. Increased carbon dioxide is not a threat, but a potential boon to
mankind. The global warming deception both conceals weather crimes
(unlegislated crimes against humanity) for profit and it is used as an
excuse for international agencies (copntrolled by the weather atrocity
perpetrators themselves) to take over more of the economic activity
of the human race.
-
- I attach below my usual message on this topic:
-
- Dick Eastman
- Yakima, Washington
-
-
- Clandestine Weather Modification
-
- I spent several years on the "chemtrail issue", eventurally
calling the activity "clandestine weather modification" and
determining that it works like this:
-
- The cloud cover that is generated causes the surface
of the earth (land or sea) to be cooler than otherwise.
-
- Cooler surface means the air directly above the
ground or ocean will be less warmed than otherwise, which means less air
will rise than would have risen otherwise, which means the pressure
in that area will be higher than it would have been otherwise, which
means that air flows will be redirected.
-
- Note: Whenever a high pressure area is to your right
you will have wind at your back. This is called the Buys-Ballot
rule. Thus, to create wind at your back create high pressure
at your right -- or more specfically, have an aircraft lay cloud so that
to your right the ground will be cooler with less thermal energy from the
sun, with the near-surface air therefore less heated, and the pressure
therefore higher. Explanation: Air does not just pour straight
into a low pressure area. This is because of the spinning
of the earth producing the Coriolis Effect. Try tossing
a ball back and forth with someone while standing on a gigantic rotating
platter. The air molecules are like the ball moving in straight lines
over the rotating earth.
-
-
- With this simple ability to create higher than otherwise
pressure by laying cloud, if you have an amazingly high powered/fast computer (the
National Science Foundation computer was the fastest known in the
world the last time I looked) and a powerful enough weather model
(systems of simultaneous equations with thousands of real data coefficients
all continuously updated) then you can control major weather events with
this proviso:
-
- Even with the most complete data, the best model and
the fastest computer, mankind's continuing inability to gather data and
compute data out to enough decimal places will yield eventual big-time
error as approximation/estimate computations are multiplied too many times
in the computation (fancifully called the "chaos" effect.) This
limits the ability to predict weather in a single computation to
perhaps a week or two.
-
- However, this is enough to modify weather because all
that is needed is a succession of fresh short-term interventions. Continuous
inverventions and continuous re-computing affording successive approximations
to the desired effect to enable clandestine weather modification; and
so parcels of air that are hot or cold, wet or dry, spinning or not spinning,
can be redirected.
-
- If hot air is contained in one area, its movement
slowed by high pressure areas blocking its usual movement, that air will
become hotter, i.e. as when Yugoslavia was fried in 124 degree heat
to bring down Slobodan Milosovic. The Sahara heat from the south was
kept in the Mediterrainian area by chemtrailing -- I call it "cloudtrailing" --
creating high pressure in Central Europe where it would ordinarily have
circulated. The air parcel hung in the Mediterrainain getting
hotter and hotter.
-
- Also when you put "chemtrailed" cloud cover
over the central Pacific south of the equator, the higher-than-normal
air pressure -- remember the sea surface gets cooler than normal so
the air above the sea does not get warmed as much -- the air does
not rise as it would have; it does not create the relative vaccum
(low pressure) to maintain the wind.
-
- So in this way you stop the prevailing
winds (the air moving west) and this in turn stops the South Equatorial
Current normally pushed by those winds, which in turn stops the Peru
Current behind it (replacing the water that went west) that
normally brings cold arctic surface waters (and fish) up the west coast
of South America. And you have created the El Niño effect
which devestates the economies of many countries (including our own).
-
- The conspiracy is that El Niño and other high-impact
weather events really are under control of powerful private
interests.
-
- Of course there are other aspects to it: Using the spin
of one system to accelerate another of smaller scale; changing the
radius of a cyclonic system to speed it up; altering the intensity of hurricanes
by seeding near the wall of the eye etc. My goal here is merely
to convince you of the validity of one aspect of current CWM technology.
I have merely presented the simple model of redirecting weather movements
by the creation of high pressure zones. I do not deny that the weather
is complex. Remember, the economy is not complex either, but the supply
and demand model nevertheless provides players with power to predict and
control economic events.
-
- No critic on usenet weather and physics newsgroups
has ever touched this argument. The science is rock solid and the
computation, modelling, monitoring and cloud-laying systems all exist. Billions
have been spent -- and the elite does not spend money like that merely
to know when to put their cars in their garages. No meterologist or earth
scientist has agrued against what I am saying and many meterologists have
said they are open to the possibility. An Israeli meterologist who read
my articles on CWM on the Usenet in the late 1990's informed me that
Israel gets 21 percent of its rain from weather modification.
-
- Also, National Science Foundation has given its weather
models and global weather monitoring feedback to Red China, while
it does not share this super data with the National Weather
Service. The Chinese are the world's experts in medium-term weather
modification. Yet in the United States weather modification is a taboo
subject. Americans still think of it in terms of cloud seeding or carboning
the sky to warm and dissipate cloud (the van Stratton effect). We are left
to guess what methods the Chinese use. My guess is that they use CWM.
-
- I suppose I would have gotten further in getting the
word out if I didn't put so many ideas in one sentence all the time. Editing
my own writing is impossible because when I try I only think of more qualifying
and elaborating phrases to include, etc. I invite anyone to break
down the above and put it out on their own. It never has recieved a clear
statment for the general public.
-
- The existence and criminal use of CWM is something
that everyone in the world should be made to understand. Forget the "Global
Warming" myth -- which I believe is mere cover for what is really
being done. The people who brought you 9-11 are capable of doing
a lot worse with CWM -- in fact they already have.
-
- One more thing: The people who are controlling the weather
are more interested in destroying crops for geopolitical purposes (weaponized
weather modification) and for economic purposes than for "benefiting
farmers." If you buy agricultural commodities futures (rights
to buy farm products in the future at a given price) and then
destroy this crop around the world using CWM to raise the price (supply
and demand) you really "make a killing" in every sense of the
word.
-
- Did I mention that hurricane systems can also be steered
by this process? A hurricane is simply a spinning parcel of air. The
rotating parcel moves along like any other parcel of air, pushed and pulled
by differences in air pressure in neighboring regions. There is as
much money to be made following a hurricane as there is following the invasion
of a Muslim country. Katrina? And remember, the ruling minority are Malthusians
-- they think it is doing God a favor to kill off surplus population. In
this way they justify their depradations.
-
-
- And were tornadoes in Washington D.C. on recent year
meant to send the same message as the anthrax scare?
-
- Google Dick + Eastman + Clandestine Weather Modification
in google groups from about 1998 to 2002 and you will see about a hundred
messages with documentation, first hand observation, an inventory of the
technology at the service of clandestine weather modification, debate, and
forwarded letters sent to me from individuals around the world -- including
a letter from a man who layed chemtrails over the Indian Ocean but didn't
know what the mission was about.
-
- Unfortunately I left all this behind me following 9-11
and especially after the Pentagon security camera video was released in
March 2002.
-
- One more thing: When you tell people about this they
just reply by dropping the name HARP as if that magic word makes everything
I have uncovered about the true purpose of
- "chemtrailing" irrelevant and so is forgotten.
HARP is a system that can heat parcels of air (whatever else it does) and
so can create low pressure areas, instead of high ones, -- or so I
speculate -- but that does not change the fact that creation of high pressure
areas by laying cloud is being done with disastrous effects on agriculture,
water needs, farm communities, all regions hit by steered cyclonic weather
and the general economy.
-
- Bottom line: Chemtrails -- cloudtrails -- although
less conspicuous than in the late 90's (perhaps because some of us are
on to them) is still being done and it is still mass-murder
and a crime against humanity if there ever was one.
-
- My thanks to Jackie Patru for her helpful editing of
this text.
|