- Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. originally covered in 1997
Princess Diana's accident, death and investigation. In fact, Google "Diana
ambulance" or "Diana Brenda Wells" and SenderBerl has kept
its leading position on Google pages for over a decade. SenderBerl's
"open issues" web page is as relevant and vibrant today as it
was in 1997. See www.senderberl.com/diquestions.htm.
-
- Now, a decade later, SenderBerl has new facts and evidence
before it that allows it to expand on the evidence it presented ten years
back: that Diana's accident was no accident but an assassination. New
photographs released as part of the Inquest regarding Princes Diana shows
us that those photographs were doctored, that the photographs were taken
seconds before Diana's death, that Henri Paul was intentionally blinded
to impair his ability to properly handle the Mercedes, and in our opinion
the evidence clearly shows us that the man taking the photographs in issue
was part of the team assembled to implement Diana's accident.
-
- If the Ritz videos were not available, as they are to
us today due to the fact that Dodi Fayed's father, Mohammed al-Fayed,
was the owner of the Ritz Hotel in Paris, France, we could never know
what we offer you herein. The official Inquest videos are viewable at
http://clients.mediaondemand.net/judiciary/inquest/. They are over two
hours in length and they first and foremost show that contrary to the
lies rendered in 1997 that Henri Paul was not only fully sober but part
and parcel of a covert scheme allowing a limited number of "paparazzi"
to be present when Diana and Dodi made their escape from the Ritz Hotel
Service Exit.
-
- PART ONE
-
- First, let us begin with showing you the two photographs
in issue
-
-
-
-
-
- The first thing to notice is that the brightest light
from whatever its source is on Henri Paul. Since Diana is the person of
primary interest for the paparazzi photographers, the question that immediately
arises, especially with Diana looking back, is why is the brightest light
on Henri Paul? Moreover if you can focus on that white circle behind the
car, and further noting Henri Paul's hand positions on the wheel, the
car is moving and obviously then the light source is immediately in front
of the car and further something is of definite interest and concern to
Trevor Rees Jones, the bodyguard (and to Diana in turning her head to
look out the back window).
-
- Next, you can see in Photo 1 that the car was on an incline
and then a second or to later the roadway is leveling off. Lastly, if
you focus on the back of Diana's head in Photo 2, as we now do....
-
-
-
-
-
- you can see that the back of her head has been subject
to photo manipulation/distortion. By comparison, here is the back of her
head in Photo 1.
-
-
-
-
-
- Now, due to the Ritz videos, we can also deduce that
the back of Diana's head in both photos were digitally tampered with:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The first photo above was taken six minutes before Diana's
accident and the second photo eleven minutes before the crash in the Alma
tunnel.
-
- SenderBerl has seen a copy of Photo 2 different from
the one now offered. On October 2nd we offered the following to our global
geopolitical audience concerning our comment regarding the photo we had
originally seen:
-
- "Since finding these photos is not that easy and
since they may disappear I wanted to note one more photo. What do you
find interesting in this photo regarding issues of light and shade? Answer:
This photo could be very important. Why is the brightest light on the
driver's face? Where would a photographer have to be to realize such a
flash effect on the driver?
-
- Alas, let me see if there are people out there who will
now use this compelled evidence to connect dots long connected by me in
the analysis of this event -- or will the issue soon disappear as an
event long past its prime?
-
- Diana is looking back -- she is the person of primary
interest. The photos should be from back to front or if front to back
on her side of the car meaning that Trevor's face should carry the highest
light reflection."
-
-
- The photograph that we originally saw showed very little
light on the back of Diana's head. Now, the one offered not only shows
light off the back of her head but is clearly without question digitally
tampered with. If we had seen this photograph we would have immediately
noted the digital tampering which is crystal clear and evident.
-
-
-
- So the question is why the need to tamper with this photograph?
-
- The answer connects to the contention that Henri Paul
was blinded by light to impede him from defending himself and the occupants
of the car as the Mercedes was directed into the 13th pillar of the Alma
Tunnel to invoke the accident.
-
- Thus if the back of Diana's head has little light on
it and Henri Paul's face has intense light on it, then this proves that
Henri Paul was intentionally blinded, and thus you have an essential part
of proving that Diana's accident was no accident at all.
-
- Thus, the original photo we saw was central to this contention
in that Henri Paul's face had even more light intensity on it, Trevor
Rees Jones had less intensity, and Diana barely any at all.
-
- In the current version, the photograph from where we
sit, shows less intensity than before on Henri Paul's face, more on Trevor
Rees Jones (but still far less than Henri Paul), and the bright spot
on Diana's head digitally rendered (in both photos) to diffuse the clear
import of her having little light on it at all.
-
- Thus, on October 4, 2007, two days later, there was a
dire need for those seeking to mask the import of these photographs to
contend that they were taken not a second or two before the accident but
earlier than that. Those seeking to mask the truth of the assassination
were desperate and thus in view of the Ritz videos they hung themselves
as this paper intends to prove.
-
- However, before we get to that discussion, it is important
to note that the entrance to the Alma tunnel involves a steep incline
and the photos themselves attest that they were taken while the Mercedes
was traveling down that incline. Moreover, with Diana looking back, photographers,
if on foot, and the photos taken at the time officially alleged to have
been taken (outside the Ritz), would have simply moved around the car
to take the photos from the back and side not the front, with Diana turning
back (but none to our knowledge have been produced). However, not only
does the photographer, if on foot, fail to move back, but he focuses on
Henri Paul, and further there are no paparazzi behind the car taking
photos they otherwise would crave for front pages of global newspapers
( Diana looking back behind her)! Thus, the official version connective
to the two key photographs is problematic. See also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJhM68U-_yA.
-
- Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. long offered the reason
she was looking back. Princess Diana was looking to Dodi Fayed for protection,
she long fearing that her life was in jeopardy post her royal divorce.
Diana not only did not recognize perhaps some of the people chasing the
Mercedes by car and motorcycle, but at the point she was turning back,
the slip roadway, which Henri Paul needed to exit, to get directly to
Dodi's apartment, was blocked. Thus, this forced Henri Paul into the Alma
tunnel and Diana was obviously concerned, as was Trevor Rees Jones from
the fact that those taking the photograph were immediately in front of
the car forcing Henri Paul, as some witnesses to the accident expressed,
to brake and blow his horn.
-
- Tack onto these realities the one that Brenda Wells,
the person who was blocked from entering the roadway into the tunnel by
two motorcycles, to preclude her from being a direct witness to what
took place in the Alma tunnel a seconds later, was told as a matter of
fact by French police to disappear, which she has, then the evidence speaks
to a planned assassination on Princess Diana's life. Moreover, do not
discount the reality that Diana not only was concerned that the slip road
was blocked forcing the Mercedes into the tunnel but she could have further
noted two motorcycles blocking Brenda Well's car from entering the tunnel
as the Mercedes she was in was doing so!
-
-
- PART TWO
-
-
- This is the news report emanating on October 4, 2007,
regarding the place where the photos were taken:
-
- Two photos shown to the inquest on Tuesday, taken by
French photographer Jacques Langevin, apparently are the last taken of
Diana before the crash - though only her hair is visible.
-
- The time is 12:20 a.m. on Aug. 31, 1997. About 10 minutes
later the Mercedes had slammed into a pillar in the Pont d'Alma tunnel.
-
- Langevin was prosecuted for invasion of privacy for taking
two photos of the couple leaving the Ritz, and he and two other photographers
faced the same charge for taking pictures of the car shortly after it
crashed.
-
- Langevin was acquitted of the charge involving the Ritz
photos.
-
- Following a series of appeals, Langevin, Christian Martinez,
and Fabrice Chassery were fined $1.42 each by a Paris appeals court for
the tunnel photos
-
-
- THIS IS A LIE. Why do we contend that this is a lie (among
a series of lies we detailed in 1997 and highlight below)? If you stay
with the Ritz videos to near the bitter end, you will see Princess Diana
and Dodi Fayed entering the Mercedes and driving off and there is no
flash or bright lights or anything of that order in the video. In fact,
while Jacques Lengevin was present in the immediate area, by his own admission,
he was not there to operate as a photographer at all as he himself proves
by his original statements made concerning where he was at the times in
issue:
-
- http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.bbc.co.uk/
politics97/diana/rat3.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.bbc.co.uk/politics97/
diana/ photo.html&h=159&w=160&sz=24&hl=en&start=1&sig2=Ai4Ukw1Jc7In0bkPegSHvw
&tbnid=RXuZ6mJbx2t6oM:&tbnh=97&tbnw=98&ei=ED0QR4XWEoiQeeOX2OwK&prev=/i
mages%3Fq%3DRomuald%2BRat%2B%26gbv%3D2%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den
-
- Langevin: condemns paparazzi who fled accident
-
- In an interview for American TV, the French photographer
Jacques Langevin, also arrested after the tragic accident that killed
Princess Diana, said he was not among the paparazzi "killers"
who chased her through Paris.
-
- "I am not paparazzi," Langevin told CBS Television.
"On this story, I work in the respect of the law. ... I arrived after
the police, after the ambulance people. I am charged now and I cannot
accept that."
-
- Mr Langevin said he was assigned by the Sygma Agency
to go to the Ritz Hotel on Saturday night and take photographs of Diana
and her companion, Dodi Al Fayed.
-
- "We knew she was coming out of the hotel. A car
came quickly... so I shoot pictures of Diana leaving the hotel (and) of
the two inside the car through the window," he told CBS.
-
- Mr Langevin said Diana put her hands in front of her
face to shield herself from flashes and after taking the photos he left
to rejoin friends for dinner. He told CBS he had arrived at the scene
of the accident by chance about 15 minutes later.
-
-
- The award-winning photographer, who has covered combat
in Bosnia and the Gulf, said he did not immediately recognize the wreckage
as the car containing Diana, Al Fayed, their driver and Diana's bodyguard
"because in my mind I couldn't accept that was the car I saw near
the hotel".
-
- Commenting on witness claims that some paparazzi who
chased the vehicle took pictures of the victims after the crash and sped
off before police arrived, Mr Langevin said: "It's unacceptable.
They are not photographers. They are - I don't know, but they are not
journalists. In a way, they are killers."
-
-
- The Ritz videos attest that Henri Paul made a covert
deal allowing a handful of people to position themselves outside the service
entrance where Diana and Dodi would and did in fact exit. Among those
thus present, by his own admission, due to this secret deal, was Jacques
Langevin, a person with credentials making his appearance on a late Saturday
night, to capture pictures of Dodi and Diana that were available all day
long, all the more noteworthy.
-
- While the large crowd was waiting for Diana to exit from
the front of the Ritz, Henri Paul, deputy director of security of the
hotel, was making plans for Dodi and Diana to exit the hotel from the
service area and then take one car without the Range Rover that usually
backs them up to Dodi's apartment. What is significant is that Henri Paul
keeps Diana and Dodi waiting an inordinate period of time in the service
area of the hotel. The following video frame shows them in the area at
12:11 AM Sunday morning, August 31, 2007:
-
-
-
-
- What we see for the first time on the Ritz videos is
that Diana, having to stand their waiting, finally shows Henri Paul her
watch questioning the delay. Thereafter Henri Paul moves them into the
car, notably nine long minutes after their arrival in the service area.
Why the delay? During those nine minutes Henri Paul is seen exiting the
service area multiple times, one time openly waiving to hiS three or four
"paparazzi" confidants in the area, privy to the exit route.
-
-
-
-
- Motorbike arrives 12:07 AM four minutes before Diana
and Dodi enter the service area. The driver sees he is in the direct line
of the security camera so he moves himself and his motorbike out of camera
range.
-
-
-
-
- On the other hand, the few "paparazzi" with
inside knowledge of where Dodi and Diana would exit, stand in waiting
across the street, thinking they are outside the range of the Ritz security
camera. Henri Paul comes out, sees them, checks inside the office, confirming
they are on camera, and waves them off to move, and they immediately do
so.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Princess Diana, who with Dodi is standing there unaware
of the true reason for the delay, becomes impatient and flashes Henri
Paul her watch to indicate that she would want to move forward, Henri
Paul, signals her that it won't be much longer, and then, twenty seconds
later, once Diana complains, things move quickly.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The Ritz video then shows the following:
-
- 12:19:50 Diana and Dodi exit the Ritz from the Service
Exit
- 12:20:17 They quickly enter the Mercedes
- 12:20:23 Mercedes leaves the area
-
- THERE ARE NO SIGNS OF THE USE OF ANY FLASH BULBS OR HIGH
INTENSITY LIGHTS ON THE CAR OR ON ANY OCCUPANT OF THE CAR. THIS IS ALSO
VERIFIED BY A SECOND RITZ SECURITY CAMERA CAPTURING DIANA'S AND DODI'S
ENTRY INTO THE MERCEDES FROM BEHIND THE MERCEDES.
-
- Jacques Langevin by his own admission was there and those
there were not there to photograph Diana but ready for the chase on a
route they knew in advance would drive the Mercedes into the Alma tunnel.
The delay was to put those involved in place including those needing to
block the slip exit and entrance off the Alma tunnel and otherwise get
the crew in place to also assure Diana's death as SenderBerl presented
in 1997 and as we, immediately below, in Part III, review here for you.
-
- PART III
-
- SenderBerl released the following guide to refresh its
global group of readers of some material events it presented in 1997 regarding
Diana. Now, with the additional facts above, everything easily falls
into place.
-
-
- SENDERBERL KEY GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING THE TRUTHS RE DIANA
-
-
- This reference was very hard to find from mainstream
news sources:
-
- Source: http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9708/30/diana.dead/
-
- Several motorcyclists were detained for questioning after
the crash, police said. A badly damaged motorcycle was taken from the
scene of the accident by police.
-
- Ehrlich: Never explained who was on it and how it got
damaged.
-
- ===
-
- Look how the BBC first put it on August 31 (1997):
-
- Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/31/
newsid_2510000/2510615.stm
-
- Mr Al Fayed and the chauffeur died at the scene but the
princess and her bodyguard were cut from the wreckage and rushed to hospital.
-
- Ehrlich: To say that Diana was rushed to the hospital
is a historic lie.
-
- ===
-
- Di's bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones survived the crash but
only has vague memories of events leading to it.
-
- Ehrlich: Have vague memories or die. Link this to our
discussion regarding Pat Tillman.
-
- ===
-
- Guardian put forth the BS regarding the assassination:
-
- http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,768041,00.html
-
- Several other decoy cars are understood to have been
driven away to lure the photographers off. But the ruse failed. The 'paps'
were smarter than that. After half an hour, the couple left the rear
entrance of the Ritz around midnight.
-
- They were snapped as they got into their car, an armour-proofed
Mercedes. The French Ritz driver had had little practice with the car,
which handled in a peculiarly heavy way.
-
- Ehrlich: They pushed this BIG LIE but could not get away
with it. Now, it is all but conveniently forgotten.
-
-
- The broad square of the Place Vendome is normally deserted
by that time of night, the jewellery boutiques and antique shop for the
super-rich long since closed for the evening. But as Diana and Dodi sped
away, the photographers leapt onto their motorcycles and the buildings
echoed to the screech of tyres.
-
- Their route would have taken them along the perimeter
walls of the Jardin des Tuilleries before they entered the expanse of
the Place de la Concorde, where the traffic flows four or five cars abreast
over the cobblestones. Here, the French chaffeur made his first attempt
to dodge the pursuing paparazzi riding BMWs. But his attempts to outmanouevre
the photographers failed. They, after all, were old hands at the deadly
game of car chasing, and he was not.
-
- The Mercedes then sped on towards the Seine and Dodi
's home. The dual carriageway exit to the west, along the Cours de la
Reine, funnels the vehicles into a narrower raceway with a low, central
dividing wall. The natural temptation here is to accelerate. Because
of this the speed limit is set between 35 and 50 mph. The Ritz driver
did accelerate - according to some reports, as fast as 95mph.
-
- Across the river, the bulking profile of the Eiffel Tower
shot into vision as the Mercedes raced along. Through, first one shallow
underpass, illuminated by yellow strip lighting from frosted glass panels
one one side.
-
- 'You should never drive along there too fast,' a woman
taxi driver said yesterday. 'Take care when you approach the second tunnel.
It swings to the left just as you go down. There have been accidents
there before.'
-
- With the paparazzi still in close pursuit, the Mercedes,
carrying Diana , Dodi and their bodyguard, Trevor Rees-Jones, made another
attempt to accelerate away. Diana and Dodi were sitting in the back seat,
without seatbelts. At least seven paparazzi on motorcycles were in hot
pursuit.
-
- As the car swung left and raced into the second underpass,
below the Pont de l'Alma, the driver appears to have lost control of the
vehicle. Skid marks, streaked with black paint were visible yesterday
on the central dividing wall marking the point where the vehicle veered
to one side.
-
- Ehrlich: With the release of those doctored photos we
now know someone was in front of the Mercedes.
-
-
- The huge Mercedes ricocheted off an opposite wall before
slamming into the 13th pillar supporting the tunnel roof, and rolling
over two or three times.
-
- The pursuing motorcycles appear to have braked before
they reached the wreckage. But even in the awful aftermath of the crash,
there was money to be made and, it seems, the prospect of a final ghoulish
exclusive.
-
- According to French radio, several of the photographers
took pictures before help arrived. One of them was beaten at the scene
by a horrified witness. An eyewitness, speaking on BBC Radio yesterday,
said: 'Initially when I approached one (photographer) was even taking
pictures. Even before I could run the 50 yards into the tunnel, he was
there. His camera equipment was far more sophisticated than that normally
used by tourists.' The fire brigade received their first call at 12.27am
from some American tourists who had heard an enormous bang. The Mercedes
had partially fallen on its roof, crushing it and forcing the engine back
into the driver's and passenger's compartment. The car's heavy radiator
had been thrown into the front.
-
- It was a catastrophic accident. Dodi , aged 42, died
instantly in the crash. The French Ritz chaffeur was also killed on impact.
Diana was still alive - just. But she was gravely injured and trapped
in the tangle of crumpled metal and broken glass.
-
- Two American tourists were the first on the scene. Tom
Richardson, from San Diego, said he saw smoke, adding: 'I think the car
hit a wall. A man started running towards us telling us to go.' His friend
Joanna Luz added: 'The horn was sounding for about two minutes. I think
it was the driver against the steering wheel.
-
-
- Ehrlich: Critical side stepped facts.
-
- 'There was a photographer on the scene within five seconds
of the crash. As we were running out of the tunnel police and others were
running in but it took around five or seven minutes for them to get there.
-
- 'People were running towards the crash site and steering
traffic away not knowing who was in the car. We were 20 yards from the
accident but we did not see anyone in the car. The car was in the right
lane facing on-coming traffic. The air bag was on the passenger's side.
We did not see one on the driver's side.'
-
- Other witnesses suggest the Mercedes had not been under
close pursuit from press photographers, though several arrived very soon
afterwards.
-
- One taxi driver, Michel Lemonnier, said: 'It must have
been the chauffeur's fault. He was mad to be driving like that in that
tunnel.'
-
- French emergency services took between five and seven
minutes to arrive. Early reports suggested the princess was suffering
from concussion, a broken arm and cuts to her thigh. In fact, those reports
were wildly optimistic. The grim reality was that she had suffered massive
chest injuries and internal bleeding.
-
- As rescue crew started to attack the mangled Mercedes
with cutting gear, paramedics revived the princess, still encased in the
crush of wreckage. Intravenous drips would almost certainly have been
used to replace blood loss, and she would have been given pain relief,
probably morphine and nitrous oxide. Of her desperate plight, she knew
nothing. At no time did she recover consciousness.
-
- Ehrlich: Not true at all. Big lie.
-
- The race to cut her free was proving difficult. The problem
was the car's dense armour plating. 'The car is extremely heavy and needs
experience to drive it,' a police officer said. 'The specially reinforced
steel made it extremely difficult to cut through and reach Princess Diana
and the injured bodyguard in the front seat after the crash.
-
-
- Ehrlich: THE BIG LIE.
-
-
- 'The firemen needed a full hour. As far as we can tell,
the bodyguard survived because he was the only person in the vehicle
who was wearing his safety belt.'
-
- The cutting continued, as police rounded up five photographers
at the scene and impounded their motocycles. After more than an hour
of cutting, at 2am Diana was finally lifted clear of the carnage of the
Mercedes.
-
- Ehrlich: All of this are lies upon lies upon lies. The
instruction for all those present who were in on what was taking place
was to delay her removal from the accident site. Top officials said they
did not call the ambulance but photos in these series of emails will
show them in communication awaiting exactly what to do and when.
-
- She was taken, still unconscious, to Paris's biggest
hospital, the Pitie Salpetriere Hospital.
-
- Diana was rushed straight into surgery. But shortly after
her arrival she suffered a catastrophic cardiac arrest. On the operating
table the French surgeons did their best. They opened the injured chest
of the princess and repaired a ruptured vein. But the internal bleeding
simply would not stop, however hard they tried.
-
- Back in Britain, the Royal Family, on holiday at Balmoral,
including the Prince of Wales, were woken and informed of the crash.
-
- The British ambassador in Paris, Sir Michael Jay, rushed
to the hospital immediately on being notified of the accident by the
French authorities.
-
- Mohamed Al Fayed flew by helicopter to Paris from his
home in Surrey. He was told that his son was dead, and that Diana was
gravely injured. The Prime Minister, Tony Blair, at home in his Sedgefield
constituency, was woken and informed of the accident. He was deeply anxious
about the princess. He got up, paced about, and waited for news.
-
- In the United States, President Bill Clinton and his
wife Hillary were told by a military aide about the crash while they are
attending a party at a private residence on Martha's Vineyard where they
were on holiday. They slipped away.
-
- The crash came just in time for the late editions of
the Sunday newspapers, but the tragedy was hedged with confusion. Buckingham
Palace confirmed the princess was undergoing treatment for injuries and
said the crash was 'an accident waiting to happen'. But the impression
in the immediate aftermath was that Diana was going to pull through. For
two hours the surgeons continued to massage Diana 's heart.
-
- At the scene, bodyguard Trevor Rees Jones, the only survivor
of the crash, was eventually cut free from the wreckage and taken to
hospital.
-
- But the valiant efforts of the French surgeons to save
Diana were in vain. The internal injuries which had caused huge blood
loss and brought on the heart attack were too serious.
-
-
- Ehrlich: You can see why the BS about Gotbaum is relevant
to Diana.
-
- At around 3am - 4am local French time - Diana , Princess
of Wales, was pronounced dead.
-
- Bruno Riou, head of the Salpetriere Hospital's intensive
care unit, said surgeons gave up their bid to restart her heart after
massive internal bleeding in the chest. There was nothing more they could
do.
-
- Her death prompted a flurry of telephone calls to the
Royal Family, senior politicians, and diplomats. The French ambassador
telephoned Balmoral and informed the Queen's private secretary that Diana
had died.
-
- The Prince of Wales was then informed and broke the tragic
news to his sons, princes William and Harry.
-
- Over at the Observer, on the fifth-floor of Farringdon
Road, London, the headline 'Di reported dead with Dodi in Paris car crash'
was being laid on the final edition of the paper.
-
- At 4.21 the Press Association put out a newsflash which
said Foreign Secretary Robin Cook's plane has been delayed from taking
off from Manila military airport in the Philippines as he prepares to
make a statement. The grimmer subtext was clear.
-
- Twenty minutes later, at 4.21am, there was another newsflash
which swept away all further doubts. ' Diana , Princess of Wales, has
died, according to British sources, the Press Association learned this
morning.'
-
- Ehrlich: You can see that original reports were replete
with OPEN AND DELIBERATE LIES to play the assassination as planned. However,
due to intense global oversight over the accident and death they had
to change tactics and thus it is imperative to highlight the BS they were
pushing down our throats to diminish us and make us grieve while they
laughed. If you don't see the Moabite/Sodomite model in play in the original
scenario then I don't know what to say.
-
- ===
-
- Now please join the above to this excellent report and
analysis I found --- generated August 31, 1997:
-
- Source: http://www.emergency.com/dianaded.htm
-
- 08/30/97 - 22:50CDT
-
- Princess Diana Reported Dead in Paris Hospital
-
- By C. L. Staten, Sr. analyst
-
- Paris, France (Emergencynet) -- According to at least
two international news services and a spokesman from Newsweek magazine,
Princess Diana, Princess of Wales, age 36, has succumbed to injuries
she received in a automobile accident that occurred at approximately midnight
(Paris time).
-
- Paris police officials have reportedly begun a criminal
investigation into the circumstances surrounding the accident that happened
in an underpass of the Pont de l'Alma bridge, near the Seine river. Speculation
continues to center on the involvement of at least one and maybe two motorcycles
who may have been pursuing the vehicle containing the Princess and her
companion, Dodi Al Fayed.
-
- According to doctors at the Hospital de la Pitie Salpetriere,
Princess Diana died as the result of massive internal and head injuries.
Reportedly, she passed away at approximately 04:00 a.m. Paris time. French
Interior Minister Jean-Pierre Chevenement and Paris Police chief Philippe
Massoni were with British diplomatic personnel at the hospital at the
time of the Princess' death. Prince Charles, vacationing in Balmoral,
Scotland, has been informed of the accident.
-
- British Prime Minister Tony Blair reportedly was ``shocked
and saddened'' by the ``devastating, appalling tragedy,'' an ministerial
spokesman said. Britons everywhere began to express their shock and dismay
shortly after the announcement of Princess Diana's passing.
-
- EmergencyNet News will continue to monitor events surrounding
the incident and the ensuing investigation and provide additional details
as they become available.
- \
- ***
- Finally, the bodyguard and driver (described as a hotel
security guard) should have been expected to flee a group of motorcyclists,
"paparazzi" or not, if they had surrounded the vehicle of their
principals. Given the history of Paris and terrorist attacks, standard
security procedures would have caused them to attempt to allude any unknown
personnel...out of fear that it was an assassination or kidnap attempt.
More facts are needed, in order to draw more conclusions. -- C. L. Staten,
Sr. Analyst
-
- Ehrlich: This was an excellent observation and comment
by the analyst!!! This is why Diana turned around because she saw that
the slip road was blocked and that they were pursued by men on
- motorcycles not known to her.
-
- ***
-
- It took rescue workers almost two hours to extricate
Diana, age 36, from the wreckage and took her to a hospital where doctors
battled for two hours to try to save the life of the Princess as she
lay with massive bleeding from terrible injuries to her chest. During
the vain and desperate battle, surgeons opened her chest and massaged
her heart with their hands in a bid to save her. Because it took so long
to extricate her from the wreckage of the car, the "golden hour"
of emergency medicine was lost in which doctors may had been able to do
more to save the life of the Princess.
-
- Ehrlich: This was the reason for the delay.
-
- ***
-
- There have been unsubstantiated reports that the flash
from the photographers cameras may have blinded the driver of the car
as he was traveling at high-speeds and then he lost control. It is not
known if the driver had received special executive protection driver
training.
-
- ****
-
- Efforts to save the life of Diana, at the accident scene
and at the hospital, were described as "heroic."
-
- Ehrlich: The same no doubt applies to those who moved
to save Carol Gotbaum.
-
- Ehrlich: Diana spoke to Dr. Maillez. While he refused
to tell the public what she said, he made it clear in 1997 that she said
things to him that he would convey to her family as he gently put an
oxygen mask over her mouth (SenderBerl covered the Diana accident real-time
in 1997 -- Google "Diana ambulance").
-
- From senderberl.com
-
- SenderBerl site (1997):
-
- CONCLUSION: We would think that Dodi Fayed's father will
investigate this entire affair using the resources he has at his disposal.
Do we need a person with vast wealth to guarantee pursuit of the truth?
Do we have to fear governmental powers thwarting an investigation by a
vastly powerful person? Trevor Rees-Jones takes on the power to singularly
oppose a false report. Will his memory ever return? Does he fear it returning?
Why did he put on a seat belt when Diana didn't? There is one piece of
seemingly confirmed evidence that may jog Trevor Rees-Jones' memory. There
is a picture showing Princess Diana turning around and looking out the
back window at a motorcycle. What we believe she may have been doing is
seeing if she recognized the motorcycle driver. She was aware - after
the many years together - of the identity of aggressive photographers.
Did Trevor Rees-Jones sense danger when Diana possibly said she did not
recognize the person/persons on the motorcycle aggressively or suspiciously
moving about the Mercedes? The free lance photographers said they were
all far back from the car, while a string of witnesses saw two motorcycles
with a black car traveling next to and/or in front of the Mercedes. Do
the French investigators know who was in the black car and the three
persons on the two motorcycles? If not, more than ever, Brenda Wells statements
to date take on critical importance, and it would be frivolous to leak
news that they are going to point to alcohol and speed (i.e. Henri Paul).
If any investigator establishes that Brenda Wells was impeded from entering
the tunnel, then the evidence points to a conclusion far different than
"alcohol and speed." Where is Brenda Wells? Again, where is
Brenda Wells? If Brenda Wells is a sham, or an illusion, then tell us.
Otherwise, produce her!
-
- Ehrlich: Nothing has changed since 1997
-
- Update(September 30, 1997): The misinformation spin masters
were out in full force. A keen example was a British spokesman who said
Britons were tired of the news regarding Diana and the newspapers were
relegating stories to pages 6 and 7. Moreover, he said, the situation
was clear. We had a highly intoxicated fellow who simply smashed up a
car. Case closed. The truth of it all is that Britons, like most others
throughout the world, are not tired of it, and in fact have grown more
suspicious and rightfully so. As one professional accident analyst proffered
today: the French permitted the accident scene to become polluted. The
skid marks were critical to determining salient facts regarding what Henri
Paul did and what effect, if any, a second car and two motorcycles may
have had on Henri Paul's driving. Normally, this type of accident analysis
is done immediately: within a week, at the latest, and steps are taken
to preserve the accident site. Since the French are treating this accident
as any other accident involving alcohol, it appears that they carry no
remorse in opening up the roadway hours after the accident without preserving
important evidence. To do the studies four weeks later is frivolous, this
accident expert said, and it appeared he didn't even know about the immediate
offer of Daimler- Benz to aid in such an analysis, Daimler-Benz obviously
aware of the critical time window existing concurrent with the accident.
-
- The public is treated with disdain: if enough spin masters
say that everyone is losing interest and getting on with their lives;
if they give the appearance the general public is thinking that it is
a simple case of an "addicted" "chronic" alcoholic
causing a horrific accident; if they further buttress it by having the
press and media altogether ignore the accident and death of Diana, or
by having the press put it on page 6 of the daily newspaper, then the
spin masters conclude they will prevail, and the dupes (the public) will
have been duped again.
- SenderBerl site (1997):
-
- However, we for one, put focus on where the press and
media should be doing its jobs. To say that this accident is just an ordinary
accident of a driver full of alcohol and drugs, belittles the facts established.
-
- It involved the Princess of Wales.
-
- It occurred just prior to an anticipated announcement
of engagement to Dodi Fayed.
- Her death eviscerated the steep problems which would
have faced the Royals and England had she in fact married Dodi, or worse,
become pregnant during the marriage.
- The original focus should not have been on Henri Paul
but the fact that Diana could have survived the accident.
-
- The Police Chief for Paris, France and the Interior Minister
for the country, jointly admitted that they were surprised at the inordinate
delay in the ambulance delivering Diana to the hospital. Yet no one picked
up a phone to call the ambulance.
-
- No facts have been revealed as to who was on ambulance,
or what treatment was rendered to Diana, and who made the decisions to
take one hour to bring her to a hospital 6 kilometers from the accident
site. It moreover is unlikely that the ambulance even carried sufficient
amounts of blood she needed.
-
- The ambulance was originally accompanied by two police
motorcycles, who "lost" the ambulance.
-
- Diana's suffered an injury to her left pulmonary vein,
not to her aorta, which we understand is the type of injury normally sustained
in a "deceleration" incident. She would have materially benefited
if she was quickly delivered to the hospital and placed on a heart lung
unit. Neither was done.
-
- Misinformation was released that the Mercedes was armored
to support why it took so long to get Diana to a hospital. Only after
intense world interest and focus did salient truthful facts became available
including that she could have been swiftly removed from the car and scene
and whisked to a hospital where 25 specialists were awaiting her.
- A picture was taken showing Diana not looking at the
photographer taking the picture but at a motorcycle behind the car. To
do so she had to fully turn around, and it would appear that she was trying
to identify those on the motorcycle. Why?
-
- Trevor Rees-Jones put on his seat belt. Diana was a devoted
seat belt user. If the focus and concern was Henri Paul then they would
have simply told him to stop the car or pull over. Diana and Dodi both
could handle another confrontation with the press. They wouldn't risk
their lives to allow someone driving erratically to continue.
-
- To further attest that Henri Paul wasn't their concern,
we have Brian Anderson seeing the Mercedes driving in a straight path.
We have Trevor Rees-Jones remembering nothing unusual about Henri Paul.
We have the fact that Henri Paul parked his car normally, a feat hard
to do when highly intoxicated, thereafter walking normally, even speaking
with both Dodi and Diana. Yet the contention is that this man was a chronic
alcoholic and based on this contention we should all blindly accept it
and go on with our lives.
-
- We do not hear the fact that during the course of Henri
Paul's chronic long term alcoholic condition he was a licensed pilot with
600 hours flying time. As one news story stated: "'Flying an aircraft
through fog is not something you can do just hoping for the best,' Jean-Andre
Cahazuc, his former instructor, told one French newspaper. 'It takes discipline,
and Paul was the complete opposite of a clown.'"
-
- While the media reports the French conducting one of
the most thorough auto accident investigations in history, it is already
a sham since they have polluted the opportunity to obtain critical evidence.
Moreover, the investigators seem to discount and belittle the evidence
of a Gary Hunter and Brenda Wells, while at the same time discouraging
others to come forward. The press and media moreover circumvent any follow-up
or discussion concerning what Wells in particular had to say. Brenda Wells
is nowhere to be found, as far as we know.
-
- It doesn't take an Einstein to recognize that the accident
took place in an area where the chances of witnesses were minimized.
Sheer coincidence? We don't think so, when the mystery black car and two
motorcycles seemingly made their move in the tunnel, and Brenda Wells
has effectively stated that she was stymied from entering the tunnel at
this very critical time window.
-
- How can the French leak and then confirm that they are
bent on seeing here a routine accident caused by an "addicted"
long term alcoholic until and unless they know the identity of the passengers
on the motorcycles and in the mystery black car. To even assert blame
under the circumstances and facts detailed above is an abomination of
responsibility and accountability and an insult to the public.
-
- There are obviously forces who want to derail intelligent
thought, press coverage and investigation of the Diana accident and death.
The investigation and press and media coverage of the Diana accident
and death are vastly important to the future of all citizens of the world.
If the press and media can be manipulated, if anyone wishing to pursue
serious inquiry and discussion can be thwarted, then do such characteristics
reflect democracy, or autocracy? In a democratic society and environment
a free, open, and aggressively inquiring press and media is essential
to offset the power and control of central government and control. In
the new world order being successfully pursued this past decade plus,
it is imperative to preserve the power and responsibilities of the press
and media. If they fail here, as they have failed recently with TWA Flight
800, then one has to question on what principles and platform the evolving
central government operates. Can people in an expanding capitalistic environment,
where opportunity seemingly expands, at least for a period of time, recognize
the erosion taking place to important democratic platforms. In the new
world order, are elementary democratic precepts inherently in conflict
with it? Is this conflict evidenced by the Diana's accident and death?
We think so.
- INSERT: THE ABOVE WAS A PRECOCIOUS PERSPECTIVE AGAIN
ON WHAT WAS TO UNFOLD (9-11 ET SEQ) THAT CONFRONTS US TODAY!
-
- Conclusion: Focus on the key issues and questions. Not
only will this pay homage to Diana above and beyond her brother's funeral
eulogy and Elton John's song, but it will be important for citizens of
the world to openly express that they will not be victims of misinformation,
as other citizens were victimized by misinformation during other times
in world history. History enforces the proposition that when people fall
as victims of misinformation, it is usually the platform to far worse
abuses. In America, a free open and aggressive press was an essential
platform to democracy. It would be disappointing, in the time where America
assumes a sole super power role, that we lose a main ingredient which
made America great. Again, the original focus should have been on testimony
whether Diana would have survived had she been taken to the hospital
immediately. Working backwards from that original precept, it then becomes
clear that one has to know the identity of those adjacent to the Mercedes
and very carefully scrutinize the critical remarks of Brenda Wells. We
never tire of asking, where is she? Can we hear what she has to say? Why
not? We tire of hearing about Henri Paul. We await hearing what happened
between the time of the accident and the time of Diana's death at the
hospital. We await hearing about Brenda Wells. Isn't what we are asking
equally if not far greater in importance than Henri Paul's claimed intoxication
- which we have responded to; but nothing which concerns us has been
addressed at all.
-
- end 1997 excerpts from senderberl.com
-
- PART IV
-
- The photographs disclosed to the public toy with us.
Here is the photograph major media likes to show to connect it to the
claim that Henri Paul was drunk and driving irresponsibly well over the
speed limit (the facts are that Henri Paul was complicit in what was
taking place and had a great deal to do that night and he was cogent,
coherent, active and not drunk at all meaning that the test results were
fabricated):
-
-
-
- However, here is an actual photo of the Mercedes after
the crash:
-
-
-
-
- Again, here is another shot to mislead the public. The
fact is that, as disclosed below, there was a false claim that Diana was
stuck and they needed to remove the roof and that the roof was armor
plated and this lie accounted for the long delay in removing her from
the ambulance. In fact, it was the use of heavy machinery to remove the
roof, one that was not armor plated, that made the car look far more awful
than was otherwise the case.
-
-
-
-
-
- PART V
-
- Why? There is no excuse for dragging in the global public,
but to the royals they had by tradition every right to eliminate Diana
for her intent to do what she was doing to her family impacting not only
them but English culture and heritage as well. Assuming arguendo that
they were furious, then the place to deal with it was among themselves,
not pursuing an execution that murdered Diana in a very cruel and sadistic
manner but also diminished the public by moving to make us complicit by
our silence and ineffectiveness in it.
-
- Here is an excerpt from Meet the Press that we published
in 1997 that details the motive.
-
- From senderberl.com/diupdate.htm:
-
- The damage and anger Diana was causing the Royal family
is readily seen from a Meet the Press televised discussion following Diana's
funeral:
-
- MR. HITCHENS: But I don't see why we should be the megaphone
for this kind of thing all the time. The desire to worship and to find
a leader figure and grovel to it is not an absolutely unmixed blessing
in human nature, OK? And there were some unpleasant aspects to it this
week, for example, the attempt to blame our profession for the death and
to shift attention away from the rather trashy and crooked family into
which Diana was hoping to marry. Because we couldn't mention anything
like that in the week of her canonization, but the fact is, she's been
saved from joining the Al Fayed family and taking those boys into that.
And that's what she was hoping to do. Now, this is not, in fact, sainthood.
It's not sainthood.
-
- MS. MATHER: We don't know that, Christopher. We have--we
absolutely can't say that.
-
- MR. HITCHENS: We're given every reason, we're encouraged
to think that it's true, and certainly no one has challenged the Fayed
family spokesman who has been groveled to by this network outside the
gates of Buckingham Palace several times this week in the impression he
gives that that's true.
-
- MR. RUSSERT: Let's go to London.
-
- MS. MATHER: I completely agree with you, that the Fayeds
are a very controversial family. It was dubious company for the mother
of the future king to keep. What has been extraordinary here is how that
has been forgiven. I personally have written very critically about it
in the Sunday Telegraph. But here all that's been swept away. There were
many notes here behind us on the railings and at Kensington Palace which
are to Diana and to Dodi. Perhaps they--the crowds in--there is sentimentality,
and sentimentality isn't entirely a bad thing. That perhaps this sad and
unhappy girl did at least have a happy few last weeks of her life.
-
- Concluding Comment: Henri Paul as Deputy Director of
Security for the Ritz Hotel was in on the deal allowing a limited number
of paparazzi as to where Diana and Dodi would exit the Ritz and also
advising them of the route he would take. His role also included contrary
to the advice of the bodyguards discarding the use of the Range Rover
which would otherwise accompany Diana and Dodi as it did all day on August
30, 1997. Henri Paul had no idea that his own death was central to what
was in play and to this day Sender, Berl & Sons Inc. never has been
able to learn of the person who removed Henri Paul off the blaring horn
of the Mercedes after the accident.
-
- Even in 1997, we were concretely suspicious that whomever
that was intruded physically on Henri Paul and that the subsequent tests
for intoxication represented a manipulated lie in line with the disinformation
about the Mercedes Benz being armor plated, that lie proffered to initially
account for the delay in extracting Diana from the Mercedes. Sender, Berl
& Sons Inc. also pointed to Brenda Wells as the witness in chief as
to the complicity in play and the press actually reported in 1997 that
French police told her that her life was in jeopardy and for her own best
interests she should vanish, which she seems to have done, our not hearing
anything about her from the Fayed camp or any other source. We will see
if the Inquest addresses Brenda Wells. However, the evidence since 1997
pointed always to a planned assassination against Princess Diana and the
photos released due to the Inquest highlighted by us above do attest even
in their altered state that Henri Paul was intentionally blinded so he
could not defend himself or his occupants from whatever propelled the
Mercedes into a spin taking them into the 13th pillar of the Alma tunnel.
However, Sender, Berl & Sons wants to make it clear that if Diana
was taken to a hospital immediately, she would have survived. She was
conscious, she spoke to Dr. Mailliez, another potential player in the
theater in play, who refused to tell the media what Diana said to him,
saying it was a confidential matter for her own family. We would think
that the Inquest should reveal what Diana did say since first it shows
that she was conscious and coherent and second what she said is probably
centrally relevant to the crime but no doubt if we do hear what she said,
we will have little confidence that we will hear it.
-
- We do know that she was rubbing her belly when speaking
to Dr. Mailliez, from initial news accounts, and we know that she endured
a very painful demise as part of what history records as her accident
and death. We will never forget Dr. Mailliez's statement that she was
talking to him as he "gently" put the mask over her mouth. Thus,
the last words she said were to a man who helped deny her say anything
more. Then the police stood by as they allowed the horde of photographers
to take endless pictures of her, the flash bulbs right in her face without
remorse or intervention by anyone there, helping promote her demise. Those
pictures were all seized by the police and they sit no doubt, but for
the two highlighted above, in the same vault as the radar images of TWA
Flight 800 similarly seized and denied disclosure to the public.
-
-
- END
|
