rense.com

ABC's Newspaper
Mentality And Rosie

By Ted Lang
Exclusive to Rense.com
4-25-7

Surely, surely they jest! Does ABC (Anti-American Broadcasting Collusion) think they're really kidding anyone? Of course, Rosie received a secret and astonishingly large sum to leave "The View!" Why wouldn't she, given the smashing ratings she has brought them? But reflecting upon the pro-Bush controllers of ABC, isn't it obvious that she presented a serious threat to Dictator Bush's power base? 
 
Highlighting the inquiry surrounding the fraudulent reporting by the criminal mass media which helped the Bush dictatorship cover up the 9/11 controlled demolitions that slaughtered thousands of innocent citizens, NY firefighters, Emergency responders and police, Rosie informed millions of formerly clueless Americans that challenges to the 9/11 official government explanation existed. It was obvious that she let something out of the bag that she shouldn't have, and the Bush regime and its pro-war network sprang into action.
 
Recall the "freeze" in events almost immediately after her unguarded remarks. Reflect now on the fact that suddenly everything involving Rosie's observations sort of went dead, except for the cacophony generated by Bush's boot-licking sycophants and propagandists, O'Reilly and Hannity, the latter an excellent example of intellectual versatility and depth. Is there any doubt about the observations, past and present, offered in this space concerning O'Reilly, Hannity, and gasbag Limbaugh's real loyalties in turning their collective backs on America's founding principles as well as their continuing abandonment of fact and truth to support and protect Dictator Bush?
 
Almost immediately, mass media website, the Drudge Report, carried an article advising that Rosie intended to tone down her criticism of the Bush crime machine. Then silence. Now, she's gone! Some real news websites, such as Alex Jones' PrisonPlanet.com, predicted early on the mass media retaliation and anticipated her being fired. This assured her bargaining position, that and her legions of fans. The criminal mass media figures by this time next week, the "newspaper mentality" of the American public will kick in and Rosie's fans and everyone else will simply forget all about Rosie's 9/11 remarks, her intention to put scientific experts on her program, and the threat such open discussion and debate presents to dictators and criminals in government.
 
And even as we speak, the members of the United States Congress of Criminals are tripping over one another to pass the Zionist network's much needed "hate crimes" legislation to stifle and silence all debate concerning AIPAC and Israel's manipulation of our government, our military and our taxes. And as the criminal mass media launches its newspaper mentality on Rosie and cushions her release with a profitable retirement sum, it is at the same time frantically trying to cover up the Alberto [VO5] Gonzales caper in the Senate. Yup, this too will receive the "NM" treatment in hopes that the public can be misled and that the event can be suppressed long enough to allow for it to slip out of public memory sometime next week.
 
The understandable primary source of the Rosie departure scoop was released by [SURPRISE!] ABCNEWS.com. Their article of April 25th and carried on the Drudge Reportentitled, "O'Donnell Leaving 'The View'" by Monica Nista begins: "ABC has been unable to come to a contractual agreement with Rosie O'Donnell. As a result, her hosting duties on 'The View' will come to an end mid-June. 'They wanted me three years, I wanted one year, and it just didn't work,' said O'Donnell on today's show. Despite controversy -- or maybe because of it -- O'Donnell was good business for ABC, owned by the Walt Disney Co. Ratings for 'The View' during February sweeps were up 15 percent in key women demographics over the same time in 2006."
 
Wow, a 15 percent hike in business, and the only options on the table were one year versus three years? What's wrong with this picture? Do I hear two years? Let's start the bids at 13 months-13 months-13 months, now do ah heah 14 - 14 -14 -14, ah see 15 - 15 - no 16 -16. Sold to Amehican! What a lucky strike from the record: the complete spike of any mention of the most controversial development of Rosie's brief but profitable tenure. Check out American's view as to what was controversial: "The co-host and comedian has been the subject of recent headlines for her ongoing feud with real estate mogul Donald Trump, and a dispute with Bill O'Reilly over the war in Iraq." That's it?! That's all she wrote? Nonsense! Where in the article is the real reason cited for the parting; namely, the challenge to Dictator Bush concerning the 9/11 cover-up by members of the criminal mass media, such as "American" Broadcasting, the home of noxious and obnoxious gasbag Rush Limbaugh?
 
Now for the official line of b.s. from on high: "Brian Frons, the president of daytime programming for the Disney-ABC Television Group, told ABCNEWS.com, 'Going in we knew we would have an amazing year with her, and that anything beyond that would be gravy.... So here we are a year later, and while we've tried to come to terms on a deal that would extend her co-hosting duties on 'The View,' we find ourselves unable to agree on some key elements." Yeah, I'll just take that bet!
 
One can't blame O'Donnell for taking the money and running; let's face it; it must have been a great deal. Imagine the conversation: "Look Rosie, you're stirring up a hornets' nest with this 9/11 crap. We'll give you what you could have earned, but just shut the 'f' up! This is dangerous stuff. Look what they did after that Janet Jackson thing! You're supposed to be entertainment, not a source of political activism. The public are a******s; they'll forget this s**t in a week or two, so just keep quiet and don't say anything more about 9/11. That, by the way, is right here in the agreement we want you to sign for the payout you're getting. You not only forfeit this money if you continue the 9/11 rant, but agree to pay us additional punitive damages in case Bush sics the FCC on us. Okay?"
 
Isn't it painfully obvious that that is precisely how it went? I'm not a Rosie fan, especially after her gun control shtick attacking Tom Sellick; but she doesn't strike me at all as wimp like Bill O'Reilly, all mouth and no real guts off camera. Some guy O'Reilly really pissed off kept trying to stare him down at some gala dinner event, and wimp O'Reilly wouldn't even make eye contact for fear that a real man would come at him and knock him on his boney ass. So I'm sure Rosie wouldn't throw in the towel for that reason; it had to be somewhat the way I had suggested.
 
Think of them: Imus, Sheen, Asner, former President Jimmy Carter, Professor Anthony Judt, and now Rosie. I asked for it, and I got it. I asked if some noteworthy public figure would have the courage to stand up to the criminal Bush regime; Rosie came through and did the best she could. And so did Charlie Sheen, another guy with an awful lot to lose, just like Mel Gibson. The latter's mistake was framing his remark in a gross and all-inclusive generalization, which was thoughtless and certainly could be hurtful to many patriotic Americans. Rosie and Charlie's mistake was in thinking that they still lived in the land of Washington and Jefferson. 
 
 
© THEODORE E. LANG 4/25/07 All rights reserved  
 
 
Ted Lang is a political analyst and freelance writer.
 
 
 


Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros