Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!



 
rense.com

Reasons For Mysterious
Computer Crashes

By Ted Twietmeyer
tedtw@frontiernet.net
5-20-7

Do you get that "blue screen of death" on your PC now and then for no reason, requiring you to reboot? Does your Apple give you that infamous fatal error message requiring you to re-boot?
 
You're not alone. Defective software can certainly cause these events to happen. The hardware industry is now pointing their finger at Microsoft - while Microsoft points their finger right back in a very crafty way.
 
Here's the latest in the finger war from an engineering newsletter dated May 18, 2007:
 
*** START OF EXTRACT
 
MICROSOFT IS THE PROBLEM ACCORDING TO HARDWARE MANUFACTURERS
 
PCs and notebooks are memory hogs, and manufacturers may need to adopt  error-correcting code memory to stem the increase in system crashes,  experts said during the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference. A  confidential Microsoft white paper analyzing the causes of system  crashes found that single-bit error rates in DRAM are a leading cause  of system failures, reports editor at large Rick Merritt. OEMs have  countered that Windows failures account for more crashes than DRAM  soft errors. The issue now is which side will assume the added cost of  fixing the problem.
 
HARDWARE MANUFACTURERS ARE THE PROBLEM ACCORDING TO EXPERTS
 
PCs and notebooks are memory hogs, and manufacturers may need to adopt  error-correcting code memory to stem the increase in system crashes,  experts said during the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference. A  confidential Microsoft white paper analyzing the causes of system  crashes found that single-bit error rates in DRAM are a leading cause  of system failures, reports editor at large Rick Merritt. OEMs have  countered that Windows failures account for more crashes than DRAM  soft errors. The issue now is which side will assume the added cost of  fixing the problem.
 
 
MICROSOFT SAYS PCs MAY NEED DRAM UPGRADE
 
Desktop and notebook computers need to adopt error-correcting code  (ECC) memory to fend off rising system crashes from single-bit memory  errors, according to a confidential white paper written by Microsoft  Corp.
 
*** END OF EXTRACT [1]
 
 
PING PONG BLAME GAME
 
What do we have here? Microsoft's position is from a "confidential white paper." Now how did that get out? Was it on purpose or even staged by the company itself? (Looks like their defense contracts have infiltrated corporate thinking.) It has been known since 1978 that DRAMs can be susceptible to radiation, causing data stored in memory to shift to the opposite state creating a crash. [2]
 
The mile-high city of Denver, Colorado has several times the cosmic background radiation found at sea level. Has anyone performed a statistical correlation of computer crashes between sea level and 5,000 ft? More than likely, no one really wants to know.
 
There was also a memory and microprocessor research laboratory built high upon a mountain for chip reliability research for studying long term radiation effects. This was announced several years ago, however little is known of the research results from this facility. The facility was built by a chip manufacturer.
 
It is well known that the plastic which encapsulates DRAM chips can emit alpha particles. Why this material is radioactive is not known. In 1990, alpha particle induced soft errors occurred in 16 Mb computer systems at the mean rate of roughly one error every 3 months. Improved DRAM designs have greatly reduced that error rate so that today the mean error rate in a 16 Mb system is roughly one bit error every 16 years. [3]
 
ALPHA PARTICLES
 
Consider what happens when you have a GIGABYTE (or more) of memory in your computer. What does this do to increase the statistical failure rate cited above, over tiny 16Mb chips? It can't be good. Memory chips are so dense today that only one or two electrons are used to retain data in each bit at any given memory location.
 
So how large are Alpha particles? A small cloud chamber anyone can make allows one to see Alpha particle tracks in the CO2-created fog. Think about the size of an Alpha particle, as opposed to the size of just ONE electron. Put another way, an Alpha particle hitting a memory cell bit is similar to taking a bowling ball and rolling it across a pool table of two people playing billiards. It would be nearly impossible NOT to knock balls off the table. You might also find that a the players will use their billiard cue sticks for another purpose, too.
 
There is also the problem of cosmic rays, which rip through all matter on the surface of the Earth day and night. Imagine just one high speed cosmic ray particle hitting one or two electrons in a memory cell. Think that data or program code will remain unchanged? In fact, statistically it is only a matter of time before one of these fast particles hits a cell just right to cause an error. Note that not all of memory is being used at any moment in time. Therefore, if an error is created in a memory cell that has no current program code or data stored in it nothing will happen. This is because when new data or program code is later written to that same cell, the error is erased.
 
CAMPING LANTERN MANTLES AND VACUUM TUBES ARE RADIOACTIVE
 
Alpha particles themselves are stopped with an ordinary sheet of paper. However, Alpha is classified as ionizing radiation. When a substance which emits Alpha particles enters the lungs, it can cause DNA to be altered and a malignancy to develop. The wicks for some camping lanterns are RADIOACTIVE. I've performed this test myself just a few years ago with a Geiger counter and proved it is true. Lantern mantles wicks do indeed contain radioactive Thorium. (There are more than 12,000 links to this problem on the web.) Why is it we are supposed to be so careful when disposing of a smoke detector, which has an amount of radioactive material so small that it's literally INVISIBLE to the human eye? Yet radioactive camping lantern mantles don't even come with a warning?
 
Remember vacuum tubes? They also have radioactive Thorium which is used for the cathodes in the tube. You can see the cathode through the glass. The end of it is visible as a short stub, as a long, skinny white tube in the center with the end of it held in place by a mica plate. Vacuum tubes have either one, two or three of these cathodes. Did vacuum tubes ever come with a radioactivity warning? No.
 
THE CURE FOR THE PROBLEM
 
With memory densities ever increasing and no practical shielding for radiation in computers, this problem will only get worse. However, memory is also becoming cheaper, too. This opens the door for using a holographic type memory storage. (RAID hard drives use technique like this today.) Program code and data would be copied to completely different memory chips. Error checking and correction would detect a faulty bit "on the fly" and would then retrieve the program or data from the backup copy. This is by far perhaps the cheapest and ultimate answer to the problem. But what will it take for hardware and chip manufacturers to implement it, and for both Microsoft and Apple to actually use it?
 
Clearly both hardware and software manufacturers alike are at fault.
 
If you "upgrade" to MS Vista on your computer? Now you're the problem and it will be something you'll truly regret. Currently, that operating system has been banned by the US Dept. of Transportation because of excessive bugs.
 
Ted Twietmeyer
www.data4science.net
www.bookonmars.info
 
REFERENCES
 
[1] Reprint permission for extracted text is explicitly given in the EE Times newsletter
[2] Brazilian Journal of Physics 2003 - http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-97332003000200013
[3] http://www.faqs.org/faqs/pc-hardware-faq/part1/

Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros