- I recently read David Horowitz's autobiography Radical
Son. Horowitz was a well- known Marxist journalist in the 1970s supposedly
transformed into a less well-known modern day neo-conservative converso.
He once wrote for the Ramparts, a liberal Marxist rag that touted every
single degenerate cause in the late sixties and early seventies, actively
supported the Black Panther Party, and rubbed shoulders with the likes
of Huey Newton, Elaine Brown, Angela Davis, Jerry Rubin, Tom Hayden, Jane
Fonda and Abby Hoffman. Horowitz's Radical Son is really nothing more than
the author's weak attempt to explain how it is that he so easily converted
to neo-conservatism from a radical 1970s Jewish liberal. The book is little
more than liberal propaganda of the crudest nature from beginning to end.
According to Horowitz he finally "saw the light," he came to
see that Marxist groups like the Black Panthers weren't ideologically motivated
at all, that they were instead composed of "thugs," and that
they used the cause to forward their own agendas, mostly of a self absorbed
criminal nature. For most people the idea that the Panther's were a criminal
organization isn't anything new, but Horowitz wants the reader to sympathize
with him, so he reinvents the Panther's just as he did in the seventies
in an effort to confuse the simpleminded reader. This is an interesting
process and extremely difficult to identify unless one is familiar with
kosher revisionism.
-
- First off Horowitz wants the reader to believe that the
he, David Horowitz was never motivated by anything except the most altruistic
and benevolent of causes Marxism true Marxism, brotherhood,
equality and tolerance and all that rhetoric. Unfortunately, according
to Horowitz, he was stymied at every opportunity by less ideologically
motivated sell-outs who took advantage of Horowitz's devotion to the cause
and naivety. Horowitz is tricky though he does this in such a way
as not to expose himself for what he really was, a fanatical anti-Gentile
Jew that exploited the Black Panther's to advance Jewish interests
Zionist interests for those still not inclined to see that Zionism is nothing
more than Jewry's latest "ism."
-
-
- He wants the reader to believe that he admired Huey Newton,
the one time leader of the Black Panthers, who was gunned down on an Oakland
street corner in the late eighties; the result of a bad drug deal. Horowitz
wants the reader to believe that Newton guided and/or mentored Horowitz
rather than the other way around. He does this by constantly inserting
insinuations in the text that suggest he felt ecstatic every time Newton
treated him as an equal and/or accepted some of his advice. He gives himself
away though by telling the reader that it was he that raised considerable
sums of money for the Panthers from his wealthy Jewish friends. In fact,
Radical Son names so many Jews within its pages that it reads like the
guest list at a New York City Bar Mitzvah. Horowitz exposes other interesting
facts about Huey Newton that suggest Newton was "bought and paid for,"
in a sense, by divulging the fact that another extremely wealthy and well
connected Jew by the name of Burt Schneider financed Newton's lavish lifestyle,
which included paying for Newton's drug habit, which was quite considerable
if Horowitz is to be believed, as well as a house in an upper scale neighborhood.
-
- In one exchange between Newton and Horowitz, the author
suggests that he felt morally obligated to correct an erroneous belief
that had developed in the Panther party; yep, you guessed it, anti-Semitism.
According to Horowitz, some Panther's had come to accept this racist idea
because of Stokely Carmichael and his less than revolutionary belief that
Jews within the movement were acting as a Fifth Column and weren't particularly
interested in the black cause; sound familiar? Of course Horowitz carefully
sets up his narrative in such a way that the naïve reader will reject
the possibility that what Carmichael believed might have had some basis
in reality; Horowitz does this by admission and denial a common tactic
employed in kosher revisionism. According to Horowitz, after a time he
felt honored to be thought of as an equal by Newton and for that reason
he was "emboldened," to speak his mind:
-
- "Talking to Huey as a kind of equal. emboldened
me to raise yet another difficult issue. A strain of anti-Semitism had
developed in the Party during the years he [Newton] was in prison. Of course,
the Panthers were not alone among black radicals in their attacks on Jews.
In 1966, Stokely Carmichael and the leaders of the SNCC had expelled whites
from the civil rights organization, accusing them of being a fifth column
inside the movement. Since Jews were a near majority of the whites in these
organizations, and had played a strategic role in organizing and funding
the struggle, it was clear to everyone that they were the primary target
of the assault. This was underscored by the support that Carmichael and
the black left gave to the Arab states during their 1967 attack on Israel.[1]"
-
- In the above paragraph Horowitz absolutely reveals himself
to be the liar he is, but it goes unnoticed by the vast majority of readers
because most people aren't aware of the fact that Israel preemptively attacked
the Arab states on June 5, 1967, not the other way around. This is what
I would refer to as "kosher revisionism," and it is quite common
in the world today, as a matter a fact, it's the norm. Historical revisionism
has developed a bad name primarily because kosher revisionism rules the
airwaves, radio and television; ethnic Jews have a near monopoly on the
media in all its forms, and for that reason, lies like Horowitz's go unnoticed
by most people. Horowitz predictably sets up his "admission,"
i.e. that Jews were disproportionately represented in the black civil rights
movement by first prostrating himself in such a way as to fool the reader
into believing that he, Horowitz, was only able to influence Newton, because
Newton, the black man in the relationship, felt that Horowitz was an equal.
Many people will laugh at the very idea that a Jew would consider any black
to be an equal as a rule, Jews loathe blacks more than they do whites,
but they find that exploiting blacks is advantageous to the advancement
of their agenda, and it is for this reason, and no other, that they associate
with blacks.
-
-
- Many blacks know this; perhaps that is why the unapologetic
and openly pro-white Larry Darby polled as many black votes as he did in
the recent June 5, 2006 democratic primary election for Alabama Attorney
General; because he is vociferously critical of organized Jewry. An excellent
book on the reality of the Jewish/Black relationship is The Secret Relationship
Between Blacks and Jews, put out by the Nation of Islam, a group Horowitz
absolutely despises as shown by the fact that he allegedly considered the
Nation to be more violent than the Black Panther's, a total joke really,
and one that no knowledgeable person could possibly accept. Horowitz again
"creates," this impossibility by revealing that he promised a
property owner that a building the owner was to sell to the Black Panther's
wouldn't be used by any violent black groups like the "Nation of Islam."[2]
-
-
- In this case, Horowitz kosher revisionism borders on
the absurd, yet most readers won't pick it up, again because the predominantly
Jewish media has so effectively smeared the Nation of Islam, that most
Americans know very little about them, other than they are supposedly anti-Semitic
and violent. The truth is that the Nation understands the nature of the
Zionist and hasn't shied away from talking about them, or documenting factual
stories that relate the actual relationship that Jews have with blacks;
which is now and has always been exploitative. In this vein, Horowitz again
attempts to create a sympathetic response from the reader by alluding to
the idea that he, and Jews in general, were actually the ones that had
been exploited by the Panthers. He again divulges important admissions
in respect to Jews and the civil rights movement, and then denies that
these Jews were motivated by anything but altruism and again he endeavors
to reinforce his earlier lie at the expense of the Arabs:
-
- "I began to review events of the past to which I
had paid little attention before, like the expulsion of the Jews from the
civil rights movement in 1966. Jews had funded the movement, devised its
legal strategies, and provided support for its efforts in the media and
in the universities and wherever else they had power. More than half
the freedom riders who had gone to the southern states were Jews, although
Jews constituted only 3% of the population. It was an unprecedented show
of solidarity from one people to another. Jews had put their resources
and lives on the line to support the black struggle for civil rights, and
indeed two of their sons Schwerner and Goodman had been murdered
for their efforts. But even while these tragic events were still fresh,
the black leaders of the movement had unceremoniously expelled the Jews
from their ranks. When Israel was attacked in 1967 by a coalition of Arab
states calling for its annihilation, the same black leaders threw their
support to the Arab aggressors, denouncing Zionism as racism.[3]"
-
- Here again Horowitz reveals what a propagandist he is,
as mentioned previously the Israeli's preemptively attacked the Arab states
in 1967, not the other way around, thus in no sense could the Arabs be
considered "aggressors." Once again Horowitz admits to the fact
that Jews were disproportionately represented in the black civil rights
movement, a fact that many liberal college professors are still afraid
to acknowledge to this day. Earlier Horowitz attempted to convince the
reader that he felt honored to be thought of as an equal by Huey Newton,
but in the above paragraph he reveals something he had carefully hidden
up to this point in his biography and that is the fact that Jews single
handedly funded the black civil rights movement, that they essentially
developed all its strategies and that they utilized their media to advance
its causes, ideas that organized Jewry has collectively denied for more
than forty years. Now I ask the reader - does this sound like a relationship
founded on the concept of equality?
-
- The truth is Horowitz was never a Marxist, a socialist
or otherwise, except in name, and only where it might have been beneficial
to Jewish Supremacism, Horowitz clearly reveals this when he classifies
Natan Sharansky as a persecuted Russian dissident,[4] rather than what
Sharansky really is, a fanatical Zionist, hater of Gentiles, purveyor of
holocaust lies, and Israeli Cultural Minister. No doubt Horowitz's attempts
to delude certain Panther's in the 1970s wasn't entirely successful, that
is why he focused on the corrupt drug addict Huey Newton, who he knew was
weak and would be willing to compromise in all the necessary ways.
-
- One last telling example of Horowitz's Zionist, rather
than socialist leanings, is his insistence that Huey allow him to write
a "position paper," for the Black Panther party on the Arab/Israeli
relationship, which only reinforces the fact that Horowitz, even in the
early 1970s, was focused on issues that were good for Jews, rather than
what would advance the allegedly revolutionary plans of the Black Panthers
and the so called Black civil-rights movement. Horowitz wasn't stupid however,
he knew he had to dress up his propaganda in such a way as not to give
away what his intentions really were, so he employed his considerable writing
skills and inserted the following rhetoric in the paper:
-
- "Though the ultimate survival of Jews and Palestinians,
as of all peoples, depends on the revolutionary overthrow world imperialism
and Capitalism[5]"
-
- Although in the 1970s this wasn't a strange position
for a supposed liberal and revolutionary to take, it is ironic that today
Horowitz is a vociferous defender of both, at least when it concerns the
racist state of Israel and its imperialist expansionism. In the end, Horowitz's
relationship with Huey Newton was based upon mutual need, Newton was never
ideologically motivated, he was a violent pimp that bathed in the persona
of a revolutionary and Horowitz was a Zionist propagandist that played
the role of a concerned Jewish liberal, and who required a front man and
found it in Huey Newton.
-
-
- <http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=23420898#_ftnref1>[1]
Pg. 227.
- <http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=23420898#_ftnref2>[2]
Pg. 231.
- <http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=23420898#_ftnref3>[3]
Pg. 275-276.
- <http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=23420898#_ftnref4>[4]
Pg. 277.
- <http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=23420898#_ftnref5>[5]
Pg. 228.
-
- http://pcapostate.blogspot.com/2006/06/david-horowitz-and-mechanics-of.html
-
|
