- "Ynet (Israel) http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/
0,7340,L-3355786,00.html Israeli billionaire and media mogul Haim Saban
is at the top of the list of donors to political campaigns in the US.
Fox Network revealed over the weekend that Saban has donated approximately
US $13 million to various candidates. According to the report, Saban, a
close friend of the Clintons, is one of the major donors to the Democratic
Party, though he has also contributed to Republican candidates, including
President George Bush and Governor of California Arnold Schwarzenegger."
-
- Democratic Party is NOT a top-down from-God church;
Hillary Clinton is not the Virgin Mary and AIPAC are not "the
Jews" deserving your tolerance and respect -- on the contrary AIPAC
is nothing more than corrupting and enslaving blood money from racist
war-profiteering billionaires like Rupert Murdoch who have used up the
neocon-hijacked Republican Party elephant and now want a fresh mount --
the starved-for-cash jackasses -- to carry on their crusade for new and
expanded genocidal wars and for ever more intrusive and intimidating
police-state power to ensure their continued control and exploitation
of the American people. But I'm counting on it that the party is not predestined
to be "dumb-ass" in 2008.
-
- By Dick Eastman
- 1-27-7
-
-
- The concept is worth repeating. The Democratic Party
is not some church whose political positions and leadership come
from on high. Hillary Clinton is not the divinely appointed immaculate
virgin commanding unquestioning adoration and elevation. And AIPAC are
not "the Jews," AIPAC is not Judaism, and AIPAC
is not well-meaning people seeking peace and security for all in the Middle
East. These three points all must be taken into account as true Democrats
ask themselves if where the party is now headed is really right.
-
- AIPAC is not deserving of your respect or even your
toleration or courtesy in its diabolically clever grab for control of your
party. AIPAC is the money power behind the foreign policy and war policy
and "anti-terrorist police state" policies that you have associated
with George W. Bush and Dick Cheney and Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz.
The bought and subverted the leadership of the Republicans starting when
they took over Reagan's administration and turned it into a neo-con Wall-Street
globalism party and they have controlled it ever since -- until now, when
the Republican party is the disgrace of the world and facing revolt in
the minds of all thinking people. And so AIPAC turns to your party (which
their money has also been quietly controlling at the top for some time
too) like a pony express rider looking for a fresh mount.
-
- Let me ask a few questions of you fearlessly loyal "my-party-right-or-wrong"
Democrats. Do like what you hear about "the liberals" and the
"goodness and rightness" of Bush war and police-state policies
from multi-billioniare media-monopolist Ruppert Murdoch's radio mouthpieces
like Michael Savage (né Michael Wiener) and Sean Hannity? What
would you do if Murdoch and AIPAC took over your party and with their money
put Sean Hannity up to win the Democratic nomination for '08? Would you
still be loyal, would you still say "my party right or wrong"?
Now think about this. Ruppert Murdoch and AIPAC are both solidly behind
Hillary Clinton for President in 2008 like they have been behind
Bush and Cheney in 2000 and 2004. So here is another question -- do
multi-billionaires put up backing for people who think independently?
Does Ruppert Murdoch have any Fox commentators that do not preach his views?
Do you think he would ever exert his money and influence to
advance people who really and truly "have concern for people issues"
that might conflict with his own interests or does he insterad advance
politicians who only say they have these concerns but who really
will serve his interests and his whims of the billionaire? Murdoch
is not abetting the elevation Hillary Clinton to the presidency because
she is a strong woman who will take care of the littel people or
because "only Hillary is electable" -- but because Hillary Clinton
is a political whore -- specifically Ruppert Murdoch's political whore,
AIPAC's political whore -- yes, an intimidating dominatrix to many
Democrats under her shadow who contemplate her "inevitable" supreme
position and the mysterious and devilishly invincible power now behind
her-- but still a pro-war, pro-globalization, pro-Israel-lobby(boss-pimp
AIPAC)- sell-out whore -- and has been all of her political career.
-
- True democrat Democrats know they are in trouble. They
see this blood-money covenent that the DNC has made with Ruppert the Serpent
and the rest of AIPAC and they tell themselves that this is necessary
if the party wants to win in the next general election. Clearly
the Democrats have forgotten who they are and what they stand for.
-
- Meanwhile others in the party, the vast majority struggling
full-time to make ends meet for their families -- these people, not looking
closely and merely trusting the party on its former reputation --
these good people are bedazzled and hoodwinked by all the sophisticated
political tricks used by the political operatives that AIPAC billionaires
etc. hire. For example, a whole flock of bland positionless pointless
nonentities announce their candidacies -- where did these nobodies
get the money to start a presidential bid??? -- obviously these
phonies are all props to glorify our Blessed Immaculate Virgin --
they are merely a clown show of obvious losers in the race
to give you, early on, the impression that "Hillary Clinton leads
the pack" -- when the fact is that no real candidate who is really
anti-war, anti-globalization and anti-AIPAC domination has been allowed
to emerge -- and that is because of another trick -- by a trickster
named Dennis Kucinich -- who is chosen by AIPAC's agents in the party
to get in front of the anti-war movement (again!!!) and keep it under his
control (again!) seeing that it amounts to nothing (again!) while absorbing
all the volunteer work and contributions of anit-war people (again!) --
so that Hillary Clinton (last time it was John Kerry) will not have to
face what she dreds most, viz., a real candidate who has taken off the
gloves, is telling the people the facts they have been kept
from hearing, and is not folding up and blowing away in response to any
of the usual party fixer's dirty tricks.
-
- Perhaps it is outdated "religion" not to make
deals with serpents. Perhaps genuflecting to Our Lady of the Foregone
Assumption is all that is left if you want to get along in this world that
already belongs to the Ruppert Murdoch and everything that is behind AIPAC.
But I always throught that a political party in a free country
serves the true interests of the people in the party. I always considered
that when Wall Street came in and hijacked the leadership of a party of
the people that it was a bad thing. I always thought that while a party
needs money to operate, that a party of the people should be supported
by the people, by those who think enough of the principles of the
party to fish into their pockets and support it -- and that the worse things
are the more they would be willing to make sacrifices in their personal
lives to give that support -- and that they would not make pacts with the
devil who will realize his choice for president with black-op
magic.
-
- One famous quote of Hillary Rodam Clinton is that you
can't make money in law, unless you work for the banks. She was not talking
about your local credit union. We all remember -- it was not
just propaganda hatched from Hillary Clinton critic Barbara Olsen who was
killed on Flight 77 on Sept. 11 -- how Hillary made a million-to-one killing
in her first dabble in the commodities market after she had done work
for some New York firms. It is not considered polite for loyal Democrats
to bring that up -- but maybe it is time for that to break some norms
in the party when they become too constraining.
-
- Keep this in mind: Hillary Clinton is not the leading
candidate in the Democratic Party -- that is a lie of the Murdoch etc.
monopoly media -- the fact is she has no real opponent in the party contest yet
-- other than a flock of bogus "easy" opponents who have appeared
to make it look like Hillary is "way-out-ahead." Kucinich
is not real. Edwards sold his soul for party position after they
clipped his wings over his scream back in 2004. That
was the year AIPAC wanted Kerry and wanted Kucinich to lose which
he gladly did, refusing even to contest an obviously fixed election. I
have received over a dozen letters from people who worked with Kucinich
who concluded that Kucinich was not in the race to win, that Kucinich was
merely going through motions to look like a campaign was being conducted
-- the volunteers around the country were misdirected and often remained
idle for want of leadership of any kind.
-
- But what about all those attractive issues that HRC is
for -- those special issues that mean so much to some of us?
Let me tell you how that works. The Clintons, as you will remember, believe
in super scientific polling and high-speed computer analysis -- remember
the cray computers in the Clinton White House put there for this
purpose and this purpose only -- which test different issues
on different groups to find the "words" that will win popularity
-- a super high-tech "thumb" that the Clinton's always
had up in the air -- and so they always played your song -- they
have put together a package to win the votes of people who
vote the "issues not the man" -- pork and patronage and
a song addressed to diffferent blocks of people really hurting promising
to address their needs. But the plutocracy are the only one's he
served -- as one Clinton staffer said "the President keeps all
the promises he intended to keep" -- Bush played to the anti-abortion
people in the same way, remember, and to the "middle-class"
but his administration for eight years served neither one of those two
groups of suckers, did it? Hillary Clinton is exactly the same. Kucinich
too and the other candidates have been given issues that will just accomplish
what they need to accomplish as candidates assigned to attract supporters
and money but then to self-sabotage at the right moment.
-
- The real democratic Democrats know that AIPAC represents
the war profiteers and the twisted "Zionism" of the Ruppert Murdoch
sociopathic billionaire types (yes, including the Zionist merchant bankers
of London and Wall Street who lend the money for these wars and who, as
genuine racists (Arab-hating Jewish supremacists -- I am talking about
the billionaire bankers and media moguls sociopaths, i.e., AIPAC, not "the
Jews") -- the wars that will cost a trillion dollars -- an amount
of money impossible to imagine -- a lot of money to receive -- enough
to motivate AIPAC to be as bold and cunning as it has been -- certainly
ample money to turn the heads of most party bosses and workers -- not to
mention the specifically hired infiltrators of the party -- to raise
up a Clinton and a Kucinich to exalt her and lay his anti-war troops at
her feet at the right moment. A trillion dollares -- for the war-profiteers
and for everyone they bribe and buy to make it all possible -- but the
trillion they receive is a trillion that comes from the lives of the people
-- and how can I describe that cost to you? How can I show you how impoverished
you are and how much more impoverished you will become. You only know
what you see, not what you might have had had there been a different kind
of leadership in this country.
-
- I know. Blah blah blah you have heard it all before
-- so what do I propose?
-
- Simply this.
-
- 1. Let every person of good will who understands the
situation join the democratic party in an effort to throw out Clinton,
Kucinich, AIPAC and Murdoch and, yes, Nancy Pelosi. (Ever wonder how she
got where she is -- is she a woman who earned it -- or was her sex merely
part of the incentive package that AIPAC interests used to put their operative
in the Speaker's chair?)
-
- 2. Let every Democrat and all people of good will demand
of this Congress that it adopt something like the bait-and-switch Kucinich
plan for getting out of Iraq -- only let's take the bait but refuse the
switch and let's insist that the bait be implimented now as a full-course
meal and not in 2009 when the next president takes over -- let Congress
enact it by resolution and by cuts of spending. And let's have every Democrat
insist that Congress make a specific delcaration that there is no authority
for the president to use military for against Iran without a formal delcaration
from Congress.
-
- 3. Let every Democrat insist that Hillary Clinton and
Dennis Kucinich withdraw their nominations -- there is no rule against
doing this -- appeals like this have always been made, candidates being
asked to withdraw for the good fo the party.
-
- 4. Every true democratic Democrat to insist that AIPAC
money be refused and that those accepting AIPAC money be denied high position
within the party.
- 5. That to quickly raise up a real anti-war candidate
that a special extraordinary committee come together to select a true anti-war
anti-globalization anti-AIPAC (but not anti-Jewish and not anti-the-existence-of-Israel)
candidate. On this committee -- if you can take a plan from Kucinich
you can take a suggestion from me -- would be
-
- Bill Moyers
- Seymour Hershe
- Jimmy Carter
- Cindy Sheehan
- Al Gore
- Alex Jones
-
- They will pick a candidate to run for the Democratic
nomination.
-
- Let other selection groups (ad hoc electors) of known
good guys come together and raise other candidates in this way -- and
let us then choose from the candidates that these different distinguished
people pick.
-
- That is my suggestion. I pray you take it. And at this
point I leave it all to you. It's up to you democratic Democrats. If
you can field a real candidate against this war and against organized-crime
plutocracy and imperialism (banker globalism) then I will vote for your
candidate. If I see you can't get it together I am going to join any movement
to draft and back David Duke in whatever third party he chooses to run.
-
- I think you like government jobs (patronage) and party
jobs and pork -- let's see if you also want freedom and peace and the general
welfare and democratic principles and a future for everyone as well --
and let's see if you like the latter more than the former.
-
- Sincerely,
- Dick Eastman
- Yakima, Washington
-
-
- Here the other messages on beating the
plutocracy's rigging of the two-party system.
-
- <>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/frameup/message/20458
-
- <>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/frameup/message/20472
-
- <>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/frameup/message/20385
-
- <>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/frameup/message/20375
-
- <>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/frameup/message/20457
-
- <>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/frameup/message/20417
-
- <>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/frameup/message/20277
-
- <>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/frameup/message/20317
-
- <>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/frameup/message/19849
-
|
