- After more than six years; four of which have been dipped
in pools of the darkened blood of several nations"it would appear
that a national debate on America's War policies ought to consist of more
than five minutes per member, in the US House of Representatives. One state,
Vermont, has finally come up with its own non-binding resolution against
the surge and the war. It's a beginning at least. What has happened to
the public's outrage when contrasted with the accountability coming from
our tarnished house of theoretical leadership? (1)
-
-
- When viewed in context, it appears that governments efforts
to diffuse the public's genuine outrage is not working; at least not as
many of the outlaws thought it would. If the darkly stained circle of contributors,
who created these wars, thought they could pull this off, without a hitch"It
appears they misjudged the depth of damage to the public that's been done
to the national psyche. Also they obviously underestimated the public's
response to an ongoing military defeat that was never able to even approach
"victory in Iraq or Afghanistan. Now on the virtual eve of the attack
on Iran, set tentatively for March 17th, 2007 it is time for an open and
nationally televised debate with all the usual administration suspects
on a national podium, before the public and the world.
-
- Formulating the questions will be difficult, but neither
national security, nor immunity from public inquiry, should be allowed
to prevent this event from taking place. Congress, due to its proven collusion
with the administration should be relegated to the sidelines"and the
questioning ought to be led by a competent, internationally recognized
Special Prosecutor that could sift through the public's questions and ask
about the pivotal points that these criminals have been dodging since they
first assumed power. No"I,m not holding my breath, but just imagine
what could be clarified by such an open session with those who have brought
the world to this point?
-
- However given the lead that Vermont has now taken, why
not take your questions to your own state governments and assist those
in State legislatures, with building on what Vermont has just done? This
partial form of outrage might go a long way toward getting to the root
of "Who, What, Where, When, & Why when it comes to the story
of this continuous administration that has RULED us all, since 2000. True"this
would not be a direct debate, but it's about as close as we might ever
get to the truth, and to the real possibility of ending the false-flag
justifications for all wars of this type.
-
- If the public cannot force the return of our troops,
then Iran and possibly Syria will be next! The underlying tragedy in all
of this being that the coming wars will cite these existing wars, as their
reason for invasion and "regime change"unless the American public
can bring current actions to a halt.
-
- This is not designed to ignore the geo-political problems
of our time. This is designed to stop the hell that we would unleash from
the skies, whenever we sentence more capitals of the world into the nuclear
flames of unwarranted attacks.
-
- It is also designed to force this government to talk
to other nations; to try to find regional solutions to differences; and
to disavow the abhorrent current US policy of pre-emptive interventions
anywhere in the world today. In other words we must return to following
the rules of International law and to the Geneva Conventions, which we
helped to write. In this process the world must find the answers to what
really happened on 911 because with the truth behind that event, the entire
history of the years since that day will be forever altered!
-
- If there are no rules in international relations or if
we are allowed to continue to violate the International rules of Warfare,
as well as the rule of Habeus Corpus then we shall never be able to rip
away the curtains of stealth and deceit that still shield 911 from the
public's view. That September day in 2001, is still the giant shadow that
openly or subtlety has been behind every action that this government has
taken"from which countries to invade, to what government programs
to slash"even to the total corruption of nearly every government function
on the books today. To-date there has never been a public DEBATE about
any of this government's actions which 911 supposedly promoted, or continues
to create. . .
-
- There is Terrorism alright in this world, but the targets
of our concern are not the same as those in the news: and it is this that
must be thoroughly discussed.
-
- Neither the people of the United States, nor the other
citizens of the world, are "the innocent and submissive children that
this administration paints us all to be: The adults in this society do
not need another father figure, especially not one that is so totally screwed
up, and so completely in the sway of so many "interests other than
those he is charged with defending. Under color of national security, the
figurehead from the coup of 2000 has left Americans exposed to hundreds
if not thousands of "enemies within the United States"many of
them were and are creatures that are still active within his various administrations.
-
- Here's an excerpt from "The Undertaker's Tally on
parts of Rumsfeld, (Twice the US Secretary of WAR) just one of those creatures
who directed thousands of Americans to their deaths, but who also, with
the stroke of his pen has murdered millions throughout his decades in power!
-
- "It all yielded more myths, more confected history
by a submissive, uninformed media profiling post-9/11 power. There would
be the image of Rumsfeld as White House "dove" on Vietnam, when
his bent was exactly the opposite; or that Nixon, it would be claimed,
saw him as uniquely in touch with the diversity of the country, especially
the young - when the reality was that Rumsfeld, having served an impatient
three terms from his lavishly unrepresentative rotten borough of Winnetka
wealth, with his generic contempt for the 1960s and his part at OEO suppressing
the emergence of millions of the young poor, was anything but.
-
- At the time, privately at least, his grasping shallowness
led to withering - now long-forgotten -verdicts from knowing witnesses.
Even a jaded Nixon would eventually deplore him as "a man without
idealism." His extensive experience with despots giving the judgment
added weight, Henry Kissinger came to think Rumsfeld the "most ruthless"
official he had ever known.
-
- In a Washington that routinely hides its ugly inner truths
of character and incompetence, none of it mattered. (2)
-
-
-
- The list of thugs that have, or have had, government
positions is obscene. The appointment of so many openly Israeli sympathizers
in US government positions is outrageous, given the statements of AIPAC
and their long-term desires on both US policies and their right to determine
those policies. AIPAC needs to be registered as a foreign lobby! Those
doing business with this foreign lobby need to clearly be identified their
sympathies printed on every piece of campaign literature, as having taken
money from this foreign lobby" if that is not done"then at least
the public will know that the American government is no longer theirs to
command.
-
- This national DEBATE is so long overdue that just the
fact alone is damning! We need to end this nightmare now, before we become
so entangled in the Tar-Baby-of-Iraq that we can never correct the things
that got us into this obscenity in the first place! The sands in the hourglass
of our lives is running out
-
- kirwanstudios@sbcglobal.net
-
- 1) Vermont Becomes the Frist State to Call for US Troop
Withdrawal from Iraq
- http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/14/1646233
-
- 2) The Undertaker's Tally
- http://www.truthout.org:80/docs_2006/021407E.sht
-
- Top Twenty Iraq Oversight Outrages Uncovered by the DPC
http://democrats.senate.gov/dpc/dpc-new2.cfm?doc_name=inv2
-
|
