rense.com

Revolt, Rebellion
Or Revolution 

By Jim Kirwan
11-30-6

It is very tempting to suggest that the Revolution has begun-from almost any angle, overseas, that appears to be true. The only place where this 'revolution' does not yet have a foothold is here in the forefront of arrogance and raw political power.
 
 
 
It has no-doubt been difficult for the Decider and his puppeteers to try and conquer the rest of the world while still trying to finish the domination of this nation. It now appears that 'having-no-specific-plans' has produced near anachary; along with the current Middle-Eastern history that is written in way-too-much blood to ever be simply 'forgiven and forgotten.' The schemes that these false warriors are about to use to legitimize their marauding private armies along with the goals of their profane followers, can never succeed so long as human beings retain their memories.
Time is running out for the Barbarians and for their victims as well ~ because there is only one planet on which all people must find ways to live and prosper ~ as opposed to disease, to death, and to the lifelong-nightmare of capture by an inhuman New World Order.
In 1947 Truman created The National Security State, the National Security Council, and the CIA to enforce this new and secret government within government and hidden from the constitution by The National Security Act of 1947. What this departure created was a shadow government that operates beyond the laws of the United States. The framers of the Constitution tried to create a document that could hold the government and the power that this government wields, accountable. The SECRECY in the National Security Act of 1947 opened Pandora's Box and became the key to our current undoing. So long as Bush & Company are allowed to continue to operate in that darkness created by the National Security State-no person in this country can be protected from the marauding barbarity of the New World Order or the growing police state that was once the USA (1).
Fast forward now, to the latest spear-point of the invasion that masquerades as the War in Iraq. Freelance Journalist and author Nir Rosen was asked: "What is Cheney doing in Saudi Arabia. (and) Why are Bush and Rice really going to see al-Maliki this week?"
 
"NIR ROSEN: Well, step into any of the top hotels in Amman, Jordan and you are likely to find people who are affiliated with the resistance, because they use Jordan as a safe haven. So many of the leadership does, wealthy people who sponsor the very many different groups of the resistance, but -- and they've been making these demands for a couple of years now, impossible as they are. And the Americans have been meeting unofficially in Iraq and outside Iraq, people from the resistance. And a year ago there were meetings in Cairo between the Iraqi Government and member of the resistance. And none of this has ever amounted to anything, because Shias own Iraq now. Sunnis can never get it back. There's nothing Americans can do about this.
 
So, for Sunnis, whether these reports are true or not, for Sunnis to ever imagine that they could ever regain power, that the Baathists could ever be restored to power, that Americans actually matter in Iraq anymore is naïve in the extreme. Iraq is Shia now. They have the majority, the security forces, they have the militias. What you are going to see in Iraq I think, in Baghdad especially, is a virtual genocide of the Sunnis. And the Americans are going to be unable to stop that.
 
As for the Bush and Maliki meeting, I think both Bush and Maliki are absolutely irrelevant in Iraq. Neither one of them has any power. Maliki has no militia to speak of. Bush has militia, the American army, one of the many militias operating in Iraq. But the American Army is lost in Iraq, as it has been since it arrived. Striking at Sunnis, striking at Shias, striking at mostly innocent people. Unable to distinguish between anybody, certainly unable to wield any power, except on the immediate street corner where it's located. So, it just doesn't matter." (2)
 
Additionally there is this. According to Jeffery Steinberg in "Self-Destruction is the Plan"
 
 
 
 
this is what Cheney's recent visit to Saudi Arabia was about:
 
"1. The essential message delivered to Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah by Vice President Cheney was that there is no basis for dialogue with Iran. The U.S. position in the region has been weakened, and therefore a new security architecture must be established, particularly in the Persian Gulf, to contain and counter Iran's growing influence. Already, NATO has been in dialogue with Qatar and Kuwait, in pursuit of closer, upgraded cooperation. Cheney proposed to establish a new regional balance of power, through a Sunni Arab alliance with Israel, to confront the Iranian threat. Cheney argued that to negotiate with Iran at this time would be tantamount to surrender. A new military organization will be built, involving the Gulf Cooperation Council states, Egypt, and Jordan. NATO and the United States will be closely involved, and Israel will be a defacto participant. These moves led by Cheney obviously aim to pre-empt adoption by the Bush Administration of any recommendations from the Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group, to initiate diplomatic talks with Iran.
 
2. Cheney took the lead in proposing this new security architecture. There is, at this point, a consensus inside the Bush Administration to pursue this policy. When President Bush arrives later this week in Amman, Jordan, to meet with Iraq's Prime Minister Maliki, he may also hold secret talks with several senior Syrian officials. In that meeting, President Bush will bluntly offer Syria the opportunity to break its ties to Iran and join in the emerging Sunni Arab bloc.
 
3. The approach to Syria coincides with a major effort, within Lebanon, to force Michel Aoun to break his alliance with Hezbollah, in the wake of the assassination of Industry Minister Pierre
Gemayel. Over the weekend, there was a meeting of leading Maronites, sponsored by Patriarch Sfeir, aimed at tightening the pressure on Aoun to break with Hezbollah, and join a Sunni Arab, Christian, Druze coalition to counter Hezbollah's power. Were the Syrians to accept the Bush offer (highly unlikely), they would be expected to pressure Hezbollah to disarm, as a condition for negotiations to get the Golan Heights back from Israel.
 
4. Condi Rice's planned meeting with Mahmoud Abbas and Ehud Olmert is aimed at kick-starting the Israeli-Palestinian talks. But the key to the Israeli policy will be to complete the construction of the wall, and to build similar walls of separation along the border with Lebanon. The argument is that both Hamas and Hezbollah represent extensions of Iran's influence into the areas bordering on Israel, and they must be contained. The "peace" offer being put on the table will center on these walls of separation.
 
5. Iran is already aware of these Cheney-led initiatives. While Arab governments will assume that Iran will react and respond to the attempt to create this Sunni Arab-U.S.-Israel security architecture to confront Iran by playing for sectarian conflict in Iraq, Lebanon and elsewhere, sources caution that Iran is taking a more sophisticated view. Recurring statements by President Ahmadinejad are calculated to instigate an Israeli attack on Iran's purported nuclear weapons sites. Iran anticipates some kind of attack on these sites-either by the United States or Israel. Iran would prefer an Israeli attack for several reasons. First, the United States has far more significant military capabilities to strike Iran than Israel does. Second, any Israeli attack on a Muslim country would trigger a revolt on the Arab streets. Iran carefully studied the response of the population throughout the Persian Gulf and Arab world to the Israeli attacks on Lebanon this summer. They anticipate massive Arab support, across the sectarian Shi'ite-Sunni divide, for Iran, in the event of an Israeli strike."
 
From these various intrigues it can be seen that unreality remains front and center among the disillusioned Marauders who began all this with their grand designs for Empire in 1947.
 
The complexity and inter-relationships between the other governments in the region, have not been considered by Bush & the Bandits in any of their rogue actions against the Palestinians, the Afghan's the Iraqi's, the Iranians, or the Syrians-much less the endangered governments of Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt or Saudi Arabia. So to now brand what the Bush inner-circle is now attempting to do, as 'diplomacy' is not only a farce, but represents a total denial of all the facts on the ground in the region. "The Marine Corps has concluded the U.S. military is no longer able to defeat the insurgency in western Iraq or counter al-Qaeda's rising popularity there." Yet Bush as late as yesterday has said that he will not leave Iraq until his mission has been completed. Al-Anbar province is huge, and has accounted for over a thousand American military deaths so far, but apparently it will now be abandoned. 'Leadership' if it is to be effective must reflect reality-and so far-despite the elections here, and in spite of the growing rebellion throughout the Middle-East; there appears to be no change in the Decider's position on the Invasion of Iraq. This arrogant denial will sentence how many more people, on all sides, to how much more maiming, torture or death?
 
The only "leader' who agrees with Bush is Israel's Olmert, who says: "I stand with the president because I know that Iraq without Saddam Hussein is so much better for the security and safety of Israel, and all of the neighbors of Israel without any significance to us," added Olmert, who was speaking in English. Thank God for the power and the determination and leadership manifested by President Bush." (3)
This may be good for Israel and Olmert, but at what cost to the United States and to our commitments on the ground, as well as to our place in the international community of nations? Bush & the Bandits have disgraced themselves and by extension the people of the US-but instead of facing the facts and dealing with what can only be seen as a rising firestorm of revolution against the Imperial aggressions of the United States and Israel: Bush and his masters seem determined to use all possible means: including those four American Aircraft Carrier-Strike Forces now waiting for orders in the Gulf, to try to delay the inevitable collapse of his war upon the planet (terra) that he continues to call his War on Terra."
"11/28/06 "Information Clearing House" -- "People do not forget. They do not forget the death of their fellows, they do not forget torture and mutilation, they do not forget injustice, they do not forget oppression, they do not forget the terrorism of mighty powers. They not only don't forget; they also strike back." Harold Pinter, Nobel Laureate
 
The central tenet of American foreign policy hasn't changed since the early 1980s when Secretary of State Henry Kissinger summarized our involvement in the Iraq-Iran War saying, "I hope they kill each other." Kissinger's dictum reveals the basic racial and religious odium which animates the current policy and has become the organizing principle for maintaining the global empire.
 
Now that the Muslim world has been systematically ravaged from the southern-most part Gaza to the northern tip of Afghanistan, we can see that the application of the Kissinger Doctrine is an effective method for decimating societies where coveted resources are located." (4)
Time is indeed running out, Will enough people finally pay attention to the hourglass and demand changes in the entire government in Washington, so that Pandora's Box can finally be closed and resealed-again?
 
kirwanstudios@sbcglobal.net
 
Background Notes:
1) The Secret Government
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2006/281106Secret.htm
2) Anatomy of a Civil War: Writer Nir Rosen on Iraq's Descent Into Chaos
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/27/1447216&mode=thread&tid=25
 
3) Iraq war was good for Israel: Olmert
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=worldNews&stor
yID=2006-11-22T201536Z_01_L22136236_RTRUKOC_0_US-ISRAEL-USA-IRAQ.xml
4) The "Gaza-Solution" and the Ongoing War on Islam
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15762.htm


Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros