rense.com


One 911 Mystery Solved! 
Flight 77 Videotape Shown! 
 
By Douglas Herman
4-12-6 
 
A little known news item appeared on April 12, 2006.  Entitled
 
More tales of horror in 9/11 trial, The account tells an amazing story, apparently missed by the mainstream media (MSM).
 
Written by Greg Gordon, it states in part: "Sept. 11 victims and family members. endured a third day of graphic evidence of the horrors and haunting impact of the nation's worst terror attackit included videos of American Airlines Flight 77 hitting the building (Pentagon) at 530 miles per hour and photosof some of the 64 airline passengers and crew and 125 Pentagon workers who died that day."
 
Amazingly, this "videotape" resolves the whole mystery of the Pentagon attack and destroys any counter-claim that a jumbo jet never struck the Pentagon. Why then didn't this massive piece of evidence, this repudiation of conspiracy theorists, this corroboration of government accounts, appear on the front page of every major newspaper in America?
 
If true, and if a massive 767 jetliner appears in the videotapes, tapes immediately confiscated from various cameras surrounding the Pentagon, the evidence lends powerful credence to the government claims.
 
 
But most of us believe some other type of aircraft hit the Pentagon.  Videotapes might vindicate government officials but probably would support critics, alleging an "Inside job," aghast that the FBI Claims 84 Videos Show NO Flight 77 Impact!
 
Instead of the five (5) frames released to the public immediately after the attack (allegedly showing a 767 striking the Pentagon but which show nothing more than a fireball exploding), the new videotape would strongly support the government's version of events. At least in the eyes of the public
 
Curiously, about a week ago I replied to a forum posted by government gadfly, Doug Thompson. The editor of Capitol Hill Blue wrote that he went to the Pentagon that day and took photographs of the attack (only one Pentagon photo posted on Thompson's website however). He claimed:
 
"I was at the Pentagon the day the plane hit. I interviewed witnesses, saw the damage and smelled the burning aviation fuel. I watched the videotape from the Pentagon's heliport landing pad that showed the plane hitting the building."
 
When I questioned Thompson, replying that only top government insiders---FBI, Pentagon, NSA-had access to the heliport videotapes (which have never been shown publicly), asking him HOW exactly he saw them, Thompson never responded.  One has to wonder how an average, dissident citizen like Thompson is allowed to see top-secret videotapes never shown to American citizens.
 
Now we learn that jurors have seen the videotapes, as reported by Greg Gordon in a news item that received almost no exposure.
 
What did they see actually? Did they see a giant passenger jet swooping over Washington DC, striking the Pentagon and disappearing except for a few obscure pieces of wreckage?  Did they see a jumbo jet screaming over the freeway, knocking down several light poles before slipping past some cable spools and crashing into the Pentagon? Were they witness to some amazing feat of flying, aerobatics that few top guns could perform, never mind a flight school failure? Did they see a grainy security cam videotape from the nearby gas station, which would probably show the descending jetliner as big as the Goodyear blimp? Did they see any of the several videotapes confiscated by FBI agents, within minutes of the crash, and never shown to the American public?
 
One would think the government would have at least created some amazing video fakes by now, four years later. Or released the ones they confiscated, if they really did show what the government claims-which I strongly doubt.
 
With all those missing trillions at the Pentagon, the government could have formed a film company called, Industrial Light and Neocon Magic, and created some wonderful propaganda videotapes.
 
Because as it stands now, four years later, the government conspiracy of a 767 striking the Pentagon is as plausible as an ice cube sinking the Titanic.
 
Unlike those who accept the official government version of events, out of fear, misguided loyalty, or years of programming, many officials with impeccable credentials are joining the growing chorus of angry patriots.
 
Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF (retired), flew 101 combat missions in Vietnam. He is the recipient of the Eisenhower Medal, the George F. Kennan Peace Prize, the President's Medal of Veterans for Peace, the Society of Military Engineers Gold Medal (twice), six Air Medals, and dozens of other awards and honors. His Ph.D. is in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from Caltech. He chaired 8 major international conferences, and is one of the country's foremost experts on National Security.
 
Bowman said this of the official government 9/11 report, the Kean Commission:
 
"The 9/11 Commission omitted anything that might be the least bit suspicious or embarrassing or in any way detract from the official conspiracy so it was a total whitewash.There needs to be a true investigation, not the kind of sham investigations we have had with the 9/11 omission and all the rest of that junk."
 
Footnote: While on the CHB forum, Readers Rant, I read several snide attacks by a number of members, accusing me of guilt by association, with Jeff Rense. Because Rense.com flies a dissident flag, allowing various viewpoints that question the OFFICIAL version of everything from the Big Bang theory to UFOs to the Holocaust and 9-11, critics skewer the messenger because they cannot rebut the message.
 
Small minds fashion smaller arguments and resort to ridiculous, personal or paranoid attacks. I wonder how much is egotism, infantilism or envy? Or Schadenfreude? That is taking delight in the misfortunes of another. I do not know either Jeff Rense or Doug Thompson but I still find them allies in the fight for the republic against the forces that would destroy it.
 

Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros