- In March an Aerospace investigator with
15 years experience analyzing Shuttle accidents emailed that he wanted
photos of the Pentagon HOLE and the impact engine. His plan was to determine
the angle of approach of the aircraft by calculating the distance of the
engine from the the engine's impact on the wall and to write an article
putting to rest the controversy of the approach angle. MSM claims the aircraft
impacted at a 45 degree angle and penetrated 3 rings of the Pentagon. That
article NOT being written makes it evident that the MSM Pentagon Hoax is
full of holes. Here is a sneak preview on the HOLE investigation:
-
- http://www.thepowerhour.com/press_release/press12.htm
-
- Using the dimensions of the typical Pentagon
wall limestone block (circled in blue in the first photo), 5 feet long
and 2 feet high,
-
- http://www.prosoco.com/Story.asp?ID=15
-
- the engine impact gouge (circled in orange)
can be calculated at 52 inches wide. Pratt & Whitney lists the Fan
tip diameter at 39.9 - 49.2 in. When the engine case thickness is added
the 52 inch gouge matches a JT8D engine.
-
- http://www.pratt-whitney.com/prod_comm_jt8d.asp
-
- The JT8D engine is circled in yellow.
There are now over 15 photos of the two ton engine in front of the engine
impact gouge for corroboration. The NYC street engine from the South Tower
crash, a Boeing 737 CFM56 engine NOT from the Flight 175 Boeing 767, which
we also were the first to identify had 'only' 10 photos:
-
- http://www.rense.com/general69/175.htm
-
-
-
-
- The Pentagon has formulated a new Rule
of Evidence for the 9/11 Hoax: If an object is missing or covered over
in latter photos, it is CONTRARY EVIDENCE. This later photo shows an attempt
to hide the engine impact gouge with a phony brace and a ladder. ALSO the
J8TD engine is MISSING:
-
-
-
-
- This photo shows the Sugano Experiment
where an aircraft was crashed into a block of concrete:
-
-
-
-
- This photo shows what happened to the
wings (highlighted in yellow):
-
-
-
-
- Apparently at the Pentagon the wing outer
portions had a similar experience. In this photo notice the part of a white
car circled in yellow at the left margin:
-
-
-
-
- Same car after it was burnt. Notice the
gash across the hood where the left wing end hit after it bounced off the
Pentagon wall:
-
-
-
- This photo shows the wing end adjacent
to the white car:
-
-
-
-
- Are these Pentagon workers bunching up
to hide the wing end from on-lookers?
-
-
-
-
- Compare the people in this photo, especially
the guy in suspenders, and the carriers of the tarp covered aircraft part
in the next photo:
-
-
-
-
-
- (Note - Can this small group of men, some middle-aged
and paunchy, carry the entire wing end of an A-3 over their shoulders like
this? Or, could they be carrying something else entirely...perhaps some
debris with human remains or blood all over it? Or some piece of classified
material? We may never know the truth. -ed)
-
-
- The Blue tarp photo was first posted
on a military server but NOW even it is gone as the link to it is dead.
The Power Hour first brought this photo to light, one of many of their
9/11 Firsts:
-
- http://www.thepowerhour.com/911_analysis/tarp-photo.htm
-
- We contributed to their superb In Plane
Site videos:
-
- http://www.policestate21.com/
-
- After a scarcity of photographic evidence
supporting the A3 Skywarrior as the Pentagon aircraft hypothesis, substantial
photographic evidence has now tipped the scales in that direction from
the Boeing 737 hypothesis. AS THERE IS NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER FOR THE FLIGHT
77 BOEING 757 HYPOTHESIS, the Flight 77 hypothesis is JUST A HOAX. Even
the FBI has confirmed that 85 Pentagon videos show no Flight 77 impacting
into the Pentagon.
-
- This photo shows the upfolded wings of
a A3 Skywarrior, one of which is believed to be under that blue tarp:
-
-
-
-
- We were the first to identify the JT8D
fan hub assembly found at the Pentagon. We teamed up with the Karl Schwarz
group and they confirmed the identification from their sources. Karl Schwarz
pioneered the A3 Skywarrior hypothesis and struck with it through thick
and thin. Kudos to Karl. Jack White has more photos and analysis:
-
- http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies72.htm
-
- As the A3 Skywarrior is a carrier-based
bomber resembling a 737 or 757 in flight
-
-
-
- It could have taken off from aircraft
carrier George Washington anchored off Long Island on 9/11 that is believed
to be the base of operations for the South Tower military helicopter and
the white jet seen in all 9/11 locations.
-
- http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2001/09/11/military-navy-deployment.htm
-
- A telemetry expert and a Avionics expert
emailed that the South Tower military helicopter and airliner had special
remote control antennas attached so that operation involved a substitute
aircraft controlled by a military helicopter hoving over the South Tower.
-
- Finally, this photo shows a similar wing
end on the right side of the Pentagon crash area:
-
|
