rense.com


Capitol Hill Tries
To Hold Gonzales Accountable
Or: A tiny molecule on the tip of the police state iceberg.
 
By Ted Twietmeyer
tedtw@frontiernet.net
4-7-6 
 
The senate oversight committee for intelligence attempted to grill attorney General Alberto Gonzales about various actions of the administration. Twenty questions were fielded from Republicans and twenty eight more from Democrats. Then came pointed questions about the CIA dirty work of "grabbing someone from an airport and taking them to Syria for interrogation." As expected, after Gonzales attempted not to answer the question he finally responded "I don't know, I'll have to get back to you on."
 
Gonzales was also asked "Why was a person abducted by the agency from an airport, rendered to Syria, interrogated, found innocent of terrorism allegations, subsequently released by Syria, picked up AGAIN by agents and re-sent to Syria for more interrogation?" Of course he refused to answer that as well, responding with "I'll have to get back to you on that." Gonzales was also asked "Is the process of rendering legal?" He responded, "We have to obey the law and the fourth amendment." A committee member blasted "you're the attorney general! How would you handle this in court?" He foolishly answered again, "I'll have to get back to you on that." Over and over he stated this ad-naseum. It's clearly a way of telling the committee the administration does not have to account to anyone - not even Congress.
 
Sensenbrenner is well known for being a hard-right chairman in support of the Patriot Act. He is also known for abruptly ending committee meetings whenever it suits him. However, to his credit this time he made some amazing comments. He reminded tight-lipped, unaccountable Gonzales that "This was the same committee that supported passing the first Patriot Act and the recent extensions of it." The chairman also reminded Gonzales that he "Was disturbed that his committee was not kept in the loop on matters that should be handled by FISA" [the court which authorizes secret intelligence actions.] Sensenbrenner reiterated that he felt "His committee had been side-stepped, and stated that "Unanswered questions of the day have raised even more questions that need to be answered."
 
The congresswoman from Texas inquired if the attorney general might answer questions in a classified session. Sensenbrenner responded that "Perhaps, but by doing so it would raise public concern even further." Quite upset at the lack of answers, all in one sentence Sensenbrenner abruptly closed the hearing with "If there are no objections then this meeting is adjourned" and immediately used his hammer.
 
THE REAL QUESTIONS
 
All citizens must diligently ask the following questions to begin with. (Many of which we already know the answers.)
 
* Will Gonzales actually "get back" to the committee with answers? (Not likely, as this line has always used by anyone grilled in front of a committee on Capitol Hill. Sensenbrenner failed to demand WHEN answers will be forthcoming.)
 
* Are these committees finally waking up to the big power grab by Bush? (No -They already know about it and are scared.)
 
* What will they do about the administration's refusal to be accountable? (Most likely nothing - which is what they've done already.)
 
* Is Bush's repeated un-accountability regarding rendering a clear indication that secret martial law is already in place? (Naw. He's a "Republican." They wouldn't do such a terrible thing, right?)
 
* Is this hearing an indication that the American people are now pressuring these four year wonders for answers in an election year? (Shucks - why would an election year have anything to do with it?)
 
* Who holds the committee responsible for following up (due diligence) on answers it does or does not receive? (Apparently no one.)
 
Sensenbrenner has shut up people in the past by abruptly closing hearings that deviated from the expected script. Improper closing of hearings is a violation of established hearing rules. The chairman cannot close a hearing as long as any other committee member has an inquiry. Sensenbrenner attempted again to do this today, when the Congresswoman from Texas attempted an inquiry when he indicated that no more questions would be accepted. After someone reminded him of the rules, he answered the Congresswoman's question about the use of a classified hearing to obtain missing answers. After Sensenbrenner responded to her inquiry, he abruptly closed the hearing.
 
What we *might* be seeing are the first rays of light illuminating a scared, complacent Congress which is now becoming worried that the Patriot Act has loosed a monster out of control (and during an election year. Oh, what a surprise that is.) There's nothing like the sanitizing sunlight of day. Ever notice moss doesn't grow on a rock or wall that receives even the shortest amount of sunlight each day? Of course, this hearing may only be pure theater to pacify the masses. After rapping his hammer to close the hearing the serious and intense Sensenbrenner arose, turned and smiled at Gonzales and said "thank-you for coming - you're welcome here anytime." So much for getting those missing answers...
 
 
Why not invite someone back that arrogantly side-steps all issues of tremendous importance to all Americans? What happens when a "mistake" is made and they pick YOU up, and send YOU to some Syrian hell-hole to be tortured for information you don't have? What happens if the Syrians go too far, and you die there in more pain and agony than you can ever imagine? Your family will never know what happened, and will be worried sick for years when YOU disappear. But "that only happens to the other guy," right?
 
 
We all know that "absolute power corrupts, absolutely." Without doubt most American people have forgotten this fact which was commonly taught in grade school throughout the last century. I cannot resist one last cliché -"those that don't learn from history's mistakes are condemned to repeat them." This is exactly what we're seeing happening right now in front of our eyes.
 
 
Unauthorized kidnapping, torture and assassinations and secret executions? Do we really want a fourth Reich to complete its rise into power? Only angry citizens can stop this.
 
 
Ted Twietmeyer
 
 
Source
: CSPAN rebroadcast of hearing with Gonzales
 

Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros